Knockout mouse lines that show embryonic and perinatal lethality are valuable models to investigate the genetic pathways that are associated with human congenital diseases. To elucidate the relationship between a specific gene and a developmental defect, detailed screening of knockout phenotypes is pivotal. Here, Wolfgang Weninger and colleagues used high-resolution episcopic microscopy (HREM) to screen the morphological phenotypes of embryonic day 14.5 (E14.5) embryos of 34 mouse strains that produce prenatally lethal offspring. The authors developed a reliable and ergonomic screening protocol to efficiently and comprehensively score structural abnormalities in those embryos. Their approach enabled them to detect a total of 58 defects that might be missed by employing alternative three-dimensional imaging methods and scoring systems. Many of these defects might be causal to embryonic or perinatal mortality. The results demonstrate that HREM combined with a systematic screening protocol enables more efficient phenotyping of E14.5 mouse embryos than any alternative approach. Such a method will contribute to advancing our knowledge of normal tissue and organ development, and of the causality of congenital diseases. Page 1143
Advancing congenital defect phenotyping using HREM imaging
Advancing congenital defect phenotyping using HREM imaging. Dis Model Mech 1 October 2014; 7 (10): e1002. doi:
Download citation file:
Advertisement
Cited by
Interviews with Biologists @ 100 conference speakers

Explore our interviews with keynote speakers from the Biologists @ 100 conference, hosted to celebrate our publisher’s 100th anniversary, where we discuss climate change and biodiversity with Hans-Otto Pörtner and Jane Francis, health and disease with Charles Swanton and Sadaf Farooqi, and emerging technologies with Manu Prakash and Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz.
A new perspective on disease research
DMM publishes perspectives – peer-reviewed articles that provide expert analysis of a topic important to the disease research community. Read our collection from authors presenting new or potentially controversial ideas or hypotheses, to help address future challenges and forge new directions.
Read & Publish Open Access publishing: what authors say

We have had great feedback from authors who have benefitted from our Read & Publish agreement with their institution and have been able to publish Open Access with us without paying an APC. Read what they had to say.
Fast & Fair peer review

Our sister journal Biology Open has recently launched the next phase of their Fast & Fair peer review initiative: offering high-quality peer review within 7 working days. To learn more about BiO’s progress and future plans, read the Editorial by Daniel Gorelick, or visit the Fast & Fair peer review page.
History of our journals

As our publisher, The Company of Biologists, turns 100 years old, read about DMM’s history and explore the journey of each of our sister journals: Development, Journal of Cell Science, Journal of Experimental Biology and Biology Open.
Other journals from
The Company of Biologists