We tested the hypotheses that hypoxic toads (Bufo marinus) in a thermal gradient would select a lower than normal temperature and that this behavioral response would be beneficial. Under normoxic conditions, selected body temperature was 24.2 +/− 3.6 degrees C. When inspired O2 was 10% or less, mean selected temperature decreased to 15.3 +/− 2.4 degrees C. The theoretical advantages of hypoxia-induced hypothermia we tested include (1) a reduction of oxygen uptake (VO2) by a Q10 effect; (2) increased arterial saturation (SaO2), (3) a decreased ventilatory response, and (4) a decreased stress response. Gas exchange, hematocrit, hemoglobin, SaO2, PaO2 and pH were measured at 25 degrees C (normal preferred temperature) and 15 degrees C (hypoxia preferred temperature) in toads breathing normoxic or hypoxic gas mixtures. During graded hypoxia at 15 degrees C, SaO2 was significantly increased and VO2 was significantly reduced compared with 25 degrees C. Graded hypoxia did not significantly affect VO2 at 25 degrees C, despite evidence for increased ventilation at that temperature (increased pH and respiratory exchange ratio, RE). At 15 degrees C, graded hypoxia had a significant effect on VO2 only at an inspired O2 of 4%. Increased RE with hypoxia was significant at 25 degrees C but not at 15 degrees C. Hematocrit and [hemoglobin] rose significantly during graded hypoxia at 25 degrees C but did not change at 15 degrees C. Toads exposed to 10% O2 (the value that elicits behavioral hypothermia) showed a significant respiratory alkalosis at 25 degrees C but not at 15 degrees C. Likewise, hypoxia caused a significant drop in SaO2 and PO2 at 25 degrees C. Cooling to 15 degrees C during hypoxia caused a significant rise in SaO2 but no change in PaO2. In conclusion, behavioral hypothermia is a beneficial response to hypoxia in Bufo marinus.
Physiological significance of behavioral hypothermia in hypoxic toads (Bufo marinus)
S. C. Wood, G. M. Malvin; Physiological significance of behavioral hypothermia in hypoxic toads (Bufo marinus). J Exp Biol 1 September 1991; 159 (1): 203–215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.159.1.203
Download citation file:
Advertisement
Cited by
The Integrative Biology of the Heart

We are pleased to welcome submissions to be considered for our upcoming special issue: The Integrative Biology of the Heart, guest edited by William Joyce and Holly Shiels. This issue will consider the biology of the heart at all levels of organisation, across animal groups and scientific fields.
JEB@100: an interview with Monitoring Editor John Terblanche

John Terblanche reveals how he narrowly avoided becoming a sports scientist and why he thinks phenotypic plasticity is the big question currently facing comparative physiologists. Find out more about the series on our Interviews page.
Vision 2024: Building Bridges in Visual Ecology

Early-career researchers can apply for funded places at our Vision 2024: Building Bridges in Visual Ecology. The event is organised by Eleanor Caves, Sonke Johnsen and Lorain Schweikert and being held at Buxted park 10-13 June 2023. Deadline 1 December 2023.
Reconciling the variability in the biological response of marine invertebrates to climate change

Drawing on work in reef-building corals, Zoe Dellaert and Hollie Putnam provide historical context to some of the long-standing challenges in global change biology that constrain our capacity for eco-evolutionary forecasting, as well as considering unresolved questions and future research approaches. Read the full Centenary Review Article here.
Sipping takes no effort for hovering hawkmoths

Hovering takes the most effort so how much energy does sipping require when hawkmoths hover? Next to nothing, apparently. Alexandre Palaoro & colleagues have discovered that the insects’ proboscises are incredibly wettable, drawing nectar along the length with no effort, giving them a free drink on the wing.