The larva of the tiger beetle Cicindela chinensis is an ambushing hunter with a body length of 15–22 mm that lives in a tunnel in the ground. It ambushes prey, keeping its head horizontal at the opening of the tunnel. When prey approaches the tunnel, the larva jumps to snap at it. When an object moves beyond its jumping range (approximately 15 mm), however, the larva quickly withdraws deep into the tunnel. These responses are mediated by two of six pairs of stemmata. How does the larva judge the hunting range using such a simple visual system? A previous study suggested that both binocular and monocular vision are used for distance estimation. Range estimation by binocular vision was further confirmed in the present behavioural observations: larvae jumped towards objects beyond the normal hunting range when virtual images of such distant objects were formed close to the larva using prisms or a narrow window. A possible mechanism involved in range estimation by monocular vision was also examined in behavioural experiments. The depth of the image in the retina appears to play a role in distance estimation because a larva with one functional stemma, the other stemmata being occluded, changed its response to a very distant object from an escape to a predatory jump when a concave lens was placed above its head. Two alternative ideas, based on optical and morphological data, are proposed to explain this behavioural change by the one-stemma larvae. First, as for myopic people, the larva might see clearly only objects that are close. Second, an infinitely distant object might produce a focused image only on the central part of the retina, whereas an object within hunting range (<15 mm) might do so on surrounding regions of the retina. The latter idea implies that the region of the retina at which the larva perceives a clear image is concerned with which type of behaviour is released, a predatory jump or an escape. We conclude that visual information about hunting range in the tiger beetle larva is extracted both peripherally by the spatial pattern of image clarity and centrally by binocular vision.

Egelhaaf
M.
(
1985
).
On the neuronal basis of figure—ground discrimination by relative motion in visual system of the fly.
Biol. Cybernetics
52
,
123
–.
Horridge
G. A.
(
1986
).
A theory of insect vision: velocity parallax.
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B
229
,
13
–.
Mizutani
A.
,
Toh
Y.
(
1995
).
Optical and physiological properties of the larval visual system of the tiger beetle, Cicindela chinensis.
J. Comp. Physiol
178
,
591
–.
Mizutani
A.
,
Toh
Y.
(
1998
).
Behavioral analysis of two distinctY. TOHANDJ.-Y. OKAMURAFig.11. Visual fields from binocular and monocular vision for a larva with its head 2mm below the opening of its tunnel. If an object 5mm in height approaches the tunnel opening, the larva sees it using monocular vision only, for the range between the two vertical lines.Monocular vision vision Bi nocular625 Role of vision in responses of tiger beetle larvae to moving objects visual responses in the larva of the tiger beetle (Cicindela chinensis).
J. Comp. Physiol
182
,
277
–.
Rossel
S.
(
1983
).
Binocular stereopsis in an insect.
Nature
302
,
821
–.
Rossel
S.
(
1986
).
Binocular spatial localization in praying mantis.
J. Exp. Biol
120
,
265
–.
Toh
Y.
,
Mizutani
A.
(
1994
).
Structure of the visual system of the larva of the tiger beetle (Cicindela chinensis).
Cell Tissue Res
278
,
125
–.
Toh
Y.
,
Mizutani
A.
(
1994
).
Neural organization of the lamina neuropil of the larva of the tiger beetle (Cicindela chinensis).
Cell Tissue Res
278
,
135
–.
Wallace
G. K.
(
1959
).
Visual scanning in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria Forskål.
J. Exp. Biol
36
,
512
–.
This content is only available via PDF.