Benthic marine suspension feeders provide an important link between benthic and pelagic ecosystems. The strength of this link is determined by suspension-feeding rates. Many studies have measured suspension-feeding rates using indirect clearance-rate methods, which are based on the depletion of suspended particles. Direct methods that measure the flow of water itself are less common, but they can be more broadly applied because, unlike indirect methods, direct methods are not affected by properties of the cleared particles. We present pumping rates for three species of suspension feeders, the clams Mya arenaria and Mercenaria mercenaria and the tunicate Ciona intestinalis, measured using a direct method based on particle image velocimetry (PIV). Past uses of PIV in suspension-feeding studies have been limited by strong laser reflections that interfere with velocity measurements proximate to the siphon. We used a new approach based on fitting PIV-based velocity profile measurements to theoretical profiles from computational fluid dynamic (CFD) models, which allowed us to calculate inhalant siphon Reynolds numbers (Re). We used these inhalant Re and measurements of siphon diameters to calculate exhalant Re, pumping rates, and mean inlet and outlet velocities. For the three species studied, inhalant Re ranged from 8 to 520, and exhalant Re ranged from 15 to 1073. Volumetric pumping rates ranged from 1.7 to 7.4 l h−1 for M. arenaria, 0.3 to 3.6 l h−1 for M. mercenaria and 0.07 to 0.97 l h−1 for C. intestinalis. We also used CFD models based on measured pumping rates to calculate capture regions, which reveal the spatial extent of pumped water. Combining PIV data with CFD models may be a valuable approach for future suspension-feeding studies.
Benthic marine suspension feeders provide an important link between benthic and pelagic ecosystems. Effects of suspension-feeding activity include exerting top-down control on phytoplankton growth (e.g. Caraco et al., 2006; Cerco and Noel, 2007, 2010; Newell, 1988; Officer et al., 1982), concentrating organic matter into fecal pellets with high settling speeds, reducing turbidity (Newell and Koch, 2004), and competing with (Cloern, 1982) and grazing on (Green et al., 2003) zooplankton. In addition, many active suspension feeders, such as the bivalves Mya arenaria and Mercenaria mercenaria, support commercial fisheries, and many others, such as the tunicate Ciona intestinalis, are fouling organisms with negative economic impacts.
In the case of active suspension feeders – those that use pumping, rather than ambient currents, to deliver the suspended particles on which they feed (Wildish and Kristmanson, 1997) – the rates of the suspension-feeding functions listed above are ultimately controlled by the flows produced by individual suspension feeders and the interactions of these flows with each other and with ambient flows. Such flows have been quantified in various ways for more than 90 years (e.g. Galtsoff, 1926). Active suspension feeding is common among bivalves, ascidians, bryozoans, polychaetes, and burrowing and tube-dwelling crustaceans, especially those occupying moderate flow regimes. An active suspension feeder produces inhalant and exhalant flows through unfused mantle margins, a straight or U-shaped tube or burrow, or a pair of well-formed siphons such as those of our study organisms.
Exhalant siphon flows (jets flows) are well studied in fluid mechanics – largely because of their relevance to aerospace engineering (Karagozian, 2014). In marine systems, bivalve exhalant jets have been shown to produce shear that enhances mixing in benthic boundary layers, which likely helps to limit local depletion of seston (Lassen et al., 2006), and physical siphon analogs have been used to study interactions between jet flows and boundary-layer flows (Crimaldi et al., 2007; Monismith et al., 1990; O'Riordan et al., 1993, 1995).
Inhalant siphon flows, in contrast, have not received as much attention, either from a fluid mechanical or a marine ecological perspective. They are arguably more important than jet flows for suspension feeding, however, because they define the spatial extent of the water pumped by a suspension feeder. These flows thus set an upper limit on the suspension feeder's growth rate and its influence on seston concentration, and determine the chemical cues to which it has access. From a marine ecology perspective, inhalant siphon flows have been recognized as triggers for copepod escape reactions (Kiørboe et al., 1999; Fields and Yen, 1996, 1997; Fields, 2010; Fields et al., 2012) and for their roles in the cannibalistic capture of larvae by the cockle Cerastoderma edule (André et al., 1993). Detailed studies of inhalant flow are likely to improve parameterizations in ecological models that include suspension feeding (e.g. Cerco and Noel, 2010). Specifically, these studies could be used to identify flow conditions and animal densities at which interactions between neighbors become significant and to scale individual suspension-feeding rates up to population scales. Because inhalant flows are convergent, velocities drop off rapidly with distance from the siphon inlet, often falling below measurement thresholds at short distances from the inlet. This property of inhalant flows makes them more difficult to study than jet flows.
Methods for measuring suspension-feeding activity can be divided into two groups: ‘indirect’ methods based on the depletion of suspended particles and ‘direct’ methods based on water flow (Riisgård, 2001). The most common indirect method is to take repeated water samples from a tank containing suspension feeders, quantify the concentration of particles in each sample, and fit a function to describe the relationship between particle concentration and time. Indirect clearance-rate measurements are useful for comparing feeding activity between species and under varying conditions within a study, but results depend on the properties of the particles used (Møhlenberg and Riisgåard, 1978; Rosa et al., 2017). They can also be affected by variations in experimental conditions because of local depletion of particles and flow effects of nearby tank walls (Riisgård, 2001).
Several direct methods have been developed. Particle-based methods – particle imaging velocimetry (PIV) and particle tracking velocimetry (PTV) – have two advantages over most other direct methods. They are non-invasive, and they produce spatially and temporally resolved velocity data in addition to flow rates. Troost et al. (2009) used PIV and PTV to measure inhalant velocities produced by three bivalve species; they modeled rather than measured exhalant velocities because exhalant water was depleted of particles. Frank et al. (2008) measured exhalant velocities for four bivalve species and the tunicate Styela clava by performing PIV with small particles (∼2 μm) that were inefficiently retained. They found that exhalant velocities were positively correlated with clearance rates. Inhalant velocity measurements were not included. Nishizaki and Ackerman (2017) used PIV to characterize exhalant flow structures produced by dreissenid mussels. In another PIV application, Delavan and Webster (2012) found an increase in variance in Mercenaria mercenaria exhalant siphon velocities in the presence of a predator. André et al. (1993) used PTV to study cannibalism on larvae by Cerastoderma edule. Stamhuis and colleagues (Stamhuis et al., 2002; Stamhuis, 2006) discussed suspension-feeding flows as part of two broader reviews of applications of PIV to biological problems.
As others have noted (Frank et al., 2008; Troost et al., 2009), one limitation of PIV is that laser light reflected by the animal often makes it impossible to obtain accurate velocity measurements immediately adjacent to a suspension feeder's siphon. Quantifying velocity at the siphon inlet is crucial, however, for calculating pumping rates. Reconstructing the proximate flow field based on the available data requires a model of the flow field's structure. Profiles of velocity, starting at the center of the siphon inlet and extending away from the siphon along its axis, are commonly used. These profiles have been modeled using empirical (Troost et al., 2009), analytical (Kiørboe et al., 1999) and numerical (Jumars, 2013) approaches, but only the numerical approach is able to accurately represent the flow near the siphon inlet. Empirical models, such as exponential fits (Troost et al., 2009), are reasonable approximations of axial profiles when the entire profile is available. Inlet velocities cannot reliably be extrapolated from partial profiles, however, because velocity increases so rapidly as distance to the siphon inlet decreases. Small errors in velocity measurements made at intermediate distances from the siphon inlet thus propagate to create large errors in velocity calculations at the siphon inlet. Analytical models for flow into a siphon are generally oversimplified, the most common simplification being the point-sink model. Jumars (2013) produced numerical computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models of inhalant siphon flows and demonstrated that the point-sink model, despite predicting realistic velocities in the far field, rapidly diverges from the true velocity fields on approaching the siphon inlet. In fact, the point-sink model predicts an infinite velocity at the siphon inlet. We used CFD models similar to those used by Jumars (2013) to interpret velocity fields produced in our PIV experiments.
In this study, we used PIV to measure velocity fields produced by the inhalant siphons of three species of active suspension feeders, the bivalves Mya arenaria and Mercenaria mercenaria and the tunicate Ciona intestinalis. We chose these species because we expected them to pump over a wide range of Rein and because they are common and well studied, enabling us to compare our results with published measurements. As in the previously cited PIV studies of inhalant siphon velocity, we were unable to measure velocities immediately adjacent to the siphon inlet. We therefore used CFD models of inhalant siphon flows based on those developed by Jumars (2013) to calculate Rein. We then used these Rein values and measurements of siphon diameter to calculate mean inlet and outlet velocities, pumping rates and Reex.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mya arenaria Linnaeus 1758 (n=9) and Mercenaria mercenaria Linnaeus 1758 (n=7) clams were obtained locally, either from seafood suppliers or intertidal sand beaches, and maintained in the flowing seawater facility at the University of Maine's Darling Marine Center (Walpole, ME, USA). Ciona intestinalis (Linnaeus 1767) tunicates (n=6) were carefully detached from tank surfaces on which their larvae had naturally settled in the same flowing seawater facility. Individuals were chosen to provide a range of sizes for comparison (Table 1). One C. intestinalis individual was excluded from analysis because of poor velocity field data.
Particle image velocimetry
Stereoscopic PIV was performed using a commercial system (LaVision, Goettingen, Germany) with a pulsed ND:YAG laser with an emission wavelength of 532 nm (New Wave Research, Fremont, CA, USA) and two Imager Intense cameras each with a resolution of 1376×1040 pixels (LaVision). Experiments were performed in a 30×30×30 cm tank filled to 27–28 cm with filtered seawater. The water was seeded with hollow glass spheres (diameter=9–13 μm, ρ=1.10±0.05 g cm–3; LaVision) and maintained at a temperature of 17–19°C and practical salinity of ∼30–32. This range of temperatures and salinities corresponds to a kinematic viscosity of ν≈1.1×10–6 m2 s−1 (Nayar et al., 2016; Sharqawy et al., 2010), the value used for all calculations. Approximately 2×106 Tetraselmis chuii cells were added to the tank at the beginning of each experiment to induce feeding. Each experiment lasted <10 h.
For each experiment with M. arenaria or M. mercenaria, an individual was buried in a 190×100 mm (diameter×depth) glass dish filled with playground sand with the ends of its siphons protruding above the surface. The clam was oriented with its sagittal plane perpendicular to the image plane and its inhalant siphon closest to the camera, with the laser sheet bisecting the inhalant siphon. A thin layer of black sand was added at the sediment–water interface to reduce reflections. Images were captured in double-frame mode with the duration between frames (‘dt’) chosen to optimize particle shift (approximately 10 pixels per frame near the inhalant siphon) for an individual clam: 25–80 ms for M. arenaria and 40–99 ms for M. mercenaria. Image pairs were captured at a recording rate of 2.5 Hz. For experiments with C. intestinalis, a tunicate was arranged with its base buried in sand. Ciona intestinalis produced much lower flow velocities than the clams, so images were recorded in single-frame mode with a recording rate of 3.5 Hz. PIV velocity data are publicly available through the Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (bco-dmo.org, accession numbers 655604 and 655656).
For each individual, 10 sequences were analyzed. Each sequence lasted 40 s and consisted of 100 sequential image pairs for the clams and 140 sequential images for C. intestinalis. LaVision's DaVis software was used to calculate vector fields from particle images. Images were first preprocessed by applying a time-averaged minimum filter to minimize noise and masking out sediment and the animal's body using a combination of a manually drawn mask and one based on intensity. Vector fields were then calculated using one pass with 64×64 pixel (50% overlap) interrogation windows followed by four passes with 32×32 pixel (75% overlap) windows. Sequences of vector fields were time averaged, yielding 10 velocity fields per animal (Fig. 1). Only sequences in which the animal was actively pumping with its siphons fully open were used, so our results represent maximal – rather than average – pumping rates.
Axial and radial velocity profiles
PIV-derived velocity fields were imported into MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) for analysis. Velocity profiles were extracted from the time-averaged velocity field for each PIV sequence (Figs 1 and 2). Our CFD models are axisymmetric, so we also assigned cylindrical coordinates to our PIV-derived velocity fields. The origin is defined as the center of the siphon inlet (Fig. 2, schematics). The z-axis is aligned with the symmetry axis and is perpendicular to the siphon inlet. The r-axis is perpendicular to the symmetry axis and parallel to the siphon inlet. The r and z components of velocity are u and w, respectively, and v corresponds to out-of-plane velocities, which are 0 in the models. The origin and rotation of the axes for each sequence were determined based on PIV images. A velocity profile, hereafter referred to simply as a profile, represents the velocity along a transect drawn along or at an angle to the z-axis (axial) or parallel to the r-axis (radial).
For each sequence, an axial profile was taken along a 30 mm transect beginning at the inhalant siphon center (Fig. 2A). To reduce the influence of the exhalant flow, calculations were based on profiles of ‘inward’ velocity, i.e. the component of the velocity vector directed toward the siphon center. Inward velocity was calculated by a scalar projection of the velocity vector at each point onto the profile (Fig. 2A). The angle of the profile was chosen by selecting the profile with the maximum inward velocity magnitude within 10 deg of the z-axis. For some sequences, the exhalant siphon had a strong influence on the axial profile, so the profile was taken at ±30 or ±60 deg from the z-axis, and the profile was fitted to CFD profiles taken at the same angle. For a convergent flow, the highest inhalant velocities outside the siphon are found closest to the inlet. Because of reflections, we were unable to accurately measure velocities within a radius of ∼4–6 mm of the inhalant siphon center, so velocity measurements in this region are unrealistically low (Fig. 2A).
Three radial profiles of vertical velocity were taken along transects perpendicular to and centered on the z-axis – one each centered at 6, 7 and 8 mm from the origin (Figs 1B, 2B). Analogously to the use of inward velocity for axial profiles, the vertical velocity component w was used to restrict the influence of the exhalant siphon. The profile was split at the z-axis, and the mean of the two halves was used for further calculations. In some cases, the influence of exhalant flow rendered one half of the profile unusable, so the remaining half was used. All processing code is available from the corresponding author upon request. As a validation of the method, values of Rein calculated from axial and radial profiles were compared by fitting a linear regression between the axial value and the median of the three radial values for each sequence.
The PIV-derived profiles described above were fitted to equivalent profiles taken from CFD models to calculate Rein for each image sequence. The CFD model geometry consists of an axisymmetric inhalant siphon drawing from a large, hemispherical domain. The models are similar to the ‘capillary’ model described by Jumars (2013) but with a shorter capillary length (3 mm for the clams and 10 mm for C. intestinalis) and an inner diameter matched to that of the experimental animal. The fluid was assigned a kinematic viscosity of ν=1.1×10–6 m2 s−1. Simulations were carried out in COMSOL Multiphysics (COMSOL, Burlington, MA, USA), using the PARDISO solver and the BDF time-stepping method. Initial model simulations were performed to ensure that the profiles were mesh independent and uninfluenced by the presence of domain walls. The model was run over a range of Rein values and inhalant siphon diameters. A study by True and Crimaldi (2017) showed that similar models perform well against experimental data from a physical siphon model with a known flow rate.
We define a capture region as the spatial extent of the fluid drawn into an inhalant siphon over a given pumping duration. Capture-region boundaries were calculated using the Particle Tracing module of COMSOL by placing 20,000 passive Lagrangian tracers across the siphon inlet and advecting them backwards in time using the previously calculated time-dependent velocity fields. We calculated capture-region bounds for each species based on the individual with the highest Rein. We also calculated maximum capture region extents in the r direction for each species based on the individuals with the smallest and largest Rein. These calculations are for the case where water motion is provided only by animal pumping, thus maximizing the potential effects of nearest-neighbor interactions.
Reynolds number calculations
For each PIV sequence, we fitted axial and radial profiles to their equivalent CFD profiles over a range of Rein and maximized R2 between PIV and CFD profiles to select a value for Rein. Those values for which R2<0.3 were excluded from further analyses. This cut-off was chosen by visually inspecting fits between PIV and CFD profiles. We also performed a sensitivity analysis using the same fitting method to test how errors in measuring siphon position and angle are likely to affect Rein calculations ( Appendix).
After each experiment, inhalant and exhalant siphons were photographed with a scale, and lengths of the major and minor axes of the inner perimeters of inhalant and exhalant siphon openings were measured from the photographs. These measurements were used to calculate equivalent circular diameters – the diameter of a circle with the same area as the ellipse with the measured major and minor axes – on which calculations and model parameterizations were based. Shell length and width were also measured for the clams, and body length was measured for C. intestinalis. Blotted wet weights (WW), dry weights (DW) and ash-free dry weights (AFDW) were obtained after blotting the animal dry with a paper towel, oven drying for at least 48 h at 60°C, and combusting overnight at 500°C, respectively. For the clams, WW and DW include shells, but AFDW does not. To facilitate comparison with the literature, AFDW was used as the metric of weight for clams, and WW was used for C. intestinalis. Where possible, allometric relationships were determined based on power-law fits between measured quantities.
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). In order to produce 10 useable image sequences for each animal, multiple sequences were often taken within a relatively short period. To avoid pseudoreplication due to autocorrelation in time, we therefore treated an individual animal, rather than a sequence, as a replicate. Because we fitted our experimental profiles to profiles from CFD models with a necessarily discontinuous range of Rein, we used nonparameteric methods. After excluding Rein values for which R2<0.3, a final value of Rein for each sequence was chosen by taking the median of the values from the axial profile and the three radial profiles.
Power-law functions were used to examine relationships between length, weight and inhalant and exhalant siphon diameters (Fig. 3). Length and weight were positively correlated for all three species (Fig. 3A,B). Based on a linear regression forced through the origin, DW for C. intestinalis were approximately 6% of WW (R2=0.68, not shown), similar to the 5% reported by Randløv and Riisgård (1979). DW was not available for one C. intestinalis individual due to improper drying.
Length and inhalant siphon inner diameter were positively correlated for all three species (Fig. 3C,D), but R2 values were low for M. mercenaria (R2=0.12) and C. intestinalis (R2=0.15).
The ratio of inhalant to exhalant diameter was calculated for each species by performing a linear regression forced through the origin (not shown). Inhalant to exhalant diameter ratios were approximately 1.6 for M. arenaria (R2=0.35), 1.4 for M. mercenaria (R2=0.36) and 1.9 for C. intestinalis (R2=0.23).
For M. arenaria, all of the 360 calculated Rein values (one axial and three radial for each sequence) had associated R2 values greater than 0.3, so all values were used. Radial profiles at higher Rein tended to slightly underestimate Rein compared with their axial equivalents: Rerad=0.74×Reax+56 (R2=0.83; Fig. S1A). For M. mercenaria, 39 out of 280 Rein values had R2<0.3 and were excluded. As for M. arenaria, radial profiles at higher Rein in M. mercenaria tended to produce lower values than their axial equivalents: Rerad=0.8×Reax+41 (R2=0.69; Fig. S1B). For C. intestinalis, 20 out of 270 Rein values were excluded. Axial and radial values agreed well: Rerad=1.0×Reax–0.8 for C. intestinalis (R2=0.76; Fig. S1C). Subsequent analyses used the median of the axial and the three radial Rein values.
Rein appeared to increase with weight for all three species (Fig. 4A,B), but R2 values were low for M. mercenaria (R2=0.09) and C. intestinalis (R2=0.02). Median Rein for individuals ranged from 179 to 520 for M. arenaria (n=9), 28 to 341 for M. mercenaria (n=7) and 8 to 33 for C. intestinalis (n=6; Fig. 4A,B).
Exhalant Reynolds numbers Reex (not shown) were calculated from Rein based on ratios of inhalant to exhalant siphon diameter for each individual (Eqn 5). Median Reex ranged from 308 to 1073 for M. arenaria, 49 to 606 for M. mercenaria and 15 to 76 for C. intestinalis.
Mean inlet and outlet velocities and pumping rates
Mean inlet () and outlet () velocities and pumping rates (Q) were calculated from Rein and inhalant siphon diameters (Eqns 3,4,6). Median for individuals ranged from 63 to 125 mm s−1 for M. arenaria, 8.4 to 147 mm s−1 for M. mercenaria and 0.4 to 3.8 mm s−1 for C. intestinalis (Fig. 4C,D). For all three species, the Akaike information criterion (AIC) was smaller for a linear model with slope constrained to 0 than for one with an unconstrained slope, suggesting that was not correlated with AFDW, so fits are not shown. Median outlet velocities ranged from 153 to 532 mm s−1 for M. arenaria, 25 to 349 mm s−1 for M. mercenaria and 1 to 20 mm s−1 for C. intestinalis.
Median pumping rates (Q) ranged from 1.7 to 7.4 l h−1 for M. arenaria, 0.3 to 3.6 l h−1 for M. mercenaria and 0.1 to 1.0 l h−1 for C. intestinalis (Fig. 4E,F). Pumping rate was positively correlated with weight for M. arenaria and M. mercenaria, but not for C. intestinalis (R2=0.03).
A capture region reveals the spatial distribution of water pumped by an inhalant siphon. Of the three species studied, M. arenaria had the largest capture regions for a given pumping duration, and C. intestinalis had the smallest as expected based on their Rein values (Fig. 5). To examine possible interactions between the inhalant flows of neighboring animals, we compared the radial extent of capture regions over 120 s to estimates of half nearest-neighbor distance (rn) based on the highest population densities we found in the literature: 360 m−2 for M. arenaria (Commito, 1982), 78 m−2 for M. mercenaria (Murphy, 1985) and 1000 m−2 for C. intestinalis (Svane, 1983).
We define a capture region interaction time (Ti) based on the pumping duration required for capture region radius to reach rn divided by two – i.e. the time for adjacent capture regions to overlap (Fig. 6). For M. arenaria individuals with the lowest and highest Rein, Ti=3.5 and 14 s for a uniform distribution and 27 and 115 s for a random distribution. For C. intestinalis, Ti=4.5 and 24 s for a uniform distribution and 57 s for a high Rein C. intestinalis in a random distribution. For the high Rein M. mercenaria in a random distribution, Ti=55 s.
Reynolds numbers and pumping rates
As predicted, the suspension-feeding flows produced by the three experimental species covered a wide range of Rein, from 8 to 520 for inhalant flows and 15 to 1073 for exhalant flows. All of these Rein are below 2000 – the approximate turbulence threshold for pipe flow (Reynolds, 1883; Avila et al., 2011). Gust and Harrison (1981) found Rein close to the turbulent transition for pumping by burrowing shrimp and suggested that animals are unlikely to regularly pump at Rein above the turbulence threshold. The energetic costs associated with pumping at high internal Re will likely be higher because pressure drop scales linearly with pumping rate for laminar pipe flow and with pumping rate squared for turbulent pipe flow (Wilkes, 1999, p. 115).
Reported suspension-feeding rates from the literature for M. arenaria, M. mercenaria and C. intestinalis vary greatly (Table 2). Direct measurements of suspension-feeding rates – such as those made using PIV – are less common than indirect measurements in the literature. Pumping rates (Q) from direct methods are related to clearance rates (C) by the filtration efficiency (E), the proportion of particles captured: C=E×Q. Pumping rates cannot be directly compared with clearance rates unless filtration efficiencies are reported as well. In general, clearance rates should be lower than pumping rates under the same conditions, but some direct methods appear to produce anomalously low rates. Methods in which a tube is inserted into the animal's siphon or the animal is otherwise constrained, which we will refer to as invasive direct methods, appear to be particularly prone to produce low pumping rates (Riisgård, 2001). Furthermore, if clearance-rate experiments use particles large enough to be retained with 100% efficiency, pumping rates and clearance rates will be equal (Møhlenberg and Riisgård, 1978). As expected, our results agree most closely with previous results based on non-invasive, direct methods or indirect methods where E=1.
Relationships between body size and C or Q are generally expressed in terms of power-law functions of the form Q=a×Wb or Q=c×Ld, where a, b, c and d are fit parameters, and W and L are body weights and shell or body lengths, respectively. Riisgård and Seerup (2003) suggested that in general, Q should be proportional to length squared for bivalves because gill area should scale with shell length squared, and Q should be directly proportional to gill area, and therefore they suggest an exponent of b=2/3 for the relationship between Q and W. This exponent should be insensitive to the measure of weight used for the calculation (e.g. dry versus ash free, with or without shell) if the ratio between measures of weight is constant (Ricciardi and Bourget, 1998). It should also be insensitive to whether C or Q is used if filtration efficiency is constant for a given experiment. Riisgård (2001) cited examples of several studies that reported exponents close to b=2/3 and d=2 for various species of bivalves. Meyhöfer (1985) measured pumping rates, weights and gill areas for four species of bivalves and reported exponents close to 1 for the relationship between gill area and pumping rate for three species, but more variable results for the relationships between weight and gill area and between weight and pumping rate.
Capture region interaction times (Ti) suggest the magnitude of local seston depletion in still water (Fig. 6). Mya arenaria and C. intestinalis have much shorter Ti than M. mercenaria – M. arenaria because of its high Rein and C. intestinalis because of its high densities. When capture regions do not overlap, each suspension feeder in a population is unaffected by the feeding activity of its neighbors. When capture regions do overlap, feeding rates are reduced by local depletion of seston. Advection of seston from outside of the population capture regions counteracts local depletion. Calculations of Ti for random distributions are conservative estimates for the earliest effects of local depletion. Local depletion will begin earlier in populations with patchy distributions. Based on preliminary model results (not shown), the presence of benthic boundary layer and exhalant siphon flows may lead to earlier local depletion because both stretch capture regions horizontally. Beginning at the Ti for uniform distributions, local depletion will be important regardless of population distribution.
Capture region extent may also have implications for olfaction because a suspension feeder can only access chemical cues within its capture region (Fig. 5). The time to respond to a chemical cue depends on the time required for the capture region to overlap the cue, so capture region growth may limit response times (Fig. 6).
By using CFD simulations, we were able to use the part of the flow for which we had accurate measurements to calculate Rein values without relying on fits to empirical models. The advantage of this method can be demonstrated by comparing an axial profile from a CFD profile with an exponential fit (Troost et al., 2009). The effects of missing data due to laser reflection can be simulated by fitting an exponential function of the form w=A×e–Br to an axial profile from a CFD simulation (D=3.0 mm, Rein=300) and sequentially excluding more data in the region closest to the siphon (Fig. 8). When the function is fitted to the full profile, the approximation is fairly accurate, predicting a velocity of 110.8 mm s−1, slightly higher than the true value of 109.0 mm s−1. As more data are excluded from the fit, however, the prediction of the velocity at the siphon inlet quickly diverges from the true value, and excluding the 4 mm of velocity data closest to the siphon, which is realistic for a PIV experiment, yields a prediction nearly an order of magnitude lower (13.7 mm s−1) at the siphon inlet. The use of CFD models allowed us to more accurately measure pumping rates and other suspension-feeding parameters and to perform capture region calculations that require the complete flow field.
We have presented results from a new technique for quantifying suspension-feeding flows. Indirect measurement techniques are often highly dependent on experimental conditions and have complicated comparisons between studies. We hope that the use of non-invasive, direct methods, such as the one presented here, will help to reveal general patterns in suspension feeding that may be masked by experimental conditions. Experiments that combine indirect and direct methods may be especially valuable. We would also like to emphasize the utility of Re as a dimensionless parameter for quantifying and comparing siphon flows and the importance of reporting siphon inner diameters, which can be used to calculate inhalant and exhalant Re and velocities and other parameters of interest. Accurate measurements of suspension-feeding rates are crucial for ecosystem models (Cranford et al., 2011; Cerco and Noel, 2010). The wide range in published suspension-feeding rate measurements (Table 2) indicates the need for more robust methods, such as those presented here.
A sensitivity analysis was performed by fitting profiles using the same method presented in the Results. Rather than minimizing R2 between PIV and CFD profiles, however, we compared shifted CFD profiles with equivalent untransformed CFD profiles with a range of Rein. Depending on the direction of the shift, a shifted profile was obtained either by transforming an unshifted profile or by shifting the transect used to extract the profile from the velocity field. We compared shifted axial and radial profiles with their unshifted equivalents. The primary goals were to compare the robustness of the axial and radial profile methods and to examine overall trends in the relative effects of different types of shifts. We therefore compared a range of shifts in z direction, r direction and angle (θ) for both axial and radial profiles. To simplify comparisons, only two Rein values (200 and 400) and only radial profiles taken 7 mm from the siphon inlet were tested.
Shifting axial profiles in the z direction (i.e. toward or away from the siphon) produced relatively large changes in Rein values (Fig. S2A,B). The effect of shifts in the z direction was highly dependent on direction. For example, shifting the profile 0.4 mm toward the siphon (negative z direction) increased the Rein value by 85 at Rein=200 and 160 at Rein=400, while shifting the profile 1 mm away from the siphon (positive z direction) only decreased the value by 60 and 115, respectively. Shifts in the r direction were performed in only one direction because the profiles are symmetric about the z-axis. Fits were less sensitive to shifts in the r direction than to shifts in the z direction (Fig. S2C,D). A shift of 0.4 mm increased the Rein value by 35 for Rein=200 and 65 for Rein=400. Rein calculations were fairly insensitive to angle in the 0–30 deg range, probably because the profiles themselves are very similar within that range (Fig. S2E,F). Rein values differed by ≤5 from the true Re within 15 deg of the axis at Rein=200 and within 11 deg of the axis at Rein=400. Therefore, inaccurate measurements of siphon inlet angle are unlikely to have significant effects on Rein calculations. R2 values were fairly insensitive to all three types of shift but were most sensitive to shifts in the r direction.
Calculations of Rein from radial profiles were much less sensitive than those from axial profiles to shifts in both the z and r directions. Shifting profiles toward the siphon by 0.4 mm increased Re values by 15 at Rein=200 and 35 at Re=400, and shifting profiles away from the siphon by 0.4 mm decreased Rein values by 15 and 30, respectively (Fig. S3A,B). Shifting profiles by 0.4 mm in the r direction increased Rein values by 10 at Rein=200 and 20 at Rein=400 (Fig. S3C,D). Changes in siphon inlet angle produced slightly larger errors in Rein calculations for radial than for axial profiles (Fig. S3E,F). An angle of 10 deg decreased the Rein value by 25 at Rein=200 and 50 at Rein=400. R2 values were fairly insensitive to all three types of shift but were most sensitive to shifts in angle.
When using profiles to calculate Rein, accurately locating the center of the siphon is crucial to producing an accurate result. Calculations of Rein from radial profiles appear to be much less sensitive overall to errors in siphon center position measurement than those from axial profiles. The higher error associated with rotation of radial profiles is unlikely to be important except at high Rein, because an error of more than 10 deg is much less likely in practice than an error on the order of 0.1 mm in the r or z direction. In the case of a discrepancy in Rein calculation between the two methods, the calculation from the radial profile is more likely to be accurate. Because calculations from radial profiles converge on the true Rein more quickly than calculations from axial profiles when approaching the true siphon center measurement, the degree of agreement between the two calculations may be a good diagnostic for the accuracy of the siphon coordinate measurements.
Unfortunately, while R2 appears to be a good metric for choosing the Rein values, it does not appear to be a good predictor of the accuracy of siphon coordinate measurements – except in the case of very bad fits – because it is relatively insensitive to profile shifts. For calculations from radial profiles, this insensitivity may be related to the self-similar properties of the flow. A change in the distance at which a radial profile is taken may have a similar effect on the shape of the profile as a change in the mean inlet velocity.
We did not include siphon diameter Din in our sensitivity analysis, but errors in measuring Din may be important as well. Based on Eqn 1, errors in Rein should be directly proportional to Din measurement errors. We assumed that Din was constant throughout the course of sequence. Although we did not formally test for this effect, Din did not appear to change when the animal was pumping steadily in any of the sequences analyzed in this study. It is also worth noting that siphons are not perfectly circular in cross-section as the axisymmetric CFD models assume. The axisymmetric assumption is probably reasonable for M. arenaria and C. intestinalis, both of which had mean ratios of long to short inhalant siphon axes of 1.1, but a 3D model might produce better results for M. mercenaria, for which the ratio is 1.3. Fits will also be affected by additional water currents not produced by the inhalant siphon, particularly those from the exhalant jet and from thermal convection. The use of the inward component of velocity helps to mitigate the influences of these currents – particularly jet currents because they are largely unidirectional – but cannot entirely eliminate them.
A flow exhibits self similarity if profiles of a property – taken from different parts of the flow field – match when scaled by factors that depend on a single variable (George, 1989). For example, Pope (2000, chapter 5) describes the self similar properties of round jet flow, for which radial profiles of axial and radial velocity converge on a single curve for each velocity component, when properly scaled. Based on Pope's description, we hypothesized that inhalant siphon flows would also exhibit self-similar properties.
We compared CFD-based radial profiles of w and u centered at distances z* from the center of the siphon entrance, where z*=z/D (Fig. S4A,B). We define w0=w(r=0) and u0 as the maximum w and u velocities, respectively, and r1/2 as the r-coordinate at which w=w0/2. As z* increases, w0 and u0 decrease, and the profiles spread (r1/2 increases). We scale the profiles by dividing r, u and w by r1/2, u0 and w0, respectively (Fig. S4B), as Pope (2000) does for a round jet. For both w and u, the scaled profiles collapse onto a single curve (i.e. they are self similar), except for the profile taken at z*=1, which is within the development region. Profiles taken farther from the siphon center (z*>16) collapse onto the same curves (not shown).
Carolyn Garrity assisted in early PIV experiments not included in the manuscript. Mick Devin at the Darling Marine Center provided algae. Two anonymous reviewers provide valuable feedback on the manuscript.
Conceptualization: K.T.D.C., P.A.J., K.T.D.C.; Methodology: K.T.D.C., P.A.J.; Software: K.T.D.C.; Investigation: K.T.D.C., I.T.J., T.J.C.; Formal analysis: K.T.D.C., I.T.J.; Writing – original draft preparation: K.T.D.C.; Writing – review and editing: K.T.D.C., I.T.J., T.J.C., P.A.J., D.C.B.; Supervision: K.T.D.C., P.A.J.; Funding acquisition: P.A.J.
This research is part of a collaborative project (National Science Foundation grant OCE-1260232 to P.A.J., and grant OCE-1260199 to J. Crimaldi, University of Colorado). Funding was also provided by NSF grant OIA-1355457 to Maine EPSCoR at the University of Maine (D.C.B.).
Data have been deposited in the Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (bco-dmo.org, accession numbers 655604 and 655656).
The authors declare no competing or financial interests.