Overlap and discriminability of probability distributions for movements to a given target under each load condition
. | Anterior target site . | . | . | Posterior target site . | . | . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No load versus load on: . | Proximal femur . | Distal femur . | Distal tibia . | Proximal femur . | Distal femur . | Distal tibia . | ||||
Overlap% | 82.0 | 79.5 | 83.1 | 88.2 | 92.2 | 85.5 | ||||
Probability | 0.463 | 0.461 | 0.469 | 0.482 | 0.488 | 0.479 | ||||
No. required | N=495 | N=443 | N>500 | N>500 | N>500 | N>500 |
. | Anterior target site . | . | . | Posterior target site . | . | . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No load versus load on: . | Proximal femur . | Distal femur . | Distal tibia . | Proximal femur . | Distal femur . | Distal tibia . | ||||
Overlap% | 82.0 | 79.5 | 83.1 | 88.2 | 92.2 | 85.5 | ||||
Probability | 0.463 | 0.461 | 0.469 | 0.482 | 0.488 | 0.479 | ||||
No. required | N=495 | N=443 | N>500 | N>500 | N>500 | N>500 |
Pairs of distributions derived from movements elicited by stimulation of the same target were tested for an effect of loading. In no case could load condition be determined reliably from observations of the grooming response because the required number of observations always exceeded by more than tenfold the mean number of video frames per scratch (42)
Other details as for Table 2