To contribute to a deeper understanding of M-phase control in eukaryotic cells, we have constructed a model based on the biochemistry of M-phase promoting factor (MPF) in Xenopus oocyte extracts, where there is evidence for two positive feedback loops (MPF stimulates its own production by activating Cdc25 and inhibiting Wee1) and a negative feedback loop (MPF stimulates its own destruction by indirectly activating the ubiquitin pathway that degrades its cyclin subunit). To uncover the full dynamical possibilities of the control system, we translate the regulatory network into a set of differential equations and study these equations by graphical techniques and computer simulation. The positive feedback loops in the model account for thresholds and time lags in cyclin-induced and MPF-induced activation of MPF, and the model can be fitted quantitatively to these experimental observations. The negative feedback loop is consistent with observed time lags in MPF-induced cyclin degradation. Furthermore, our model indicates that there are two possible mechanisms for autonomous oscillations. One is driven by the positive feedback loops, resulting in phosphorylation and abrupt dephosphorylation of the Cdc2 subunit at an inhibitory tyrosine residue. These oscillations are typical of oocyte extracts. The other type is driven by the negative feedback loop, involving rapid cyclin turnover and negligible phosphorylation of the tyrosine residue of Cdc2. The early mitotic cycles of intact embryos exhibit such characteristics. In addition, by assuming that unreplicated DNA interferes with M-phase initiation by activating the phosphatases that oppose MPF in the positive feedback loops, we can simulate the effect of addition of sperm nuclei to oocyte extracts, and the lengthening of cycle times at the mid-blastula transition of intact embryos.
Numerical analysis of a comprehensive model of M-phase control in Xenopus oocyte extracts and intact embryos
B. Novak, J.J. Tyson; Numerical analysis of a comprehensive model of M-phase control in Xenopus oocyte extracts and intact embryos. J Cell Sci 1 December 1993; 106 (4): 1153–1168. doi: https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.106.4.1153
Download citation file:
Advertisement
Cited by
Call for papers: Cell Biology of Motors
(update)-MotorCFPExtended.jpg?versionId=3964)
Journal of Cell Science is pleased to welcome submissions for consideration for an upcoming special issue, Cell Biology of Motors. The deadline for submitting articles has been extended to 30 August 2022.
Find out more about our preprint policies
-bioRxiv.jpg?versionId=3964)
Last year, 47% of the manuscripts published in Journal of Cell Science were posted as preprints on bioRxiv. You can find our preprint policies here.
Cell scientist to watch: Jeremy Carlton
(update)-CSTW.png?versionId=3964)
Journal of Cell Science caught up with Jeremy Carlton, who established his independent research group in 2012 at the Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London. His lab is currently seconded to the Francis Crick Institute and is investigating membrane and organelle remodelling during cell division. This year, he was awarded the Hooke Medal by the British Society for Cell Biology (BSCB).
The FocalPlane Network
-FocalPlaneNetwork.png?versionId=3964)
The FocalPlane Network is an international directory of researchers with microscopy expertise including developers, imaging scientists and bioimage analysts. It is designed to help you find speakers, committee members, reviewers and potential collaborators. Find out more about the FocalPlane Network.
The Corona Files
-Mole.png?versionId=3964)
“We were not ready for a pandemic, despite decades of warnings.”
Our resident insectivore, Mole, continues his latest series – The Corona Files. This time, Mole reflects on what we have learned from the pandemic.