ABSTRACT
The British fauna includes three species of Arenicola. The most abundant is the common lugworm, A. marina L., which Uves in great numbers on tidal sand flats and mud flats. The other two, A. ecaudata Johnston and A. branchialis Aud. & Edw. (=A. grubii Claparède), are found, usually together, in. coarse, rather foul, sandy material, between stones and rocks.
A. marina is distinguished from the other two by many anatomical characters, notably its possession of a ‘tail’, denuded of appendages and continually renewed from reserve segments at the base. The other species differ from each other in minor points only. The anatomical characteristics of marina can perhaps be regarded as adaptations to its rather special habitat ; an explanation along these lines has been attempted in the case of the tail (Wells, 1950).
The behaviour of marina has been studied by several investigators; that of the others has received very little attention. In marina, the behaviour of the intact worm has been shown to be dominated, to a remarkable extent, by two spontaneously active pacemakers. The evidence on this point is briefly reviewed in an accompanying paper (Wells & Albrecht, 1951). We thought it worth while to make comparative studies of the other species, to see whether differences of behaviour organization would appear, to parallel the known differences in structure and habitat. We were however unsuccessful with branchialis,* and the following account is restricted to ecaudata, a species which affords good material for this kind of investigation.
The work was done at the Plymouth laboratory of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, in September 1949 and January 1950.
BRAINLESS ISOLATED EXTROVERT PREPARATIONS
The isolated extrovert preparation consists essentially of the proboscis with a length of the oesophagus attached. It also includes most of the retractor muscle sheath and of the first diaphragm. In marina, it exhibits ‘f cycles’, i.e. an alternation of vigorous rhythmic contraction and comparative rest, the pacemaker being the oesophageal wall (see preparations M. 36 and M. 37 in Fig. 1).
We made a series of thirty isolated extrovert preparations from ecaudata, taking care to exclude the brain. They were suspended in sea water, at temperatures ranging from 11·4 to 18·2° C., and with lever weights of 0·12, 02 or 0·4 g. In eighteen of the experiments, brainless marina extroverts were simultaneously suspended in the same bath, and recorded in exactly the same way, to reduce to a minimum the possibility that the very striking differences observed between the two species were due to the experimental conditions.
The results obtained with ecaudata were very consistent, and are typified by the trace of preparation E. 30 in Fig. 1. There is a background of activity, either continuous or grouped into very brief outbursts, so closely crowded as almost to run into each other. Against this background, one sees a series of spells of vigorous activity, of long duration and spaced widely apart. Three of these appear in the published extract from E. 30. The interval between the spells is rather variable, but typically about 30–40 min. In many cases, it is shorter than this at the beginning of the experiment, then lengthens out and settles at the usual value. The lower trace (E. 31) shows a preparation in which the spells are still visible, but the background activity is grouped in a way which resembles the f cycle of a marina extrovert. This particular preparation was however a unique exception; the normal behaviour of the ecaudata extrovert is that shown by E. 30.
If now one examines a series of records from brainless extroverts of marina, one can often detect prolonged spells of activity, superposed on the f cycle and occurring at longer intervals. Three such spells are visible in the extract from M.36 in Fig. 1. There seems to be little doubt that all of the tracings in Fig. 1 are modifications of a common scheme. Starting from the typical ecaudata pattern of E. 30, and passing through E. 31 and M. 36 to M. 37, one can derive the f cycle of the marina extrovert by supposing the background activity in ecaudata to be increased in vigour, and organized into the characteristic intermittence.
The widely-spaced spells resemble the irrigation-defaecation cycles of marina in timing, but we think it unlikely that the two are related. The extrovert spells are generally suppressed, in both species, when the extrovert is connected with the central nervous system, as in the experiments described in the next section. They may perhaps be related to the ‘secondary rhythm’ reported in the oral half of the marina oesophagus by Wells (1937). We have no suggestions to offer about their functional significance.
EXTROVERT BODY-WALL PREPARATIONS
We made a series of experiments on ecaudata by the method illustrated in Fig. 1 of the accompanying paper, to find out whether the extrovert pattern of this species has any influence on the behaviour of the whole worm. The gills of ecaudata are borne by all segments from the 16th or 17th to the hind end of the body; the irrigation waves, by which water is driven through the burrow, run forwards from the hinder extremity, and die out at about the level of the most anterior gill. In seventeen cases, we recorded from the extrovert and an anterior body-wall strip. In a further ten, we added one or two tracings from the branchiate part of the body. The experiments were performed, some in September 1949, at temperatures from 17·5 to 20·5° C., and some in January 1950, at 10·8–15·5°C. The levers were weighted at 0·2 or 0·4 g.
The behaviour of the extrovert was quite different, in the majority of these experiments, from that shown by the isolated brainless preparations. It now gave a series of vigorous activity bursts, of very variable duration and frequency, and exactly correlated with bursts in the various body-wall lines. An example is given in Fig. 2. The bursts can be clearly seen along the whole length of the body; they are superposed, in the case of the branchiate segments, on a rather regular oscillation that may represent irrigation waves.
On dividing the nerve cord just behind the head, there was definite inhibition of the part of the worm behind the cut in fifteen out of twenty-five cases, and doubtful inhibition in five. This effect is temporary, and is paralleled in the case of marina. When it has passed off, the hinder end of ecaudata shows vigorous and fluctuating activity patterns, like those of the whole worm before the cut was made ; and similar patterns are also visible in the anterior portion (extrovert, nerve ring and brain). As long as some part of the central nervous system is present, the activity patterns of ecaudata are more variable than in the case of marina, not only from preparation to preparation, but also from time to time in the same preparation.
The pictures given by the two species are in obvious contrast. The extrovert of marina traces its characteristic f cycle, whether isolated from the central nervous system or not; in the latter case, its pattern is transmitted to the body wall. On the other hand, the behaviour of the ecaudata extrovert is usually greatly changed when the brain and nerve cord are present; the extrovert now appears to be dominated by activity patterns of central nervous—or, at least, non-oesophageal—origin. It may not be irrelevant that the brain of ecaudata is very much better developed than that of marina (Wells, 1950).
In five of the twenty-seven experiments in this series, the extrovert gave tracings like that of an isolated, brainless extrovert for at least a large part of the time. In a further four, there were short periods during which the ‘brainless’ pattern appeared. The remainder, making two-thirds of the whole, gave only the ‘central nervous’ type of activity described above.
An extract from one of the preparations whose extrovert behaved in the ‘brainless’ manner is shown in Fig. 3. The major activity spells of the extrovert have no influence on the body wall. Its background activity is however closely correlated with that of the anterior body-wall strip, as one can see by running a set-square along the record. It is tempting to suppose, since we have homologized the background activity of the ecaudata extrovert with the f cycle of marina, that this correlation is due to a flow of oesophageal influences into the central nervous system. Unfortunately, owing to the great variability of the behaviour of the innervated ecaudata body wall, even after its connexion with the brain and extrovert has been severed, this suggestion could not be checked with any certainty by the means at our disposal.
The main conclusion is that the extrovert of ecaudata is more subordinate than that of marina. The organization of the activity of the marina extrovert into a regular 6–7 min. intermittence is accompanied by the assumption—or the great intensification—of its pacemaker role. The habitat of ecaudata differs from that typical of marina, and the mode of life of the former species has not yet been described in any detail. From preliminary observations which we have made, and hope to develop more fully, its habits do not seem to differ very fundamentally from those of many littoral errant polychaetes. The adaptations which have enabled marina so successfully to colonize the tidal sand flats are not only anatomical, but include the very distinct and specialized structure of its burrow. Perhaps the organization of its behaviour into cycles of great regularity is part of the same story.
SUMMARY
Arenicola ecaudata differs not only in structure, but in mode of life, from A. marina. Our results indicate that there are also great differences in behaviour physiology.
The brainless isolated extrovert of ecaudata traces a continuous, or nearly continuous, background of activity, upon which prominent spells of vigorous rhythmic contraction appear at intervals of the order of 30–40 min. Similar spells are sometimes shown by the corresponding preparation from marina, whose characteristic/cycle can be regarded as produced by the organization of the background activity of ecaudata into vigorous and regularly spaced outbursts.
There is little evidence of a pacemaker role of the oesophagus in ecaudata. If the movements of the extrovert and body wall are simultaneously recorded, they generally exhibit correlated outbursts of variable and fluctuating pattern, and very unlike the behaviour of the brainless extrovert. Similar outbursts are shown by the body wall after severance of its connexion with the extrovert. They are probably of central nervous origin.
REFERENCES
In a series of seventeen brainless isolated extroverts of branchialis, set up exactly as described for ecaudata, the great majority failed to give satisfactory tracings. The lever strokes were feeble or absent, even in the case of preparations which had been seen to contract vigorously and rhythmically in a bowl of sea water before they were mounted on the apparatus. Only two good records were obtained. One was like a typical ecaudata tracing (e.g. E. 30 in Fig. 1). The other—the most vigorous of the series—gave a quite exceptional record, like one obtained from an atypical marina oesophagus by Wells (1937, fig-3, lower half). The available specimens of branchialis were rather smaller than those of ecaudata-, partly for this reason, and partly because of our unsatisfactory experience with the extroverts, we made no attempt to set up more complicated preparations of branchialis.