ABSTRACT
The sensory axons of the thread hair receptors, free hook hair receptors and most receptors of the statolith area of the crab statocyst all project to the same dorsolateral part of the brain. Large sensory receptors which innervate some hairs surrounding the statolith project to a more ventral site, and send some branches across to the contralateral side of the brain.
The central projections of oculomotor neurones have a characteristically open branch pattern and their dendritic field corresponds closely with that of the thread hairs. There are no branches extending to the contralateral side of the brain.
Intracellular responses from the motor neurones of horizontal eye-movement muscles during nystagmus show that they are probably directly inhibited during a fast-phase movement of the eye opposite to the direction in which they act. During a slow-phase eye movement opposite to their preferred direction the input to the motor neurones is diminished pre-synaptically.
Sets of antagonist motor neurones maintain a fairly rigid relationship to one another so that an increase in activity of one set leads to a decrease in the antagonists. Neither this, nor the onset of the fast phase of nystagmus, is governed by proprioceptive input or by the frequency of discharge of the motor neurones themselves.
INTRODUCTION
The detection of horizontal rotational acceleration by crabs follows the same principle as that of vertebrates in that the crab statocyst is equipped with a horizontal circular canal containing fluid and sets of receptor hairs which detect displacements of the fluid. If a blind but otherwise intact crab is rotated about its vertical axis, its stalked eyes undergo the typical slow forward and quick return phases of nystagmus. We have found that displacement of the canal fluid, even in isolated eye-brain preparations of the crab, is an adequate stimulus for the production of nystagmus (Sandeman & Okajima, 1972a, b). The crab therefore provides an opportunity to study, in a fairly simple way, the neural mechanisms of a basic eye movement reflex which is common to most animals with movable eyes.
The structure of the statocyst canals and the qualitative responses of the different groups of receptor hairs in the statocyst are described in the first paper of this series. The similarity between the optokinetic and statocyst-induced eye movements and the responses of the eye muscles in isolated preparations are dealt with in the second paper (Sandeman & Okajima, 1972a, b). The purpose of this study is (1) to examine the anatomical projections of the statocyst and oculomotor nerves and (2) to explore the physiological responses and relationship between antagonist eye-muscle systems during statocyst-evoked nystagmus.
We have found that the branches of the sensory neurones of the statocyst and the motor neurones of the eye muscles are close to one another in the brain and are confined to the side of the brain ipsilateral to their nerve trunks. Different hair receptors in the statocyst have nerve cells of different sizes and shapes associated with them. Electrical recordings from the motor neurone cell bodies produced evidence of direct inhibition of motor neurones during the fast phase of nystagmus. Direct inhibition of motor neurones during the slow phase could not be convincingly demonstrated but is not excluded. The outputs to the antagonist muscles are balanced against one another and this balance is maintained both during a stimulus and in its absence.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The Australian mud crab, Scylla serrata, was used, and the details of the preparation are the same as those reported previously. The statocyst stimulator which allows a small controlled displacement of the fluid within the statocyst canals in either direction is also described in a previous paper (Sandeman & Okajima, 1972b).
Electrical recordings were taken intracellularly (by micropipettes filled with 3M-KCI) from the somata of the oculomotor neurones and extracellularly from specific branches of the oculomotor nerves at a point near where they run into the respective muscles. The extracellular recordings were made by supporting the nerve branches on pairs of wire hooks surrounded by a wire ring containing a drop of mineral oil (Fig. 1).
Recordings of eye-muscle potentials were also made on some occasions by inserting fine wires, insulated except at the tips, into the muscles.
Amplification of the electrical signals was achieved with conventional equipment. Microelectrodes were coupled to the high-impedance amplifier through a Wheatstone bridge which allowed simultaneous recording and stimulation of the penetrated cells.
Anatomical details of the sensory and motor neurones were revealed by electro-phoretically forcing cobalt chloride along nerves through their cut ends and then precipitating cobalt sulphide by immersing the nerves in ammonium sulphide. Principles of the method are given in Fig. 2. We found that a current of 0·5 μamps maintained for 3–4 h produced the best results, but the range and size of axon diameters in the nerve appears to be an important factor in the success of the method. For example, in a nerve bundle where the axon diameters are all similar the distribution of cobalt chloride is fairly uniform, but in a nerve bundle containing a few large axons and many fine axons only the large axons will take up the cobalt chloride. We were unable to get cobalt chloride to go any distance down very fine nerves (⪡ 2 μm) such as those in the olfactory bundle of the antennular nerve. Application of electrophoretic currents stronger than 0·5 μamps produced an abrupt stoppage of the cobalt half way along the axons. Considerable diffusion of the cobalt chloride along the axons occurs without any forcing current but we found that without a small current the finer branches of neurones were not as satisfactorily filled. The cobalt chloride will sometimes contaminate neighbouring nerve branches, and to obtain the clean preparations such as we have figured in this paper may require 10–30 trials.
Precipitation of the cobalt sulphide was effected by placing the whole ganglion in 10 c.c. of saline with two drops of concentrated ammonium sulphide for 5–10 min. This was followed by a brief wash in saline and fixation in phosphate-buffered formalin (Pease, 1962), alcoholic Bouin’s or Camoy’s (Pantin, 1949). For standard wax histology preservation of the tissue was passable, but we were not able to obtain satisfactorily preserved material for the electron microscope. A fairly effective stain to use in conjunction with the cobalt-treated material is Mann’s methyl-blue eosin (Pantin, 1949) which does not include any strong acids and gives good contrast with the brown colour of the deposited cobalt sulphide.
RESULTS
During the fast and slow phases of nystagmus all but two of the eleven eye muscles of the crab change their pattern of activity in some way (see Burrows & Horridge, 1968, for details). The activity of three muscle blocks, numbers 20a, 21 and 19b (numbering according to Cochrane, 1935) is particularly relevant to the study of nystagmus because their activity is closely correlated with the position of the eye in the horizontal plane. Muscle 20 a moves the eye away from the midline and is active during both slow and fast movements in that direction but is silent when the eye is moved in the opposite direction by muscles 21 and 19b. Similarly, muscles 21 and 19b are silent when 20 a is activated. None of the other eye muscles exhibit the same clear association between their activity and the horizontal movements of the eyes.
What follows is a description of the anatomy and physiology of the eye-movement system with particular reference to these muscles and the sense organ which activates them.
Anatomy
1. Sensory nerves
There are three types of sensory hairs - thread hairs, free hook hairs and statolith hairs – arranged in definite areas in the lumen of the statocyst. Cobalt perfusion has shown that the different hairs are associated with sensory cells of different sizes.
The thread hair receptor cells are slender and spindle shaped. A count of hair bases and associated cells shows that some, if not all, the thread hairs are supplied by more than one sensory cell and these lie about 300 μm from the hair bases (Fig. 3 A).
The free hook hair receptor cells are more globular in shape and are larger than the thread hair receptors. The bases of the free hook hairs are not arranged in orderly rows so that an accurate count of hair bases and associated cells was not possible (Fig. 3B). However, the distal processes of some bipolar cells were seen to fuse and may terminate beneath a single hair.
The statolith is supported on the tips of two concentric rings of receptor hairs which closely resemble the free hook hairs. The receptor cells beneath the hairs of the inner row are very like those of the free hook hairs but the outer row of receptor hairs have much larger bipolar cells associated with them. In ten separate preparations we observed only one large cell to each outer hair but there are more small cells than inner hair bases (Fig. 3 C). We could not find any sensory cells belonging to the very fine statolith hairs which lie directly beneath the statocyst.
The bundles of axons from the thread hairs, free hook hairs and statolith area maintain their integrity in the antennular nerve (Fig. 4 and Table 1), and although they fuse when they reach the brain we can trace the peripheral and central projections of known cell groups by electrophoretically forcing cobalt chloride along the axons of selected bundles of the antennular nerve. The central projections of these nerves are mapped in relation to a grid superimposed on a diagram of the brain where the spaces between the grid lines represent 250 μm (Fig. 5).
The axon arborizations of the thread hair receptors have the widest distribution in the brain when compared with the other statocyst receptors and cover almost the whole of the dendritic field of the oculomotor neurones (see below). The arborizations are confined to the dorsal part of the brain and no branches were traced to the contralateral side. A slender bundle of axons approaches to within 20–30 μm of the midline and fine unfilled branches from this bundle may spread to the other side, although we never observed this (Fig. 5 A).
The free hook hair nerve bundle contains more large-diameter sensory axons than any of the sensory nerves and these have a fairly limited projection, with most axons ending in squares E2 and F 2 of the grid and a subsidiary branch in square F 3 (Fig. 5 B). Like the thread hairs, the free hook hair projections are confined to the ipsilateral part of the brain.
Two main bundles of the nerve from the statolith area can be distinguished. The first (A in category III in Fig. 4) contains axons from the inner circlet of statolith hook hairs, and like the free hook hairs and thread hairs these project to the dorsal ipsilateral part of the brain but here they spread more medially and anteriorly than the fibres of the free hook hairs and thread hairs (D1 and E1, Fig. 5 C). The second bundle of the statolith nerve (B in category III in Fig. 4) contains large-diameter axons from the large bipolar receptors associated with the outer circlet of statolith hook hairs. The bundle also carries a number of smaller axons which probably come from mechanoreceptors on the outer surface of the basal joint of the antennule. The central projections of these axons is significantly different from other statocyst receptors in that they end in the ventral and medial part of the brain with the projections of mechanoreceptors in the oculomotor and tegumentary nerve branches (Fig. 5 C).
Axons of mechanoreceptors in the distal joints of the antennule (category I in Fig. 4) project to the ventral part of the brain and the fine olfactory fibres enter the outer layers of the olfactory lobe.
The central projections of all the sensory and motor fibres from the antennular nerve and oculomotor nerve are shown from the side in Fig. 6. This figure was compiled from the cobalt studies and serial sections of the brain and fitted to the same grid system as was used for the cobalt projections. The narrowing of the axon bundles is real and not intended to show perspective. All the antennular bundles shown in Fig. 4 are again represented here.
2. Motor nerves
Motor neurones in the nerve bundles are identified by the location of their cell bodies in the brain, and a number of motor neurones in the antennular nerve were identified in this way. All of these have their cell somata located on the ventral side of the brain and their dendritic fields distributed dorsally, ipsilaterally and contralaterally.
The oculomotor nerve contains the motor axons of the eye muscles and sensory axons from mechanoreceptors on the eyecup. Precipitated cobalt sulphide in the oculomotor nerve confirms that the somata of the oculomotor neurones lie in a compact cluster on the dorsal surface of the brain, medial to the olfactory lobe and just anterior to the large somata of the reflex eye-withdrawal motor neurones (Bethe, 1897; Sandeman, 1971). The dendritic fields of the motor neurones extend into two main areas and can be distinguished from sensory fibres by their open and extensive branching patterns (Fig. 5D). Anteriorly the dendritic field is dorsal, ipsilateral and spreads into the optic neuropile (squares E2 and D2, Fig. 5D). Some small branches extend laterally and posteriorly to F 2. The main posterior dendritic field is bell-shaped and extends dorsally over the tegumentary neuropile (G2, G 3 in Fig. 5D, see also Fig. 6). Simultaneous cobalt deposition in the thread hair nerve and in the oculomotor neurones shows the coincidence of their central projections (Fig. 7). We never found any branches of oculomotor neurones which crossed the brain to the contralateral side.
Physiology
Because the cell somata of the oculomotor neurones occur in a compact cluster it is not possible to visually select a particular motor neurone for microelectrode penetration. It is therefore necessary to identify the impaled cells by physiological criteria. Recordings were always taken from the right-hand side and the motor neurones referred to here all belong to the right eye.
Penetration of an oculomotor neurone is accompanied by the registration of a resting potential of 48-54 mV and the appearance of small synaptic potentials. Many oculomotor neurones were found to be spontaneously active, and attenuated axon spikes are recorded in the cell bodies. Coincidence observed between the action potentials in the cell body with those recorded from a peripheral branch of the oculomotor nerve going to a known muscle allows positive identification of the impaled cell body.
1. Generation of slow and fast phases of nystagmus
Very few motor neurones give no response to statocyst stimulation and most can be clearly divided into those which increase their firing frequency irrespective of the direction of fluid displacement in the statocyst and those which increase their rate of firing only when the statocyst fluid is displaced in one particular direction. A proportion of the first group of neurones are strongly inhibited during stimulation of the tegumentary or oculomotor nerve of the same side. This inhibition must be directly applied to the motor neurone because the membrane potential becomes hyperpolarized and repeated IPSPs appear following the stimulus (Fig. 8).
The directionally sensitive motor neurones are not inhibited by tegumentary or oculomotor nerve stimulation. They can be further identified as 20 a or 21 type neurones depending upon the particular direction of statocyst fluid displacement which produces excitation. Clockwise rotation of statocyst fluid for example is known to excite no. 20 a motor neurones of the right eye while anticlockwise rotation of the fluid excites no. 21 motor neurones. In addition these neurones show a characteristic break in the excitation which is interpreted to be the fast phase of nystagmus (Sandeman & Okajima, 1972b).
The responses of two directionally sensitive motor neurones are shown in Fig. 9. Taking the tonic no. 20a type unit in Fig. 9A as an example it can be seen that after the stimulus is applied the unit increases its frequency from 7 impulses/sec to 40 impulses/sec. The increase is accompanied by a general depolarization of the membrane. Three seconds after the onset of the stimulus there is a sudden strong repolarization of the membrane which reaches its original level in about 100 msec and spike activity is abolished. The repolarization coincides with a burst of activity in a motor unit in the nerve going to muscle 21 and a complete cessation of at least five motor units (identified by spike amplitude) in the nerve to muscle 20 a. In this preparation all the branches of the oculomotor nerve were cut peripherally and there was no possibility of any sensory feedback from the eye.
The cessation of spike activity in the 20 a motor neurones lasts for about 200 msec after which there is a renewed excitation which reaches a peak of 80 impulses/sec. The re-excitation of the 20 a motor neurone coincides with a temporary cessation of the activity in the 21 motor neurones, but 1·5–2 sec later no. 21 begins to discharge again, this time at a significantly higher rate than before the stimulus had been applied.
Reversal of the stimulus slows down the rate of the 20 a neurones and increases that of the 21 motor neurones. The membrane potential of the 20 a motor neurone is repolarized with the change in frequency.
The same basic features of the response are observable in a 21 motor neurone Fig. 9B). The fast phase is accompanied by a repolarization of the motor neurone and followed by a resumption of excitation. Reversal of the stimulus repolarizes the membrane gradually to its original level and there is a clear decrease in the number of EPSPs. There is no significant difference in the response of 21 type neurones when compared with the 20 a type neurones apart from the obvious one of directional sensitivity.
The rate of a motor neurone’s discharge can be altered by hyperpolarizing or depolarizing the neurone through the electrode in its cell body. Depolarization produces the repetitive firing common to crustacean motor neurones but never led to a fast phase nor did it have any effect on the rate of firing of the antagonist motor neurones. Statocyst stimulation applied to depolarized motor neurones produces the same slow and fast responses. The only observable difference is that the peak discharge frequency of about 80 impulses/sec was achieved earlier and maintained for a longer period before the fast phase occurred (Fig. 10A).
Hyperpolarization slows down or stops the firing of a tonic unit but if applied in conjunction with a stimulus to the statocyst it will not prevent the occurrence of a fast phase. A tonic unit, hyperpolarized to the extent that its resting discharge is just blocked and then subjected to an input from the statocyst, gives the characteristic slow and fast response except that the fast phase occurs when the unit has reached only 20 impulses/sec instead of its normal 40 impulses/sec (Fig. 10B). A further hyperpolarization of this neurone results in an almost complete block during slow phase excitation, but a fast phase is still produced (Fig. 10C). The longer delay between the onset of the stimulus and the appearance of the fast phase is more likely to be caused by adaptation than by the hyperpolarization of the cell because the same delays can be produced by repeated application of the statocyst stimulus to preparations in which a motor neurone is depolarized.
Further evidence of there being no direct correlation between the frequency of any one motor neurone and the occurrence of the fast phase is provided by stimulation of only one statocyst. Only the ipsilateral statocyst was stimulated in one preparation and this produced a motor neurone discharge of 40 impulses/sec but without a fast phase occurring. The same motor neurone, subject to bilateral statocyst stimulation, underwent a fast phase after the firing rate had reached only 8-10 impulses/sec (Fig. 11).
Finally, antidromic stimulation of one set of motor neurones was never seen to have any effect on the discharge frequency of the antagonists.
Direct polarization of a single neurone through its cell body will affect its own spike frequency but not that of its synergists. Hyperpolarization of the cell eventually blocks the action potentials but does not prevent the appearance of EPSPs which are synchronous with the bursts of the synergist cells (Fig. 10).
2. Interaction between antagonist motor systems
The interaction between the antagonist motor systems during nystagmus can be studied by comparing the frequencies of motor neurone discharges during bilateral stimulation of the statocysts. If the statocysts are stimulated simultaneously and in the same direction, the motor neurones of muscles 20a and 21 behave as expected, the increase in one being accompanied by a decrease in the other (Fig. 12). If only a single fast phase occurs (as in Fig. 12 A) the final frequencies of both sides may be higher than what they were originally. In some cases the fast phase is followed by fluctuations in the motor neurone discharges and when this happens the outputs maintain their complementary relationship to each other. The neurones in the first histogram in Fig. 12 A for example are responding to clockwise rotation of the fluid in the statocysts. This produces the initial increase in 20 a motor neurones of the right eye and a decrease in 21 motor neurones of the same eye. A fast phase occurs with the vigorous excitation of 21 and decrease of activity in 20a. The second histogram in Fig. 12A shows that the reverse occurs when the fluid in the statocysts is moved in an anticlockwise direction. In this case, however, the response of the 21 motor neurone rises to a second peak after the fast phase and 20 a decreases. The same interdependence of the antagonist motor neurones is seen when no stimulus is applied and a slow drift in the frequency of one set of motor neurones is matched by the other (Fig. 12 C).,
Simultaneous stimulation of the statocysts in opposite directions results in an initial excitation of both antagonist muscle systems which is sometimes followed by a sudden further increase in the discharge frequency of one set of motor neurones accompanied by a decrease in the other. The same oscillatory phenomenon described above then follows with frequency increases of one side matched by decreases in the other (Fig. 12B).
DISCUSSION
1. Anatomical considerations
The cobalt chloride perfusion technique which we have developed from two previous neurone-marking methods (Pitman, Tweedie & Cohen, 1972; Iles & Mulloney, 1971) provides a convenient way to identify the central cell bodies of motor neurones with axons in specific nerve bundles and to relate sensory nerve bundles to specific groups of receptors. It also allows maps to be made of the central dendritic fields of known motor and sensory nerves and has provided new information about the neural components of the eye-movement system of the crab.
In the statocyst we can identify three sets of receptors, the thread hairs, free hook hairs and statolith hook hairs, and we know now that these receptors send their axons to discrete areas in the brain. It is of interest to find that the axons of the very large bipolar cells innervating the outer circlet of statolith hook hairs terminate in the same part of the brain as the axons from mechanoreceptors on the carapace and eye, and that the terminals of the large eye-withdrawal axons are also found there. The inference which can be drawn is that excessive displacement of the statolith will activate withdrawal of the eyes. All the other statocyst hairs project directly to an area occupied by the branches of the oculomotor neurones.
One of the most striking anatomical features revealed by the cobalt chloride mapping is the characteristically open and wide dendritic branching of the motor neurones and the more densely structured sensory field. There is always the problem that the entire nerve cell has not been filled by the cobalt; but presumably this restriction applies equally to both the sensory and motor neurones, and more complete filling would not remove the distinction already conferred by the low-order branches. Also, the results from different individual preparations are consistent as to the extent, shape and position of the dendritic fields.
The individual branch patterns of all the motor neurones are anatomically similar and can be grouped as a class. Branch profiles of other motor neurones, for example the eye-withdrawal neurones, are a different shape (Sandeman, 1971, and unpublished observations) and belong to a different anatomical class. In the Crustacea as in insects (Burrows, in preparation) groups of neurones with similar function apparently share the same approximate shape.
The branches of both the motor neurones and sensory neurones associated with the statocyst eye-movement system are clearly ipsilateral with respect to their nerve branches. Transference of sensory information across the brain must be performed by interneurones.
2. Physiological considerations
The vestibulo-ocular reflex of the vertebrate has been well studied and a number of models have been proposed which could explain how the continuous sensory input is converted to the discontinuous movement of the eyes (see Robinson, 1971). Most have a reciprocal inhibitory network so that during the slow or fast phases of nystagmus one muscle system is inhibited while the antagonist is excited. There is general agreement that the slow-phase system is simpler than the fast-phase system but the site of action of the inhibition proposed in the models has been open to question. It has been supposed to be entirely pre-synaptic to the motor neurone (Horcholle-Bossavit & Tyc-Dumont, 1969; Lorente de Nó, 1938) but there is also good evidence of direct post-synaptic inhibition of motor neurones at least during the fast phase (Maeda, Shimazu & Shinoda, 1971).
The motor output of the eye-movement system in the crab is the same as in the vertebrate but there is a difference in the nature of the sensory input which produces the typical nystagmus movements. In the vertebrate the vestibular nerve transmits a steady tonic discharge from the receptors in the horizontal canal. This is increased when the animal is turned in one direction and decreased when it is turned in the opposite direction. Section of the nerve on one side leads to a tonic imbalance between the two sides, and spontaneous nystagmus movements occur which can be counteracted and even reversed by appropriate stimulation of the cut nerve (Baker & Berthoz, 1971). In the crab the level of tonic activity in the thread hairs of one statocyst is relatively low and is increased during rotation in both directions. Section of the nerve of one statocyst does not produce nystagmus and direct stimulation of the nerve raises the level of excitation in all the eye motor neurones. In spite of this difference the principle upon which the two systems operate may still be similar because in both vertebrate and crab the transient change in velocity resulting from an imposed rotation of the animal is transmitted in the sensory nerve as a change in the discharge frequency of much longer duration. This is brought about by the properties of the transducing mechanism which is very similar in vertebrates and in crabs (Sandeman & Okajima, 1972a).
The diagram in Fig. 13 summarizes what we know about the crab system and what we infer to be taking place within the neuronal circuits of the central nervous system. The boxes representing the central components can easily be modelled as real interneurones (two excitatory and one inhibitory neurone would be sufficient) but we do not at this stage have any evidence that the system is so simple.
To begin with, the two statocysts are shown to have dominant and subdominant outputs. The evidence for this stems from eye-muscle recordings in which we found that the slow-phase activity of both muscles 20 a and 21 are mainly induced by the ipsilateral and contralateral statocysts respectively (paper II). However, it should be pointed out that this dominance may be central and not a property of the receptor (see paper I). The dominant output from the right statocyst drives both eyes to the right during the slow phase (Fig. 13 B) and similarly the dominant left statocyst produces slow-phase eye movements to the left. Experiments in which the statocysts were stimulated one at a time show that the subdominant outputs from the statocysts are important for the generation of the fast phase, and so these are shown in the model to summate with those of the dominant side. A slow-phase excitation seems to be a prerequisite for the fast phase and so it is inferred that the fast-phase generator is an interneurone which fires repetitively on reaching a certain threshold. The output from this is connected to and directly inhibits motor neurones of both eyes and also excites the slow-phase driving system of their antagonists (Fig. 13C). The only evidence so far obtained for direct inhibition of the motor neurones during the fast phase is the very rapid repolarization of the cells at this time. It is impracticable to measure changes in conductance of the cell with the electrode placed in the cell soma and remote from the site of synaptic activity.
The relationship between the output to the antagonist muscles is flexible to a point. An increase in the frequency of both can be produced by stimulating the statocysts in opposite directions, but if the frequency of one side increases significantly its antagonist decreases. This interdependence is not governed by the sensory input because spontaneous shifts of the frequency of one motor neurone are matched by equivalent but opposite changes in the frequency of the antagonists. It is also clear that the interaction is pre-synaptic to the motor neurone because direct electrical stimulation of one set of motor neurones has no effect on the antagonists and so a reciprocal inhibitory path is shown to be between interneurones in the model. It is not known whether the motor neurones themselves are directly inhibited during the slow phase but the EPSPs impinging upon the motor neurones certainly decrease in number when the antagonist system is activated, so that pre-synaptic inhibition is more likely. Also, inhibition of non-directional units is accompanied by an easily measurable hyperpolarization and the appearance of presumed IPSPs. This does not occur in the directional units during a slow phase of nystagmus opposite to their preferred direction.
The extracellular recordings from the motor nerves to eye muscles reveal that they discharge in bursts, and simultaneous intracellular recordings show the appearance of phase-related action potentials (Fig. 10). Polarization of the one motor neurone, however, fails to affect the frequency of its partners and so a low-resistance electrical link between similar motor neurones does not seem to be present. The EPSPs in a hyperpolarized motor neurone, however, still maintain the phase relationship with the synergists, suggesting that a common interneuronal driving system is responsible for the observed synchrony of the action potentials.
The arrangement of the motor neurones, ipsilateral to their muscles, is established anatomically as is the coincidence of their dendritic fields with the relevant receptor neurones. Clearly, contralateral excitation of the motor neurones and the synchrony of the fast phases relies on interneurones, and further knowledge of the whole system now depends on the location and identification of these.