Table 1.

Comparisons of empirical data against the model predictions

ModelObserved mass scaling exponent*(N)PvalueMean log10 difference between data and dimensional analysis prediction
Running velocity 0.17±0.014 (98) NS  
   Friction=air   –0.19±0.22 
   Friction=ground   0.80±0.22 
Flying velocity 0.13±0.010 (72) <0.05 0.133±0.14 
Swimming velocity 0.19±0.023 (27) NS –0.06±0.28 
Running stride frequency –0.19±0.020 (11) NS  
   Friction=air   –1.26±0.11 
   Friction=ground   –0.26±0.11 
Flying wing beat frequency –0.26±0.015 (77) <0.001 –1.18±0.23 
Swimming stroke frequency –0.14±0.01 (27) <0.05 –0.14±0.15 
Running force 1.12±0.08 (4) NS –0.30±0.23 
Flying force 0.93±0.011 (166) <0.001 0.026±0.14 
Swimming force 1.03±0.07 (8) NS 0.16±0.09 
ModelObserved mass scaling exponent*(N)PvalueMean log10 difference between data and dimensional analysis prediction
Running velocity 0.17±0.014 (98) NS  
   Friction=air   –0.19±0.22 
   Friction=ground   0.80±0.22 
Flying velocity 0.13±0.010 (72) <0.05 0.133±0.14 
Swimming velocity 0.19±0.023 (27) NS –0.06±0.28 
Running stride frequency –0.19±0.020 (11) NS  
   Friction=air   –1.26±0.11 
   Friction=ground   –0.26±0.11 
Flying wing beat frequency –0.26±0.015 (77) <0.001 –1.18±0.23 
Swimming stroke frequency –0.14±0.01 (27) <0.05 –0.14±0.15 
Running force 1.12±0.08 (4) NS –0.30±0.23 
Flying force 0.93±0.011 (166) <0.001 0.026±0.14 
Swimming force 1.03±0.07 (8) NS 0.16±0.09 

Data sources are indicated in the legend of Fig. 2.

*

Estimated from the slopes of log10 transformed least-squares regressions; mean ± s.e.m.

P values are given for t-test of scaling exponent vs 0.167 or –0.167. NS, not significant

Mean ± s.d.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal