ABSTRACT
In birds, the use of corticosterone (Cort) implants is a frequent tool aimed at simulating systemic elevations of this hormone and studying effects on biological traits (e.g. physiology, morphology, behavior). This manipulation may alter adrenocortical function, potentially changing both baseline (CortBAS) and stress-induced (CortSTRESS) plasma Cort levels. However, implant effects on the latter trait are rarely measured, disregarding downstream consequences of potentially altered stress responses. Here, we analyzed the effects of Cort implants on both CortBAS and CortSTRESS in nestling and adult European white storks, Ciconia ciconia. In addition, we performed a review of 50 studies using Cort implants in birds during the last two decades to contextualize stork results, assess researchers' patterns of use and infer current study biases. High and low doses of Cort implants resulted in a decrease of both CortBAS (31–71% below controls) and CortSTRESS (63–79% below controls) in storks. Our literature review revealed that CortBAS generally increases (72% of experiments) whereas CortSTRESS decreases (78% of experiments) following implant treatment in birds. Our results challenge and expand the prevailing assumption that Cort implants increase circulating CortBAS levels because: (i) CortBAS levels show a quadratic association with implant dose across bird species, and decreased levels may occur at both high and low implant doses, and (ii) Cort implants also decrease CortSTRESS levels, thus producing stress-hyporesponsive phenotypes. It is time to work towards a better understanding of the effects of Cort implants on adrenocortical function, before addressing downstream links to variation in other biological traits.
Footnotes
Author contributions
Conceptualization: F.T.-M., S.C., T.A.M., M.W., L.M.R., M.H., M.C., J.L.T., J.B.; Methodology: F.T.-M., S.C., T.A.M., M.W., L.M.R., M.H., M.C., J.L.T., J.B.; Validation: F.T.-M., S.C., T.A.M., J.B.; Formal analysis: F.T.-M., J.B.; Investigation: F.T.-M., S.C., M.C., J.L.T., J.B.; Resources: T.A.M., M.W., L.M.R., M.H., J.B.; Data curation: F.T.-M., S.C., J.B.; Writing - original draft: F.T.-M., S.C., J.B.; Writing - review & editing: F.T.-M., S.C., T.A.M., M.W., L.M.R., M.H., M.C., J.L.T., J.B.; Visualization: F.T.-M., J.B.; Supervision: J.B.; Project administration: J.B.; Funding acquisition: T.A.M., J.B.
Funding
This work was supported by the University of Saskatchewan (Isabel Maria Lopez Martinez Memorial Scholarship to F.T.-M.), the Spanish Council of Science (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; Ramon y Cajal contract 2010-07120 and i-link project 0564 to J.B.), the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and European funds (Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; project CGL2012-32544 to J.B.) and the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and the Environment (Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente; Organismo Autónomo de Parques Nacionales, grant 511/2012 to J.B.).