There was an error in J. Exp. Biol. (2022) 225, jeb242957 (doi:10.1242/jeb.242957). In Fig. 5, the left y-axis label was incorrect; the right y-axis label was missing. The corrected and original figure are shown below; both the online full-text and pdf versions have been corrected.

The authors apologise to readers for this error.

Fig. 5 (corrected).

Rate of SL reduction with range to target for the different noise treatments and bats. SL (left y-axis: dB re. 20 μPa2 s at 0.1 m, right y-axis: dB re. 20 μPa RMS at 0.1 m) of all the calls from successful trials is shown for bats 1, 3 and 4. a, rate of compensation with the decimal logarithm of range. n=17,408 calls.

Fig. 5 (corrected).

Rate of SL reduction with range to target for the different noise treatments and bats. SL (left y-axis: dB re. 20 μPa2 s at 0.1 m, right y-axis: dB re. 20 μPa RMS at 0.1 m) of all the calls from successful trials is shown for bats 1, 3 and 4. a, rate of compensation with the decimal logarithm of range. n=17,408 calls.

Fig. 5 (original).

Rate of SL reduction with range to target for the different noise treatments and bats. SL (left y-axis: dB re. 20 μPa2 s at 0.1 m, right y-axis: dB re. 20 μPa RMS at 0.1 m) of all the calls from successful trials is shown for bats 1, 3 and 4. a, rate of compensation with the decimal logarithm of range. n=17,408 calls.

Fig. 5 (original).

Rate of SL reduction with range to target for the different noise treatments and bats. SL (left y-axis: dB re. 20 μPa2 s at 0.1 m, right y-axis: dB re. 20 μPa RMS at 0.1 m) of all the calls from successful trials is shown for bats 1, 3 and 4. a, rate of compensation with the decimal logarithm of range. n=17,408 calls.