Mantispids (Mantispa styriaca) are predatory insects; on bright sunny days, they wait in ambush for insect prey. The prey is captured as soon as it is within reach by means of lightning-speed strikes with the powerful forelegs. The strikes can take less than 60 ms. The mantispid accomplishes this almost as effectively as the larger praying mantis, which occupies a similar habitat, even though the praying mantis has apposition eyes with a high-resolution fovea, whereas the mantispid has unspecialized optical superposition eyes. Mantispa styriaca reacts to an item of prey when the latter covers a critical visual angle. The detection of prey immediately triggers adjustment reactions in the mantispid, which attempts to position the prey item in the visual field of both eyes and in the capture zone. Irrespective of the size of the prey, the capture reaction of the mantispid is always triggered if the distance to the prey falls below a certain critical value. As indicated by the analysis of individual video frames, immediately before an aimed strike, the item of prey is always positioned exactly in the centre of the binocular field of vision in the extended midsagittal plane of the mantispid's head. The strike may be triggered by the ommatidia of the left and right eyes, the lines of sight of which converge precisely on this region. The principal conclusion to be drawn is that the prey-capture behaviour of the mantispid appears to be based on a triangulation mechanism.

Bauer
T.
(
1985
).
Different adaptation to visual hunting in three ground beetle species of the same genus
.
J. Insect Physiol
31
,
593
–.
Betz
O.
(
1998
).
Comparative studies of the predatory behaviour of Stenus spp. (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae): the significance of its specialized labial apparatus
.
J. Zool.,. Lond
244
,
527
–.
Burkhardt
D.
,
Darnhofer-Demar
B.
,
Fischer
K.
(
1973
).
Zum binokularen Entfernungssehen bei Insekten. I. Die Struktur des Sehraumes von Insekten
.
J. Comp. Physiol
87
,
165
–.
Collett
T. S.
,
Land
M. F.
(
1975
).
Visual control of flight behaviour in the hoverfly, Syritta pipiens L
.
J. Comp. Physiol
99
,
1
–.
Corrette
B. J.
(
1990
).
Prey capture in the praying mantis Tenodera aridifolia sinensis: coordination of the capture sequence and strike movements
.
J. Exp. Biol
148
,
147
–.
Devetak
D.
,
Amon
T.
(
1997
).
Substrate vibration sensitivity of the leg scolopidial organs in the green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea
.
J. Insect Physiol
43
,
433
–.
Eggenreich
U.
,
Kral
K.
(
1990
).
External design and field of view of the compound eyes in a raptorial neuropteran insect, Mantispa styriaca
.
J. Exp. Biol
148
,
353
–.
Horridge
G. A.
,
Duelli
P.
(
1979
).
Anatomy of the regional differences in the eye of the mantis Ciulfina
.
J. Exp. Biol
80
,
165
–.
Köck
A.
,
Jakobs
A.-K.
,
Kral
K.
(
1993
).
Visual prey discrimination in monocular and binocular praying mantis Tenodera sinensis during postembryonic development
.
J. Insect Physiol
39
,
485
–.
Kral
K.
(
1998
).
Spatial vision in the course of an insect's life
.
Brain Behav. Evol
52
,
1
–.
Rossel
S.
(
1979
).
Regional differences in photoreceptor performance in the eye of the praying mantis
.
J. Comp. Physiol
131
,
95
–.
Rossel
S.
(
1983
).
Binocular stereopsis in an insect
.
Nature
302
,
821
–.
Rossel
S.
(
1986
).
Binocular spatial localization in the praying mantis
.
J. Exp. Biol
120
,
265
–.
This content is only available via PDF.