Skip to Main Content
Table 1.

Means and standard errors of immune responses of male blue tits by dietary and testosterone treatment during moult 2006 and in spring 2007

Moult 2006
Dietary treatment
Testosterone (T) treatment
EnhancedStandardHigh T malesControl males
Moult 2006 Anti-PHA response (mm) 0.32±0.04 0.33±0.04 0.32±0.05 0.33±0.04 
 Anti-SRBC antibody response (corrected values) 0.63±0.64 0.83±0.54 1.71±0.62 –0.24±0.43 
Spring 2007 Anti-PHA response (mm) 0.65±0.05 0.70±0.05 0.68±0.04 0.66±0.06 
 Anti-SRBC antibody response 5.1±0.40 4.6±0.50 5.5±0.50 4.3±0.40 
Moult 2006
Dietary treatment
Testosterone (T) treatment
EnhancedStandardHigh T malesControl males
Moult 2006 Anti-PHA response (mm) 0.32±0.04 0.33±0.04 0.32±0.05 0.33±0.04 
 Anti-SRBC antibody response (corrected values) 0.63±0.64 0.83±0.54 1.71±0.62 –0.24±0.43 
Spring 2007 Anti-PHA response (mm) 0.65±0.05 0.70±0.05 0.68±0.04 0.66±0.06 
 Anti-SRBC antibody response 5.1±0.40 4.6±0.50 5.5±0.50 4.3±0.40 

For details of statistical tests, see text. PHA, phytohaemagglutinin; SRBC,sheep red blood cell; T, testosterone

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal