Results of two-way ANCOVA, with θ as covariate
| . | Least-squares means . | . | . | Least-squares means . | . | . | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Forelimb (N=31) . | Hindlimb (N=29) . | P-value . | Rough (N=32) . | Smooth (N=28) . | P-value . | |||||
| Peak Fshear (BW units) | 1.04±0.10 | 1.49±0.11 | 0.0072 | 1.17±0.10 | 1.36±0.10 | 0.1839 | |||||
| Median Fshear (BW units) | Regressions not significant | ||||||||||
| Peak Fnormal (BW units) | Slopes significantly different (i.e. slopes were not homogeneous) | 0.46±0.02 | 0.42±0.02 | 0.0725 | |||||||
| Median Fnormal (BW units) | 0.35±0.02 | 0.31±0.02 | 0.0651 | ||||||||
| Peak μreq | 5.5±0.8 | 8.3±0.8 | 0.0256 | 6.7±0.7 | 7.1±0.8 | 0.7155 | |||||
| Median μreq | 2.5±0.3 | 3.2±0.3 | 0.2232 | 2.7±0.3 | 3.0±0.3 | 0.4191 | |||||
| . | Least-squares means . | . | . | Least-squares means . | . | . | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Forelimb (N=31) . | Hindlimb (N=29) . | P-value . | Rough (N=32) . | Smooth (N=28) . | P-value . | |||||
| Peak Fshear (BW units) | 1.04±0.10 | 1.49±0.11 | 0.0072 | 1.17±0.10 | 1.36±0.10 | 0.1839 | |||||
| Median Fshear (BW units) | Regressions not significant | ||||||||||
| Peak Fnormal (BW units) | Slopes significantly different (i.e. slopes were not homogeneous) | 0.46±0.02 | 0.42±0.02 | 0.0725 | |||||||
| Median Fnormal (BW units) | 0.35±0.02 | 0.31±0.02 | 0.0651 | ||||||||
| Peak μreq | 5.5±0.8 | 8.3±0.8 | 0.0256 | 6.7±0.7 | 7.1±0.8 | 0.7155 | |||||
| Median μreq | 2.5±0.3 | 3.2±0.3 | 0.2232 | 2.7±0.3 | 3.0±0.3 | 0.4191 | |||||
Interactions between limb and substrate texture factors were never significant (P⩾0.389). Regressions were significantly different from zero (P⩽0.0357) unless otherwise indicated