Many fish experience daily cycles of hypoxia in the wild, but the physiological strategies for coping with intermittent hypoxia are poorly understood. We examined how killifish adjust O2 supply and demand during acute hypoxia, and how these responses are altered after prolonged acclimation to constant or intermittent patterns of hypoxia exposure. We acclimated killifish to normoxia (∼20 kPa O2), constant hypoxia (2 kPa) or intermittent cycles of nocturnal hypoxia (12 h:12 h normoxia:hypoxia) for 28 days, and then compared whole-animal O2 consumption rates (O2) and tissue metabolites during exposure to 12 h of hypoxia followed by reoxygenation in normoxia. Normoxia-acclimated fish experienced a pronounced 27% drop in O2 during acute hypoxia, and modestly increased O2 upon reoxygenation. They strongly recruited anaerobic metabolism during acute hypoxia, indicated by lactate accumulation in plasma, muscle, liver, brain, heart and digestive tract, as well as a transient drop in intracellular pH, and they increased hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-1α protein abundance in muscle. Glycogen, glucose and glucose-6-phosphate levels suggested that glycogen supported brain metabolism in hypoxia, while the muscle used circulating glucose. Acclimation to constant hypoxia caused a stable ∼50% decrease in O2 that persisted after reoxygenation, with minimal recruitment of anaerobic metabolism, suggestive of metabolic depression. By contrast, fish acclimated to intermittent hypoxia maintained sufficient O2 transport to support normoxic O2, modestly recruited lactate metabolism and increased O2 dramatically upon reoxygenation. Both groups of hypoxia-acclimated fish had similar glycogen, ATP, intracellular pH and HIF-1α levels as normoxic controls. We conclude that different patterns of hypoxia exposure favour distinct strategies for matching O2 supply and O2 demand.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: B.G.B., G.R.S.; Methodology: B.G.B., G.B.M., B.B.R., G.R.S.; Validation: B.G.B.; Formal analysis: B.G.B., G.B.M., B.B.R., G.R.S.; Investigation: B.G.B.; Resources: G.B.M., B.B.R., G.R.S.; Writing - original draft: B.G.B.; Writing - review & editing: B.G.B., G.B.M., B.B.R., G.R.S.; Visualization: B.G.B., G.R.S.; Supervision: G.R.S.; Funding acquisition: G.R.S.

Funding

The equipment and operational costs of this research was supported by funds from McMaster University, the Canada Foundation for Innovation, the Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science, and a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant to G.R.S. and G.B.M. B.G.B. was supported by an Ontario Graduate Scholarship and an NSERC postgraduate scholarship. G.R.S. is supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program.

You do not currently have access to this content.