Skip to Main Content
Table 4.

The properties of the different gastric mill rhythms that were used for standardizing stimulation protocols

Rhythm typePeriod (s)Train duration (s)Intertrain interval (s)Stimuli per trainAverage intratrain firing frequency (Hz)
In vitro      
    dpon 8.63 4.09 4.54 50 12.23 
    ion 7.14 2.15 4.99 18 7.94 
In vivo      
    Weak 13.33 1.02 12.31 10 9.8 
    Intermediate 4.82 2.58 2.24 39 15.12 
    Strong 6.65 5.64 1.01 76 13.48 
Rhythm typePeriod (s)Train duration (s)Intertrain interval (s)Stimuli per trainAverage intratrain firing frequency (Hz)
In vitro      
    dpon 8.63 4.09 4.54 50 12.23 
    ion 7.14 2.15 4.99 18 7.94 
In vivo      
    Weak 13.33 1.02 12.31 10 9.8 
    Intermediate 4.82 2.58 2.24 39 15.12 
    Strong 6.65 5.64 1.01 76 13.48 

All parameters were derived from the activity of the LG motor neuron in the different recording situations (type).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal