The circadian oscillation of sensitivity of the anterior median eye of a nocturnal spider Araneus ventricosus and that of a diurnal spider Menemerus confusus were examined by recording electroretinograms. The anterior median eye of Araneus ventricosus showed a marked circadian oscillation of sensitivity, but that of Menemerus confusus showed no circadian oscillation.

The anterior median eyes of the orb-weaving spiders Argiope bruennichii and Argiope amoena have three types of visual cells, with maximum sensitivities at approximately 360 nm (ultraviolet cell), 480–500 nm (blue cell) and 540 nm (green cell). The blue cells are the most sensitive and have a circadian oscillation of sensitivity (Yamashita and Tateda, 1978). Argiope sp. appears to be active both during the day and at night (a noct-diurnal spider); during the day, it stays in the hub of its web and attacks its prey. In the present study, we examined the circadian oscillation of sensitivity of the anterior median eye of the garden spider Araneus ventricosus and the jumping spider Menemerus confusus. Araneus ventricosus constructs its web each day after sunset and destroys the web before sunrise, i.e. Araneus ventricosus is active only at night. Menemerus confusus is a typical diurnal hunting spider, and a number of its behavioural activities are initiated by visual stimuli (for reviews, see Forster, 1985; Land, 1985; Yamashita, 1985).

The animals used in this study were female garden spiders Araneus ventricosus and male and female jumping spiders Menemerus confusus. They were collected in open fields. Preparation and recording methods were similar to those described previously (Yamashita and Tateda, 1978). A tungsten electrode was inserted into the eye to record electroretinograms (ERGs) from intact animals. For white light stimulation, light emitted by a Xenon arc lamp or a tungsten filament lamp was delivered to the eye via a quartz light guide, 0.2 mm in diameter, positioned in front of the corneal lens. The maximum intensity of the white light was referred to as unit intensity (logI=0). The duration of illumination was controlled by an electromagnetic shutter, and the intensity was adjusted by calibrated neutral-density filters and wedges. A monochromatic light beam was produced using interference filters. The energy of the selected monochromatic light was measured at the cornea of the eye using a radiometer. Monochromatic light (520 nm) of 1014 quanta cm−2 s−1 and white light of logI=—2 generated ERGs with a similar amplitude.

The anterior median eye of Araneus ventricosus showed a marked circadian oscillation of sensitivity. An example is shown in Fig. 1. After the cessation of background illumination at 17:00 h, the ERG amplitude increased gradually for over 3 h. It then showed a circadian oscillation with a period of approximately 24–25 h under a constant dark background for 9 days. ERGs of constant low and high amplitude were recorded for approximately 9–11 h and 8–10 h, respectively. We call the former period ‘subjective day’ or briefly ‘day’, and the latter period ‘subjective night’ or briefly ‘night’.

Fig. 1.

Circadian changes in electroretinogram (ERG) amplitude obtained from the anterior median eye of Araneus ventricosus in a constant dark background. The spider was collected in an open field and maintained on a photoperiod of 12 h:12 h light:dark (light from 05:00 h to 17:00 h) for 2 days. After the cessation of the second 12 h light period at 17:00 h on 29 August, ERGs were recorded for 9 days. A dim flash lasting 5 ms emitted by a light-emitting diode (560 nm emitting wavelength) placed in front of the preparation was automatically presented every 10 s. ERG amplitudes are plotted every 10 min. The ERG amplitude between 20:10 h on 29 August and 06:40 h on 30 August was greater than the limit of the scale of the recorder.

Fig. 1.

Circadian changes in electroretinogram (ERG) amplitude obtained from the anterior median eye of Araneus ventricosus in a constant dark background. The spider was collected in an open field and maintained on a photoperiod of 12 h:12 h light:dark (light from 05:00 h to 17:00 h) for 2 days. After the cessation of the second 12 h light period at 17:00 h on 29 August, ERGs were recorded for 9 days. A dim flash lasting 5 ms emitted by a light-emitting diode (560 nm emitting wavelength) placed in front of the preparation was automatically presented every 10 s. ERG amplitudes are plotted every 10 min. The ERG amplitude between 20:10 h on 29 August and 06:40 h on 30 August was greater than the limit of the scale of the recorder.

Fig. 2 shows ERGs in response to white light stimuli of 0.1 s duration at various intensities recorded during the subjective day and night. The waveforms of night-time ERGs at logI=—7, —5 and —3 are similar to those of daytime ERGs at logI =—5, —3 and —1, respectively. The intensity/response relationships for daytime and night-time ERGs are shown in Fig. 3. The threshold intensity for the night-time ERG was approximately 2 log units lower than that for the daytime ERG.

Fig. 2.

Electroretinograms (ERGs) in response to white light stimuli of 100 ms duration at various intensities obtained from the dark-adapted anterior median eye of Araneus ventricosus during the subjective day and night. The intensity is indicated for each ERG in log units. Horizontal bars indicate 100 ms light stimuli.

Fig. 2.

Electroretinograms (ERGs) in response to white light stimuli of 100 ms duration at various intensities obtained from the dark-adapted anterior median eye of Araneus ventricosus during the subjective day and night. The intensity is indicated for each ERG in log units. Horizontal bars indicate 100 ms light stimuli.

Fig. 3.

Intensity/response relationships for the dark-adapted anterior median eye of Araneus ventricosus determined during the subjective day (open circles) and night (filled circles). The relative amplitude of the electroretinogram (ERG) in response to white light is plotted against the relative stimulus intensity. The amplitude of the night-time ERG at LogI=—2 is referred to as 1.0.

Fig. 3.

Intensity/response relationships for the dark-adapted anterior median eye of Araneus ventricosus determined during the subjective day (open circles) and night (filled circles). The relative amplitude of the electroretinogram (ERG) in response to white light is plotted against the relative stimulus intensity. The amplitude of the night-time ERG at LogI=—2 is referred to as 1.0.

The spectral sensitivity of the anterior median eye was examined by recording ERGs (Fig. 4). Under a constant dark 0.2 s background, daytime ERGs in response to a flash of 1014 quanta cm−2 s−1 and night-time ERGs in response to a flash of 1012 quanta cm−2 s−1 showed similar amplitudes at each wavelength. Each curve had a broad peak at approximately 520 nm in the visible region and a smaller peak or a shoulder in the ultraviolet region (approximately 360 nm). There was no significant difference between the daytime and night-time spectral response curves, as reported for Argiope spp. (Yamashita and Tateda, 1978). Chromatic light adaptation did not change the spectral response characteristics. Fig. 4 shows the amplitude of the night-time ERG in response to a flash of 1014 quanta cm−2 s−1 during adaptation to 540 nm light. These observations suggest that the anterior median eye of Araneus ventricosus has a single spectral type of photoreceptor that has a circadian oscillation of sensitivity.

Fig. 4.

Spectral response curves of the dark-adapted anterior median eye of Araneus ventricosus for the subjective night (filled circles) and day (open circles), and that for the subjective night during adaptation to 540 nm light (Green-adaptation, half-filled circles). The stimulus intensities for the dark-adapted eye during the subjective night and day are 1012 quanta cm−2 s−1 and 1014 quanta cm−2 s−1, respectively, and that for the light-adapted eye during the subjective night is 1014 quanta cm−2 s−1. The electroretinogram (ERG) amplitude in response to a monochromatic stimulus is plotted against the stimulus wavelength. The ERG amplitude obtained from the light-adapted eye is magnified ten times, e.g. the actual value of the ERG in response to a 520 nm flash under the background light is approximately 0.12 mV. 2D, second subjective day; 2N, second subjective night; 3D, third subjective day; 3N, third subjective night.

Fig. 4.

Spectral response curves of the dark-adapted anterior median eye of Araneus ventricosus for the subjective night (filled circles) and day (open circles), and that for the subjective night during adaptation to 540 nm light (Green-adaptation, half-filled circles). The stimulus intensities for the dark-adapted eye during the subjective night and day are 1012 quanta cm−2 s−1 and 1014 quanta cm−2 s−1, respectively, and that for the light-adapted eye during the subjective night is 1014 quanta cm−2 s−1. The electroretinogram (ERG) amplitude in response to a monochromatic stimulus is plotted against the stimulus wavelength. The ERG amplitude obtained from the light-adapted eye is magnified ten times, e.g. the actual value of the ERG in response to a 520 nm flash under the background light is approximately 0.12 mV. 2D, second subjective day; 2N, second subjective night; 3D, third subjective day; 3N, third subjective night.

No circadian oscillation of sensitivity was observed in the anterior median eye of Menemerus confusus. An example is shown in Fig. 5. After the cessation of background illumination at 16:00 h, the ERG amplitude increased rapidly within 1 min to a plateau level (Fig. 5A). The ERG amplitude then remained almost constant for approximately 1 month (Fig. 5B). Similar results were obtained from the anterior lateral eye and the posterior lateral eye. The intensity/response relationships obtained from the dark-adapted anterior median eye at 10:00 h and at 20:00 h are shown in Fig. 6. The two curves are almost identical. The ERG threshold for Menemerus confusus was approximately 100 times higher than that for Araneus ventricosus during the subjective night (cf. Fig. 3). We conclude that photoreceptor cells in the eyes of Menemerus confusus do not show a circadian sensitivity rhythm.

Fig. 5.

Electroretinograms (ERGs) of the anterior median eye of the jumping spider Menemerus confusus. The spider was collected in an open field and maintained on a photoperiod of 12 h:12 h light:dark (light from 04:00 h to 16:00 h) for 2 days. After the cessation of the second light period at 16:00 h on 19 October, ERGs were recorded for approximately 1 month. A dim flash of duration 5 ms emitted by a light-emitting diode (LED; 560 nm emitting wavelength) was given every 10 s. (A) Changes in ERG amplitude after the cessation of 12 h light period at 16:00 h. (B) ERGs recorded on 20 October, 1 November and 20 November. The numbers indicate the time of day. The occasional transient decreases in ERG amplitude may be caused by eye movements (see Land, 1969).

Fig. 5.

Electroretinograms (ERGs) of the anterior median eye of the jumping spider Menemerus confusus. The spider was collected in an open field and maintained on a photoperiod of 12 h:12 h light:dark (light from 04:00 h to 16:00 h) for 2 days. After the cessation of the second light period at 16:00 h on 19 October, ERGs were recorded for approximately 1 month. A dim flash of duration 5 ms emitted by a light-emitting diode (LED; 560 nm emitting wavelength) was given every 10 s. (A) Changes in ERG amplitude after the cessation of 12 h light period at 16:00 h. (B) ERGs recorded on 20 October, 1 November and 20 November. The numbers indicate the time of day. The occasional transient decreases in ERG amplitude may be caused by eye movements (see Land, 1969).

Fig. 6.

Intensity/response relationships for the dark-adapted anterior median eye of Menemerus confusus determined at 10:00 h (open circles) and at 20:00 h (filled circles). The relative amplitude of the electroretinogram (ERG) in response to white light is plotted against the relative stimulus intensity. The amplitude of the night-time ERG at LogI=0 is referred to as 1.0.

Fig. 6.

Intensity/response relationships for the dark-adapted anterior median eye of Menemerus confusus determined at 10:00 h (open circles) and at 20:00 h (filled circles). The relative amplitude of the electroretinogram (ERG) in response to white light is plotted against the relative stimulus intensity. The amplitude of the night-time ERG at LogI=0 is referred to as 1.0.

Yamashita and Tateda (1978) reported that the more-sensitive blue cells in the anterior median eye of noct-diurnal spiders, Argiope spp., show a circadian oscillation of sensitivity, but that the less-sensitive green and ultraviolet cells do not. As shown in the present study, the anterior median eye of a nocturnal spider, Araneus ventricosus, showed marked circadian oscillation of sensitivity, but the anterior median eye of a diurnal spider, Menemerus confusus, did not. The posterior median eye and the posterior lateral eye of Argiope spp. demonstrate the morphological characteristics of noct-diurnal spiders: i.e. they have two types of retina in the same eye (Uehara et al., 1978). In one type, the rhabdomic layer of the retina is backed by a tapetal reflecting layer. In the other type, the rhabdomic layer is backed by a pigmented layer. These observations suggest that Argiope is an intermediate type of spider between typical nocturnal spiders such as Araneus ventricosus and typical diurnal spiders such as Menemerus confusus.

Circadian sensitivity changes in the eye that are controlled by efferent optic nerve fibres have been reported for Limulus polyphemus (for a review, see Barlow et al., 1989), scorpions Androctonus australis (for a review, see Fleissner and Fleissner, 1988) and Argiope bruennichii and Argiope amoena (Yamashita and Tateda, 1981). Nakamura and Yamashita (1997) recorded efferent impulses from the optic nerve of Araneus ventricosus. In Araneus ventricosus, efferent optic nerve fibres may also control the sensitivity of the eye. The eye of Menemerus confusus showed no circadian oscillation of sensitivity. We observed no efferent activity in the optic nerve of Menemerus confusus, suggesting that Menemerus confusus may lack efferent optic nerve fibres.

The eyes of spiders have various spectral types of receptor cells (for a review, see Yamashita, 1985). Walla et al. (1996) made intracellular recordings from photoreceptor cells of the eyes of the ctenid spider Cupiennius salei, a nocturnal hunting spider, and found three spectral groups of cells with sensitivity maxima in the blue (480 nm), green (520 nm) and ultraviolet (340 nm) regions. In the present study, we have demonstrated that the anterior median eye of Araneus ventricosus has a single spectral type of photoreceptor. It seems that the anterior median eye of Araneus ventricosus is not capable of colour discrimination.

This research was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan.

Barlow
,
R. B.
, Jr
,
Chamberlain
,
S. C
. and
Lehman
,
H. K.
(
1989
).
Circadian rhythms in the invertebrate retina
. In
Facets of Vision
(ed.
D. G.
Stavenga
and
R. C.
Hardie
), pp.
257
280
.
Berlin, Heidelberg, New York
:
Springer Verlag
.
Fleissner
,
G.
and
Fleissner
,
G.
(
1988
).
Efferent control of visual sensitivity in arthropod eyes: with emphasis on circadian rhythms
. In
Information Processing in Animals
, vol.
5
(ed.
M.
Lindauer
), pp.
1
67
.
Stuttgart, New York
:
Gustav Fischer Verlag
.
Forster
,
L.
(
1985
).
Target discrimination in jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae)
. In
Neurobiology of Arachnids
(ed.
F. G.
Barth
), pp.
249
274
.
Berlin, Heidelberg, New York
:
Springer Verlag
.
Land
,
M. F.
(
1969
).
Movements of the retinae of jumping spiders (Salticidae: Dendryphantinae) in response to visual stimuli
.
J. Exp. Biol.
51
,
471
493
.
Land
,
M. F.
(
1985
).
The morphology and optics of spider eyes
. In
Neurobiology of Arachnids
(ed.
F. G.
Barth
), pp.
53
78
.
Berlin, Heidelberg, New York
:
Springer Verlag
.
Nakamura
,
T.
and
Yamashita
,
S.
(
1997
).
Phototactic behavior of nocturnal and diurnal spiders: negative and positive phototaxes
.
Zool. Sci.
14
,
199
203
.
Uehara
,
A.
,
Toh
,
Y.
and
Tateda
,
H.
(
1978
).
Fine structure of the eyes of orb-weavers, Argiope amoena L. Koch (Aranea: Argiopidae). II. The anterolateral, posterolateral and posteromedial eyes
.
Cell Tissue Res.
186
,
435
452
.
Walla
,
P.
,
Barth
,
F. G.
and
Eguchi
,
E.
(
1996
).
Spectral sensitivity of single photoreceptor cells in the eyes of the ctenid spider Cupiennius salei Keys
.
Zool. Sci.
13
,
199
202
.
Yamashita
,
S.
(
1985
).
Photoreceptor cells in the spider eye: spectral sensitivity and efferent control
. In
Neurobiology of Arachnids
(ed.
F. G.
Barth
), pp.
103
117
.
Berlin, Heidelberg, New York
:
Springer Verlag
.
Yamashita
,
S.
and
Tateda
,
H.
(
1978
).
Spectral sensitivities of the anterior median eyes of the orb web spiders, Argiope bruennichii and A. amoena
.
J. Exp. Biol.
74
,
47
57
.
Yamashita
,
S.
and
Tateda
,
H.
(
1981
).
Efferent neural control in the eyes of orb weaving spiders
.
J. Comp. Physiol.
143
,
477
483
.