ABSTRACT
Reef-building corals import inorganic carbon (Ci) to build their calcium carbonate skeletons and to support photosynthesis by the symbiotic algae that reside in their tissue. The internal pathways that deliver Ci for both photosynthesis and calcification are known to involve the enzyme carbonic anhydrase (CA), which interconverts CO2 and HCO3−. We have developed a method for absolute quantification of internal CA (iCA) activity in coral tissue based on the rate of 18O-removal from labeled Ci. The method was applied to three Caribbean corals (Orbicella faveolata, Porites astreoides and Siderastrea radians) and showed that these species have similar iCA activities per unit surface area, but that S. radians has ∼10-fold higher iCA activity per unit tissue volume. A model of coral Ci processing shows that the measured iCA activity is sufficient to support the proposed roles for iCA in Ci transport for photosynthesis and calcification. This is the case even when iCA activity is homogeneously distributed throughout the coral, but the model indicates that it would be advantageous to concentrate iCA in the spaces where calcification (the calcifying fluid) and photosynthesis (the oral endoderm) take place. We argue that because the rates of photosynthesis and calcification per unit surface area are similar among the corals studied here, the areal iCA activity used to deliver Ci for these reactions should also be similar. The elevated iCA activity per unit volume of S. radians compared with that of the other species is probably due to the thinner effective tissue thickness in this species.
INTRODUCTION
Active inorganic carbon (Ci) supply pathways are required to support the high rates of photosynthesis and calcification that have allowed reef-building corals to thrive and create the extensive reef structures that support coral reef ecosystems. These pathways must deliver Ci to the symbiotic dinoflagellates (of the genus Symbiodinium) that reside primarily within the upper endodermal layer of the coral (Furla et al., 2000b; Bertucci et al., 2013). The algae further concentrate Ci obtained from the coral using a CO2 concentrating mechanism and ultimately convert the Ci to CO2 for fixation in the Calvin cycle (Leggat et al., 1999). At the same time, Ci is routed to the calcifying space at the interface between the existing CaCO3 skeleton and the ectodermal cells of the coral animal where the Ci is converted to CO32− and combined with Ca2+ to form new skeleton (Tambutte et al., 2011). Much of the carbon fixed by the symbiotic algae is transported to and then respired by the coral. The coral recycles most of the respired CO2, using it for both photosynthesis and calcification (Furla et al., 2000b). The full details of these Ci supply and recovery pathways are not fully understood, but it is clear that they are complicated and interconnected (Fig. 1; Tambutte et al., 2011; Bertucci et al., 2013).
Inorganic carbon (Ci) fluxes and potential roles of carbonic anhydrase (CA) in coral Ci processing. The figure is based primarily on Bertucci et al. (2013). (1) External carbonic anhydrase (eCA) on the oral surface converts HCO3− to CO2, which then passively diffuses in the oral ectoderm as the result of a concentration gradient. (2) CA in the oral ectoderm may convert imported and respired CO2 to HCO3−, which is then transported into the oral endoderm. Respiration occurs in the mitochondria (Mito, orange ovals). (3) In the oral endoderm, HCO3− can be converted to CO2 by CA for uptake by Symbiodinium (Sym, green circle). (4) Respired CO2 can be converted to HCO3− using CA for use in calcification or photosynthesis. (5) CA in the calcifying fluid converts respired CO2 to HCO3− for subsequent use in calcification.
Inorganic carbon (Ci) fluxes and potential roles of carbonic anhydrase (CA) in coral Ci processing. The figure is based primarily on Bertucci et al. (2013). (1) External carbonic anhydrase (eCA) on the oral surface converts HCO3− to CO2, which then passively diffuses in the oral ectoderm as the result of a concentration gradient. (2) CA in the oral ectoderm may convert imported and respired CO2 to HCO3−, which is then transported into the oral endoderm. Respiration occurs in the mitochondria (Mito, orange ovals). (3) In the oral endoderm, HCO3− can be converted to CO2 by CA for uptake by Symbiodinium (Sym, green circle). (4) Respired CO2 can be converted to HCO3− using CA for use in calcification or photosynthesis. (5) CA in the calcifying fluid converts respired CO2 to HCO3− for subsequent use in calcification.
A critical component of nearly all Ci supply pathways is the enzyme carbonic anhydrase (CA). This enzyme catalyzes the hydration of CO2 and dehydration of HCO3− moving the CO2/HCO3− system towards chemical equilibrium. CAs play diverse roles in organisms and are involved in CO2 uptake, gas exchange, pH homeostasis and internal Ci transport pathways (Henry, 1996; Badger, 2003; Boron, 2004). In corals and related cnidarians, CAs are involved in supplying Ci for both photosynthesis and calcification. A surface-associated extracellular CA is involved in CO2 uptake (Furla et al., 2000a; Tansik et al., in press), and internal CAs are likely used to convert newly imported CO2 to HCO3−, and for recovery of respired CO2 as HCO3− (Fig. 1; Bertucci et al., 2013). These transformations serve to concentrate Ci as HCO3−, which is the form of Ci typically concentrated by organisms because as a charged molecule it does not pass easily through membranes. In contrast, biological membranes are highly permeable to CO2, a small, uncharged molecule (Gutknecht et al., 1977). Accumulated HCO3− can then be transported to the symbiotic algae, possibly via SLC4-type bicarbonate transporters, which have recently been identified in the genomes and transcriptomes of several coral species (Moya et al., 2012; Kenkel et al., 2013), or converted to CO2 in the oral endoderm for uptake by Symbiodinium (Al-Moghrabi et al., 1996; Bertucci et al., 2010). Inhibition of CAs reduces the photosynthetic rates of corals, showing that this enzyme is essential for maintaining high rates of photosynthesis (Weis et al., 1989; Al-Moghrabi et al., 1996).
CAs are also involved in calcification (Goreau, 1959), probably as part of the Ci transport system in coral tissue and within the calcifying fluid to enhance calcification. Ci used for calcification is a mix of respired CO2, HCO3− transported through coral tissue, and Ci obtained from direct seawater import to the calcifying fluid (Furla et al., 2000b; Cohen and McConnaughey, 2003; Gagnon et al., 2012). The Ci transport pathways for calcification are thus broadly similar to those used to transport Ci for photosynthesis, and so the likely roles of CA in these transport steps are analogous. In several corals (Stylophora pistillata, Acropora hebes and Tubastrea aurea), CA has been localized directly to the calicoblastic ectoderm, the cell layer that mediates calcification and is in direct contact with the calcifying fluid, or the skeletal matrix and it has been suggested that CA may be secreted into the calcifying fluid (Isa and Yamazato, 1984; Tambutte et al., 2007; Moya et al., 2008). CA in the calcifying fluid would convert respired CO2 to HCO3− for subsequent conversion to CO32− (Fig. 1; Cohen and McConnaughey, 2003).
CAs are clearly important in corals and there has been substantial progress in identifying, localizing and in some case characterizing individual CAs. Weis et al. (1989) found that corals contain substantial amounts of CA activity and that zooxanthellate species had significantly more CA than species lacking symbiotic algae. While this work showed that corals have high levels of CA activity, the approach used was not quantitative in an absolute sense, that would, for example, allow the measured rates to be incorporated into models of photosynthesis and calcification (e.g. Hohn and Merico, 2012; Nakamura et al., 2013). Here, we adapted a method that relies on the rate of 18O-removal from labeled Ci to obtain quantitative measurements of internal CA (iCA) activity in corals – in this case Orbicella faveolata (Ellis and Solander 1786), Porites astreoides Lamarck 1816 and Siderastrea radians (Pallas 1766). As the 18O-removal measurement is made on coral homogenate, the method provides a measure of the average iCA activity throughout the corals tissue layers including the calcifying fluid. It is highly unlikely that CA is in fact distributed homogeneously throughout the tissue, and the need for CA localization is explored using a spatially resolved model of Ci processing.
RESULTS
Coral iCA activity
Coral iCA activity was determined by quantitative analysis of 18O-removal catalyzed by purified coral tissue homogenate using a model that includes coral iCA and external (e)CA activity, and Symbiodinium iCA activity (see Materials and methods). The method relies on the fact that all CA isoforms accelerate the hydration of CO2 and dehydration of HCO3−, which in turn accelerates the exchange of the 18O label in Ci for 16O from water (Silverman, 1982). In this analysis, CA activity in the purified tissue homogenate is partitioned into various experimentally separable fractions. eCA activity is first measured on intact coral fragments (Tansik et al., in press), and then the coral tissue is removed and homogenized (Fig. 2A). Symbiodinium cells are removed from the homogenate by centrifugation and their CA activity is measured. Finally, the purified tissue homogenate is assayed for CA activity, and the iCA activity of the coral is determined by subtracting the contributions of coral eCA and residual Symbiodinium iCA from the total CA activity in the purified homogenate.
iCA measurement procedure and sample results. (A) Diagram illustrating iCA measurement procedure. The intact coral fragment contains eCA (e) on the outer surface, iCA (i) within the tissue, and CA within Symbiodinium (s, Sym). The tissue is homogenized and then centrifuged to remove Symbiodinium. The purified tissue homogenate is then assayed for CA activity using an 18O-removal assay. Key model terms affecting 18O-removal are indicated: kif,d, the diluted coral iCA CO2 hydration rate constant; ksf,d, the diluted coral eCA CO2 hydration rate constant; fc, the Symbiodinium CO2 mass transfer coefficient; kcf, the Symbiodinium CO2 hydration rate constant (see also Table 1). (B–D) Examples of 18O-CO2 data for each coral taxa (B: Orbicella faveolata, C: Porites astreoides, D: Siderastrea radians) showing background rates of 18O-removal prior to time zero, acceleration of 18O-removal upon addition of coral tissue homogenate at time zero (first dotted vertical line) and a slow down in the 18O-removal rate after addition of a CA inhibitor (acetazolamide, AZ) at 7–10 min (second dotted vertical line). The solid lines are fits to the data of the 18O-removal model used to determine coral iCA activity. The key in B indicates which symbols represent different CO2 isotopic species: 13C16O16O (blue circles), 13C18O16O (green circles), and 13C18O18O (red circles).
iCA measurement procedure and sample results. (A) Diagram illustrating iCA measurement procedure. The intact coral fragment contains eCA (e) on the outer surface, iCA (i) within the tissue, and CA within Symbiodinium (s, Sym). The tissue is homogenized and then centrifuged to remove Symbiodinium. The purified tissue homogenate is then assayed for CA activity using an 18O-removal assay. Key model terms affecting 18O-removal are indicated: kif,d, the diluted coral iCA CO2 hydration rate constant; ksf,d, the diluted coral eCA CO2 hydration rate constant; fc, the Symbiodinium CO2 mass transfer coefficient; kcf, the Symbiodinium CO2 hydration rate constant (see also Table 1). (B–D) Examples of 18O-CO2 data for each coral taxa (B: Orbicella faveolata, C: Porites astreoides, D: Siderastrea radians) showing background rates of 18O-removal prior to time zero, acceleration of 18O-removal upon addition of coral tissue homogenate at time zero (first dotted vertical line) and a slow down in the 18O-removal rate after addition of a CA inhibitor (acetazolamide, AZ) at 7–10 min (second dotted vertical line). The solid lines are fits to the data of the 18O-removal model used to determine coral iCA activity. The key in B indicates which symbols represent different CO2 isotopic species: 13C16O16O (blue circles), 13C18O16O (green circles), and 13C18O18O (red circles).
Determination of coral iCA activity using this approach first requires measurement of coral eCA activity and the algal iCA activity and mass transfer coefficients. The coral eCA activity was measured by an 18O-removal assay on intact coral fragments. These data are presented elsewhere (Tansik et al., in press) and the eCA activities are listed in Table 1. eCA activity varied substantially between taxa with O. faveolata having the highest eCA activity, approximately one order of magnitude greater than that of S. radians and P. astreoides. Algal iCA activity and mass transfer coefficients were measured using an 18O-removal assay on cells freshly isolated from coral tissue. Algal iCA activity also differed among taxa, although activities in all taxa were very high compared with those in other microalgae (Tu et al., 1986; Hopkinson et al., 2013). Symbiodinium from S. radians had the highest iCA activity, followed by those from P. astreoides, and then Symbiodinium from O. faveolata. CO2 and HCO3− mass transfer coefficients were similar among the taxa, and showed that the cell membranes are highly permeable to CO2 but impermeable to HCO3− like other microalgae (Table 1).
After obtaining coral eCA and algal parameters, coral iCA activity was determined from analysis of the effect of purified coral tissue homogenate on 18O-removal rates. The coral homogenate substantially accelerated the rate of 18O-removal (Fig. 2, Table 2). Addition of the CA inhibitor acetazolamide (AZ) slowed 18O-removal rates to background rates (or even slightly below background rates), verifying that CA activity was responsible for the acceleration (Table 2). Although the potency of AZ differs with CA isoform, the 100 μmol l−1 AZ added should be sufficient to fully inhibit most CA isoforms as typical inhibitory constants are <50 nmol l−1 (Moya et al., 2008). The fact that 18O-removal rates returned to background levels after addition of AZ confirms that CA activity was effectively inhibited for these corals. Analysis of these data using the 18O-removal model presented in Eqns 3–6 (see Materials and methods) shows that the model fits the data well for all taxa, allowing accurate determination of coral iCA activity. The coral iCA activity can either be normalized by the coral tissue volume to obtain a first-order rate constant, or normalized by coral surface area. The advantage of the first-order rate constant is that it is directly relevant to internal Ci fluxes, can be applied to models of Ci processing in corals and is intuitive. However, normalization by volume treats the iCA as being homogeneously distributed throughout the internal volume of the coral, which is not likely to be the case. When normalized to coral tissue volume, S. radians has approximately 10-fold higher iCA activity than both O. faveolata and P. astreoides (t-test, P<0.05), but the iCA activities of O. faveolata and P. astreoides are not significantly different from one another (Fig. 3).
18O-removal rates calculated as the slope of a linear fit through natural log-transformed 18O atom fraction data

Coral iCA activity normalized to coral tissue volume (kif) and to coral surface area (kif,a) and net photosynthetic rates (P) for each coral taxon. Error bars represent s.d.
In contrast, when normalized to coral surface area, O. faveolata and S. radians have similar iCA activity, while P. astreoides has approximately half the iCA activity of the other two species. However, only the difference between S. radians and P. astreoides is statistically significant (t-test, P<0.05). The overall range in coral iCA activity between taxa is lower when normalized to surface area (2.8×) than when normalized by volume (9×), and it is notable that photosynthetic rates per unit area are very similar among the coral species (Fig. 3).
Contribution of coral eCA and algal iCA to 18O-removal
Obtaining the coral iCA activity requires accounting for the effects of coral eCA and algal iCA on 18O-removal catalyzed by the purified tissue homogenate (see Materials and methods; supplementary material Fig. S1). The greater the contribution of these additional components to 18O-removal, the more difficult it is to accurately determine coral iCA activity. We assessed the effects of these additional components in two ways: first, graphically, showing how the 18O-removal model predicts that 18O-CO2 isotopologues would evolve as components are added, and second, by determining how neglecting the additional components in the model would affect inferred coral iCA activity.
We ran the 18O-removal model in a forward (predictive) sense first, considering how the 18O-CO2 isotopologues would evolve in the absence of any CA activity, and then sequentially adding the effects of algal iCA, coral eCA and coral iCA. Fig. 4 shows representative results for each taxon, but similar results were obtained for each sample within a taxon. The effect of residual Symbiodinium on 18O-removal was quite small in all taxa. Centrifugation removes more than 98% of the Symbiodinium cells from the crude homogenate, which is sufficient to effectively eliminate any interference for determination of coral iCA activity. In general, the effects of coral eCA were also small, though in O. faveolata, which had the highest eCA activity, coral eCA could have a substantial effect on 18O-removal. This analysis indicates that accounting for the effect of coral eCA activity is important, but that residual Symbiodinium contribute little to 18O-removal as long as the centrifugation is effective.
Contribution of CA components in the coral homogenate to total 18O-removal. The 18O-removal model was run in a predictive sense, sequentially adding components to the model (Sym, Symbiodinium iCA; eCA, coral eCA; iCA, coral iCA). A: O. faveolata, B: P. astreoides, C: S. radians.
To make a more quantitative assessment, we examined the effects of neglecting coral eCA and algal iCA on the inferred coral iCA activity. When these components are neglected in the model, their contribution to 18O-removal will be attributed to coral iCA activity, the unknown model parameter, increasing the inferred coral iCA activity. As shown in Fig. 5, neglecting algal iCA resulted in only minor increases in the inferred coral iCA activity (<7%), consistent with the graphical analysis showing that residual algal cells have negligible effects on 18O-removal. For P. astreoides and S. radians, neglecting coral eCA activity led to at most moderate increases in inferred coral iCA activity (<15%), but for O. faveolata the effects were much more significant, especially for one specimen that had low iCA activity.
Effect of neglecting contributions of Symbiodinium iCA and coral eCA on the determination of coral iCA activity. Data for three samples each of O. faveolata (Of), P. astreoides (Pa) and S. radians (Sr) are shown.
Ci processing model analysis
A one-dimensional model of coral Ci processing that includes active HCO3− transport, passive CO2 transport, CA-catalyzed interconversion of CO2 and HCO3−, photosynthesis and calcification was used to help interpret the measured iCA activities. Ci processing pathways in corals are still under study and are in some cases controversial. For example, electron microscopy of the tissue–skeleton interface suggests that there is little to no calcifying fluid (Clode and Marshall, 2002), but more sizable reservoirs of calcifying fluid have been detected as high pH regions in confocal microscopic imaging (Venn et al., 2011). The Ci pathways in the model were chosen from among proposed routes in a way that maximizes iCA requirements (using iCA in all the reactions shown in Fig. 1). The model is schematic and is used here only to assess the suitability of measured iCA activity to perform proposed functions and to explore iCA requirements. It is not a general mechanistic model of coral Ci processing. Most notably, the metabolic fluxes (photosynthesis, respiration, calcification, HCO3− transport) are specified based on measured rates or to achieve mass balance, rather than being determined mechanistically using enzyme kinetics.
First, the model was run with an iCA activity of 50 s−1, approximately what was measured in O. faveolata and P. astreoides, distributed homogeneously throughout the coral tissue layers and calcifying fluid (Fig. 6). This iCA activity was able to support rates of photosynthesis, calcification and respiration measured in O. faveolata, but in the case of calcification the iCA activity was only just sufficient. In the oral ectoderm, iCA catalyzes the conversion of newly imported and respired CO2 to HCO3−. Although CO2 concentrations in this layer are lower than in seawater, driving the CO2 influx, they are in fact above equilibrium concentrations with HCO3− because HCO3− concentrations are low as a result of active export to the underlying oral endoderm. The active transport of HCO3− across membranes would be mediated by transporters such as the SLC4-type HCO3− transporters recently identified in corals (Moya et al., 2012; Kenkel et al., 2013). In the oral endoderm, HCO3− is imported and converted to CO2 by iCA. The CO2 is then consumed by the Symbiodinium that reside in the oral endoderm layer, lowering CO2 concentrations below equilibrium values. CO2 and HCO3− are in equilibrium in the coelenteron where no metabolic processes occur. In the aboral tissue layer, respiration produces CO2, part of which is converted to HCO3− by CA and the remainder of which diffuses into the calcifying fluid where it is then converted to HCO3− by CA for use in calcification.
Results of the spatially resolved Ci processing model. iCA activity was homogeneously distributed throughout the tissue at the rates indicated (kcf). Photosynthetic and calcification rates were the same in the models with measured (50 s−1) and elevated (500 s−1) iCA activity but the calcification rate was reduced to 40% of the original rate in the model with lowered (5 s−1) iCA activity. Plots show (A) the CO2 concentration, (B) the HCO3− concentration and (C) CO2 deviations from equilibrium with HCO3− as a function of depth in the coral tissue. Background colors and abbreviations in A indicate the model layers: DBL, diffusive boundary layer; OEc, oral ectoderm; OEn, oral endoderm; Coel, coelenteron; Ab, aboral tissue; CF, calcifying fluid. The thickness of the calcifying fluid has been exaggerated (60×) in the plot for clarity.
Results of the spatially resolved Ci processing model. iCA activity was homogeneously distributed throughout the tissue at the rates indicated (kcf). Photosynthetic and calcification rates were the same in the models with measured (50 s−1) and elevated (500 s−1) iCA activity but the calcification rate was reduced to 40% of the original rate in the model with lowered (5 s−1) iCA activity. Plots show (A) the CO2 concentration, (B) the HCO3− concentration and (C) CO2 deviations from equilibrium with HCO3− as a function of depth in the coral tissue. Background colors and abbreviations in A indicate the model layers: DBL, diffusive boundary layer; OEc, oral ectoderm; OEn, oral endoderm; Coel, coelenteron; Ab, aboral tissue; CF, calcifying fluid. The thickness of the calcifying fluid has been exaggerated (60×) in the plot for clarity.
The iCA activity in the calcifying fluid was only just sufficient to support the measured rates of calcification for O. faveolata. This can be most clearly seen from the low HCO3− concentration in the calcifying fluid, indicating high rates of removal relative to input, and in the nearly 100% deviation of CO2 concentrations from equilibrium with HCO3− (Fig. 6C). Greater deviations from equilibrium (either positive or negative) indicate that maximal CO2 hydration or HCO3− dehydration fluxes are being reached because the maximal net fluxes occur when the product concentration (HCO3− for hydration, CO2 for dehydration) is zero. Consequently, the deviation of CO2 from equilibrium with HCO3− is used as an index of the effectiveness of the Ci processing system, with moderate deviation (<25%) being acceptable, but further deviation indicating the system is near its maximal capacity. We note that in our simplistic model, meant only to explore the role of iCA, there is no dependence of the calcification rate on HCO3− or CO32− concentrations. The low HCO3− and CO32− concentrations in this model would probably not provide a high enough aragonite saturation state to obtain the observed calcification rates (e.g. Burton and Walter, 1987).
Running the model with higher (500 s−1) and lower (5 s−1) iCA activities shows that the observed iCA activity is nearly optimal for supporting the required Ci fluxes and keeping CO2 and HCO3− concentrations close to equilibrium (Fig. 6). Decreasing iCA 10-fold leads to significant deviations of CO2 from equilibrium with HCO3− and the model is only able to support calcification at 40% of the observed rate. This results in a lower HCO3− concentration in the calcifying fluid compared with that in models with higher iCA activity. Increasing iCA 10-fold does lead to nearly complete equilibrium between CO2 and HCO3− throughout the coral, but there are no performance gains directly associated with this increase.
The Ci processing model was used to explore the effect of changes in photosynthetic rate and tissue thickness on required iCA activity. The model with a homogeneous iCA activity similar to that measured in the reef corals (50 s−1) and metabolic rates of O. faveolata was used as a reference point. First, the net photosynthetic rate was varied (with the respiration rate being set equal to the net photosynthetic rate) and the iCA activity was optimized to obtain the same average CO2 deviations in each tissue layer as in the base model. The average CO2 deviations are used here as a measure of the effectiveness of CA at supplying Ci for transport or metabolism. The required iCA activity scaled approximately linearly with the photosynthetic rate (Fig. 7A). Next, the tissue thickness was varied from the reference point (2 mm), keeping the metabolic rates per unit surface area constant, and the iCA activity was optimized to match CO2 deviations to the base model. The required iCA activity per unit volume increased rapidly as the tissue thickness decreased and conversely decreased as the tissue thickness increased (Fig. 7B). However, the iCA activity per unit surface area was nearly constant, increasing slightly with increasing tissue thickness.
Effect of photosynthetic rate and tissue thickness on iCA activity required to maintain constant CO2 deviations from equilibrium in the spatially resolved model of coral Ci processing. iCA activity is given normalized to coral tissue volume (kif) and to coral surface area (kif,a). (A) Photosynthetic rate, P; (B) tissue thickness, Lc. On the x-axes, the parameters are plotted relative to baseline values for photosynthetic rate (Pbase=1×10−6 mol cm−2 h−1) and tissue thickness (Lc,base=2 mm).
Effect of photosynthetic rate and tissue thickness on iCA activity required to maintain constant CO2 deviations from equilibrium in the spatially resolved model of coral Ci processing. iCA activity is given normalized to coral tissue volume (kif) and to coral surface area (kif,a). (A) Photosynthetic rate, P; (B) tissue thickness, Lc. On the x-axes, the parameters are plotted relative to baseline values for photosynthetic rate (Pbase=1×10−6 mol cm−2 h−1) and tissue thickness (Lc,base=2 mm).
DISCUSSION
CA is a widely distributed enzyme having many isoforms and diverse roles in organisms. It has long been recognized to be important in marine organisms, some of the earliest work being in mollusks (Freeman and Wilbur, 1948; Wilbur and Jodrey, 1955), and more recently its roles in corals and other cnidarians have been investigated (Bertucci et al., 2013). We have developed a method to determine the iCA activity of corals by measuring the acceleration of 18O-removal from labeled Ci catalyzed by purified coral tissue homogenate (Fig. 2, Table 2). iCA activity was measured in three species of Caribbean corals. We found that the two species that inhabit offshore reefs (O. faveolata, P. astreoides) had similar iCA activity when normalized to tissue volume, whereas a species from Florida Bay (S. radians) had ∼10-fold higher iCA activity (Fig. 3). In contrast, when normalized to coral surface area, O. faveolata and S. radians had similar iCA activities, while the iCA activity of P. astreoides was lower. Determination of coral iCA activity required removing contributions from residual Symbiodinum cells and coral eCA from the total CA activity of the purified coral tissue homogenate. Residual Symbiodinium cell numbers were always low and did not significantly affect determination of coral iCA activity (Figs 4, 5). In P. astreoides and S. radians, eCA activity was also not a major issue, but in O. faveolata, which had very high eCA activity, accounting for eCA activity was essential for accurate determination of coral iCA activity.
The coral iCA activity measurement includes all CAs in the cytoplasm, on internal membranes, in the coelenteron and in the calcifying fluid. Membrane-bound CAs have been localized near the symbiosome membrane presumably to facilitate Ci delivery to Symbiodinium (Weis, 1993; Al-Moghrabi et al., 1996), and could also be facing the coelentron, or attached to the calicoblastic cells to aid calcification (Moya et al., 2008). iCAs have also been identified within the cytoplasm of the oral and aboral tissue (Grasso et al., 2008; Bertucci et al., 2011), and within calicoblastic cells (Moya et al., 2008), but there are many more CAs in coral genomes that have yet to be localized.
As the iCA measurements required homogenizing the tissue, the measured iCA activity may not precisely match in vivo activity. This is always a concern with enzyme assays, but is somewhat less of an issue for CA because it does not require an energy source, though its activity can be regulated by cellular conditions such as redox status (Kikutani et al., 2012). The in vivo iCA activity provides complementary rate information to molecular work on coral CAs that has provided more detailed information about CA localization and hence the potential role of individual CA isoforms. While molecular approaches can provide quantitative information about CA activity, this is quite time consuming and difficult, requiring over-expression of active CA proteins followed by assessment of CA activity, and is only rarely done (Moya et al., 2008; Bertucci et al., 2011).
Measured iCA activity is sufficient to fulfill hypothesized roles
The net CO2 or HCO3− generation rate will depend on the CO2 and HCO3− concentrations and pH in the coral tissue, and the rates and net direction of the reaction will likely vary in different regions of the coral. Nonetheless, the gross generation rates put limits on the net generation rates.
Assuming the CO2 concentration in the coral is 10 μmol l−1, similar to seawater concentrations, the gross iCA-catalyzed HCO3− generation rate for O. faveolata would be 3.4×10−4 mol cm−2 h−1. This rate is many orders of magnitude higher than the net photosynthetic rate we measured for O. faveolata (5×10−7 mol cm−2 h−1), and as calcification rates are generally comparable to or less than the net photosynthetic rate, the gross HCO3− generation rate also greatly exceeds the calcification rate. Similarly, the gross HCO3− generation rates for P. astreoides and S. radians greatly exceed net photosynthetic rates. Thus, there is in principle sufficient iCA activity to convert CO2 imported for photosynthesis to HCO3− (Fig. 1, arrow 2), and to convert respired CO2 to HCO3− for calcification (Fig. 1, arrows 4 and 5). The gross CO2 generation rate, calculated assuming that the average internal pH is 7.4 (Venn et al., 2009,, 2011) and that the internal HCO3− concentration is 1.8 mmol l−1, similar to seawater, is 1.6×10−3 mol cm−2 h−1. Again, the gross CO2 production rate is orders of magnitude higher than the net photosynthetic rate, showing there is sufficient iCA activity to produce CO2 for uptake by symbiotic algae (Fig. 1, arrow 3). These gross production rates are of course maximal net production rates, and use estimates for internal CO2, HCO3− and H+ concentrations. But the fact that they are many orders of magnitude higher than the required net production rates suggests that there should be enough iCA capacity to fulfill any of these roles.
For a more detailed assessment, a spatially resolved model of Ci processing in the coral tissue was developed. Because Ci processing pathways have not been fully defined in corals, the model is necessarily schematic, and iCAs are used in as many roles as possible to maximize the need for iCA activity. The model was first run with an iCA activity similar to that measured in O. faveolata and P. astreoides (50 s−1) distributed homogeneously throughout the coral tissue. This iCA activity and distribution are sufficient to support realistic rates of photosynthesis and calcification in the model, though they are only just sufficient to support a realistic calcification rate (Fig. 6). The ability of the measured iCA activity to catalyze the multiple hydrations and dehydrations needed to move Ci from seawater to Symbiodinium and to the calcifying fluid is consistent with the simpler calculations showing that the potential CO2 and HCO3− generation rates from iCA greatly exceed those required for individual steps in the Ci processing pathways. The measured iCA activity is neither deficient nor greatly excessive as shown by model runs with 10-fold higher or lower iCA activity. Higher iCA activity (500 s−1) does not offer any direct benefit in the model, and the lower iCA activity (5 s−1) is only barely sufficient to meet the Ci requirements of photosynthesis and does not supply enough Ci to support measured rates of calcification.
The fact that a homogeneous distribution of iCA is capable of meeting Ci needs does not imply that iCA is or should be homogeneously distributed. The calcifying fluid and oral endoderm would benefit from greater CA activity as shown by the significant deviation of CO2 from equilibrium with HCO3− in these model layers (Fig. 6). The observed localization of CA in the calicoblastic cells and potentially in the calcifying fluid (Isa and Yamazato, 1984; Tambutte et al., 2007; Moya et al., 2008) may be particularly helpful as CaCO3 is being rapidly precipitated from a very thin layer of calcifying fluid (∼3 µm thick; Venn et al., 2011), necessitating high rates of CO2 conversion to HCO3− within a very small volume of fluid. It may also be detrimental to have CA activity in all parts of the tissue. For example, cyanobacteria lack CA in the cytoplasm, allowing them to accumulate HCO3−, and if CA is artificially expressed in the cytoplasm, HCO3− is rapidly converted to CO2, which leaks out of the cell (Price and Badger, 1989). Storage of HCO3− in a tissue layer or vacuole within the coral may require CA to be absent from that space.
Differences among species
Coral iCA activities were determined in three species of coral, O. faveolata and P. astreoides, which inhabit offshore reefs, S. radians, which is found in the shallow, soft-bottomed environment of Florida Bay. When normalized by tissue volume, the two reef species show similar iCA activity, while S. radians has about 10-fold higher iCA activity (Fig. 3). The slow circulation in the bay may limit the transfer of Ci between bulk seawater and the surface of S. radians, requiring increased iCA activity to help facilitate Ci acquisition. Lesser et al. (1994) showed that total CA activity of the coral Pocillopora damicornis increased when exposed to low flow in a controlled flume experiment. However, S. radians also has the thinnest effective tissue thickness (tissue volume per unit surface area; Table 1) of the corals surveyed and when coral iCA activity is instead normalized by surface area we find that S. radians and O. faveolata have similar iCA activities with P. astreoides having ∼50% lower iCA activity (Fig. 3).
As coral iCA is involved in Ci supply for photosynthesis and calcification, the similar rates of photosynthesis (and so presumably of calcification) per unit surface area for these corals would suggest that they need similar amounts of iCA on an areal basis, an intuition that we explored with the spatially resolved model of Ci processing. When photosynthetic rates were varied, the iCA activity required to maintain constant effectiveness of the Ci processing system in the model, as indicated by CO2 deviations from equilibrium, increased or decreased approximately linearly with the photosynthetic rate (Fig. 7A). Next, photosynthetic rates were kept constant, while coral tissue thickness was varied. The iCA activity per unit surface area required to maintain constant CO2 deviations from equilibrium remained essentially constant, though there was a slight increase in iCA activity per unit surface area as tissue thickness increased, a result of its role in facilitated diffusion of Ci through the tissue layers (Fig. 7B; Enns, 1967). In contrast, the iCA activity per unit volume must increase dramatically as the metabolic rates are squeezed into a thinner tissue layer and can decrease as the tissue expands. This analysis suggests that the primary reason iCA activity per unit volume is higher in S. radians is because of the thinner effective tissue thickness in this organism and not because of environmental differences, whereas the iCA activity per unit surface area is more similar among species because the metabolic processes iCAs are involved in are relatively constant on an areal basis.
In summary, we have developed a method to measure the absolute iCA activities of corals and have applied this method to three species of scleractinian corals found in the Florida Keys. A key advantage of these absolute measurements is that they allow us to assess the ability of measured iCA activity to fulfill proposed roles in photosynthesis and calcification. Using simple back of the envelope calculations and a more detailed spatially resolved model, we showed that the iCA activities are capable of sustaining the rapid rates of CO2/HCO3− interconversion required to deliver Ci for photosynthesis and calcification.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Coral collection and maintenance
Fragments of Orbicella (previously Montastraea) faveolata, Porites astreoides and Siderastrea radians were collected from Little Grecian reef and Florida Bay in Key Largo, FL, USA, in August of 2013 as permitted by the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS-2011-093, FKNMS-2014-015). Exposed skeleton was covered with modeling clay, and the colonies were maintained in closed circulation tanks filled with reef seawater, allowing at least 2 days of recovery after collection prior to experimentation. The tank was exposed to a natural light regime, with shading added at midday to keep solar irradiance below 600 μmol photons m−2 s−1. Coral surface area was measured using an aluminium foil method (Marsh, 1970). Coral tissue thickness was measured on freshly fragmented corals with an ocular micrometer on a stereomicroscope (Leica WILD M3Z, Wetzlar, Germany). The thickness varied between polyps and the coenosarc and multiple measurements across the colony were averaged to obtain an average tissue thickness (Lc) for each species (Table 1). The tissue of P. astreoides and S. radians is intermingled with the skeleton and the fractional occupancy of tissue (φ, porosity of the skeleton) was estimated from cross-sectional images of the fragmented coral colonies. The images were analyzed with ImageJ using color and brightness characteristics to segment the image between tissue and skeletal fractions. The effective tissue thickness, the thickness of the tissue if it was not intermingled with skeleton, was calculated as φLc. Algal symbiont clades as determined by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis of the ITS2 sequence were: O. faveolata – B1; P. astreoides – A4a; S. radians – B5 (LaJeunesse et al., 2003).
Coral eCA activity
eCA activity was measured on intact coral fragments using an 18O-removal technique described in Tansik et al. (in press). Briefly, a water-jacketed chamber is interfaced to a membrane inlet mass spectrometer (MIMS; QMS 220M2, Pfeiffer Vacuum, Asslar, Germany) that allows continuous monitoring of CO2 isotopes. The chamber is filled with Ci-free artificial seawater (ASW), buffered with 20 mmol l−1 Tris at pH 8.0, and 13C-18O-labeled Ci is added to the chamber. After monitoring 18O-removal for approximately 15 min to determine the background rate of removal, a coral fragment is added to the chamber and 18O-removal catalyzed by the coral is monitored for a further 10 min. Finally 100 μmol l−1 of the eCA inhibitor dextran-bound AZ is added to the chamber and 18O-removal is monitored for 10 min. The data are fitted to a model of 18O-removal that accounts for background removal rates, iCA activity and eCA activity, with the measurement of interest being eCA activity.
iCA activity and mass transfer coefficients of symbiotic algae
To measure the iCA activity and mass transfer coefficients of the symbiotic algae, the algae were first isolated from the coral. Coral tissue was removed from the skeleton with an airbrush (Paasche, Chicago, IL, USA) using ASW with 20 mmol l−1 Tris at pH 8.0 and containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (complete protease inhibitor cocktail mini tablets, 1 tablet per 20 ml). The algae were then separated from the coral homogenate by centrifugation at 2350 g for 5 min. iCA activity and the CO2 and HCO3− mass transfer coefficients were measured on the algae using an 18O-removal method described previously (Tu et al., 1978; Hopkinson et al., 2011). Absolute iCA activity was inferred by fitting a model that treats the interior of the cell as a single homogeneous compartment to the 18O-removal data. The mass transfer coefficients describe controls on the flux of CO2 and HCO3− into the cells, which is primarily controlled by the diffusive boundary layer and cell membrane permeability.
CA activity of the coral tissue homogenate
The CA activity of the coral tissue homogenate from which symbiotic algae had been removed (‘purified coral tissue homogenate’) was measured using an 18O-removal technique. 13C-18O-labeled Ci (2 mmol l−1) was added to assay buffer (Ci-free ASW, 20 mmol l−1 Tris at pH 8.0) in a small MIMS chamber that holds ∼1 ml of solution. Temperature in the chamber was maintained at 28°C with a water jacket. 18O-CO2 species were monitored with the MIMS system for approximately 10 min to determine the background rate of removal due to CO2 hydration/HCO3− dehydration. Then a sample of the purified homogenate was added to the chamber and the accelerated 18O-removal rate was monitored for approximately 10 min. In some cases a CA inhibitor, 10 μmol l−1 AZ, was then added to confirm that the accelerated 18O-removal rate was due to CA activity. A sample of the purified homogenate was preserved in formalin to determine the residual concentration of symbiotic algae in the sample via microscopy.
18O-removal model for coral iCA determination
Spatially resolved model of coral Ci processing
The first two terms describe the chemical reactions: hydration of CO2 and dehydration of HCO3−, while the third term describes diffusion, and the final two terms represent transport (T) and the metabolic reactions (M): photosynthesis, respiration and calcification. kf and kr are the first-order rate constants for CO2 hydration and HCO3− dehydration. Dc and Db are the diffusion coefficients for CO2 and HCO3−, respectively, and z is the thickness of the model layer. pH in each tissue layer was set as shown in supplementary material Fig. S1, based on literature values (Venn et al., 2009,, 2011; Ries, 2011) except that the pH in the oral tissue layers had to be elevated somewhat to achieve a net CO2 influx. HCO3− transport rates between the tissue layers were set to obtain steady-state concentrations in each layer, delivering Ci as needed for photosynthesis and calcification, and removing respired CO2 (supplementary material Fig. S1).
Rates of gross photosynthesis (1×10−6 mol cm−2 h−1), respiration (5×10−7 mol cm−2 h−1) and calcification (1.7×10−7 mol cm−2 h−1) measured for O. faveolata were used as base rates in the model. The model was designed to maximize the need for iCA, employing iCA in as many consistent roles as possible as shown in supplementary material Fig. S1: conversion of imported and respired CO2 to HCO3− in the oral ectoderm, conversion of HCO3− to CO2 for uptake by Symbiodinium in the oral endoderm, and conversion of respired CO2 to HCO3− in the aboral tissue and calcifying fluid. CO2 and HCO3− concentrations were set at typical seawater values at the outer edge of the diffusive boundary layer and the model was then run until a steady state was reached.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dustin Kemp and Clinton Oakley for assistance with coral collection and maintenance, and Virginia Weis for advice on measurement of carbonic anhydrase activity in corals. Permission to collect corals was granted by the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary.
Footnotes
Author contributions
B.M.H., A.L.T. and W.K.F. designed the project. A.L.T. conducted the experiments. B.M.H. developed and executed the models. B.M.H., A.L.T. and W.K.F. wrote the paper.
Funding
This work was supported by a National Science Foundation grant to B.M.H. and W.K.F. [EF1315944] and a Sloan Foundation Fellowship to B.M.H.
References
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing or financial interests.