The mechanics of avian take-off are central to hypotheses about flight evolution, but have not been quantified in terms of whole-body movements for any species. In this study, I use a combination of high-speed video analysis and force plate recording to measure the kinematics and mechanics of ground take-off in the European starling Sturnis vulgaris and the European migratory quail Coturnix coturnix. Counter to hypotheses based on the habits and morphology of each species, S. vulgaris and C. coturnix both produce 80–90 % of the velocity of take-off with the hindlimbs. S. vulgaris performs a countermovement jump (peak vertical force four times body weight) followed by wing movement, while C. coturnix performs a squat jump (peak vertical force 7.8 times body weight) with simultaneous wing movement. The wings, while necessary for continuing the movement initiated by the hindlimbs and thereafter supporting the body weight, are not the primary take-off accelerator. Comparison with one other avian species in which take-off kinematics have been recorded (Columba livia) suggests that this could be a common pattern for living birds. Given these data and the fact that running take-offs such as those suggested for an evolving proto-flier are limited to large or highly specialized living taxa, a jumping model of take-off is proposed as a more logical starting point for the evolution of avian powered flight.
Skip Nav Destination
JOURNAL ARTICLE| 15 February 2000
Kinematics and mechanics of ground take-off in the starling Sturnis vulgaris and the quail Coturnix coturnix
Online Issn: 1477-9145
Print Issn: 0022-0949
© 2000 by Company of Biologists
J Exp Biol (2000) 203 (4): 725–739.
- Views Icon Views
- PDF LinkPDF
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
K.D. Earls; Kinematics and mechanics of ground take-off in the starling Sturnis vulgaris and the quail Coturnix coturnix. J Exp Biol 15 February 2000; 203 (4): 725–739. doi: https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.203.4.725
Download citation file: