The SuUR (suppressor of underreplication) gene controls late replication and underreplication of DNA in Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes: its mutation suppresses DNA underreplication whereas additional doses of the normal allele strongly enhances underreplication. The SuUR protein is localized in late replicating and underreplicating regions. The N-terminal part of the SuUR protein shares modest similarity with the ATPase/helicase domain of SWI2/SNF2 chromatin remodeling factors, suggesting a role in modification of chromatin structure.

Here we describe novel structural modifications of polytene chromosomes(swellings) and show that SuUR controls chromatin organization in polytene chromosomes. The swellings develop as the result of SuURectopic expression in the transgene system Sgs3-GAL4; UAS-SuUR+. They are reminiscent of chromosome puffs and appear in ∼190 regions of intercalary, pericentric and telomeric heterochromatin; some of them attain tremendous size. The swellings are temperature sensitive: they are maximal at 29°C and are barely visible at 18°C. Shifting from 29°C to 18°C results in the complete recovery of the normal structure of chromosomes. The swellings are transcriptionally inactive, since they do not incorporate [3H]uridine. The SuUR protein is not visualized in regions of maximally developed swellings. Regular ecdysone-inducible puffs are not induced in cells where these swellings are apparent.

Three types of heterochromatin in polytene chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster are known: pericentric (PH), telomeric (TH) and intercalary(IH). They differ in DNA sequences and location, yet demonstrate a set of common characteristics such as special packing of chromatin (solid compact bands of IH, α-heterochromatin and net-like granularβ-heterochromatin pack in pericentric regions and specific net-like material packs into some telomeric ends of chromosomes), late DNA replication in S phase, DNA underreplication during polytenization cycles (resulting in weak point or breaks) and non-homologous (ectopic) pairing of chromosome regions (Zhimulev, 1998; Richards and Elgin, 2002). At the molecular level all three types of heterochromatin show additional similarities: regions of pericentric and telomeric heterochromatin contain at least one specific protein (Heterochromatic protein 1, HP1)(James et al., 1989; Eissenberg et al., 1995). Many sites of IH contain specific silencer proteins of the Polycomb Group of genes (PcG) (Zhimulev et al.,2002). Both types of proteins, PcG and HP1, share structural and functional similarity: they have chromodomains and are present in specific protein complexes, which seem to participate in the formation of silencing(PcG) or heterochromatic (HP1) domains(Eissenberg et al., 1995; Wallrath, 1998; Cavalli and Paro, 1998). New approaches to the study of heterochromatin are provided by the discovery of the SuUR gene. Mutation of this gene results in the complete suppression of underreplication in intercalary heterochromatin and partial suppression of underreplication in pericentric heterochromatin(Belyaeva et al., 1998; Moshkin et al., 2001; Semeshin et al., 2001). The mutation shifts the time of completion of DNA replication to later in S phase for regions of IH. These regions complete DNA replication later than euchromatic regions but generally terminate replication earlier than the wildtype; that is, closer to the stage of continuous replication in chromosomes (Zhimulev et al.,2002). Antibodies against the SuUR protein are localized almost completely in regions of late replication of polytene chromosomes, namely in regions of IH and TH. Especially strong binding of antibodies was found in pericentric heterochromatin (Makunin et al., 2002).

No homology with full-length SuUR protein was found in databases when a BLAST search was used (Altschul et al.,1997). However, the first 250 amino acids from the N-terminus show a moderate similarity to the N-terminal part of the ATPase/helicase domain found in the SWI2/SNF2 family of proteins(Makunin et al., 2002).

In lines containing two to six additional transgenic doses of the SuUR+ gene the degree of DNA underreplication and ectopic pairing in regions of IH is sharply enhanced; that is, the SuUR gene functions as an enhancer of underreplication causing many late replication sites to become underreplicated. Overexpression of SuUR+under an ubiquitously active promotor is lethal for the organism, whereas overexpression of the gene under a promotor that is continuously active in the salivary gland cells results in development of tiny salivary glands (E.I.V. and I.V.M., unpublished). In this paper we describe visible modifications of polytene chromosome structure and morphology resulting from ectopic expression of UAS-SuUR under the control of the Sgs3-Gal4 driver. It contains the promoter region from the tissue-specific gene Sgs3 of D. melanogaster and a coding sequence for the yeast transcription activator GAL4 (Do et al., 2002). The Sgs-3 gene is active only in cells of larval salivary glands and only during the second part of the third larval instar(Biyasheva et al., 2001). This peculiarity of the driver permits us to analyze the overexpression of SuUR in a single larval organ, which normally histolyses soon; this overexpression presumably will not damage the normal development of the whole organism. We expected that strong overexpression of the SuUR+ gene under the Sgs3-Gal4 driver would result in a further enhancement of underreplication and ectopic pairing. However, by contrast, in the polytene chromosomes of the Sgs3-Gal4;UAS-SuUR+ larvae and prepupae unexpected and unusual swellings appeared in the regions of IH, PH and in some telomeric regions. The most interesting characteristics of these swellings are described in this paper.

Drosophila stocks

The Sgs3-Gal4 transposon was constructed by L. Cherbas and A. Andres, and the transformed stock was received from L. Cherbas. The insertion is located in the third chromosome (Cherbas et al., 2002; Do et al., 2002).

Transgenic larvae Sgs3-Gal4/+ UAS-SuUR+/+obtained from mating of lines Sgs3-Gal4 and UAS-SuUR+ were raised on standard medium at 18, 25 or 29°C. Both backgrounds, SuUR and SuUR+, were used for transgene expression. Polytene chromosomes of larvae and prepupae obtained from mating of these strains were analyzed.

The Drosophila strain containing UAS-lacZ was given by F. Karch.

Cytology

Preparations of salivary gland polytene chromosomes stained with acetic orcein were made by the standard method and analyzed under a phase-contrast microscope. Polytene chromosome maps were taken from a previous paper(Bridges, 1935).

For autoradiography, salivary glands were dissected in Ephrussi and Beadle solution (Ephrussi and Beadle,1936) and transferred to the same medium containing[3H]uridine (25 mCi/ml, specific activity 38 Ci/mM, Amersham) for 30 minutes. They were then fixed in alcoholacetic acid (3:1) mixture, covered with liquid emulsion Illford L4, exposed for two weeks and then developed (for details, see Zhimulev,1999).

Squashes for EM purposes were prepared as described earlier(Semeshin et al., 2001). Sections 120-150 nm thick were cut with an LKB-IV ultratome and examined under the JEM-100C electron microscope at 80 kV. Immunostaining of polytene chromosome was performed according to a previous paper(Elgin, 1996) with minor modifications.

Constructs for transformations

The clone f27 contains the full ORF and 3′UTR of the SuURtranscript cloned into pBluescript SK+ between PstI and XhoI sites (for details, see Makunin et al., 2002). The insert of the f27 clone was excised with NotI and Acc65.I and subcloned into pUAST (Brand and Perrimon, 1993) that had been digested with NotI and Acc65.I. The resulting U6 clone contains the SuUR ORF and 3′UTR under the control of the UAS-containing minimal Hsp70promoter in the P-element vector. For transformation 8 μg of the U6 DNA were mixed with 2 μg of DNA of helper plasmid pUChspi delta 2-3 turbo in a total volume 20 μl, and this mixture was injected in y w embryos by standard procedures, and several independent transformed lines were established. Two of the insertions of the UAS-SuUR+constructs were localized in polytene chromosome regions 59DE and 47A,respectively (V.S., unpublished) [UAS(59DE) and UAS(47A)]. The main part of the work was done using the UAS(59DE) line. Experiments on reversibility of the swellings, antibodies localization and[3H]uridine incorporation were performed on the UAS(47A) line.

The salivary gland is differentiated in two parts, distal and proximal; the first synthesize the salivary gland secretion, one component of which is the SGS3 protein (for a review, see Berendes and Ashburner, 1978). Analysis of the expression of the Sgs3 promoter in transgenic larvae Sgs3-Gal4 UAS-lacZ shows that it is expressed only in the distal part of the salivary gland(Fig. 1A-C). In SuUR,Sgs3-Gal4/+ UAS-SuUR+/+ larvae (which have no other source of the SuUR protein except that from the transgene), antibodies against the SuUR protein stained chromosomes only in the distal part of the salivary gland but not the proximal (Fig. 1D,E). These data can be considered, in turn, as an additional confirmation of the high specificity of the antibodies.

Fig. 1.

Cell specificity of expression and overexpression of the Sgs3promoter in the salivary gland cells. Staining in the distal (D) parts and absence of staining in the proximal (P) parts of the salivary gland in Sgs3-Gal4 UAS-lacZ larvae (A-C). No expression was seen in young(about 100 hours) larvae (A). The beginning of expression was seen in the salivary glands of older (B) and late (C) larvae. Binding of antibodies against SuUR protein in polytene chromosomes of distal part of salivary gland of young SuUR/SuUR Sgs3-Gal4 UAS-SuUR+ larvae:immunofluorescence (D) and phase contrast (E). Arrows point to a smaller polytene chromosome in the proximal part of the salivary gland that does not bind the antibodies. Binding of antibodies against SuUR protein in polytene chromosomes of the distal part of salivary gland of wildtype (F,G) shown by immunofluorescence (F) and phase contrast (G). Recognition of an additional band in the SuUR/SuUR Sgs3-Gal4 UAS-SuUR+ larvae by the SuUR antibodies on western blots (H)

Fig. 1.

Cell specificity of expression and overexpression of the Sgs3promoter in the salivary gland cells. Staining in the distal (D) parts and absence of staining in the proximal (P) parts of the salivary gland in Sgs3-Gal4 UAS-lacZ larvae (A-C). No expression was seen in young(about 100 hours) larvae (A). The beginning of expression was seen in the salivary glands of older (B) and late (C) larvae. Binding of antibodies against SuUR protein in polytene chromosomes of distal part of salivary gland of young SuUR/SuUR Sgs3-Gal4 UAS-SuUR+ larvae:immunofluorescence (D) and phase contrast (E). Arrows point to a smaller polytene chromosome in the proximal part of the salivary gland that does not bind the antibodies. Binding of antibodies against SuUR protein in polytene chromosomes of the distal part of salivary gland of wildtype (F,G) shown by immunofluorescence (F) and phase contrast (G). Recognition of an additional band in the SuUR/SuUR Sgs3-Gal4 UAS-SuUR+ larvae by the SuUR antibodies on western blots (H)

The Sgs3 transgenic promoter, as well as the genomic Sgs3gene, are expressed only in salivary gland cells of the third instar larvae,beginning at mid instar (about 100 hours after oviposition) and continuing until pupariation (120 hours of larval development or 0 hours prepupa) (for a review, see Biyasheva et al.,2001). Specific changes appear in polytene chromosomes during the period of activity of the Sgs3 promoter and, as a consequence, there is the period of SuUR+ ectopic expression in the Sgs3-GAL4/+ UAS-SuUR+/+ larvae and prepupae. In young larvae,actively feeding and moving in the media (this developmental stage corresponds to 100-114 hour larvae), characteristic capsules appear in polytene chromosome bands (Fig. 2A). In older larvae migrating on tube walls (114-120 hours) some of these capsules convert into swellings of tremendous sizes (Fig. 2B). The size and number of the swellings are maximal in 4-8 hour prepupae. In the SuUR Sgs3-GAL4 UAS-SuUR+ larvae and prepupae the swellings are bigger than in the transgenic strain with normal endogenous SuUR genes. The localization of the capsules and swellings in chromosomes is very specific (see below) and highly reproducible (see mapping in Figs 2 and 3). In total, about 190 bands demonstrate capsule or swelling formation in polytene chromosomes(Table 1). These swellings look like the puffs known in polytene chromosomes for decades (for a review, see Zhimulev, 1999). Nevertheless they strongly differ from puffs, in at least, four aspects, which are listed below.

  1. The capsules and swellings arise in chromosome regions where puffs never appear; that is, the sites of their formation are tightly condensed solid bands. In the distal part of chromosome 2R these swellings arise in six regions (Fig. 3), five of which belong to regions of IH and one (60F) is a region of TH. Several regions are of special interest, particularly 84AB(Fig. 2) and 89E1-4 where the genes of the Antennapedia complex and the Bithorax complex are located. These two are classic examples of silenced regions in IH. Especially impressive is the swelling of the PH(Fig. 4). The heterochromatic material visible in the chromocenter of normal polytene chromosomes gradually converts, first into bubble-like mass, and eventually into a light transparent cloud (Fig. 4). Analysis of all 190 polytene chromosome bands where capsules or swellings appear shows that they represent the regions of IH characterized by late replication,underreplication and localization of the SuUR protein and, in many cases, PcG proteins localization. As is seen in Fig. 5, almost all regions bind antibodies against the SuUR protein,and regions of DNA underreplication (weak points) form these swellings. A somewhat lower proportion of swelling-forming regions was found in late replicating regions, although in the tip of the chromosome arm 2R shown on Fig. 3 the correlation between late replication and swelling formation sites is almost complete. The swellings appears in 47% of PcG protein-binding sites(Fig. 5).

  2. The regular puffs are regions of very intensive transcriptional activity,this can be demonstrated by variety of techniques, including[3H]uridine incorporation or binding of antibodies against different proteins of transcription complex, RNA polymerase II or transcriptional factors etc. (for a review, see Zhimulev, 1999). The swellings are completely inactive in the incorporation of the RNA precursor, although other chromosome loci are heavily labelled(Fig. 6A).

  3. The swellings show a very specific structure(Fig. 7). Even at the low magnification of the light microscope swelling formation can be seen to start with the central part of the polytene chromosome band. The band becomes diffuse and light; however, its borders still contain condensed material, as in the bands 87C, 87D, 87F, 88E and 89A in Fig. 2a, or 57A and 58A in Fig. 3b. Subsequently, when the capsules reach their maximal sizes and convert into the swellings, thin envelopes of material remain (indicated in Fig. 7 by arrows with crosses). The swellings are not empty inside; they contain abundant condensed electron-dense material (they are more dense than the neighboring interbands). The chromosome material within the swellings looks like foam (see 58A in Fig. 7A). When the chromosomes are stained with the fluorescent dye Hoechst 33258, abundant staining material is seen within the swellings but not in regular polytene chromosome puffs(Fig. 7C,D). This is evidence that a large amount of incompletely decondensed DNA is present in the swellings.

  4. Swelling formation is temperature sensitive and reversible. The largest swellings occur when larvae develop at 29°C throughout, at least, for the last 12 hours of the third larval instar. Only capsules of minimal size, if any, appeared at 18°C. This permitted us to show that the formation of the swellings is reversible. As a result of development of larvae from mid third instar till 0 hour prepupae at 29°C, the swellings reach their maximal size. After a shift to 18°C the swellings condense and revert into almost normal polytene chromosome bands, sometimes with only small capsules in places of the former swellings (see 56F, 59D and 58A in Fig. 3E).

Fig. 2.

Proximal part of the polytene 3R chromosome of SuUR+/SuUR+ Sgs3-GAL4 UAS-SuUR+ young larva (A) and late prepupa (B): small capsules and swellings in regions 83DE, 84AB, 84D, 86C, 86D, 87B, 87D, 87F and 88E are marked.

Fig. 2.

Proximal part of the polytene 3R chromosome of SuUR+/SuUR+ Sgs3-GAL4 UAS-SuUR+ young larva (A) and late prepupa (B): small capsules and swellings in regions 83DE, 84AB, 84D, 86C, 86D, 87B, 87D, 87F and 88E are marked.

Fig. 3.

Swellings in the distal part of the chromosome 2R of Oregon R control stock(A) and SuUR+/SuUR+ Sgs3-GAL4 UAS-SuUR+ young larvae (B), late larva (C) and late prepupa (D). The chromosome shown in E was taken from prepupa that developed till the 0 hours prepupal stage at 29°C followed by a 15 hour development at 18°C. Asterisks in A mark regions of late replication.

Fig. 3.

Swellings in the distal part of the chromosome 2R of Oregon R control stock(A) and SuUR+/SuUR+ Sgs3-GAL4 UAS-SuUR+ young larvae (B), late larva (C) and late prepupa (D). The chromosome shown in E was taken from prepupa that developed till the 0 hours prepupal stage at 29°C followed by a 15 hour development at 18°C. Asterisks in A mark regions of late replication.

Table 1.

Localization of sites of swellings and capsule formation in polytene chromosomes of the SuUR/SuUR, Sgs3-GAL4; UAS-SuUR+

X2L2R3L3R
chromosomechromosomechromosomechromosomechromosome
1B 21D 41A 61A 81F 
1E 22A 41D 61F 83D4-5 
3C 22B 41F 62C 84A1-2 
4B 22F 42A 62D 84A4-5 
4C 23A 42B 63A 84B1-2 
4D 24D 43A 63E 84D 
4E 25A 44A 64C1-2 85A 
5D 25E 44C 64C4-5 86C 
6A 25F 44D 64D 86D 
7A 26A 44F 65A 86E 
7B 26C 45A 65B 87B 
7C 30A 47A 65D 87C 
7E 32A 47D 65E1-4 87D 
8B 32F 48A 66A 87E 
8E 33A 48C 67A 87F 
9A 33D 50A 67D 88A 
9B 34A1-2 50C 67E 88E 
10A 34EF 53B 67F 89A 
10B 35B 54AB 68A 89D 
11A 35C 55A 68E 89E 
12A 35D 56AB 69D 90A 
12E1-2 35E 56F 69F 90D 
12E7-8 35F 57A 70A 90E 
13A 36B 57B 70C 91B 
13B 36C 58A 70D 91D 
14B1-2 36D 59D 70E 91E 
16F 36E 60F 71A 92A 
17A 37D  71C 92B 
17C 38A  72A 92D 
17D 38C  73A 92E 
18A 38E  74A 93A 
19A 39A  75A 93E 
19E 39D-E  75C 93F1 
20A 40A  76B 93F9-10 
20B-F   77A 94A 
   77E 94D 
   79D 95A 
   79E 96A 
   80C 96C 
    96D 
   96E 
 chromosome   97B 
 101DF   97F 
    98A 
    98B 
    98C 
    98D 
    98E 
    99A 
    100A 
    100B1-2 
    100B4-5 
    100C5 
X2L2R3L3R
chromosomechromosomechromosomechromosomechromosome
1B 21D 41A 61A 81F 
1E 22A 41D 61F 83D4-5 
3C 22B 41F 62C 84A1-2 
4B 22F 42A 62D 84A4-5 
4C 23A 42B 63A 84B1-2 
4D 24D 43A 63E 84D 
4E 25A 44A 64C1-2 85A 
5D 25E 44C 64C4-5 86C 
6A 25F 44D 64D 86D 
7A 26A 44F 65A 86E 
7B 26C 45A 65B 87B 
7C 30A 47A 65D 87C 
7E 32A 47D 65E1-4 87D 
8B 32F 48A 66A 87E 
8E 33A 48C 67A 87F 
9A 33D 50A 67D 88A 
9B 34A1-2 50C 67E 88E 
10A 34EF 53B 67F 89A 
10B 35B 54AB 68A 89D 
11A 35C 55A 68E 89E 
12A 35D 56AB 69D 90A 
12E1-2 35E 56F 69F 90D 
12E7-8 35F 57A 70A 90E 
13A 36B 57B 70C 91B 
13B 36C 58A 70D 91D 
14B1-2 36D 59D 70E 91E 
16F 36E 60F 71A 92A 
17A 37D  71C 92B 
17C 38A  72A 92D 
17D 38C  73A 92E 
18A 38E  74A 93A 
19A 39A  75A 93E 
19E 39D-E  75C 93F1 
20A 40A  76B 93F9-10 
20B-F   77A 94A 
   77E 94D 
   79D 95A 
   79E 96A 
   80C 96C 
    96D 
   96E 
 chromosome   97B 
 101DF   97F 
    98A 
    98B 
    98C 
    98D 
    98E 
    99A 
    100A 
    100B1-2 
    100B4-5 
    100C5 

Regions are given according to 13.

Fig. 4.

Decondensation and swelling of pericentric heterochromatin regions in SuUR+/SuUR+ Sgs3-GAL4 UAS-SuUR+ (B) in comparison with the chromocenter of the Oregon-R control line (A). Arrows show chromocentral regions.

Fig. 4.

Decondensation and swelling of pericentric heterochromatin regions in SuUR+/SuUR+ Sgs3-GAL4 UAS-SuUR+ (B) in comparison with the chromocenter of the Oregon-R control line (A). Arrows show chromocentral regions.

Fig. 5.

Swelling and capsule formation in regions demonstrating different characteristics of heterochromatin. Abscissa: regions of late replication (1),SuUR (2) and PcG (3) protein localization, weak points in wildtype(2×SuUR+) (4) and in line with extra copies of SuUR [(4-8) x SuUR+] (5). Ordinate: number of regions demonstrating different characteristics (total height of columns) of intercalary heterochromatin and number of swellings or capsule formation regions among them (blue part of bars).

Fig. 5.

Swelling and capsule formation in regions demonstrating different characteristics of heterochromatin. Abscissa: regions of late replication (1),SuUR (2) and PcG (3) protein localization, weak points in wildtype(2×SuUR+) (4) and in line with extra copies of SuUR [(4-8) x SuUR+] (5). Ordinate: number of regions demonstrating different characteristics (total height of columns) of intercalary heterochromatin and number of swellings or capsule formation regions among them (blue part of bars).

Fig. 6.

Failure to incorporate [3H]uridine into swellings in 83DE, 84AB and 84D regions as well as in some unidentified regions (indicated by arrows in A) in chromosomes of SuUR/SuUR Sgs3-GAL4 UAS-SuUR+prepupae. (C) Incorporation of the [3H]uridine into regular puffs 62C, 62E and 63E in wild-type polytene chromosomes.

Fig. 6.

Failure to incorporate [3H]uridine into swellings in 83DE, 84AB and 84D regions as well as in some unidentified regions (indicated by arrows in A) in chromosomes of SuUR/SuUR Sgs3-GAL4 UAS-SuUR+prepupae. (C) Incorporation of the [3H]uridine into regular puffs 62C, 62E and 63E in wild-type polytene chromosomes.

Fig. 7.

Structure of swellings under an electron (A,B) and a fluorescent (C,D)microscope. Part of the swelling in 56F (rectangular in A) is shown at higher magnification in B. An external envelope of the bubble is indicated by arrows with crosses; inner envelopes around small bubbles are indicated by straight arrows; and open thick arrow indicate the matrix within the bubble. A fluorescent Hoechst-33258-stained regular chromosome puff 71CF of the Oregon R strain (C) and swellings in regions designated by arrows in chromosomes of SuUR/SuUR Sgs3-GAL4 UAS-SuUR+ prepupae (D) are shown. Scales represent 1 μm (A) and 0.1 μm (B).

Fig. 7.

Structure of swellings under an electron (A,B) and a fluorescent (C,D)microscope. Part of the swelling in 56F (rectangular in A) is shown at higher magnification in B. An external envelope of the bubble is indicated by arrows with crosses; inner envelopes around small bubbles are indicated by straight arrows; and open thick arrow indicate the matrix within the bubble. A fluorescent Hoechst-33258-stained regular chromosome puff 71CF of the Oregon R strain (C) and swellings in regions designated by arrows in chromosomes of SuUR/SuUR Sgs3-GAL4 UAS-SuUR+ prepupae (D) are shown. Scales represent 1 μm (A) and 0.1 μm (B).

Such an important change in the structure of numerous bands may result in changes in polytene chromosome function. In normal larvae more than 120 puffs are activating and inactivating during this period in a cascade of changing gene activity (Ashburner et al.,1974). Among many thousands of salivary gland nuclei analyzed after SuUR overexpression we could not find ecdysone-inducible puffs. The exceptions were a few nuclei in which the chromosomes contained very small puffs at the earliest ecdysone inducible sites 74E-75B.

The SuUR protein in wild-type larvae is localized at a limited (113) number of sites (Makunin et al.,2002). But after even a short period of overexpression in young larvae, it appeared in practically all visible polytene chromosome bands.(Fig. 1D,E). Swellings as a rule have not yet developed at this stage; however, in places where they will soon appear, small cavities free of the antibodies are visible (74A, 75C and 81F in Fig. 1D). At the stage when the swellings reach their maximal size, staining of IH and PH with antibodies is not revealed (Fig. 8A).

Fig. 8.

Localization of SuUR antibodies in polytene chromosomes of the SuUR+/SuUR+ Sgs3-GAL4 UAS-SuUR+ prepupae after overexpression of the SuUR+ gene. The swollen chromocenter (arrow), small capsules (21D, 22A, 22B and 24D) and big swellings (75C, 74A, 71C, 67D and others) are free of the antibodies.

Fig. 8.

Localization of SuUR antibodies in polytene chromosomes of the SuUR+/SuUR+ Sgs3-GAL4 UAS-SuUR+ prepupae after overexpression of the SuUR+ gene. The swollen chromocenter (arrow), small capsules (21D, 22A, 22B and 24D) and big swellings (75C, 74A, 71C, 67D and others) are free of the antibodies.

Three types of heterochromatin in polytene nuclei, pericentric, telomeric and intercalary have been described, and they share several common characteristics: condensed chromosome structure, late replication and underreplication of DNA during polytenization cycles. The SuUR protein is located predominantly in these three types of heterochromatin, and the level of polytenization of these regions strongly depends on dosage of this gene(Zhimulev et al., 2002). The results described in this paper show that all three types of heterochromatin similarly react to strong overexpression of the SuUR gene by decondensation of chromosome material and visible swelling. Mechanisms of formation of swellings are not known. There are, at least, two possibilities,which we could discuss.

  1. SuUR overexpression may act indirectly, blocking transcription of some locus required for maintaining a compact chromatin structure. We find that in conditions of overexpression numerous ecdysone puffs do not appear in polytene chromosomes, meaning that ecdysone-inducible genes are not able to activate. The same can happen with other genes inducible during this period of development. Data on [3H]uridine incorporation suggest that binding of overexpressed SuUR protein to all bands does not stop transcription in chromosome regions that are already active (they incorporate[3H]uridine) but prevents induction of the ecdysone puffs. Binding of other overexpressed proteins to all polytene chromosome bands has been shown for HP1, Su(var)3-7 (Delattre et al., 2000), Su(z)2 and Psc(Rastelli et al., 1993)proteins and probably takes place as result of their affinity for DNA or chromatin, but in those papers there are no indications of the swellings and inhibition of puff development described here. At the same time as we see, the possibility of inhibition of transcription induction exists, and it has to be taken into consideration when interpreting the results of ectopic overexpression of genes.

  2. The other possible mechanism for swelling formation is direct action of the SuUR protein on heterochromatic regions. As was indicated above, all the facts point to heterochromatic regions being targets for SuUR gene activity. There may be some common structural peculiarities in all types of heterochromatin, which are critical for binding the SuUR protein in the wildtype. It is not clear whether this would be specific protein complexes or a specific conformation of heterochromatin. When it is overexpressed the SuUR protein binds with all bands but swellings develop only in heterochromatic regions. Perhaps some structural specificity of heterochromatin is responsible for DNA underreplication when SuUR normally expresses and disintegration of chromosome material when this gene is overexpressed.

It is possible that the effects of additional doses of the SuUR protein are determined by the similarity of SuUR to SWI2/SNF2(Makunin et al., 2002), a member of a protein family capable of remodelling chromatin complexes. For this, SWI2/SNF2 has an ATP hydrolysing function. The SWI/SNF complex can alter histone-DNA interactions in the nucleosome. High concentraions of SWI/SNF complex can disrupt a synthetic nucleosome core(Wolffe and Guschin, 2000). As shown recently, null mutation of the ISWI gene, a highly conserved member of the SWI2/SNF2 family, affects both cell viability and gene expression and causes striking alterations in the structure of the male X chromosome (Deuring et al.,2000). Mutations of other gene, JIL-1, coding for tandem chromosomal kinase, leads to dramatic changes in banding pattern(Wang et al., 2001). We could,therefore, propose that overexpression of SuUR results in changes of chromatin packaging specifically in all types of heterochromatin and results in swellings. These changes appear to be reversible, and after lowering the temperature, heterochromatic regions condense again, swellings disappear and chromosomes acquire an almost normal morphology. These effects are probably related to adaptation of the Ga14-UAS system to high temperature(Brand et al., 1994). This means that chromosomes are able to restore normal structure and functions and swelling formation does not cause irreversible changes in chromosome structure. Most interesting was the finding that after gene overexpression,the SuUR protein itself is not revealed within the swollen heterochromatic regions where it normally resides. At the same time DNA is easily visible in the swellings after staining with Hoechst 33258. It is possible that the SuUR protein and other proteins dissociate from chromatin. A case of such dissociation occurs when under the influence of the E(z) mutation,some of proteins of the PcG complex dissociate from chromosomes(Rastelli et al., 1993).

Other cases of global changes of properly heterochromatin structure are known as well. For example, specific puffs appeared in regions of PH in polytene chromosomes of Glyptotendipes barbipes (Chironomidae) larvae developing at 18°C (Keyl,1963) or in Chironomus thummi thummi after long maintenance of larvae in a solution of Actinomycin D(Kiknadze, 1965; Valeyeva et al., 1979). Heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster mitotic chromosomes looks decondensed in a mus-101ts mutant at 29°C(Gatti et al., 1983). The mus-101 gene encodes a member of the superfamily of proteins containing the BRCT domain, which is implicated in DNA repair and cell checkpoint control (Yamamoto et al.,2000). It shares homology with human TopBP1 protein, which is associated in vitro with DNA topoisomerase IIβ and with the fission yeast Rad4/Cut5 protein required for repair, replication and checkpoint control. So this gene is probably involved in processes of chromatin reorganization, and its action can influence heterochromatin condensation.

However, structures resembling the swelling described in this paper were not found before. These modifications of chromosome structure specifically appear in chromosome regions binding SuUR protein and demonstrating late replication in the endocycle.

We thank Lucy Cherbas for the gift of the Sgs3-Gal4 strain and F. Karch for UAS-lacZ. Thanks also to Michael Ashburner, Lucy and Peter Cherbas, Yurii Moshkin, Vincenzo Pirrotta and Geoff Richards for critical comments on this manuscript and Dmitrii Koryakov for preparing some of the pictures. This work was supported by grants from the RFBR program (N 00-15-97984, 02-04-48222,01-04-06509), from the Russian State Program `Frontiers in Genetics of Russian Federation' (02-2PNG) and a grant to support young scientists (V.V.S.) from the Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Altschul, S. F., Madden, T. L., Schaeffer, A. A., Zhang, J.,Zhang, Z., Miller, W. and Lipman, D. J. (
1997
). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs.
Nucleic Acids Res.
25
,
3389
-3402.
Ashburner, M., Chihara, C., Meltzer, P. and Richards, G.(
1974
). On the temporal control of puffing activity in polytene chromosomes.
Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.
38
,
655
-662.
Belyaeva, E. S., Zhimulev, I. F., Volkova, E. I., Alekseyenko,A. A., Moshkin, Yu. M. and Koryakov, D. E. (
1998
). Su(UR)ES a gene suppressing DNA underreplication in intercalary and pericentric heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95
,
7532
-7537.
Berendes, H. D. and Ashburner, M. (
1978
). The salivary glands. In
The genetics and biology of Drosophila
, vol.
2b
(eds M. Ashburner and T. R. F. Wright), pp.
453
-492. London: Academic Press.
Biyasheva, A., Do, T.-V., Lu, Y., Vaskova, M. and Andres, A. J. (
2001
). Glue secretion in the Drosophila salivary gland: a model for steroid-regulated exocytosis.
Dev. Biol.
231
,
234
-251.
Brand, A. H. and Perrimon, N. (
1993
). Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes.
Development
118
,
401
-415.
Brand, A. H., Manoukian, A. S. and Perrimon, N.(
1994
). Ectopic expression in Drosophila.
Methods Cell Biol.
44
,
635
-654.
Bridges, C. B. (
1935
). Salivary chromosome maps with a key to the banding of the chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster.
J. Hered.
26
,
60
-64.
Cavalli, G. and Paro, R. (
1998
). The Drosophila Fab-7 chromosomal element conveys epigenetic inheritance during mitosis and meiosis.
Cell
93
,
505
-518.
Cherbas, L., Xiao, H., Zhimulev, I., Belyaeva, E., Cherbas,P. (
2003
). ECR isoforms in Drosophila: Testing tissue-specific requirements by targeted blockade and rescue.
Development
(in press).
Delattre, M., Spierer, A., Tonka, C.-H. and Spierer, P.(
2000
). The genomic silencing of position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster: interaction between the heterochromatin-associated proteins Su(var)3-7 and HP1.
J. Cell Sci.
113
,
4253
-4261.
Deuring, R., Fanti, L., Armstrong, J. A., Sarte, M., Papoulas,O., Prestel, M., Daubresse, G., Verardo, M., Moseley, S. L., Berloco, M. et al. (
2000
). The ISWI chromatin-remodeling protein is required for gene expression and the maintenance of higher order chromatin structure in vivo.
Mol. Cell
5
,
355
-365.
Do, T. V., Biyasheva, A. and Andres, A. J.(
2002
). Ecdysone mediates glue secretion in Drosophilathrough calmodulin, E63-1, and myosin VI.
Genesis
(in press).
Eissenberg, J. C., Elgin, S. C. R. and Paro, R.(
1995
). Epigenetic regulation in Drosophila: a conspiracy of silence. In
Chromatin: structure and gene expression. Frontiers in molecular biology
(ed. S. C. R. Elgin), pp.
147
-171. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elgin, S. C. R. (
1996
). Heterochromatin and gene regulation in Drosophila.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
6
,
193
-202.
Ephrussi, B. and Beadle, G. B. (
1936
). Technique of transplantation for Drosophila.
Amer. Naturalist
70
,
218
-225.
Gatti, M., Smith, D. A. and Baker, B. S.(
1983
). A gene controlling condensation of heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster.
Science
221
,
83
-85.
James, T. C., Eissenberg, J. C., Craig, C., Dietrich, V.,Hobson, A. and Elgin, S. C. R. (
1989
). Distribution patters of HP1, a heterochromatin-associated nonhistone chromosomal protein of Drosophila subobscura.
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
50
,
170
-180.
Keyl, H.-G. (
1963
). DNS-Konstanz im Heterochromatin von Glyptotendipes.
Exp. Cell Res.
30
,
245
-247.
Kiknadze, I. I. (
1965
). Functional changes in giant chromosomes under conditions of inhibition of RNA synthesis.
Tsitologiia
7
,
311
-318.
Makunin, I. V., Volkova, E. I., Belyaeva, E. S., Nabirochkina,E. N., Pirrotta, V. and Zhimulev, I. F. (
2002
). The Drosophila Suppressor of Underreplication protein binds to late-replicating regions of polytene chromosomes.
Genetics
160
,
1023
-1034.
Moshkin, Y. M., Alekseyenko, A. A., Semeshin, V. F., Spierer,A., Spierer, P., Makarevich, G. F., Belyaeva, E. S. and Zhimulev, I. F.(
2001
). The bithorax complex of Drosophila melanogaster.Underreplication and morphology in polytene chromosomes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98
,
570
-574.
Rastelli, L., Chan, C. S. and Pirrotta, V.(
1993
). Related chromosome binding sites for Zeste, suppressor of zeste and Polycomb group proteins in Drosophila and their dependence on Enhancer of zeste function.
EMBO J.
12
,
1513
-1522.
Richards, E. J. and Elgin, S. C. R. (
2002
). Epigenetic codes for heterochromatin formation and silencing: rounding up the usual suspects.
Cell
108
,
489
-500.
Semeshin, V. F., Belyaeva, E. S. and Zhimulev, I. F.(
2001
). Electron microscope mapping of the pericentric and intercalary heterochromatic regions of the polytene chromosomes of the mutant Suppressor of underreplication in Drosophila melanogaster.
Chromosoma
110
,
487
-500.
Valeyeva, F. S., Kiknadze, I. I., Panova, T. M. and Perov, N. A. (
1979
). Effect of high doses of actinomycin D on structure, puffing and transcription of the polytene chromosomes of Chironomus thummi salivary glands.
Tsitologiia
21
,
1411
-1419.
Wallrath, L. L. (
1998
). Unfolding the mysteries of heterochromatin.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
8
,
147
-153.
Wang, Y., Zhang, W., Jin, Y., Johansen, J. and Johansen, K. M. (
2001
). The JIL-1 tandem kinase mediates histone H3 phosphorylation and is required for maintenance of chromatin structure in Drosophila.
Cell
105
,
433
-443.
Wolffe, A. P. and Guschin, D. (
2000
). Review:chromatin structural features and targets that regulate transcription.
J. Struct. Biol.
129
,
102
-122.
Yamamoto, R. R., Axton, J. M., Yamamoto, Y. Y., Saunders, R. D. C., Glover, D. M. and Henderson, D. S. (
2000
). The Drosophila mus101 gene, which links DNA repair, replication and condensation of heterochromatin in mitosis, encodes a protein with seven BRCA1 C-terminus domains.
Genetics
156
,
711
-721.
Zhimulev, I. F., Belyaeva, E. S., Makunin, I. V., Pirrotta, V.,Semeshin, V. F., Alekseyenko, A. A., Belyakin, S. N., Volkova, E. I.,Koryakov, D. E., Andreyeva, E. N. et al. (
2002
). Intercalary heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes and the problem of genetic silencing.
Genetica
(in press).
Zhimulev, I. F. (
1999
). Genetic organization of polytene chromosomes.
Adv. Genetics
39
,
170
-327.
Zhimulev, I. F. (
1998
). Polytene chromosomes,heterochromatin and position effect variegation.
Adv. Genet.
37
,
90
-282.