There was an error in J. Exp. Biol. (2022) 225, jeb242957 (doi:10.1242/jeb.242957). In Fig. 5, the left y-axis label was incorrect; the right y-axis label was missing. The corrected and original figure are shown below; both the online full-text and pdf versions have been corrected.
The authors apologise to readers for this error.
Rate of SL reduction with range to target for the different noise treatments and bats. SL (left y-axis: dB re. 20 μPa2 s at 0.1 m, right y-axis: dB re. 20 μPa RMS at 0.1 m) of all the calls from successful trials is shown for bats 1, 3 and 4. a, rate of compensation with the decimal logarithm of range. n=17,408 calls.
Rate of SL reduction with range to target for the different noise treatments and bats. SL (left y-axis: dB re. 20 μPa2 s at 0.1 m, right y-axis: dB re. 20 μPa RMS at 0.1 m) of all the calls from successful trials is shown for bats 1, 3 and 4. a, rate of compensation with the decimal logarithm of range. n=17,408 calls.
Rate of SL reduction with range to target for the different noise treatments and bats. SL (left y-axis: dB re. 20 μPa2 s at 0.1 m, right y-axis: dB re. 20 μPa RMS at 0.1 m) of all the calls from successful trials is shown for bats 1, 3 and 4. a, rate of compensation with the decimal logarithm of range. n=17,408 calls.
Rate of SL reduction with range to target for the different noise treatments and bats. SL (left y-axis: dB re. 20 μPa2 s at 0.1 m, right y-axis: dB re. 20 μPa RMS at 0.1 m) of all the calls from successful trials is shown for bats 1, 3 and 4. a, rate of compensation with the decimal logarithm of range. n=17,408 calls.