The properties of the different gastric mill rhythms that were used for standardizing stimulation protocols
| Rhythm type . | Period (s) . | Train duration (s) . | Intertrain interval (s) . | Stimuli per train . | Average intratrain firing frequency (Hz) . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In vitro | |||||
| dpon | 8.63 | 4.09 | 4.54 | 50 | 12.23 |
| ion | 7.14 | 2.15 | 4.99 | 18 | 7.94 |
| In vivo | |||||
| Weak | 13.33 | 1.02 | 12.31 | 10 | 9.8 |
| Intermediate | 4.82 | 2.58 | 2.24 | 39 | 15.12 |
| Strong | 6.65 | 5.64 | 1.01 | 76 | 13.48 |
| Rhythm type . | Period (s) . | Train duration (s) . | Intertrain interval (s) . | Stimuli per train . | Average intratrain firing frequency (Hz) . |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In vitro | |||||
| dpon | 8.63 | 4.09 | 4.54 | 50 | 12.23 |
| ion | 7.14 | 2.15 | 4.99 | 18 | 7.94 |
| In vivo | |||||
| Weak | 13.33 | 1.02 | 12.31 | 10 | 9.8 |
| Intermediate | 4.82 | 2.58 | 2.24 | 39 | 15.12 |
| Strong | 6.65 | 5.64 | 1.01 | 76 | 13.48 |
All parameters were derived from the activity of the LG motor neuron in the different recording situations (type).