SUMMARY
The metabolic consequences of cold exposure and exercise are not well characterized in birds. Ruff sandpipers Philomachus pugnax are migrant shorebirds traveling between Africa and Siberia for up to 30 000 km annually. Our goal was to quantify the fuel selection pattern of these remarkable athletes during shivering and terrestrial locomotion. We used indirect calorimetry and nitrogen excretion analysis to measure their rates of lipid, carbohydrate and protein oxidation at different temperatures (22, 15,10 or 5°C) and different treadmill speeds (15, 20, 25, 30, 35 or 40 m min–1). Results show that lipid oxidation supplies nearly all the energy necessary to support shivering and running, and that the pattern of oxidative fuel selection is independent of shivering or running intensity. During shivering, total ATP production is unequally shared between lipids(82%), carbohydrates (12%) and proteins (6%). During running, lipids remain the dominant substrate (66%), with carbohydrates (29%) and proteins (5%)playing more minor roles. The prevailing use of lipids during intense shivering and high-speed running is not consistent with the fuel selection pattern observed in exercising and cold-exposed mammals. The exact mechanisms allowing birds to use lipids at extremely high rates are still largely unexplored, and quantifying the relative importance of different fuels during long-distance flight remains a major challenge for future research.
Introduction
The metabolic consequences of cold exposure and exercise have been well characterized in mammals (Himms-Hagen,1996; Rowell and Shepherd,1996), but little information is available for birds(Bicudo et al., 2001; Butler, 1991; Hohtola et al., 1998; St-Laurent and Larochelle,1994), and the physiological changes caused by shivering and exercise are even less well understood for migrants(Jenni-Eiermann et al., 2002; Klaassen, 1996; Kvist et al., 2001; Piersma et al., 2003; Ramenofsky, 1990; Ward et al., 2002). Ruff sandpipers Philomachus pugnax are long-distance migrant shorebirds that fly from wintering areas in Africa to nesting grounds in Northeastern Siberia; this annual round trip can reach 30 000 km(Cramp and Simmons, 1983). These remarkable athletes have been able to extend the physiological limits of endurance capacity, but nothing is known of their pattern of metabolic fuel selection. Quantifying the relative contributions of the different fuels to total metabolism has proved very difficult, mainly because methods routinely used in mammalian research are not easily adaptable to birds.
Migration flights are energetically very demanding, but other activities than flying also offer significant physiological challenges. For instance,metabolic rate must be increased when low temperatures are encountered (during the night or at high altitude), or when the birds are rapidly building fat reserves and spend a lot of time running while feeding. In some species, leg muscles are even known to hypertrophy during stopovers(Piersma et al., 1999). Therefore, shivering thermogenesis and terrestrial locomotion are two ecologically relevant activities regularly performed by ruff sandpipers.
Acclimation to cold environments has been the subject of many bird studies(Ballantyne and George, 1978; Block, 1994). For acute cold exposure, however, most of the work has been carried out on juvenile birds,and it has been shown that they cannot thermoregulate(Østnes et al., 2001). As they age, shivering thermogenesis develops in leg and pectoral muscle, and the latter becomes a major site of heat production(Marjoniemi and Hohtola,1999), although few studies have determined which oxidative fuels are being used. One study provides indirect information on metabolic fuels during cold exposure, and reports respiratory exchange ratios (RER) of 0.70 and 0.77(RER=V̇CO2/V̇O2)in fasted and fed Arctic terns Sterna paradisaea, suggesting that lipid oxidation is dominant (Klaassen et al., 1989). However, the RER values given were not corrected for protein oxidation, and results from a single species exposed to two temperatures cannot be generalized. It is possible that the relative use of carbohydrates (CHO) for thermogenesis is higher in other species and at lower temperatures. For example, the use of glycogen as a thermogenic fuel during extreme cold exposure was investigated in the pectoral muscle of pigeons(Parker and George, 1975). The authors concluded that carbohydrates could become a significant fuel for heat production during high-intensity shivering.
Most of the information available on avian fuel metabolism during exercise is based on measurements of metabolite concentrations and total body composition in captive birds, or in wild animals caught at various stages of migration (Guglielmo et al.,2002; Jenni and Jenni-Eiermann, 1998; Jenni-Eiermann et al., 2002). All these studies have shown that birds can use lipids at very high rates, but they have not provided much information on carbohydrate metabolism, on individual birds (i.e. only groups of animals are compared), or on the time course of changes in fuel utilization (only start and end points have been measured). In a few cases, it has been possible to exercise birds in flying wheels (red junglefowl, Chappell et al.,1996; Hammond et al.,2000; house sparrow, Chappell et al., 1999) or in wind-tunnels (pigeon, Rothe et al., 1987; Rothe and Nachtigall, 1987;thrush nightingale, Klaassen et al.,2000; Lindström et al.,1999; European starling, Ward et al., 2001; barnacle and bar-headed geese, Ward et al., 2002; red knot, Jenni-Eiermann et al., 2002; Kvist et al., 2001). Changes in metabolite concentration reported in many of these studies are very useful,but they only provide an estimate of fuel utilization, and conclusions based on such measurements can be misleading (e.g. see Haman et al., 1997). In contrast, dynamic changes in substrate oxidation over time can be followed using indirect calorimetry, and this is the main reason it was selected for our experiments. Unfortunately, this method has rarely been applied to bird exercise studies in the past and the RER values reported have never been used to calculate fuel oxidation (Brackenbury and Vincent, 1988; Rothe et al., 1987; Ward et al., 2002, 2001). In this study, our goal was to quantify the rates of lipid, carbohydrate and protein oxidation in ruff sandpipers during cold exposure and terrestrial locomotion, using indirect calorimetry and nitrogen excretion measurements. Even though it is well established that long-distance flight is predominantly supported by lipid oxidation, the fuel selection patterns of running and shivering birds are not known. Information presently available shows that the neural and hormonal pathways regulating body temperature and thermogenesis are very different between birds and mammals (Hissa,1988). Therefore, we anticipated that fuel selection of birds and mammals would also be different. The experimental approach selected in our study has enabled characterization of how the duration and the intensity of running and cold exposure affect fuel metabolism.
Materials and methods
Animals
Adult European ruff sandpipers Philomachus pugnax L. were obtained from a captive colony (Dr David Lank, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby,British Columbia, Canada). The birds were kept indoors in a room allowing flight (2.1 m × 3.9 m × 2.4 m) with ad libitum access to food (Zeigler, Finfish Silver, Gardners, PA, USA; 42% protein; 10% lipid; 4%fiber) and water (67 cm × 42 cm × 11 cm deep water basin with ramp). The room had no windows and was only supplied with artificial light. Photoperiod (12 h:12 h L:D) and temperature (22°C) were kept constant. The animals were acclimated to these conditions for at least 2 months before starting experiments. Seven females and 3 males (mean mass ± s.e.m., 110±7 g) were used for the experiments. The physiological parameters reported in this study showed no gender differences,and therefore results for males and females were pooled. Average body masses for males and females were 166±6 g and 98±2 g, respectively, and were very similar to the values reported by Cramp and Simmons(1983) for wintering birds(December–February; 172 g for males and 99 g for females). Body mass is known to increase significantly before and during spring migration(March–April; 210 g for males and 132 g for females), and therefore our experiments were performed in lean ruffs that were not physiologically prepared for enhanced lipid oxidation associated with migration. All experiments were started 30 min after the animals had stopped having access to food.
Indirect calorimetry
For cold exposure, rates of oxygen consumption(V̇O2) and carbon dioxide production(V̇CO2) were measured using an Oxymax system (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH, USA)supplied with room air at 2–3 l min–1 as detailed previously (Weber and O'Connor,2000). For exercise, gas exchange was measured with Applied Electrochemistry analyzers (models S-3A/II and CD-3A; Pittsburgh, PA, USA),using an air flow rate of 2 l min–1. Small fans ensured that the air was continuously mixed in the measuring chambers. Air flow rate was controlled by a mass flow regulator accurate to within 1% of full scale and calibrated using a reference volume meter (Porter Instruments, Edgemont, PA,USA). Oxygen and CO2 concentrations were measured in the inflow and outflow air after removing water vapor through calcium sulphate columns(Drierite; W. A. Hammond, Xenia, OH, USA). New calcium sulfate was always exposed to air for 5 min before use to avoid CO2 absorption during measurements. All analyzers were calibrated with known gas mixtures before and after each experiment. V̇O2 and V̇CO2 were corrected for dry gas under standard temperature and pressure conditions(stpd). Both experimental systems were accurate to within±3% after bleeding known amounts of CO2 or N2, or within ±2% by burning 99% ethanol in the respirometers. The method of indirect calorimetry was selected for these experiments because it is non-lethal, non-invasive, and allows us to measure changes in the rates of metabolic fuel utilization in individual animals over time (i.e. rates of carbohydrate and lipid oxidation after correcting for protein oxidation,itself estimated by measuring the rate of nitrogen excretion). These advantages are not provided by alternative methods commonly used in this field(i.e. changes in blood or tissue metabolite concentrations, or whole body composition analyses).
Cold exposure experiments
Shivering experiments were carried out in a closed respirometer (38 cm× 26 cm × 21 cm) connected to a cooling bath (PolyScience, Niles,IL, USA) containing Canadian windshield washer fluid. The refrigerated fluid was recirculated within the respirometer walls. All the cold exposure measurements were started between 9:00 and 11:00 h, and no food or water was available in the respirometer. While shivering, the birds stood quietly in place. No walking or jumping was observed. A piece of perforated Plexiglas covered the respirometer floor to protect the animal's feet. Before collecting data, each bird was placed in the respirometer for 5 h at 22°C on two separate occasions to familiarize it with the experimental set-up. After familiarization, each animal was measured at four temperatures in random order(22, 15, 10 and 5°C) with a minimum of 3 days between measurements. Each experiment included a 60 min baseline period at 22°C, a transition period of 30–60 min to reach the test temperature, and a 3 h period at the test temperature. Ambient respirometer temperature was recorded every 5 min.
Exercise experiments
The metabolism of running birds was quantified on a motorized treadmill enclosed in an acrylic respirometer (50 cm × 28 cm × 14 cm) at an incline of 8% (modified Simplex II, rat treadmill respirometer from Columbus Instruments). This incline was selected to reach as high a metabolic rate as possible without wing flapping. The animals were familiarized with the experimental set-up by running at different speeds for at least three practice sessions of 15–30 min. Baseline gas exchange values (speed 0) were obtained by leaving each animal quietly in the respirometer for 60 min in the dark. The last 10 min of this resting period were used to quantify pre-exercise V̇O2and V̇CO2. In each exercise session, two different running speeds were monitored until steady gas exchange values were reached (i.e. when the coefficient of variation remained<10% for at least 10 min). Each bird was measured at speeds of 15, 20, 25,30, 35 and 40 m min–1. The order of speeds tested was randomized and successive sessions for the same animal were separated by at least 24 h.
Nitrogen excretion
The rate of nitrogen excretion was measured by collecting excreta for 6 h in eight fasting individuals kept at 22°C, and by quantifying the concentrations of uric acid (Marquardt,1983) and urea (Kit 640-A; Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA). A mean value of 0.534±0.056 mg N min–1 kg–1 body mass (N=8) was measured and used for all birds in our calculations. Therefore, we have assumed that the rate of protein oxidation was not affected significantly by cold exposure or running.
Calculations and statistical analyses
Percentages were transformed to the arcsine of their square root before analysis. For cold exposure, mean V̇O2, V̇CO2, RER and percentages were compared using one- or two-way, repeated-measures analyses of variance (ANOVA). For running data, one-way ANOVA was used because sample size differed between speeds. For each bird, the cost of transport was measured and compared to values calculated from allometric equations for shorebirds only(Bruinzeel et al., 1999) or for birds in general (Taylor et al.,1982). Mean observed and predicted values were compared using a one-way ANOVA. Comparisons between test and control means were performed using Bonferroni's adjustment. Decisional threshold was set at P<0.05 and all the values presented are means ± s.e.m.
Results
Cold exposure experiments
Changes in environmental temperature, metabolic rate(V̇O2) and RER during cold exposure are presented in Fig. 1. After a progressive decrease from baseline temperature of 22°C, the animals were kept under constant cold conditions for 3 h at 15,10 or 5°C (Fig. 1A). While standing quietly at 22°C, metabolic rate was 46.1±1.0 ml O2 min–1 kg–1 body mass. When temperature was decreased, metabolic rate increased proportionately with the intensity of cold exposure, and reached a maximum of 81.6±9.1 ml O2 min–1 kg–1 body mass after 80 min at the lowest test temperature of 5°C(Fig. 1B). RER was not significantly different between temperatures (P>0.05), and therefore values for all treatments were pooled for this parameter(Fig. 1C). RER did not change from the mean baseline value of 0.756±0.003 over time(P>0.05). However, when the effect of time was tested separately for each temperature, RER was temporarily elevated from baseline levels between 25 and 30 min in the 5°C group (P<0.05).
Changes in the rates of carbohydrate and lipid oxidation (CHOoxand FATox) during cold exposure are presented in Fig. 2. At all times,FATox was more than 3.2-fold higher than CHOox (the average ratio of FATox/CHOox was 5.6). Overall,CHOox was higher at 5°C than at all other temperatures(P<0.05). Cold exposure had no effect on CHOox over time (P>0.05), except between 45 and 75 min at 5°C, when it was higher than baseline (P<0.05). FATox was increased in proportion with the intensity of cold exposure. All treatment temperatures were significantly different from each other (P<0.001), and each treatment showed a significant increase in FATox over time, except for the control group kept at 22°C (P<0.001 for 5, 10 and 15°C; P>0.05 for control). Regression analysis shows that the slope of the relationship between FATox and V̇O2 is very different from 0 (slope=0.841; r2=0.920; P<0.001). The relationship between CHOox and V̇O2 is also significant, but the slope is much shallower than for FATox(slope=0.174; r2=0.338; P<0.01).
All the parameters measured in the cold exposure experiments reached steady-state values (see Fig. 1B), and are summarized in Table 1. These values were calculated by averaging measurements over the last 25 min at each temperature,and they are presented for gas exchange(V̇O2, V̇CO2 and RER) and fuel utilization (CHOox and FATox). Steady-state values were progressively higher for V̇O2, V̇CO2 and FATox as cold exposure intensified. However, RER and CHOox were not affected by temperature(Table 1).
. | Temperature (°C) . | . | . | . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | 22 (Control) . | 15 . | 10 . | 5 . | |||
V̇O2 (ml min-1 kg-1 body mass) | 42.9±1.3a | 52.7±2.1a,b | 61.4±2.4b,c | 74.0±7.0c | |||
V̇CO2 (ml min-1 kg-1 body mass) | 32.1±1.2a | 38.8±1.4a,b | 45.6±1.7b,c | 54.9±5.7c | |||
RER | 0.747±0.005a | 0.737±0.005a | 0.742±0.008a | 0.739±0.008a | |||
CHOox (ml O2 min-1 kg-1 body mass) | 5.9±0.8a | 5.2±0.8a | 7.2±1.7a | 8.7±3.0a | |||
FATox (ml O2 min-1 kg-1 body mass) | 33.8±0.7a | 44.3±2.6a,b | 51.1±3.1b,c | 62.1±4.6c |
. | Temperature (°C) . | . | . | . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | 22 (Control) . | 15 . | 10 . | 5 . | |||
V̇O2 (ml min-1 kg-1 body mass) | 42.9±1.3a | 52.7±2.1a,b | 61.4±2.4b,c | 74.0±7.0c | |||
V̇CO2 (ml min-1 kg-1 body mass) | 32.1±1.2a | 38.8±1.4a,b | 45.6±1.7b,c | 54.9±5.7c | |||
RER | 0.747±0.005a | 0.737±0.005a | 0.742±0.008a | 0.739±0.008a | |||
CHOox (ml O2 min-1 kg-1 body mass) | 5.9±0.8a | 5.2±0.8a | 7.2±1.7a | 8.7±3.0a | |||
FATox (ml O2 min-1 kg-1 body mass) | 33.8±0.7a | 44.3±2.6a,b | 51.1±3.1b,c | 62.1±4.6c |
V̇O2, rate of oxygen consumption; V̇CO2, rate of carbon dioxide production; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; CHOox,carbohydrate oxidation; FATox, lipid oxidation.
Values are means ± s.e.m. (N=6). Values not sharing a common superscript letter are significantly different(P<0.05).
Exercise experiments
Oxygen consumption and RER of birds running at various speeds are shown in Fig. 3. Baseline values for animals resting on the treadmill at 22°C were 51.7± 4.0 ml min–1 kg–1 body mass for V̇O2 and 0.761±0.008 for RER (N=11). These resting rates were not different from baseline values measured in the cold exposure experiments(P>0.05; Fig. 1). V̇O2 increased progressively with running speed (P<0.05; Fig. 3A), and the highest exercise V̇O2 of 78.9±3.5 ml O2 min–1 kg–1body mass was measured at a speed of 35 m min–1. RER was elevated from baseline at low and intermediate speeds (P<0.05 at 15, 30 m min–1; P<0.001 at 25 m min–1), but it was not different from baseline at the two highest speeds (P>0.05; Fig. 3B). The slope of the regression line for RER vs speed was not different from zero (P>0.05).
Fig. 4 shows CHOox and FATox as a function of speed. At all times,FATox was more than 1.6-fold higher than CHOox (the average ratio of FATox/CHOox was 2.5). Baseline CHOox in animals resting on the treadmill was 9.07± 1.28 ml O2 min–1 kg–1 body mass. The slope of the regression line for the CHOoxvs running speed was not different from zero (P>0.05). In contrast,FATox increased progressively as speed increased (slope of regression line higher than zero; P<0.01).
Fig. 5 shows the relationship between the energy cost of locomotion per unit time(Emetab) and running speed. Mean resting rate of energy expenditure was 2.21±0.23 J s–1 (speed=0), and the slope of the linear regression between Emetab and speed was different from 0 (P<0.01). The slope of this relationship, or cost of transport (energy cost per unit distance) for running ruff sandpipers was 1.29 J m–1. This value is significantly lower than predicted from the allometric equation for birds in general (2.49 J m–1; P<0.01; Taylor et al., 1982). However,it is not different from the value predicted from the allometric equation specifically derived for shorebirds (1.68 J m–1; P>0.05; Bruinzeel et al.,1999).
Fuel selection during cold exposure and exercise
The relative contributions of carbohydrate, lipid and protein oxidation to V̇O2 during cold exposure and running are summarized in Fig. 6. In the cold exposure experiments(Fig. 6A), lipid oxidation accounted for more than 80% of V̇O2, the same value observed in the control animals held at 22°C. Protein oxidation(4–7%) and carbohydrate oxidation (10–14%) had much lower relative contributions. The importance of carbohydrates and lipids did not vary between temperatures (P>0.05), but the percentage contribution of proteins decreased with temperature (P<0.001).
In the exercise experiments (Fig. 6B), lipid oxidation contributed 75% of V̇O2 at speed 0. This contribution was lower at 15, 25 and 30 m min–1(58–62%; P<0.05) but did not differ from the resting value at the other speeds measured (65–72%; P>0.05). Exercise caused an increase in relative carbohydrate oxidation above resting levels(P<0.001), but only at the lower running speeds (15–30 m min–1). The relative contribution of protein oxidation to V̇O2 was decreased during exercise compared to rest (P<0.001).
Discussion
Our goal was to quantify the pattern of oxidative fuel utilization of a long-distance migrant shorebird during cold exposure and running. Results show that shivering thermogenesis and land locomotion of ruff sandpipers are predominantly supported by lipid oxidation. The large lipid reserves of this endurance athlete provide most of the energy for heat generation and running,even at the lowest temperature and at the highest exercise intensity tested in our experiments.
Cold exposure
The metabolic rate of ruff sandpipers is stimulated in proportion with the intensity of cold exposure (Fig. 1B) and lipids are responsible for fueling shivering thermogenesis(except for a minor, transient contribution from carbohydrates; see Figs 2, 6A, and Table 1). This conclusion is further supported by the observation that the slope of the regression line between FATox and V̇O2 is much higher than for CHOoxvs V̇O2 (0.841 and 0.174,respectively). This study is the first to quantify the use of oxidative fuels for heat production in an avian species exposed to cold. It shows that the relative use of lipids and carbohydrates is not affected by shivering, and is therefore independent of environmental temperature(Fig. 6A). More than 80% of V̇O2 is accounted for by lipid oxidation at all temperatures, even during intense shivering at 5°C. At the highest FAT measured here (∼62 ml O2min–1 kg–1 body mass), and assuming that the same pattern of fuel utilization is maintained, we can calculate that a 110 g ruff sandpiper with lipid reserves of 20% body mass (or half the maximal value observed just before migration; Van Rhijn,1991) could shiver continuously for 4.5 days.
How does this fuel selection pattern compare with what has been observed in other cold-exposed endotherms? In the absence of information on birds, we looked for shivering studies on mammals of similar size (and surface to volume ratio) as our sandpipers, but without much success. Using arterio–venous differences in substrate concentrations, the only study we were able to find reports that lipid oxidation accounts for more than 90% of V̇O2 in cold-exposed rats (Adán et al.,1995). However, comparing these results with ours is not appropriate because the rats were acclimated to 22°C and kept in individual cages. Under such housing conditions, rats are known to produce significant amounts of brown adipose tissue, because they are well below their thermoneutral zone (29–31°C for Wistar rats; Romanovski et al., 2002) and cannot use social thermoregulation. Therefore, heat production from brown adipose tissue may explain the high FATox reported for rats by Adán et al. (1995),whereas the presence of this specialized thermogenic tissue has never been demonstrated in birds (Saarela et al.,1991). In addition, we have recently carried out experiments on group-housed rats acclimated to 28°C, to eliminate the thermogenic contribution of brown adipose tissue. Under these conditions, lipids were responsible for 52%V̇O2 and carbohydrates for 37%V̇O2 during prolonged exposure to 5°C (E. Vaillancourt, F. Haman and J.-M. Weber,unpublished).
Surprisingly, the only other mammal whose fuel metabolism has been well characterized during shivering is the adult human. In this experimental model,it was established that lipids play a much less important role than observed in ruff sandpipers. For cold exposure conditions eliciting a twofold increase in metabolic rate, lipid oxidation is responsible for 50% of V̇O2 in humans(Haman et al., 2002). The exact reasons for these discrepancies are unknown, but may be due to differences in the fiber composition of shivering muscles. In humans, it has been shown recently that CHOox for thermogenesis depends on the specific recruitment of type II, fast glycolytic fibers, responsible for`burst shivering' (Haman et al.,2004). In long-distance migrant birds, large pectoral muscles produce most of the heat, and the metabolic machinery of their fibers is specifically geared for lipid oxidation. Therefore, the high metabolic capacity of flight muscles for fat catabolism could explain why, on their own,lipids account for over 80% of V̇O2 in cold-exposed ruffs. This high capacity for lipid oxidation and the large lipid reserves available in migrant birds mean that carbohydrates and proteins only play minimal roles during shivering, each accounting for less than 14% of V̇O2. Taken together, these results show that lipids probably play a much more prominent role for shivering thermogenesis in migrant birds than in mammals.
At the lowest temperature tested in our study, metabolic rate appeared to fluctuate with a period of ∼90 min(Fig. 1B) and this pattern may be related to a well-known heat-saving strategy previously observed in birds. Similar cyclic variation in V̇O2 and leg temperature has been observed in cold-exposed pigeons; these changes are caused by vasoconstriction/vasodilation cycles of the leg geared to decrease heat loss from this uninsulated region of the body. Interestingly, pigeons exposed to a lower temperature than tested here (–10°C) showed a shorter period of only 20 min(Østnes and Bech,1998). Further research is needed to establish whether this energy-saving strategy is found in all birds or only in species regularly exposed to cold conditions.
Exercise
As experimental models, long-distance migrant birds provide a unique vantage point to study the extreme performance of metabolic systems during exercise. Unfortunately, making physiological measurements during migration or simulating prolonged flight in the laboratory are extremely difficult and rarely attempted. As a compromise, and because little in vivoinformation is presently available on avian exercise, we reasoned that investigating land locomotion would be an important first step towards a better understanding of fuel metabolism in exercising migrants. However, it is clear that running does not simulate migration because leg and flight muscles are different, and maximal metabolic rates achievable during running are low compared to flight.
Indirect calorimetry measurements in running or flying birds have only been performed in a few studies that report V̇O2 and V̇CO2 (or RER),but these parameters have never been used to determine oxidation rates of metabolic fuels (Brackenbury and Vincent,1988; Rothe et al.,1987; Suarez et al.,1990; Tucker,1968; Vincent and Brackenbury,1988; Ward et al., 2002, 2001). In the present study,we have quantified V̇O2, V̇CO2 and nitrogen excretion to calculate absolute rates of fat, carbohydrate and protein oxidation as well as the relative contribution of each fuel to V̇O2 during running (Figs 3, 4 and 6B). Results show that, as for cold exposure, lipids play a dominant role in energy metabolism during running(Fig. 6B). When exercise intensity is increased, FATox is augmented whereas CHOoxremains independent of running speed (Fig. 4). The overall fuel selection pattern of exercising ruff sandpipers stays relatively constant across speeds, with lipids providing more energy than all other fuels combined (58–72%V̇O2) and carbohydrates being responsible for about half the contribution of lipids(24–38%V̇O2; Fig. 6B). The increased reliance on carbohydrates associated with higher running speeds commonly observed in mammals does not occur in birds, showing that the fuel selection patterns of exercising birds and mammals are different. Even though lipids are well known to provide most of the energy for sustained flying in long-distance migrant birds (Guglielmo et al.,2002; Jenni and Jenni-Eiermann, 1998, 2002), the present study is the first to investigate running, and to provide detailed information about the use of all oxidative fuels under controlled exercise conditions of different intensities.
For comparison, we have calculated FATox and CHOoxfrom published bird exercise studies reporting V̇O2 and V̇CO2 values, but without correcting for protein oxidation (because rates of nitrogen excretion are not available). The only two treadmill studies we could find show that CHO oxidation accounts for >80% of V̇O2 in running chickens (Brackenbury and Vincent,1988; Vincent and Brackenbury,1988). The divergent fuel selection patterns observed in highly aerobic ruff sandpipers and sedentary, domesticated chickens can probably be explained by differences in the fiber composition of leg muscles (and associated enzymatic machinery), a parameter known to vary with species, age and gender (Guglielmo et al.,2002; Olson,2001). From studies on flying birds, we calculated that lipid oxidation accounts for >65% of V̇O2 (budgerigar, Tucker, 1968; pigeon, Rothe et al., 1987; European starling, Ward et al., 2001;barnacle and bar-headed goose, Ward et al., 2002), except for hovering hummingbirds that can temporarily rely entirely on carbohydrates while feeding on nectar(Suarez et al., 1990). Migrant birds must clearly rely predominantly on lipids during non-stop, long-distance flights because alternative fuels are only stored in very small quantities,and would therefore be rapidly depleted.
Land locomotion is particularly important for long-distance migrant shorebirds because it allows them to replenish energy reserves rapidly during short stopovers. Strong selection pressure for decreasing the cost of walking and running may therefore be responsible for the very low cost of transport(energy cost per unit distance) observed here in ruff sandpipers. This cost is 48% lower than predicted from the allometric equation established for birds in general (Taylor et al., 1982),but it is not different from the value predicted from the allometric equation for shorebirds only (Bruinzeel et al.,1999). This observation suggests that economical running is not an exclusive attribute of migrants, but that it is a common feature of all shorebirds, possibly related to their particular leg morphology.
Conclusions
The energy necessary to support shivering and running in ruff sandpipers is provided almost exclusively by the oxidation of lipid reserves. Their pattern of oxidative fuel selection does not depend on shivering or running intensity. During shivering, total ATP production is unequally shared between lipids(82%), CHO (12%) and proteins (6%). During land locomotion, lipids remain the dominant substrate (66%), with CHO (29%) and proteins (5%) playing more minor roles. The prevailing use of lipids during intense shivering and high-speed running is not consistent with the fuel selection pattern observed in exercising and cold-exposed mammals. Long-distance flying is well known to be supported primarily through lipid oxidation and this study shows that the same source of fuel is also dominant during other activities like intense running and shivering. The exact mechanisms allowing birds to use lipids at extremely high rates are still largely unexplored, and quantifying the exact importance of proteins and carbohydrates during long-distance flight remains a major challenge for future research.
Acknowledgements
This work would not have been possible without help from David Lank (Simon Fraser University) who provided essential advice and the animals used in this study. The research was supported by an NSERC discovery grant to J.-M.W.