The abrupt halt of a bumble bee's flight when it impacts the almost invisible threads of an orb web provides an elegant example of the amazing strength and toughness of spider silk. Spiders depend upon these properties for survival, yet the impressive performance of silk is not limited solely to tensile mechanics. Here, we show that silk also exhibits powerful cyclic contractions, allowing it to act as a high performance mimic of biological muscles. These contractions are actuated by changes in humidity alone and repeatedly generate work 50 times greater than the equivalent mass of human muscle. Although we demonstrate that this response is general and occurs weakly in diverse hydrophilic materials, the high modulus of spider silk is such that it generates exceptional force. Furthermore, because this effect already operates at the level of single silk fibers, only 5 μm in diameter,it can easily be scaled across the entire size range at which biological muscles operate. By contrast, the most successful synthetic muscles developed so far are driven by electric voltage, such that they cannot scale easily across large ranges in cross-sectional areas. The potential applicability of silk muscles is further enhanced by our finding that silkworm fibers also exhibit cyclic contraction because they are already available in commercial quantities. The simplicity of using wet or dry air to drive the biomimetic silk muscle fibers and the incredible power generated by silk offer unique possibilities in designing lightweight and compact actuators for robots and micro-machines, new sensors, and green energy production.
Most of the world's 40,000 species of spiders produce dragline silk from major ampullate silk glands to spin lifelines and frames of webs(Fig. 1A,B). Dragline silk's impressive toughness (work/volume ∼5× greater than Kevlar®),high strength to weight ratio (∼5× greater than steel),immunological compatibility with living tissue, and production under environmentally benign conditions all make spider silk an important model for biomimetic research (Gosline et al.,1986; Vadlamudi,1995; Vollrath and Knight,2001; Vollrath and Porter,2006). Many of these properties result from the structure of silk proteins, which combine β-sheet crystals that interlock molecules together and stiffen fibers with less organized `amorphous' regions of the proteins that allow molecular mobility(Gosline et al., 1999; Hayashi et al., 1999; Termonia, 1994). This composite structure results in fibers that are both strong and stretchy and that resist crack propagation. Spiders depend upon these properties for survival, yet the impressive performance of silk is not limited solely to tensile mechanics. Here, we show that spider silk also exhibits powerful cyclic contractions that are precisely controlled by changes in humidity,allowing silk to act as a high performance mimic of biological muscles.
At high humidity spider dragline silk `supercontracts' – unrestrained silk will shrink up to 50% in length whereas restrained silk generates stresses in excess of 50 MPa (Bell et al.,2002; Guinea et al.,2003; Work, 1977). Water infiltrates the silk, disrupting hydrogen bonding within the amorphous region of the proteins (Jelinski et al.,1999; Schafer et al.,2008). This increases molecular mobility such that entropy can drive the proteins into a less organized configuration(Gosline et al., 1984). Supercontraction generates substantial forces providing the tantalizing possibility that the phenomenon could be exploited to perform work. However,such applicability is limited because supercontraction occurs in the silk of only some spiders, it is a one-time response, and it depends upon high molecular orientation to generate the initial low entropy state.
There are several other intriguing examples of materials in nature that move in response to humidity and that could provide inspiration for biomimetic muscle. The cellulose fibrils in wheat awns expand and contract in response to humidity, driving the wheat grains into the soil(Elbaum et al., 2007). The scales of seed-bearing pine cones open in response to humidity, helping to expel seeds (Dawson et al.,1997). Some synthetic materials can also change size when exposed to water or humidity (Beebe et al.,2000; Tanaka et al.,1980). These materials are all hydrophilic suggesting the hypothesis that movement is caused simply by swelling during bulk uptake of water. Here, for the first time, we show that spider dragline silk exhibits a similar, cyclic response to humidity, and demonstrate how that response can be harnessed to create precisely controlled biomimetic muscles for different applications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
To examine the interaction of water with spider dragline silk we performed two types of tests. In some instances, silk threads were restrained at a constant length, which we refer to as `wetted strained' tests (WSx)where `x' refers to the strain of the specimen. In other instances,silk threads were not restrained but were subjected to constant loading, which we refer to as `wetted loaded' tests (WL).
To measure the stress generated by spider silk under changing humidity,individual fibers of major ampullate silk were first collected from restrained Nephila clavipes (Linnaeus 1776) and adhered to cardboard mounts across 21 mm gaps, as described previously(Blackledge et al., 2005b). The diameters of fibers were then measured to the nearest 0.1μm using polarized light microscopy (Blackledge et al.,2005a) before testing. Measurements of stress were performed using an MTS Nano Bionix that measured force to ±10 μN. The Nano Bionix was custom fit with an environmental chamber that controlled humidity to an accuracy of 1% with a range of ∼1–95% RH. Humidity in the environmental chamber was regulated by dividing the flow of dry gaseous N2 into channels, one of which flowed through a 1 m high water column and the other which remained dry. The controller then mixed the two flows before they entered the chamber, to achieve the desired humidity. The feedback between the hygrometer on the chamber and the controller was slow enough that an initial switch from wetting to drying was usually accomplished through a brief burst of completely dry N2 that was then rapidly mixed with a small amount of moist gas. This resulted in a brief`undershooting' of the targeted dryness that normally occurred too quickly to register on the hygrometer, but did manifest itself in some tests (see below). The opposite effect also occurred to a lesser degree during wetting.
Silk was mounted onto the grips of the Nano Bionix at a strain of 0.5%. The chamber was then cycled to ∼90% RH to achieve a fully supercontracted state in the fibers. Finally, each silk fiber (N=35) was exposed to approximately eight cycles of humidity while stress was measured continuously. Similar procedures were used to test fibers of polyethylene (N=6),acrylic (N=7), cotton (N=5), keratin (hair, N=7)and both native (N=9) and degummed silkworm (N=16) fibers. For one series of tests, a bundle of 90 fibers of spider silk was used. Fibers were then removed from the bundle and the test repeated until only a single fiber remained.
Fig. 1C shows the response of a single 5μm diameter dragline thread from the golden silk spider Nephila clavipes to cyclical changes in humidity. The test began at high humidity. Initial drying induces stress (contraction) of ∼40 MPa(ranging from 10–140 MPa across 35 independent tests). The fiber then relaxes back to its original tension when humidity is subsequently increased. This cyclic response occurs independently of supercontraction, generating high forces in the silk. Fig. 1Cshows eight repetitions with no evidence for fatigue in the silk, even after approximately 100 min under tension. The magnitude of the stress generated is directly proportional to the change in humidity(Fig. 2A), providing a precise mechanism to control the stress generated by the spider silk. The total force generated increases as fibers are bundled together(Fig. 2B, Fig. 3).
The cyclic contraction of spider silk can produce work, sufficient for a single ∼40 mm long, 5 μm diameter fiber to lift at least 100 mg. Fig. 4 shows cyclic lifting of a 9.5 mg weight in response to seven cycles of drying in an environmental chamber. The work generated as a function of applied stress is shown in Fig. 5. We estimate that the lifting response occurs within 3 s, as indicated by video analysis of the much larger amplitude changes during supercontraction. Also, the maximum change in stress during the WS testing approached 20–30% of the total magnitude per second. This time can probably be reduced further by increasing the rate of change in humidity. Using a 3 s response time, a maximum power density of 130 W kg–1 is achieved at a stress of 50 MPa(Table 1). This power density is comparable to human muscles (Kornbluh et al., 1998; Madden et al.,2004). In addition, the maximum sustainable stress of 80 MPa,which defines the upper limit at which silk can no longer perform work, is much higher than the 0.1–0.4 MPa for typical biological muscles. Furthermore, this stress can be maintained for long periods without additional input of energy, in contrast to natural muscle. We also determine that the maximum work density of silk fibers is 500 kJ m–3, 50 times higher than most biological muscles(Kornbluh et al., 1998; Madden et al., 2004). Thus,spider silk rapidly achieves high force at an impressively light weight.
The maximum sustainable stress, work density, power density and modulus for silk are superior to many synthetic polymer-based muscle mimics(Table 1). In addition, most successful polymer-based synthetic muscle mimics are activated by electric fields (E=V/d)(Bar-Cohen, 2004; Bar-Cohen et al., 2007; Madden et al., 2004; Osada et al., 1992). In order to keep the driving voltages (V) low, the devices have to have a diameter of∼100–900μm and many layers have to be stacked together to scale up the devices to larger dimensions (Osada et al., 1992). In comparison, the force lifted by a single silk fiber can be easily scaled up by forming bundles or sheets of silk fibers(Fig. 3). Bundles of 1–90 silk fibers lift forces that scale directly with the number of fibers(Fig. 2B). Extrapolating, we estimate that a silk bundle equivalent in cross-sectional area to a 1 mm diameter fiber could lift as much as 5 kg whereas the equivalent of a 2 cm diameter fiber could lift 2 metric tons, making silk useful for a range of applications from micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) to macro-robotics(e.g. Bar-Cohen, 2003; Shahinpoor et al., 1998).
The main limitation of silk as a biomimetic muscle fiber is the small maximum displacement that can be achieved (maximum strain of 2.5%). In general though, materials that exhibit higher strains have substantially lower sustainable stress and modulus compared with spider silk(Table 1). Moreover, there is considerable variation in silk produced by different species of spiders(Swanson et al., 2006) such that bioprospecting may reveal species whose silk maintains higher cyclic strain without compromising other properties. More importantly, we also observed cyclic contraction in silkworm silk(Fig. 6). Even though the maximum power density for silkworm silk is lower than spider silk, its commercial availability offers the possibility of using large lengths of silk threads. The potential limitation of lower strain can therefore be overcome by using larger lengths of silk or through strain amplification. The use of silk threads, or even two-dimensional woven silk mats, is an attractive technology for lightweight biomimetic muscles. The micron to sub-micron diameters of spider silk fibers results in a high surface to volume ratio that is ideal for fabricating devices controlling application of water through microfluidic geometries (e.g. Sia and Whitesides,2003; Wheeler and Stroock,2008).
Our focus here is on the potential applicability of silk as a biomimetic muscle, rather than on the causes of the cyclic contraction itself. However,cyclic contraction is clearly a phenomenon distinct from supercontraction(Blackledge et al., 2009). It is repeatable both before and after supercontraction, and infiltration of water causes the relaxation phase. We hypothesize that water molecules cause a general swelling of the silk and their removal during drying results in contraction. This is strikingly similar to the mechanism proposed to explain how plant tissues can act as motors – actively expelling seeds from the parent plant and even burying seeds in the ground(Dawson et al., 1997; Elbaum et al., 2007). For instance, differential expansion and contraction on opposite sides of the cellulose awns of wheat seeds causes them to bend under daily fluctuations of humidity thereby burying the seeds in the ground(Elbaum et al., 2007). Thus,cyclic contraction of spider silk may result from a relatively general response of biological tissues to humidity. This is supported by our finding of a lack of cyclic contraction in hydrophobic synthetic fibers, such as polyethylene and acrylic, whereas it is weakly exhibited by natural fibers such as cotton and hair (0.6±0.1 and 6.1±3.0 MPa, respectively). Moreover, cyclic contraction occurs in other types of silk, such as fibers spun by silkworms (Fig. 6). The stresses generated in all of these materials during humidity cycling scale directly with stiffness. Thus, the impressive capacity of spider silks to perform work probably depends in large part on the high modulus of spider silk(10–20 GPa), the hydrophilic nature of some of its constituent proteins,and the relatively high cyclic strain caused by changes in humidity. Together,these properties combine to generate work density 50× higher than biological muscles.
In summary, we demonstrate the use of dry and wet air to control the contraction and relaxation of spider silk and silkworm fibers. This results in a very environmentally friendly and energy efficient mimic of biological muscles that generates impressive power density. Silk thus emerges as an attractive model for biomimetic muscle fibers that could be used for a range of applications in industry and the biomedical sciences.
We thank Linden Higgins and Claire Ritschoff for supplying spiders. Cecilia Boutry and Victoria Sain assisted with collection of data for non-spider silk fibers. Cheryl Hayashi, Alan Gent, John Gosline, Hans Thewissen, and an anonymous reviewer provided helpful comments on early drafts of the manuscript. This work was supported by National Science Foundation awards DBI-0521261 (T.A.B.), IOS-0745379 (T.A.B.), DEB-0516038 (T.A.B.) and DMR-0512156 (A.D.). Additional funding was provided by a Slovenian Research Agency research fellowshipARRS Z1-9799-0618-07 (I.A.), and from the Integrated Bioscience Program at University of Akron.