Skip to Main Content
Table 2.

Estimated detection ranges of different prey items based on detection capabilities of a captive Pseudorca, and the source parameters derived in the present study

PredatorSL (dB re. 1 μPa, pp)f0 (kHz)Noise (dB re. 1 μPa2 Hz-1)PreyTS (dB)Detection range (m)
Pseudorca 220 50 35 Tuna (1 m) —301 210 
Pseudorca 220 50 35 Dolphin (Tursiops—202 320 
Pseudorca 220 50 35 Small squid (20 cm) —503 80 
Grampus 220 75 32 Small squid (20 cm) —503 85 
Grampus 220 75 32 Large squid (80 cm) —403 130 
PredatorSL (dB re. 1 μPa, pp)f0 (kHz)Noise (dB re. 1 μPa2 Hz-1)PreyTS (dB)Detection range (m)
Pseudorca 220 50 35 Tuna (1 m) —301 210 
Pseudorca 220 50 35 Dolphin (Tursiops—202 320 
Pseudorca 220 50 35 Small squid (20 cm) —503 80 
Grampus 220 75 32 Small squid (20 cm) —503 85 
Grampus 220 75 32 Large squid (80 cm) —403 130 

SL, source level; f0, centroid frequency; TS, target strength.

It is assumed that detection is limited by ambient noise, and that the receiving system of a Grampus performs like that of a Pseudorca.

TS for a Tursiops may not represent TS for smaller delphinids preyed upon by Pseudorca, but it is the only available TS for a dolphin.

1

Bertrand et al. (1999)

2

Au (1996)

3

Medwin and Clay (1998)

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal