Fertilisation in ascidians triggers a series of periodic rises in cytosolic Ca2+ that are essential for release from metaphase I arrest and progression through meiosis II. These sperm-triggered Ca2+ oscillations are switched off at exit from meiosis II. Ascidian zygotes provided the first demonstration of the positive feedback loop whereby elevated Cdk1 activity maintained these Ca2+ oscillations. Since then it has been reported that Cdk1 sensitises the type I inositol trisphosphate [Ins(1,4,5)P3] receptor in somatic cells, and that sperm-triggered Ca2+ oscillations in mouse zygotes stop because the forming pronuclei sequester phospholipase C zeta that was delivered to the egg by the fertilising sperm.
Here, using enucleation, we demonstrate in ascidian eggs that Ca2+ spiking stops at the correct time in the absence of pronuclei. Sequestration of sperm factor is therefore not involved in terminating Ca2+ spiking for these eggs. Instead we found that microinjection of the Cdk1 inhibitor p21 blocked Ca2+ spiking induced by ascidian sperm extract (ASE). However, such eggs were still capable of releasing Ca2+ in response to Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptor agonists, indicating that ASE-triggered Ca2+ oscillations can stop even though the response to Ins(1,4,5)P3 remained elevated. These data suggest that Cdk1 activity promotes Ins(1,4,5)P3 production in the presence of the sperm factor, rather than sensitising the Ca2+ releasing machinery to Ins(1,4,5)P3. These findings suggest a new link between this cell cycle kinase and the Ins(1,4,5)P3 pathway.
The essential regulatory role played by intracellular Ca2+ in a wide variety of cellular events is well established (Berridge and Dupont, 1994). A good example is the rise in Ca2+ that occurs universally at fertilisation (Jaffe, 1980; Cuthbertson et al., 1981; Swann and Ozil, 1994). This rise may take the form of a single transient rise as seen in the jellyfish (Freeman and Ridgeway, 1993), some species of molluscs (Deguchi and Osani, 1994), sea urchins (Steinhardt et al., 1977) and frog (Busa and Nuccitelli, 1985), or as a series of transient rises or oscillations, as seen in ascidians (McDougall and Sardet, 1995; Runft and Jaffe, 2000), nemertean worms (Stricker, 1996) and mammals, e.g. mouse (Cuthbertson and Cobbold, 1985; Swann and Ozil, 1994) (reviewed by Whitaker, 2006). A correlation can be drawn between the number of Ca2+ rises and the stage of the meiotic cell cycle at which the eggs are arrested. As a rule, Ca2+ oscillations have only been observed in oocytes that are fertilised during meiotic metaphase (for a review, see Sardet et al., 1998). In these species, evidence suggests that full activation and exit from meiosis will only occur after a series of oscillations of sufficient magnitude and duration has taken place (Kline and Kline, 1992; Lawrence et al., 1998; Ozil et al., 2005).
Almost a century after Jacques Loeb suggested that “the spermatozoon carries a catalytic substance into the egg” (Loeb, 1901) it was demonstrated that sperm cytosol from hamsters contains a protein factor capable of triggering Ca2+ oscillations when microinjected into eggs (Swann, 1990). This sperm factor hypothesis was later confirmed in other mammalian species (Stice and Robl, 1990; Homa and Swann, 1994; Wu et al., 1997), nemerteans (Stricker, 1997) and ascidians (Kyozuka et al., 1998; McDougall et al., 2000; Runft and Jaffe, 2000). The sperm factor model is based upon sperm-egg fusion (allowing delivery of the sperm protein into the egg), and probably explained earlier observations in sea urchin eggs showing that egg activation could be blocked by preventing sperm-egg fusion; sperm-egg binding alone proving insufficient for activation (Shen and Steinhardt, 1984). Although the expectation was that a universal sperm factor would trigger the Ca2+ increase at fertilisation, this assumption was not supported with the identification of mammalian sperm factor in 2002 by Saunders et al. (Saunders et al., 2002). For example, the testes-specific isoform of the vertebrate sperm factor phospholipase C zeta (PLCζ) has not been found in sequenced genomes outside of the vertebrates (A.M. and K.T.J., unpublished observations). Rather there is evidence that the sperm factor in ascidians and echinoderms is most likely an activator of an Src family kinase (SFK) pathway, which at fertilisation triggers Ca2+ release by activation of egg-derived PLCγ (Abassi et al., 2000; Runft et al., 2002; Giusti et al., 2003).
In both ascidians and mammals, sperm-triggered Ca2+ oscillations are controlled by the metaphase-like state of the zygote. Consequently it is important to determine how the egg switches off the Ca2+ oscillations when they have completed their task of activating the egg. In ascidians it was initially demonstrated that sperm-triggered Ca2+ oscillations are switched off at the precise moment that the fertilised egg exits meiosis (Speksnijder et al., 1989; McDougall and Levasseur, 1998). This correlation appears more than just a coincidence, not just in ascidians but also in mammals, since preventing meiotic exit in fertilised mouse eggs by inducing the spindle assembly checkpoint leads to persistent Ca2+ oscillations (Jones et al., 1995). The stimulatory effect of the metaphase-like state in maintaining Ca2+ oscillations was also demonstrated in fertilised ascidian zygotes injected with mRNA encoding a truncated form of cyclin B1 that prevents inactivation of Cdk1. The eggs were arrested in a metaphase-like state and Ca2+ oscillations persisted for as long as Cdk1 activity remained elevated (Levasseur and McDougall, 2000).
It has now been shown in somatic cells (a human T cell line) that the type I inositol trisphosphate receptor [Ins(1,4,5)P3R] is phosphorylated on two sites by Cdk1, leading to an increase in inositol trisphosphate [Ins(1,4,5)P3] binding (Malathi et al., 2003; Li et al., 2005). This observation may partly explain the Ca2+ rises that have been recorded during M phase in somatic cells (Ratan et al., 1986; Kao et al., 1990), during early embryogenesis (Groigno and Whitaker, 1998), and during meiotic M phase. However, how the production of Ins(1,4,5)P3 is increased to trigger Ca2+ rises during M phase (meiotic or mitotic) is not known. One clue is that the mammalian sperm factor is active until it is sequestered by the pronuclei as the Ca2+ oscillations stop (Marangos et al., 2003; Larman et al., 2004). However, since PLCζ is testes-specific and confined to the vertebrates, there are likely other ways of regulating Ins(1,4,5)P3 production during M phase (meiotic or mitotic). Here, using ascidians as a model system, we have explored the mechanism by which the Ca2+ signalling system is modulated during meiotic M phase. From a combined study of the specific inhibition of Cdk1 activity with p21, and flash photolysis of caged Ins(1,4,5)P3 in activated eggs, we propose that Ins(1,4,5)P3 production is inhibited when Cdk1 activity is abrogated. In addition, we suggest that the mechanism of regulating Ins(1,4,5)P3 production during meiotic M phase is not dependent on pronucleus formation.
Sperm-extract-triggered Ca2+ oscillations stop in the absence of pronuclei
We made small cytoplasts (Fig. 1A), into which ascidian sperm extract (ASE) was injected to test the hypothesis whether the fertilisation-associated Ca2+ oscillations stop as a result of pronuclear formation and sequestration of sperm factor into the pronuclei (Marangos et al., 2003; Larman et al., 2004). In whole eggs activated with ASE, Ca2+ oscillations propagate as waves (Kyozuka et al., 1998; McDougall et al., 2000). Similarly the Ca2+ oscillations were seen to propagate as waves in both large and small cytoplasts (Fig. 1B). The Ca2+ oscillations stopped in cytoplasts at the same time as they did in the (chromatin containing) karyoplast (Fig. 1C). In these experiments extrusion of polar bodies was taken as confirmation of the presence of chromatin since Hoechst staining was not used.
The above experiment suggests that in ascidian eggs, chromatin, and hence ultimately pronuclei, play little part in the cessation of Ca2+ oscillations. However, additional proof was needed that the termination of the Ca2+ oscillations following injection of ASE into cytoplasts was not a consequence of the small size of the cytoplast or the manipulation they had endured during their creation. We therefore made a second series of cytoplasts; eggs previously stained with Hoechst to reveal the location of the chromatin were enucleated leaving a very large cytoplast (Fig. 2A). We then injected ASE into these large cytoplasts and found that the Ca2+ oscillations again stopped at the same time as control, nucleated eggs (Fig. 2Ba). Furthermore, it was possible to induce long-lasting Ca2+ oscillations in these large cytoplasts by first injecting Δ90-cyclinB1::GFP protein to maintain high Cdk1 activity (Fig. 2Bb). This result suggested that the cytoplasts have a sufficiently intact Ca2+ homeostatic machinery to display long-lasting Ca2+ rises.
Inhibiting Cdk1 activity inhibits the second series of Ca2+ oscillations
The above experiments appear to rule out a role for pronuclei in the termination of fertilisation-associated Ca2+ oscillations in ascidians, so we set out to investigate the role played by Cdk1 activity in regulating this process. In order to do this we used p21, a Cdk inhibitor (Xiong et al., 1993), which we have previously shown to be an effective inhibitor of Cdk1 activity and not to inhibit MAPK activity in ascidian eggs (Levasseur and McDougall, 2003).
Eggs injected with an inhibitory concentration of p21 (fused to GFP for quantification purposes) were then further injected with ASE. In these eggs the second phase Ca2+ oscillations were completely absent, whereas in control eggs injected only with ASE and imaged simultaneously the pattern of Ca2+ oscillations was normal (Fig. 3). This suggested a role for Cdk1 activity in generating second phase Ca2+ oscillations.
Prolonged Δ90 cyclin B1-mediated oscillations are terminated by the addition of p21
Finally, to obtain further evidence that Cdk1 activity is necessary for second phase Ca2+ oscillations, we set out to test the hypothesis that long-lasting Δ90-cyclin B1-mediated oscillations would stop if the Δ90-dependent Cdk1 activity was inhibited. Pairs of eggs were injected with Δ90 cyclin B1::GFP protein and Ca2+ oscillations were triggered by injection of ASE. Once it was clear that both eggs were giving prolonged oscillations, one egg was then injected with p21::GFP protein (the Δ90 cyclin B::GFP protein was present at such a concentration as to not interfere with quantification of p21). The oscillations stopped promptly, within 10 minutes, in the p21 injected egg (Fig. 4).
This, taken together with the previous data, suggests that Cdk1 activity is both necessary and sufficient for the generation of second phase Ca2+ oscillations. We next hypothesised that Cdk1 may regulate the oscillations in at least one of two ways; either by regulating Ins(1,4,5)P3 generation, or by controlling the responsiveness of the Ca2+ releasing machinery, or possibly even both (see Discussion).
Low Cdk1 activity does not cause Ins(1,4,5)P3 responsiveness to decline
We thus sought to test the hypothesis that Cdk1 activity is responsible for modulating the generation of Ins(1,4,5)P3 that is necessary for the second phase Ca2+ oscillations. In order to do this we needed to eliminate the other possible mechanism, namely that Cdk1 regulates responsiveness of the Ca2+ releasing machinery. Thus we set out to test whether, by inhibiting Cdk1 activity, we could detect a decline in responsiveness to Ins(1,4,5)P3. This was performed in two different ways.
Firstly we used the potent non-hydrolysable Ins(1,4,5)P3 analogue, adenophostin A. The adenophostin A concentration was titrated to the lowest level needed to give repeated Ca2+ oscillations (Fig. 5A). This was found to be at a final egg concentration of approximately 0.25 μM. This gave one large initial Ca2+ rise followed by four or five oscillations. A final concentration of 0.1 μM gave the same large initial rise but only one or two very small oscillations, whereas concentrations up to 2 μM gave the same pattern of oscillations seen with 0.25 μM. Eggs were then injected with an inhibitory concentration of p21::GFP and activated by injection with ASE. Injection of adenophostin A to 0.25 μM during the period when the egg would normally have been producing second phase oscillations gave a large Ca2+ rise and the four or five oscillations seen during the titration experiment (Fig. 5Ba). Therefore, inhibition of Cdk1 activity did not result in a decline in responsiveness to Ins(1,4,5)P3. As a control to show that this dose of adenophostin is not supramaximal, the same amount was injected into an egg after meiotic exit. This resulted in only a single Ca2+ rise with no subsequent oscillations (Fig. 5Bb), evidence that this dose of adenophostin is within the range that eggs naturally desensitise at meiotic exit.
Next, instead of adenophostin injection providing the exogenous source of agonist, we used caged gPtdIns(4,5)P2, a slowly hydrolysable analogue of Ins(1,4,5)P3, discrete doses of which could be delivered by ultraviolet (UV) uncaging. These experiments also allowed direct comparison of responsiveness between control eggs and eggs with low Cdk1 activity. Pairs of eggs were coinjected with caged gPtdIns(4,5)P2 and the Ca2+ indicator Ca2+ Green (Molecular Probes Invitrogen), and then one egg was further injected with an inhibitory concentration of p21::HcRed protein (the red fusion variant was used so as not to interfere with the Ca2+ Green signal). Flashes of UV light of increasing duration were then applied to discover the threshold needed to give a measurable Ca2+ signal in the eggs (Fig. 6, flash no. 1). This was then the flash duration used throughout the rest of the experiment. Both eggs were then activated synchronously by injection of ASE, and once the second phase oscillations had commenced in the control egg, UV-light flashes were administered in between each control second phase oscillation. The result was that each flash elicited a response of similar (or even slightly larger) magnitude in the p21-injected egg compared to the control (Fig. 6, flashes 2-6). (We did note, however, that control eggs displayed a shoulder as the Ca2+ level approached basal levels whereas the p21-injected eggs did not display the shoulder.) This was taken as further evidence that lowering the Cdk1 activity does not result in a decline in responsiveness of the Ins(1,4,5)P3R. As a control to show that this duration of flash was not releasing supramaximal amounts of gPtdIns(4,5)P2, and thereby eliciting a false response, we gave two further flashes after the second phase oscillations had stopped in the control. These flashes caused no response in the now desensitised control egg (Fig. 6, flashes seven and eight), showing that the dose of gPtdIns(4,5)P2 released was within the range of desensitisation that occurs at meiotic exit. A supramaximal dose would have caused a Ca2+ release in the control after meiotic exit.
The pronucleus plays no part in the temporal regulation of the sperm-triggered Ca2+ oscillations in the ascidian
In mammals elegant experiments indicate that sperm-triggered Ca2+ oscillations may be switched off by the sequestration of PLCζ into the pronuclei (Jones et al., 1995; Kono et al., 1995; Marangos et al., 2003; Larman et al., 2004). This model is unlikely to explain the pattern of the oscillations in ascidians, where the oscillations stop between meiosis I and meiosis II without formation of pronuclei (McDougall and Levasseur, 1998). However, since only the second phase of Ca2+ oscillations are inhibited by Cdk1 inhibition (Levasseur and McDougall, 2000), only the second phase of Ca2+ oscillations are associated with the metaphase-like state. Thus, the pause between the first and second phases of oscillations may be misleading. To understand how the sperm-triggered Ca2+ oscillations are controlled it is therefore important to focus only on the second phase of Ca2+ oscillations. Since these start during meiosis II and end minutes before formation of the pronucleus it is possible that they are switched off by a mechanism requiring pronuclear formation, as in mammals (Marangos et al., 2003; Larman et al., 2004).
We therefore decided to test whether the sequestration model is conserved in ascidian eggs, and to do this we developed a technique for producing two separate egg fragments from a single egg before activation; a karyoplast, which retains the nuclear material, and a cytoplast lacking the nuclear material and hence unable to form a pronucleus (Fig. 1A). We found that, as in whole eggs, the oscillations propagated as waves (Fig. 1B), and stopped at the expected time in both cytoplasts and karyoplasts (Fig. 1C).
A similar study in mouse eggs, in which one-cell embryos were bisected to produce nucleate and anucleate halves, showed oscillations stopped at approximately the same time in each half (Day et al., 2000). However, the difficulty in producing nucleate and anucleate halves during fertilisation without perturbing the ability of the cell to regulate intracellular Ca2+ has been raised (Marangos et al., 2003).
The bisection process we used (Fig. 1B) consisted of a simple aspiration technique which involved neither cytochalasin treatment nor segmentation by a fine needle. Nevertheless, we went on to develop an even more gentle bisection technique (Fig. 2A) whereby we were able to show that in large enucleated eggs the Ca2+ oscillations stopped at the expected time (Fig. 2Ba) and, moreover, that these cytoplasts were still capable of giving prolonged oscillations when Cdk1 activity remained elevated due to the presence of Δ90 cyclin B1 (Fig. 2Bb). These observations demonstrate that enucleated eggs behave indistinguishably from nucleated eggs in their physiological response to ASE.
We therefore conclude from these data that formation of pronuclei plays no essential role in the temporal regulation of the Ca2+ oscillations in ASE-activated ascidian eggs.
Cdk1 activity is both necessary and sufficient for the generation of second phase Ca2+ oscillations
We have previously shown that there is a close correlation between Cdk1 activity and sperm-triggered Ca2+ oscillations in the ascidian (McDougall and Levasseur, 1998), and that maintaining Cdk1 activity prolongs the oscillations, whereas the second phase oscillations are absent when Cdk1 activity is inhibited using the pharmacological inhibitor roscovitine (Levasseur and McDougall, 2000). However, although roscovitine has also been shown to abolish all but the first Ca2+ oscillation in fertilised mouse eggs (Deng and Shen, 2000), it has inhibitory effects on other Ca2+ channels (Yan et al., 2002), leading us to question the specificity of this pharmacological inhibitor.
Here instead of roscovitine we used the specific Cdk inhibitor p21, and showed that there were no second phase Ca2+ oscillations in eggs activated by ASE injection when Cdk1 activity is inhibited with p21 (Fig. 3). The results agree with those achieved using roscovitine (Levasseur and McDougall, 2000), in that the first Ca2+ rise is unaffected.
When p21 was injected into eggs where Cdk1 activity had been kept elevated with Δ90 cyclin B1, the prolonged oscillations rapidly ceased (Fig. 4). This corroborates our previous findings that Cdk1 activity positively regulates Ca2+ oscillations (Levasseur and McDougall, 2000). These data indicate that Cdk1 activity is both necessary and sufficient for second phase ASE-induced Ca2+ oscillations.
How does Cdk1 activity positively regulate the second phase Ca2+ oscillations?
Having provided evidence of the necessity for Cdk1 activity in the generation of second phase Ca2+ oscillations, we next addressed the mechanism by which Cdk1 controls these oscillations. We tested two possibilities; the first is that Cdk1 could regulate the responsiveness of the Ins(1,4,5)P3Rs to Ins(1,4,5)P3. The second is that Cdk1 activity modulates, directly or indirectly, Ins(1,4,5)P3 production by a sperm-derived protein, which is not PLCζ, but more likely an SFK regulator in the ascidian (see below for our model).
The ability of eggs to respond to injection of adenophostin (Fig. 5) and uncaging of gPtdIns(4,5)P2 (Fig. 6) when ASE-induced Ca2+ spiking was inhibited by p21 strongly suggests that inhibition of Cdk1 activity does not result in a decline in Ins(1,4,5)P3 responsiveness, indicating that Cdk1 activity most likely plays a positive regulatory role in the generation of Ins(1,4,5)P3.
Regulation of sperm-triggered Ca2+ oscillations in other species
In species other than the ascidian, one possibility is that Cdk1 activity regulates responsiveness of the Ins(1,4,5)P3R. Evidence for this comes from somatic cells where the type I Ins(1,4,5)P3R was demonstrated to be a substrate of Cdk1 and that the phosphorylation sites are conserved from human to Drosophila (Malathi et al., 2003), although interestingly this conservation does not extend to the ascidian (Fig. 7). However, in vertebrate eggs it is more likely that MAPK activity is involved in the control of sperm-triggered Ca2+ oscillations (Lee et al., 2006). These data are important in light of the finding that the response of the Ins(1,4,5)P3R declines when the MAPK activity falls in activated ascidian (McDougall and Levasseur, 1998) and mouse eggs (Jellerette et al., 2004). However, there does not always appear to be a causal relationship between the termination of the Ca2+ oscillations and the fall in responsiveness of the Ins(1,4,5)P3R. For example, the fall in responsiveness of the Ins(1,4,5)P3R occurs after the oscillations terminate in the ascidian (Levasseur and McDougall, 2003), whereas the fall in responsiveness in the mouse occurs at the time the oscillations are switched off (Jellerette et al., 2004). It is more likely that the Ca2+ oscillations terminate because the production of Ins(1,4,5)P3 is switched off as the zygote exits the metaphase-like state.
An elegant mechanism for switching off production of Ins(1,4,5)P3 has been proposed in the mouse (Marangos et al., 2003). The sperm factor PLCζ has a bipartite nuclear localisation signal and when nuclear localisation signal (NLS)-truncated PLCζ cRNA is injected into unfertilised oocytes it triggers a series of Ca2+ oscillations that do not terminate (Larman et al., 2004), although this result was not seen in recent work in which point mutation in the NLS of PLCζ abolished pronuclear localisation but induced Ca2+ oscillations, which stopped prior to formation of the pronucleus (Kuroda et al., 2006). Further evidence for a role of the pronuclei comes from the finding that fertilised eggs injected with either WGA to prevent pronuclear formation, or with a dominant negative importin B to inhibit pronuclear localisation, display Ca2+ oscillations that persist after the time of pronuclear formation and the decline of both MAPK and Cdk1 activity (Marangos et al., 2003). Although there appears to be a growing body of evidence in support of the nuclear localisation hypothesis some discrepancies persist. First, zygotes that lack nuclei should not be able to switch off Ca2+ oscillations. However, one report indicates that the Ca2+ oscillations stop in nucleus-free cytoplasts at the same time as in control halves (Day et al., 2000). The bisection itself has been proposed as an explanation of the perturbation of the Ca2+ signalling machinery in these cytoplasts, but it has not yet been tested. Second, PLCζ should enter the nuclei before the Ca2+ oscillations stop. This is sometimes but not always the case: PLCζ was found to enter the nuclei both before and after the oscillations terminate (Yoda et al., 2004; Sone et al., 2005). However, even with these caveats, the observations that the Ca2+ oscillations are not stopped by blocking nuclear import of native proteins following fertilisation support the nuclear sequestration hypothesis in the mouse, although it is possible that other mechanisms, such as Ins(1,4,5)P3R desensitisation, play some role.
Another role has been assigned for Cdk1 activity in nemertean worms, where it has been proposed to transform the endoplasmic reticulum (ER; the major cytosolic store of Ca2+) into clusters, and consequently increases the capacity to produce normal Ca2+ oscillations, However, the ability to generate Ca2+ oscillations in the absence of ER clusters led the authors themselves to question a direct correlation between ER structure and oscillatory behaviour (Stricker and Smyth, 2003). Cdk1 has also been shown to be involved in regulating ER clustering in mouse eggs, but the same study also shows that there is no correlation between the time the clusters disperse and when the Ca2+ oscillations stop (Fitzharris et al., 2003). Although it is well known that there is ER-rich localisation in the ascidian egg (Speksnijder et al., 1993; Roegiers et al., 1995) we chose not to investigate a link between Cdk1 activity and ER structure as we report here that ascidian eggs show no decline in Ins(1,4,5)P3 responsiveness when Cdk1 activity is inhibited. This would appear to rule out any significant disruption of ER structure due to low Cdk1 activity.
A model for the regulation of sperm-triggered Ca2+ oscillations in the ascidian
We demonstrated in two different ways that in the absence of Cdk1 activity Ins(1,4,5)P3 responsiveness does not decline, and therefore we conclude that Cdk1 controls the oscillations by positively regulating Ins(1,4,5)P3 generation. This model is consistent with our previous observations that responsiveness does not decline when the oscillations pause and Cdk1 activity is low (McDougall and Levasseur, 1998), and also that responsiveness only declines after meiotic exit, when the oscillations have already stopped (Levasseur and McDougall, 2003). We have also shown here and previously (Levasseur and McDougall, 2000) that the first sperm-induced Ca2+ signal is Cdk1 independent. This is consistent with observations that there is a single Ca2+ rise in species that are fertilised when Cdk1 activity is low, i.e. either before or after meiotic entry (Stricker, 1999).
We therefore propose the following model (Fig. 8). Following fertilisation, the ascidian sperm factor is delivered into the egg with active Ca2+-releasing activity, resulting in the first phase of Ca2+ oscillations. The sperm factor is then inactivated by an unknown egg-derived mechanism such that the Ca2+ oscillations pause, and it is the rise in Cdk1 activity following the metaphase-anaphase transition of meiosis I that restores the Ca2+-releasing activity of the sperm factor, resulting in the second phase Ca2+ oscillations. The decline in Cdk1 activity prior to meiotic exit results in inactivation of the sperm factor and consequently the oscillations cease. We hypothesise that Cdk1 modulates sperm factor activity directly by phosphorylation. Indeed the closest match in the ascidian to SpSFK1, the SFK known to cause the fertilisation Ca2+ rise in the sea urchin (Giusti et al., 2003), has two consensus Cdk1 phosphorylation sites. Interestingly, these sites are not conserved in SpSFK1, but this is still consistent with our model, in that sea urchin eggs are arrested in interphase, and a single Ca2+ rise at fertilisation is sufficient for entry into first mitosis.
Finally, these findings may be of significance to how other non-PLCζ-derived Ca2+ signals are regulated in the mitotic cell cycle, for example, those that have been observed to occur at anaphase in sea urchin embryos (Groigno and Whitaker, 1998) and the G2-M transition in HeLa cells (Patel et al., 1999).
Materials and Methods
Specimens of the two species of ascidian used in this study, Ascidiella aspersa and Phallusia mammillata, were collected on the North East coast of England and the Mediterranean coast of France, respectively. Animals were kept for several weeks in the laboratory in a tank of sea water at 10°C. Oocytes were harvested and prepared for microinjection and microscopy as described previously (Keihart, 1982).
Plasmid constructs and fusion protein purification
Construction and synthesis of mRNA from the Δ90 cyclin B1::GFP plasmid has been described previously (Levasseur and McDougall, 2000), as has the construction and purification of fusion protein from the p21::GFP plasmid (Levasseur and McDougall, 2003). Here we also made a red fluorescent p21 fusion, p21::HcRed. The plasmid containing HcRed, pHcRed 1-1, was purchased from BD Biosciences or Clontech, and the HcRed gene was then subcloned, in frame, next to p21 in the GST purification vector pGEX 6P-1 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) using a PCR-based approach. Fusion protein was then purified according to the kit protocol and the purified protein was buffer exchanged into PBS and concentrated to approximately 10 mg/ml using Microcon YM 30 spin concentrators (Millipore, UK). Δ90cyclin B::GFP fusion protein was also subcloned, expressed and purified in the same way to a final concentration of approximately 1 mg/ml. Aliquots were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –70°C.
Microinjection and fluorescent measurement of Ca2+, GFP, HcRED and DNA
Oocytes were mounted in a wedge based on the design of Keihart (Keihart, 1982) and microinjected as described previously (McDougall and Levasseur, 1998). Intracellular Ca2+ levels were measured by injecting either Fura 2 or Ca2+ Green to final concentrations of 20 and 50 μM respectively. Caged gPtdIns(4,5)P2 (Calbiochem) was injected to a final concentration of 35 μM, a previously reported effective concentration (Dumollard and Sardet, 2001). p21 fusion proteins were injected to a final concentration equal to or greater than 1.6 μM, which we have previously shown to be the lowest concentration needed for effective inhibition of Cdk1 activity (Levasseur and McDougall, 2003). Concentration was determined by referring to a calibration curve of fluorescence against known amounts of injected recombinant EGFP (BD Biosciences or Clontech) or HcRED (purified by GST affinity chromatography as above), details of which we have previously reported (Levasseur and McDougall, 2000).
Imaging was performed using an Olympus IX70 microscope set up for epifluorescence. A xenon lamp (150 W; Opti Quip, Highland Mills, NY) provided the light source, which was band-pass filtered through 350 nm, 365 nm, 380 nm, 488 nm and 565 nm filters depending on the fluorophore or chromophore being excited. A triple pass dichroic/emission filter set (Chroma; set 6100 for use with DAPI, FITC and TRITC) directed light to the specimen and then to the collecting device. This was a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (MicroMax, Sony Interline chip, Princeton Instruments, Trenton, NJ), operated at –10°C. Data collected was analysed by MetaFluor and MetaMorph software packages (Universal Imaging, Marlow, UK). Microinjection was done with the aid of a 10× objective lens, fluorescence imaging and Ca2+ measurement with a 20× objective, and chromatin imaging with a 60× water immersion objective. Oocytes were bathed in the vital dye Hoechst 33342 (Sigma) at 10 μg/ml in sea water, then returned to natural sea water prior to visualisation of the chromatin. Flashes of UV light for uncaging were administered by exciting the specimen using the 365 nm filter.
Production of egg cytoplasts
We set out to partition eggs into fragments: karyoplasts, which contain the nuclear material, and cytoplasts which have none, and are therefore unable to form pronuclei.
Two methods were employed (see Figs 1 and 2). In the first, relatively large portions of the egg were drawn off with a wide bore glass micropipette using a tube aspirator assembly and suction pressure applied by mouth. This produced a large and small pair of egg fragments, one of which contained the chromatin (hereafter referred to as a karyoplast) and one which did not (a cytoplast). Both were used for subsequent experiments. In the second, a smaller bore micropipette was used and applied to the side of the egg where the chromatin was situated as determined using simultaneous brightfield and chromatin imaging. This small portion of the egg was then removed under suction pressure supplied by mouth to leave a very large cytoplast. The small karyoplast was discarded.
The experiments carried out required close synchrony of activation in eggs or cytoplasts. In order to achieve this, our chosen method of activation was sperm extract injection, use of which we justify in that we have shown it faithfully mimics all aspects of fertilisation in ascidian eggs (McDougall et al., 2000). Activation was achieved by microinjection of 1% egg volume of sperm extract, prepared as previously described (McDougall et al., 2000).
This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust grant to M.L., and by funding to A.M from the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), including ATIP and ATIP plus, the Université Paris VI, the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC) and the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR).