Estimated effective signal range of the carrier frequency and harmonic frequencies of the advertisement call and mean percentage of males located within that range on 11 Gryllotalpa major leks
| Call component (kHz) . | Estimated effective signal distance . | Mean % ± s.e.m. . |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 76.8 | 73.6±8.9 |
| 4 | 6.4 | 10.7±3.5 |
| 6 | 4.3 | 8.6±3.3 |
| 8 | 1.6 | 1.4±0.9 |
| 10 | 0.8 | 0.1±0.06 |
| Call component (kHz) . | Estimated effective signal distance . | Mean % ± s.e.m. . |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 76.8 | 73.6±8.9 |
| 4 | 6.4 | 10.7±3.5 |
| 6 | 4.3 | 8.6±3.3 |
| 8 | 1.6 | 1.4±0.9 |
| 10 | 0.8 | 0.1±0.06 |
Percentages were calculated based upon spatial distribution of males,estimated effective signal range for the species, and frequency-specific signal attenuation properties