1-20 of 164569
Keywords: TOR
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Articles
Images
Identification of Cavin1-binding nanobodies. (A) Initial selections of nanobodies interacting with the mouse Cavin1 (mC1)-HR1 domain. GST–mC1-HR1 was used as a bait for His-tagged nanobodies. P, pellet; S, supernatant. (B) Isothermal calorimetry (ITC) thermogram for binding of nanobodies NbA12 and NbB7 to mC1-HR1. (C) Schematic representation of the HR1 domain and mutations in cavin family proteins tested for nanobody binding (shown to scale). (D) NbA12 and NbB7 showed identical binding affinity with an N-terminal fragment of mC1-HR1 (residues 45–103) as measured by ITC. (E) Similarly, both NbA12 and NbB7 interacted with the 5Q mutant of the mC1-HR1 domain as measured by ITC. (F) Binding of NbA12 and NbB7 with the full-length mC1 protein was still detected by ITC, although the affinity was reduced compared to that of the isolated HR1 domain. For all ITC graphs, the upper panel represents raw data, and the lower panel represents the normalised and integrated binding isotherms fitted with a 1:1 binding ratio. DP, differential power; ΔH, enthalpy of binding. The binding affinity (Kd) is determined by calculating the mean of at least two independent experiments. Thermodynamic parameters for the binding analysis are provided in Table S1.
Published: 28 April 2025
Fig. 1. Identification of Cavin1-binding nanobodies. (A) Initial selections of nanobodies interacting with the mouse Cavin1 (mC1)-HR1 domain. GST–mC1-HR1 was used as a bait for His-tagged nanobodies. P, pellet; S, supernatant. (B) Isothermal calorimetry (ITC) thermogram for binding of nanobodies... More about this image found in Identification of Cavin1-binding nanobodies. (A) Initial selections of nan...
Images
Nanobodies do not affect the in vitro intrinsic membrane-remodelling properties of Cavin1. (A) Liposome pelleting assay of the mouse Cavin1 (mC1)-HR1 domain in the presence of nanobodies. Multilamellar vesicles were generated from Folch I lipids. In the presence or absence of NbA12 or NbB7, the mC1-HR1 domain was incubated with or without liposomes and centrifuged. S, unbound supernatant; P, bound pellet. Images represent two independent experiments. (B) Negatively stained electron microscopy images of nanobody–Cavin1 complexes incubated with Folch I liposomes. His-MBP full-length mC1 was used to test liposome tubulation in the presence of either NbA12 or NbB7. Images represent two independent experiments. Scale bars: 200 nm (top, NbA12–mC1); 500 nm (bottom, NbB7–mC1).
Published: 28 April 2025
Fig. 2. Nanobodies do not affect the in vitro intrinsic membrane-remodelling properties of Cavin1. (A) Liposome pelleting assay of the mouse Cavin1 (mC1)-HR1 domain in the presence of nanobodies. Multilamellar vesicles were generated from Folch I lipids. In the presence or absence of NbA12 or ... More about this image found in Nanobodies do not affect the in vitro intrinsic membrane-remodelling prop...
Images
NbB7 can be used as a molecular probe for Cavin1 in cells. (A) Co-immunoprecipitation of GFP-tagged nanobodies with Cavin1 and CAV1. HeLa cells expressing NbA12–GFP or NbB7–GFP were incubated with a GFP-binding nanobody coupled to NHS-activated Sepharose resin. Cavin1 and CAV1 were detected by western blotting. Blots represent two independent experiments. (B) Confocal microscopy of HeLa cells transfected with NbB7–GFP (top) and NbA12–GFP (bottom) nanobodies. Fixed cells were also stained for Cavin1. Scale bars: 10 μm. (C) Confocal microscopy of A431 cells transfected with NbB7–GFP (top) and NbA12–GFP (bottom) nanobodies. Fixed cells were also stained for CAV1. Scale bars: 10 μm. Fluorescence images represent two independent experiments. (D) The NbB7–GFP nanobody was detected at the cell plasma membrane by electron microscopy of BHK cells co-transfected with constructs expressing APEX–GBP and NbB7–GFP. Black arrows represent invaginated caveolae labelled with APEX–GBP. Scale bars: 1 μm (left); 500 nm (right expanded view). (E) The NbA12–GFP nanobody showed cytosolic labelling by electron microscopy of BHK cells co-transfected with constructs expressing APEX–GBP and NbA12–GFP. White arrows indicate caveolae without APEX–GBP labelling. Scale bar: 1 μm. Electron micrographs represent a single experiment.
Published: 28 April 2025
Fig. 3. NbB7 can be used as a molecular probe for Cavin1 in cells. (A) Co-immunoprecipitation of GFP-tagged nanobodies with Cavin1 and CAV1. HeLa cells expressing NbA12–GFP or NbB7–GFP were incubated with a GFP-binding nanobody coupled to NHS-activated Sepharose resin. Cavin1 and CAV1 were detec... More about this image found in NbB7 can be used as a molecular probe for Cavin1 in cells. (A) Co-immunopr...
Images
Molecular basis of nanobody NbB7 interaction with the mouse Cavin1 HR1 domain. (A) The crystal structure of trimeric mouse Cavin1 (mC1)-HR1 in complex with NbB7. The asymmetric unit contains one copy of the mC1-HR1 protein and one copy of NbB7, with the trimeric structure inferred from the crystallographic symmetry. (B) Close-up of the boxed region in A highlighting key residues mediating the interaction between NbB7 (violet) and two adjacent helices of the mC1-HR1 coiled coil (magenta and yellow). Residues in mC1-HR1 tested by mutagenesis are boxed in red. (C) Comparison of the mC1-HR1–NbB7 complex (coloured cartoon) with the previous crystal structure of the mC1-HR1 domain (PDB ID: 4QKV) (Kovtun et al., 2014). Numbers on the left indicate N- and C-terminal residues of mC1-HR1 visible in the electron density for the NbB7–mC1-HR1 complex (residues 55–98) and for mC1-HR1 alone (residues 55–143). Residues His102, Thr105 and Ser106 mutated in later experiments are indicated on the right. (D) ITC binding experiments of NbB7 and selected mutations in mC1-HR1. ND+, not determined.
Published: 28 April 2025
Fig. 4. Molecular basis of nanobody NbB7 interaction with the mouse Cavin1 HR1 domain. (A) The crystal structure of trimeric mouse Cavin1 (mC1)-HR1 in complex with NbB7. The asymmetric unit contains one copy of the mC1-HR1 protein and one copy of NbB7, with the trimeric structure inferred from t... More about this image found in Molecular basis of nanobody NbB7 interaction with the mouse Cavin1 HR1 doma...
Images
Mutational analysis of the NbB7–Cavin1 interaction in cells. (A–D) Confocal images showing the localisation of transiently co-expressed NbB7–GFP nanobody with wild type (WT) or mutated mCherry–Cavin1 in HeLa Cavin1 knockout cells. Images for each channel were inverted into black and white. The bottom panels display enlarged views of the selected regions indicated by dashed boxes in the top panels. Scale bars: 20 μm. Co-localisation between NbB7–GFP and mCherry–Cavin1 was examined by line profile analysis. Scanned lines are indicated in white in the merged images. Images represent two independent experiments.
Published: 28 April 2025
Fig. 5. Mutational analysis of the NbB7–Cavin1 interaction in cells. (A–D) Confocal images showing the localisation of transiently co-expressed NbB7–GFP nanobody with wild type (WT) or mutated mCherry–Cavin1 in HeLa Cavin1 knockout cells. Images for each channel were inverted into black and whit... More about this image found in Mutational analysis of the NbB7–Cavin1 interaction in cells. (A–D) Confoca...
Images
Altered dynamics in binding affinity between nanobodies and hydrogen-bonded pair mutants in Cavin1. (A) Heptad repeat sequence alignments of cavin proteins. The top panel represents the mouse Cavin1 (mC1) HR1 domain structure and the central residues are shown with sidechains. The bottom panel shows the sequence alignment of heptad repeats in human Cavin1–Cavin4 with the corresponding residues at positions a and d. The histidine–threonine (His102–Thr105 in mC1) pair is highlighted in green. (B) The hydrogen-bonded pair forms between the central His102–Thr105 sidechains in mC1. (C,D) The interactions of the nanobodies NbB7 (C) and NbA12 (D) with the mC1-HR1 HT/II and TS/DD mutants were validated by ITC. Upper panels represent raw data and lower panels represent the binding isotherms. The binding affinity (Kd) was determined by calculating the mean of at least two independent experiments. (E) Structural alignment of the complexes formed by the mC1-HR1 wild-type protein or HT/II and TS/DD mutants with the nanobody NbB7.
Published: 28 April 2025
Fig. 6. Altered dynamics in binding affinity between nanobodies and hydrogen-bonded pair mutants in Cavin1. (A) Heptad repeat sequence alignments of cavin proteins. The top panel represents the mouse Cavin1 (mC1) HR1 domain structure and the central residues are shown with sidechains. The bottom... More about this image found in Altered dynamics in binding affinity between nanobodies and hydrogen-bonded...
Images
Mutations in the Cavin1 HR1 domain inhibit recruitment of Cavin3 to caveolae. (A–D) Confocal images showing the localisation of transiently co-expressed mouse Cavin1–GFP mutants with mouse Cavin2–mCherry or mouse Cavin3–mCherry in PC3 cells. These cells lack endogenous cavins and only form caveolae when Cavin1 is exogenously expressed. Scale bars: 10 μm. Co-localisation between Cavin1–GFP and mCherry-tagged proteins was examined by line profile analysis. Scanned lines are indicated in white in the enlarged images. Images represent two independent experiments.
Published: 28 April 2025
Fig. 7. Mutations in the Cavin1 HR1 domain inhibit recruitment of Cavin3 to caveolae. (A–D) Confocal images showing the localisation of transiently co-expressed mouse Cavin1–GFP mutants with mouse Cavin2–mCherry or mouse Cavin3–mCherry in PC3 cells. These cells lack endogenous cavins and only fo... More about this image found in Mutations in the Cavin1 HR1 domain inhibit recruitment of Cavin3 to caveola...
Journal Articles
Images
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Images
Images
Substrate stiffness affects PSC migration and morphology. (A) Representative phase-contrast microscopy images of PSCs seeded on substrates with different stiffnesses, as indicated. Scale bars: 100 µm (B) Durotaxis polar plots depict individual PSC trajectories over 24 h (black lines) on substrates with stiffnesses as indicated for the images above in A. The radii of the blue half circles on the right-hand and left-hand sides of each plot are proportional to the mean cellular displacement towards 0° and 180°, respectively. Radial lines indicate 0°, 90°, 180° and 270°. Scale bar: 100 µm for the migration trajectories and 50 µm for the half circles. The radius of the concentric gray circle is a visual aid for the scale bar. (C–E) Scatter plots depict PSC velocity (C), area (D) and circularity (E) on substrates with indicated stiffness levels (n=30 cells from N=3 experiments). Data and statistical comparisons in C–E: median±95% confidence interval; Kruskal–Wallis statistical test with Dunn's post-hoc test. a.u., arbitrary units.
Published: 25 April 2025
Fig. 1. Substrate stiffness affects PSC migration and morphology. (A) Representative phase-contrast microscopy images of PSCs seeded on substrates with different stiffnesses, as indicated. Scale bars: 100 µm (B) Durotaxis polar plots depict individual PSC trajectories over 24 h (black lines) on ... More about this image found in Substrate stiffness affects PSC migration and morphology. (A) Representati...
Images
PSCs undergo durotaxis on linear stiffness gradient hydrogels. (A) Experimental setup of gradient gel construction. Glass-bottom dishes were coated with a UV polymerized hydrogel using a gradient photomask (grayscale form inside the dish). The resulting stiffness gradient of the gel was measured with AFM from stiff (blue) to soft (white), starting from the middle of the gel (horizontal line) in 1 mm steps (black dots on line). Created in BioRender by Pethö, Z., 2025. https://BioRender.com/eaiqsui. This figure was sublicensed under CC-BY 4.0 terms. (B) Gradient hydrogel stiffness before (gray) and after (black) ECM coating. n=40 points measured across N=4 gels. The stiffest area of the gradient hydrogel (position 2 mm, ‘stiff’) has a median stiffness of 7.6 kPa (95% confidence interval: 7.3–8.3 kPa), whereas the soft area of the gel (position 4 mm, ‘soft’), has a median stiffness of 2.4 kPa (95% confidence interval: 1.3–3.6 kPa). Note the linear stiffness decay in the gradient region after coating (red dashed line, slope=−2.47 kPa/mm). (C) Scatter plots depict gel stiffness measured before (black) and after (gray) cell migration assays at the indicated position (Pos). n=33 points measured on each of N=3 gels. (D) Representative phase-contrast image of PSCs on an ECM-coated gradient hydrogel. The dashed line indicates the center of the gradient separating ‘stiff’ and ‘soft’ gradient regions. Scale bar: 250 µm. Image representative of N=4 experiments. (E) Representative immunofluorescence images of the myofibroblastic PSC marker αSMA (green), vimentin (red) and DAPI (blue) in PSCs seeded on stiff (left) and soft (right) regions. Images are representative of N=4 experiments. Scale bars: 150 µm. (F) Scatter plot of total PSC αSMA fluorescence assessed by multiplying cell area with αSMA fluorescence intensity. n=51 cells on a soft substrate and n=99 cells on a stiff substrate were measured across N=4 experiments. (G) Schematic illustration of ‘positive’ durotaxis: cells migrate towards the stiffer side of the gradient. Created in BioRender by Pethö, Z., 2025. https://BioRender.com/g0g0gfu. This figure was sublicensed under CC-BY 4.0 terms. (H) Durotaxis polar plots depict individual PSC trajectories over 24 h (black lines) for stiff and soft areas. For each plot, the gradient orientation is towards the left side. The radii of the blue half circles on the right-hand and left-hand sides of each plot are proportional to the mean cellular displacement towards 0° and 180°, respectively. Radial lines indicate 0°, 90°, 180° and 270°. Scale bar: 100 µm for the migration trajectories and 50 µm for the half circles. Radius of the concentric gray circle is a visual aid for the scale bar. (I–L) Scatter plots show the PSC durotaxis index (I), velocity (J), displacement along the X-axis up the stiffness gradient (K) and area (L), on stiff (left) and soft (right) areas of the gradient hydrogels. n=56 cells measured across N=4 experiments. Data in B,C,F and I–L: median±95% confidence interval. Statistical tests: Mann–Whitney U-test in C,F and J–L; one-sample Wilcoxon test in I. a.u., arbitrary units; n.s., not significant.
Published: 25 April 2025
Fig. 2. PSCs undergo durotaxis on linear stiffness gradient hydrogels. (A) Experimental setup of gradient gel construction. Glass-bottom dishes were coated with a UV polymerized hydrogel using a gradient photomask (grayscale form inside the dish). The resulting stiffness gradient of the gel was ... More about this image found in PSCs undergo durotaxis on linear stiffness gradient hydrogels. (A) Experim...
Images
Piezo1 is involved in PSC durotaxis. (A) Durotaxis polar plots of wild-type (Wt, left) and Piezo1GFAP KO PSCs depict cell trajectories over 24 h (black lines). For each plot, the gradient orientation is towards the left side. The radii of the blue half circles on the right-hand and left-hand sides of each plot are proportional to the mean cellular displacement towards 0° and 180°, respectively. Radial lines indicate 0°, 90°, 180° and 270°. Scale bar: 100 µm for the migration trajectories and 50 µm for the half circles. Radius of the concentric gray circle is a visual aid for the scale bar. n=29 cells for Wt, n=22 cells for Piezo1GFAP KO from N=3 experiments. (B) Interpretation of results depicted in A. In Piezo1GFAP KO PSCs the intracellular Ca2+ signal is missing in response to stiffness sensing. Thus, Piezo1GFAP KO PSCs fail to perform durotaxis. (C) Durotaxis indices of Piezo1GFAP KO PSCs (orange, open), PSCs treated with 100 nM GsMTx-4 (orange, filled), PSCs treated with 5 µM Yoda1 (green) and their respective controls (black) on stiffness gradient hydrogels, compared to PSCs on gels with constant stiffness (gray, mean marked by dotted line). Where cells undergo durotaxis, the P value is indicated. n≥22 cells from N≥3 experiments. (D) Representative immunofluorescence image of PSCs stained for Piezo1 (red), from N=3 experiments. Channels were quantified in rectangular regions in the cell center (red) and periphery (cyan). Scale bar: 50 µm. (E) Box and whisker plot shows quantification of Piezo1 channel density in rectangular regions as outlined in D. Center n=41, periphery n=82 from N=3 experiments. (F) Schematic interpretation of how Yoda1 treatment affects durotaxis by clamping Piezo1 activity to its maximal value throughout the cell. [Ca2+]i increases over the whole cell, diminishing the differential stiffness sensing by Piezo1. (G) F340/F380 ratios were used as a readout for intracellular Ca2+ measurements of PSCs. The F340/F380 ratio is a surrogate of the [Ca2+]i. After control superfusion (black bar), PSCs seeded on hydrogels with varying stiffness (750 Pa, 5 kPa, 13.5 kPa, and gradient gels) were superfused with 5 µM Yoda1 (white bar). n≥13 cells from N=3 experiments. Gray vertical dashed line indicates the start of Yoda1 superfusion. (H) Box and whisker plots show quantification of F340/F380 ratios of PSCs superfused with control solution from experiments detailed in G. (I) Box and whisker plots indicate the slope of F340/F380 ratio upon Yoda1 application, from experiments detailed in G. Data in C are represented as mean±s.e.m., and G are median±95% confidence interval. Boxes in E, H and I extend from the 25th to 75th percentiles, whiskers from 10th to 90th percentiles, and points below and above the whiskers are drawn as individual points. Statistical tests are as follows: Dunnett's multiple comparison test in C; Mann–Whitney U-test in E, and Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn's post-hoc test in H and I. Statistical comparison of panel C is further detailed in Table S2. a.u., arbitrary units; n.s., not significant. Images in B and F were created in BioRender by Pethö, Z., 2025. https://BioRender.com/szyhl8v. This figure was sublicensed under CC-BY 4.0 terms.
Published: 25 April 2025
Fig. 3. Piezo1 is involved in PSC durotaxis. (A) Durotaxis polar plots of wild-type (Wt, left) and Piezo1 GFAP KO PSCs depict cell trajectories over 24 h (black lines). For each plot, the gradient orientation is towards the left side. The radii of the blue half circles on the right-hand and lef... More about this image found in Piezo1 is involved in PSC durotaxis. (A) Durotaxis polar plots of wild-typ...
Images
Multiple mechanosensitive channels are necessary for durotaxis. (A) Durotaxis polar plots depict cell trajectories over 24 h (black lines) of wild-type (Wt, top) and TRPC1 KO (TRPC1-KO, bottom) PSCs treated with the TRPV4 inhibitor 100 nM HC067047. For each plot, the gradient orientation is towards the left side. The radii of the blue half circles on the right-hand and left-hand sides of each plot are proportional to the mean cellular displacement towards 0° and 180°, respectively. Radial lines indicate 0°, 90°, 180° and 270°. Scale bar: 100 µm for the migration trajectories and 50 µm for the half circles. Radius of the concentric gray circle is a visual aid for the scale bar. n=28 for Wt and n=59 for TRPC1-KO cell trajectories from N=3 experiments. (B) Durotaxis indices of n=28 wild-type PSCs (TRPC1 +) from N=3 experiments and n=59 PSCs from TRPC1 KO mice (TRPC1 −) from N=3 experiments (left and right from vertical line, respectively) seeded on gradient hydrogels treated with 0.1% DMSO (black), 10 µM TRPV4 activator GSK1016790A (TRPV4 ↑, light blue) or 100 nM HC067047 (TRPV4 ↓, purple). They are compared with wild-type PSCs seeded on gels with homogeneous stiffness (gray, median marked by dotted line). n=50 cell trajectories from N=4 experiments. (C) Representative graphs of Mn2+ quench experiments showing the relative fluorescence intensity (F/F0) of Fura-2 AM-loaded wild-type and TRPC1 KO PSCs. Upon application of Mn2+ (box), quenching of the Fura-2 signal can be observed under control conditions (black), in the presence of 20 nM GSK1016790A (blue) or 2 µM HC067047 (purple). (D) Mn2+ entry rates of wild-type PSCs (TRPC1 +) and PSCs from TRPC1 KO mice (TRPC1 −) determined under control conditions (TRPV4 +) and in the presence of GSK1016790A (20 nM, TRPV4 ↑; 100 nM, TRPV4 ↑↑) or 2 µM HC067047 (TRPV4 ↓), as indicated. n≥87 cells from N=3 experiments. (E) Representative immunofluorescence image of a PSC stained for TRPV4 (red) and TLN1 (cyan), with magnified image in the inset. Scale bars: 50 µm; inset, 5 µm. Images are representative of N=3 experiments. (F) Durotaxis indices as a function of ion channel activity. To estimate total channel activity, individual channel activity was binned: impaired channel=0; intermediate activity=1 for TRPV4 and TRPC1; intermediate activity=2 for Piezo1; overactivation=3 for TRPV4; and overactivation=4 for Piezo1. A Gaussian curve was fitted over the data. Data in B are represented as median±95% confidence interval; data in D are represented as mean±s.e.m.; data in F are represented as median±95% confidence interval. Statistical tests: Kruskal–Wallis statistical test with Dunn's post-hoc test in B; one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test in D. Statistical comparison of panel B is further detailed in Table S2. a.u., arbitrary units.
Published: 25 April 2025
Fig. 4. Multiple mechanosensitive channels are necessary for durotaxis. (A) Durotaxis polar plots depict cell trajectories over 24 h (black lines) of wild-type (Wt, top) and TRPC1 KO (TRPC1-KO, bottom) PSCs treated with the TRPV4 inhibitor 100 nM HC067047. For each plot, the gradient orientation... More about this image found in Multiple mechanosensitive channels are necessary for durotaxis. (A) Durota...
Images
The mathematical model supports the hypothesis of the dependence of durotaxis on ion channel function. (A) E denotes the elastic modulus of the substratum; it is larger for a stiffer material. The substratum's stiffness gradient is indicated in black. (B) The bell-shaped function q accounts for the strength of the cell to sense the gradient of E due to the relative number of open versus closed channels. (C) The diagram depicts the velocity of the probability density of the cell (green) in dependence of the channel opening rate α. Red is the density of open channels. α=10 corresponds to an intermediate channel activity, whereas α=1 and α=100 indicate an impaired or overactivated channel function, respectively. The closing rate is β=1. For a comparison, initially two cells (green rectangles) are located at around 0.2 (stiffer region) and 0.8 (less stiff region). The cell located on the right moves from right to left, towards the stiffer region. The cell on the left is already located in the stiffer region and hardly changes position at all. Initial time points are shown in light green and red, with colors becoming progressively darker for subsequent time points. These snapshots are equidistant in time. PSC movement towards the stiffer region is attenuated if the mechanosensitive channels are closed (α=1) or overactivated (α=100).
Published: 25 April 2025
Fig. 5. The mathematical model supports the hypothesis of the dependence of durotaxis on ion channel function. (A) E denotes the elastic modulus of the substratum; it is larger for a stiffer material. The substratum's stiffness gradient is indicated in black. (B) The bell-shaped function q a... More about this image found in The mathematical model supports the hypothesis of the dependence of durotax...
Images
The HOPS Vps41Δ527–640 mutant forms a hexameric complex and can be purified from yeast. (A) Density map generated from the atomic model of the yeast HOPS tethering complex (left; PDB: 7ZU0 and AlphaFold AF-P38959-F1) and a zoom-in of the predicted atomic model of Vps41 from wild-type (WT; middle) and Δ527–640-mutant (right) HOPS in ribbon representation with α-helices shown as tubes. The density map is shown here as an outline. The deleted fragment of the α-solenoid is indicated. HOPS subunits are colored as follows: Vps41, light green; Vps11, light blue; Vps18, dark blue; Vps16, sand; Vps33, brown; Vps39, dark green. (B) Proteins from affinity purification (eluate), the concentrated HOPS complex [size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) load] and the SEC peak were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Red asterisks indicate purified Vps41Δ527–640. (C) Western blot analysis of HOPS mutant purification. For raw data, see Fig. S4. ft, flow through sample, representing unbound protein. (D) SEC of the affinity-purified HOPS Vps41Δ527–640 protein. (E) Mass photometry analysis of the mutant Vps41Δ527–640 HOPS complex. The peak fraction from SEC was analyzed for the respective size of the complex. (F) Representative two-dimensional class averages obtained from negative-stain electron microscopy analysis and the corresponding schematics of wild-type and mutant HOPS. Vps41 subunits are indicated by violet arrowheads. Subunits in the schematics are colored as in A. Scale bars: 330 Å.
Published: 25 April 2025
Fig. 1. The HOPS Vps41 Δ527–640 mutant forms a hexameric complex and can be purified from yeast. (A) Density map generated from the atomic model of the yeast HOPS tethering complex (left; PDB: 7ZU0 and AlphaFold AF-P38959-F1) and a zoom-in of the predicted atomic model of Vps41 from wild-type... More about this image found in The HOPS Vps41 Δ527–640 mutant forms a hexameric complex and can be purifi...