Bucking, C. and Wood, C. M. (2005). Renal regulation of plasma glucose in the freshwater rainbow trout. J. Exp. Biol.208,2731-2739.

In the online version of this paper, the regression equations reported in the captions of Figs 3 and 4 (p. 2736) are incorrect. The correct captions, together with the original figures, are shown below.

Fig. 3.

Glucose reabsorption (μmol kg–1 h–1) vs Na+ reabsorption (μmol kg–1h–1) in fish infused with glucose-only or phlorizin and glucose together. * indicates significantly different (P<0.05)regression line slopes. Points are values for individual fish at different times, not mean values. Regression equations: for glucose only group, y=0.200x–35.471 (r2=0.8489) and for glucose + phlorizin treated group, y=0.031x+58.047(r2=0.018).

Fig. 3.

Glucose reabsorption (μmol kg–1 h–1) vs Na+ reabsorption (μmol kg–1h–1) in fish infused with glucose-only or phlorizin and glucose together. * indicates significantly different (P<0.05)regression line slopes. Points are values for individual fish at different times, not mean values. Regression equations: for glucose only group, y=0.200x–35.471 (r2=0.8489) and for glucose + phlorizin treated group, y=0.031x+58.047(r2=0.018).

Fig. 4.

Glucose filtration (μmol kg–1 h–1) vs glucose reabsorption (μmol kg–1h–1) in fish infused with glucose-only or phlorizin and glucose together. Points are values for individual fish at different times,not mean values. See text for details. Regression equations: for glucose only group, y=162.01–[171/(1+0.00004x)227.7](r2=0.9657) and for glucose + phlorizin treated group, y=0.29x+22.586 (r2=0.2584).

Fig. 4.

Glucose filtration (μmol kg–1 h–1) vs glucose reabsorption (μmol kg–1h–1) in fish infused with glucose-only or phlorizin and glucose together. Points are values for individual fish at different times,not mean values. See text for details. Regression equations: for glucose only group, y=162.01–[171/(1+0.00004x)227.7](r2=0.9657) and for glucose + phlorizin treated group, y=0.29x+22.586 (r2=0.2584).

The print version of the article is unaffected by this error.

The authors apologise to readers for any inconvenience this may have caused.