ABSTRACT
To model peripheral nerve degeneration and investigate molecular mechanisms of neurodegeneration, we established a cell system of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived sensory neurons exposed to vincristine, a drug that frequently causes chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Sensory neurons differentiated from iPSCs exhibit distinct neurochemical patterns according to the immunocytochemical phenotypes, and gene expression of peripherin (PRPH, hereafter referred to as Peri) and neurofilament heavy chain (NEFH, hereafter referred to as NF). The majority of iPSC-derived sensory neurons were PRPH positive/NEFH negative, i.e. Peri(+)/NF(−) neurons, whose somata were smaller than those of Peri(+)/NF(+) neurons. On exposure to vincristine, projections from the cell body of a neuron, i.e. neurites, were degenerated quicker than somata, the lethal concentration to kill 50% (LC50) of neurites being below the LC50 for somata, consistent with the clinical pattern of length-dependent neuropathy. We then examined the molecular expression in the MAP kinase signaling pathways of, extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (MAPK1/3, hereafter referred to as ERK), p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK11/12/13/14, hereafter referred to as p38) and c-Jun N-terminal kinases (MAPK8/9/10, hereafter referred to as JNK). Regarding these three cascades, only phosphorylation of JNK was upregulated but not that of p38 or ERK1/2. Furthermore, vincristine-treatment resulted in impaired autophagy and reduced autophagic flux. Rapamycin-treatment reversed the effect of impaired autophagy and JNK activation. These results not only established a platform to study peripheral degeneration of human neurons but also provide molecular mechanisms for neurodegeneration with the potential for therapeutic targets.
INTRODUCTION
Degeneration of sensory neurons results in peripheral neuropathy, which is common after chemotherapy; in dysmetabolic syndromes, such as diabetes; and in painful nerve degenerative diseases (Bráz and Basbaum, 2010; Freeman et al., 2020; Gewandter et al., 2019; Kobayashi and Zochodne, 2018). Although sensory neuropathy can be studied in animal models of diabetes (Frank et al., 2019; Jolivalt et al., 2016), chemotherapy (Bruna et al., 2020; Staff et al., 2020) and painless versus neuropathic pain (Currie et al., 2019; Hama and Takamatsu, 2016; Monteiro et al., 2019; Terada and Kawabata, 2015), it is crucial to conduct experiments in human systems. This is because of the differences in genetic background and molecular expressions in animals and humans (Jin et al., 2021) and, in particular, for establishing platforms to study mechanisms and to develop new therapeutic strategies (Lee-Kubli and Calcutt, 2014; Staff et al., 2020). Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) offer a new approach, fulfilling the above purposes of modeling diseases (Bianchi et al., 2018; Lee and Huang, 2017; Mertens et al., 2018) and screening drugs (Christensen et al., 2018; Fujimori et al., 2018; Stacey et al., 2018). So far, iPSCs have mainly been applied to investigate neurodegenerative diseases in the central nervous system (Lee and Huang, 2017; Stacey et al., 2018), and there have been relatively limited applications of iPSCs to study peripheral nerve degeneration (Cao et al., 2016; Little et al., 2019; Mazzara et al., 2020). When using appropriate protocols, iPSCs can be successfully converted into peripheral sensory neurons (Chambers et al., 2012), raising the opportunity to study the molecular mechanisms of neuropathy mainly influencing nociceptors.
Vincristine is a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent that targets microtubules – hence, being a main trigger of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (Murillo and Mendes Sousa, 2018). Patients receiving vincristine also suffer from neuropathic pain, mainly attributed to injury of small-diameter sensory neurons of the nociceptive type. However, studies of vincristine on nociceptive neurons are relatively limited (Geisler, 2021; Li et al., 2020). Clinically mainly affected, are large-diameter sensory neurons, resulting, for example, in loss of proprioception (Haberberger et al., 2019), documented for nerve-conduction studies, i.e. sensory nerve physiology (McCorquodale and Smith, 2019). A crucial question is how the phenotypes of sensory neurons influence patterns of neurodegeneration, i.e. neuronopathy versus axonopathy (Jortner, 2020; McCorquodale and Smith, 2019; Valentine, 2020).
A further issue is the underlying molecular expression of neuronal injury, in particular, the MAP kinase pathway, as an important cellular response to environmental stimuli and stress (Kim and Choi, 2010). Previous studies have revealed that MAP kinases participate in neurodegenerative diseases (Ahmed et al., 2020; Obergasteiger et al., 2018). In addition, autophagy – as a mechanism for cellular homeostasis – has been implicated in neurodegenerative diseases of the brain (Corti et al., 2020; Nishijima et al., 2020; Suomi and Mcwillams, 2019). Both, the MAP kinase pathway and autophagy, are potential therapeutic targets. The above-mentioned observations raise further questions: (1) How is autophagy affected in vincristine-induced nerve degeneration and, (2) How is autophagy related to the MAP kinase signaling cascade. To address these issues, our study aimed to establish an iPSC model of vincristine-induced neurodegeneration, and investigate the molecular mechanisms and underlying signal cascades.
RESULTS
Nociceptive sensory neurons differentiated from human iPSCs
Sensory neurons were differentiated from human iPSCs following an established protocol (see Chambers et al., 2012), using the activin receptor-like kinase (ALK) inhibitor SB431542, the selective BMP type-I receptor inhibitor LDN193189, the glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) inhibitor CHIR99021, the multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitor SU5402 and the γ-secretase inhibitor DAPT that indirectly inhibits Notch. To evaluate whether the cells differentiated into sensory neurons or not, gene expression patterns and protein levels were examined using qPCR and immunocytochemistry, respectively. Protein synthesis of pluripotency markers, including homeobox protein NANOG (NANOG), podocalyxin (PODXL, hereafter referred to as TRA-1-60) and stage-specific embryonic antigen-4 (SSEA-4), was evident at the earliest stage, i.e. day 0 (Fig. 1A), confirming the pluripotency of iPSC before differentiation. At day 3 after the start of differentiation, iPSCs were induced toward the stage of neural stem cells through expression of the specific neural stem cell markers: vimentin, nestin and SOX2 (Fig. 1B). Cells expressed cytoskeletal proteins on differentiation into mature neurons: peripherin (PRPH, hereafter referred to as Peri), neurofilament heavy chain (NEFH, hereafter referred to as NF) and βIII-tubulin (TUBB3, hereafter referred to as TUB) on day 14 (Fig. 1C). At the initial stage of differentiation (day 0-2), mRNA expression levels of NANOG, POU5F1 (also known as OCT4) and REXO1 (also known as REX1) were higher than at later differentiation stages (Fig. 2A). mRNA expression of SOX2, PAX6 and ASCL1 peaked at early stages of differentiation, and decreased following the differentiation into mature neurons (day 15) (Fig. 2B). At later stages of differentiation, gene expression of PRPH, TUBB3 (also known as TUJ1) and transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1 (TRPV1) was robust (Fig. 2C). These observations indicate that iPSCs were induced into sensory neurons expressing stage-specific genes and proteins.
To further assess the phenotypes of sensory neurons, we examined gene expression patterns of nociceptors, mechanoreceptors and proprioceptors, in particular, those belonging to the family of neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinases 1, 2 and 3 (NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3, hereafter referred to TRKA, TRKB and TRKC, respectively). Among these genes, expression of TRKA markedly increased (a reduced ΔCt value represents increased mRNA expression) during neuronal differentiation, whereas those of TRKB and TRKC remained relatively unchanged (Fig. 2D). We further examined the gene expression patterns of transcription factors pivotal for differentiation into nociceptive, mechanoreceptive and proprioceptive sensory neurons. Gene expression of transcription factor RUNX1 and short stature homeobox 2 (SHOX2) were upregulated at the differentiation stage, whereas that of transcription factor RUNX3 did not change substantially (Fig. 2E). These results provide evidence that human iPSCs were differentiated into sensory neurons of the nociceptive type.
Phenotypes of iPSC-derived sensory neurons – Peri(+)/NF(+) versus Peri(+)/NF(−) neurons
To set up a platform for quantifying neurons and neurites, we used immunocytochemistry for Peri, NF and TUB. Peri and NF are neuron-specific intermediate filaments expressed in neurons of various diameters. TUB is a component of the microtubule networks. We then quantified neuron numbers, neurite lengths and neuronal soma sizes. There were two types of neuron: Peri(+)/NF(+) and Peri(+)/NF(−), making Peri suitable as a marker when staining for all neurons. In contrast to the Peri immunostaining the pattern, staining against TUB was weak at the soma but obvious at the neurite (Fig. S2). Taken together, we, therefore, chose Peri to quantify the total number of neurons and the soma size. Neurite length was best measured using immunostaining against TUB in the following experiments.
iPSCs were differentiated into two phenotypes according to the immunoreactivity of Peri and NF. The soma size of Peri(+)/NF(+) neurons was larger than that of Peri(+)/NF(−) neurons (Fig. 3B), i.e. the diameter of Peri(+)/NF(+) neurons was 51.2±20.86 µm (Fig. 3C, mainly ∼40-50 µm). Peri(+)/NF(−) neurons, by contrast, were smaller: 24.0±9.55 µm (mainly ∼15-30 µm, P<0.01), suggesting that Peri(+)/NF(−) neurons are small-diameter sensory neurons, whereas Peri(+)/NF(+) neurons are medium-sized sensory neurons.
To investigate the difference in gene expression of Peri(+)/NF(+) and Peri(+)/NF(−) neurons, cells were stained against Peri and NF, and sorted using the 4-laser FACSAriaIII cell sorter. The gene expression pattern was examined by qPCR (Fig. 3D). We found Peri(+)/NF(−) neurons to have significantly higher expression of the nociceptor gene TRKA than Peri(+)/NF(+) neurons but observed no difference between regarding expression of RUNX1. However, Peri(+)/NF(+) neurons expressed more NEFH (encoding neurofilament protein) and expression of the peptidergic nociceptor genes calcitonin related polypeptide alpha (CALCA, hereafter referred to as CGRP) and tachykinin precursor 1 (TAC1) were also higher. However, no significant difference in expression of the non-peptidergic nociceptive ret proto-oncogene (RET) was found (Fig. 3D).
Neurotoxic effects of vincristine: neurodegeneration and phosphorylation of JNK
Clinical studies on vincristine neurotoxicity have mainly focused on large-diameter sensory neurons. The presence of neuropathic pain in patients receiving vincristine, raised the possibility of its neurotoxicity on small-diameter neurons. We, therefore, tested neurotoxicity of vincristine on iPSC-derived nociceptive neurons and calculated the lethal concentration at which 50% of them are killed (LC50), a measure for the degree of injury to soma and neurite.
Cells were treated for 48 h with vincristine at ascending concentrations (0.47 nM, 1.88 nM or 7.5 nM). There was a dose-dependent reduction of neurites, neurons and axon degeneration index (Fig. 4A-C, Fig. S3). Furthermore, reduction of neurites was more robust than loss of neuronal cell bodies. The LC50 of vincristine for neurites was below that for neurons (Fig. 4D, 0.37±0.025 nM vs 0.84±0.162 nM, P<0.01), suggesting that neurites are more vulnerable to vincristine than neurons.
We next investigated the effect of vincristine on the expression of signaling molecules. The mitogen-activated protein kinases cascade contains three main protein subfamilies, i.e. JNK, p38 and ERK. Their respective signaling pathways are activated during various physiological processes, including cell growth, cell differentiation, death, autophagy and neurodegenerative diseases (Lee and Kim, 2017; Zhou et al., 2015). Among these three pathways, only the phosphorylated form of JNK (P-JNK) achieved a time-dependent increase after treatment with vincristine (Fig. 4E-H), indicating that phosphorylation of JNK is related to vincristine neurotoxicity.
Effect of vincristine on autophagy: autophagosome accumulation due to impaired autophagy
To understand the effects of vincristine on autophagy, we analyzed the patterns of autophagy pathway proteins. For this, we treated human iPSCs-derived sensory neurons with vincristine and analysed the levels of lipidated microtubule associated protein 1 light chain 3 alpha (MAP1LC3A, hereafter referred to as LC3-II) and sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1; hereafter referred to as p62) (Fig. 5). LC3-II and p62 protein levels following vincristine treatment were then compared to those following treatment with the autophagy inducer rapamycin and the autophagy inhibitor bafilomycin A1, a vacuolar H+-ATPase inhibitor that inhibits the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes and blocks the acidification of the lysosome, resulting in the accumulation of LC3-II (Wang et al., 2017, 2021). After 24 h of treatment with vincristine, bafilomycin A1 or rapamycin, protein levels of LC3-II and p62 were increased in the vincristine and bafilomycin A1 groups compared to those in the control group. However, there was no change in the rapamycin group (Fig. 5A-C). These results demonstrated that vincristine has an autophagy inhibitory effect on iPSCs-derived sensory neurons, similar to the effect of bafilomycin A1. Meanwhile, cleaved – i.e. activated – caspase-3, which activates downstream proteins to execute apoptosis, was not detected after vincristine treatment that indicated apoptosis did not occur in this cell model (Fig. S4).
Both induction and downstream blocking of autophagy can increase the number of autophagosomes. To clarify this issue, we performed turnover assays of LC3 and p62 to measure the autophagic flux, i.e. the degradation, of these proteins. Protein levels were then analysed by western blotting to examine their expression patterns in the presence and absence of 10 nM bafilomycin A1. The differences in the densitometric levels of LC3-II and p62 represented the amount of LC3-II or p62 delivered to lysosomes for degradation, i.e. the autophagic flux, which was measured by comparing the protein levels between control and treatment groups (Fig. 6A-E). The difference in the densitometric levels of the vincristine group was 80.4±5.5% [(④-③)÷(②-①), P<0.01; (④-③) and (②-①) denote the respective differences in densitometric levels (DVs) of LC3-II in the vincristine group or control group respectively.] of the control group (Fig. 6B,D). Furthermore, by using the same definition to monitor p62 protein levels, the degree of p62 degradation was found to be reduced in the vincristine group [(⑧-⑦)÷(⑥-⑤)=24.3±15.3%, P<0.01; (⑧-⑦) and (⑥-⑤) denote the respective differences in DVs of p62 in vincristine-treated and control groups.] compared to that of the control group (Fig. 6C,E). Taken together, these data indicate that vincristine blocked LC3-II and p62 degradation, thereby causing impairment of autophagy.
We then investigated the phosphorylation of JNK after treatment of iPSC-derived sensory neurons with bafilomycin A1, to assess whether the MAPK pathway has a role in autophagy. JNK phosphorylation levels were unaltered after bafilomycin A1 or vincristine treatment for 12 h. However, administration of vincristine and bafilomycin A1 together did induce phosphorylation of JNK compared with levels in the control group (Fig. 6F-H). Whereas addition of the autophagy inhibitor bafilomycin A1 to vincristine-treated cells increased levels of P-JNK, addition of the autophagy inducer rapamycin decreased them, meaning P-JNK levels were affected when autophagy was induced or inhibited. Taken together, we speculate that phosphorylation of JNK is a downstream effect of vincristine-induced autophagy. The additive effect suggests that vincristine can impair autophagy followed by JNK phosphorylation.
Reversal of vincristine-induced effects by rapamycin: autophagy impairment and JNK phosphorylation
Given that the blockade of LC3-II and the degradation of p62 resulted in autophagy impairment after treatment of iPSC-derived sensory neurons with vincristine, we tested whether the autophagy inducer rapamycin can attenuate the effect of vincristine. iPSC-derived sensory neurons were pretreated with three different concentrations of rapamycin (100 nM, 200 nM or 400 nM) for 24 h. Culture medium was washed out and replaced with 7.5 nM vincristine in new culture medium followed by addition or not of 10 nM bafilomycin for 24 h to determine autophagic flux (Fig. 7A). No significant difference between treatment groups was found regarding protein levels of p62. However, cells that had been pretreated with 200 nM or 400 nM rapamycin showed a significant increase in LC3 flux (150.7±13.36% and 198.5±5.67%, P<0.05, respectively) compared with cells not pre-treated with rapamycin (Fig. 7B). These results indicate that rapamycin pretreatment can alleviate the effect of vincristine-induced autophagy impairment.
We then examined whether the effect of rapamycin extends to MAP kinases, especially to JNK. After pretreatment with different concentrations of rapamycin (0, 100, 200, 400 nM), cells were treated with 7.5 nM vincristine for 24 h or 48 h. Pretreatment with 200 nM and 400 nM rapamycin resulted in a significant reduction of phosphorylated JNK after vincristine treatment for 24 h (Fig. 8A) and 48 h (Fig. 8B). These findings suggest that rapamycin pretreatment ameliorates the effect of vincristine on phosphorylation of JNK. However, no difference was found regarding neuron number and degeneration index after treatment with rapamycin (Fig. 8C,D). We, therefore, speculate that multiple factors affect the vincristine-induced degeneration – a hypothesis that requires further investigation.
DISCUSSION
iPSC-derived sensory neurons offer a great potential in the biomedical field. In our case, sensory neurons were differentiated from human iPSC and used as a modeling in vitro system to investigate CXCR4 signaling during the development of the peripheral nervous system (Terheyden-Keighley et al., 2018). iPSC-derived sensory nociceptors were induced to create a disease model of inherited erythromelalgia, providing a new strategy for pain management by regulating the voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.7 (Meents et al., 2019). iPSC-derived nociceptors from patients diagnosed with small fiber neuropathy display increased excitability, which can be reversed by treatment with the FDA-approved drug lacosamide (Namer et al., 2019).
In this study, we documented (1) the profiling of iPSC, (2) different patterns of degeneration and, (3) signaling cascades that are initiated by neurodegeneration and exposure to neurotoxins. Our report successfully established a platform of peripheral sensory neurons by generating a cell model of neurodegeneration. According to the immunocytochemical pattern of Peri and NF, we differentiated iPSCs into nociceptive neurons, mainly into small- and medium-sized sensory neurons comprising both peptidergic and non-peptidergic phenotypes (Haberberger et al., 2019; Lawson et al., 2019; Nascimento et al., 2018). Differentiation was confirmed by analyzing the histograms showing frequency distributions of soma size and by using qPCR to investigate gene expression patterns. Interestingly, expression of TRKA increased excessively during the differentiation to sensory neurons, being 100 times higher than that of TRKB or TRKC. These findings are consistent with the functional role of TRKA in nociceptors compared to the expression of TRKB and TRKC receptors mainly for large-diameter sensory neurons of proprioceptors (Marmigère and Carroll, 2014). Thus, such a differentiation protocol provides a system to study the neurodegeneration of nociceptive neurons that contribute to the generation of neuropathic pain upon nerve injury (Hill and Bautista, 2020; Tran and Crawford, 2020; Yeh et al., 2020).
In this study, we combined (1) different neurochemical markers and (2) the calculation of LC50 values to decipher the susceptibility of neuronal compartments to vincristine. Given the preferential localization of soma versus neurite between Peri and TUB, we were able to compare the susceptibility of vincristine on different parts of a neuron, i.e. neurites (dentrite and axon) and soma. Intriguingly, according to the LC50, neurites were more vulnerable than somata to exposure of vincristine. This finding, indeed, corroborates with the clinical manifestations of vincristine neuropathy, i.e. a length-dependent distribution of symptoms, such as earlier and worse in toes compared to fingers, because axons innervating toes are longer than those innervating fingers; hence, on exposure to neurotoxins or metabolic derangements, longer axons are more vulnerable than shorter ones (Coleman and Höke, 2020; Lehmann et al., 2020). These observations raise the following topics for future elaboration: what is the molecular basis of neurite susceptibility and can it be confirmed. Additional mechanisms for vincristine-induced neurotoxicity include alteration of the bidirectional axonal transport, disruption of the transmission function of nerve impulses, damage of mitochondria, induction of neuroinflammation and inhibition of polymerization of microtubules (Fukuda et al., 2017; Starobova and Vetter, 2017; Triarico et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2021). Despite the disruption of microtubules leading to degeneration of neurites, as observed in our cell model, possible secondary effects cannot be completely excluded and require further experimentation. We demonstrated activation of the JNK signaling pathway on exposure to vincristine, and MAPK signaling pathways have a key role in neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson disease, Alzheimer disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Jin and Zheng, 2019; Obergasteiger et al., 2018). They are potential therapeutic targets for neurodegenerative diseases of the central nervous system (Ahmed et al., 2020).
Phosphorylation of JNK leads to expression of pro-apoptotic molecules and, hence, cell death (Bekker et al., 2021; Uzdensky, 2019). The alterations of JNK signaling pathway associated with the neurodegeneration in Drosophila models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Alzheimer disease (Gogia et al., 2020; Irwin et al., 2020; Yarza et al., 2015). In Alzheimer disease, JNK phosphorylation results in phosphorylation of Tau (officially known as MAPT) and impaired fast axonal transport (Morris et al., 2021). Dual leucine kinase (MAP3K12) and leucine zipper-bearing kinase (MAP3K13) both induce JNK phosphorylation, thereby leading to degeneration of cerebellar Purkinje cells through apoptotic cell death (Li et al., 2021). Furthermore, members of the Ste20 family of serine/threonine kinase activate JNK and drive neurodegeneration. Inhibition of these kinases might be a useful therapeutic target (Larhammar et al., 2017). In addition to its effect on neurodegeneration, JNK is activated in a model of chronic senescence in response to chronic administration of D-galactose, an effect that is alleviated by glycine can alleviate the JNK signaling cascade, D-galactose-induced oxidative stress neuroinflammation and cognitive impairment (Ullah et al., 2020). Only few studies exist on the roles and mechanisms of JNK signaling regarding the degeneration of peripheral nerves; for example, the orphan receptor death receptor 6 (officially known as TNFRSF21) coordinates with JNK to mediate nerve degeneration (Gamage et al., 2017). Our current study indicated that JNK phosphorylation is activated upon exposure to vincristine in iPSCs.
Autophagy plays a key role in maintaining cellular homeostasis and is tightly regulated by kinases, including JNK (King et al., 2021). Autophagy is blocked and JNK activated in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; both pathways lead to motor neuron degeneration (Wu et al., 2019). Our study showed impaired autophagy on exposure to vincristine, with two lines of evidence: (1) increased p62 and (2) reduced autophagic flux. This is in contrast to the observation that suppression of autophagy and JNK activation can reduce injury-induced neuropathic pain (Larhammar et al., 2017). Our current study indicated that vincristine impaired autophagy and, sequentially, induced JNK phosphorylation. These results provide new insights for the development of therapies treating vincristine-induced neurodegeneration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell culture and differentiation
Human iPSCs were obtained from healthy donors from National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH 201504052RINC) after informed consents were obtained (Fig. S1). This project was approved by the Ethic Committee of National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Huang et al., 2020). Cells were maintained in Essential 8 medium supplemented with 1% penicillin-streptomycin (100×, Gibco, New York, NY), 2% Essential 8 Supplement (Gibco), Essential 8 Basal Medium (Gibco), on 3.5-cm dishes. Neuronal differentiation was started at 90-100% cell confluency following the protocol by Chambers et al. (2012). iPSCs were cultured on 3.5 cm dishes coated with Matrigel (day 0) [DMEM F-12, diluted 1:100; Corning, New York, NY). The next day (day 1), medium was replaced with knockout serum replacement (KOSR) medium with added SMAD inhibitors the activin receptor-like kinase (ALK) inhibitor SB431542 (10 µM, Selleckchem, Houston, TX) and the selective BMP type-I receptor inhibitor LDN193189 (100 nM, BioGems, Westlake Village, CA). The KOSR medium contained 15% knockout serum replacement (Gibco), 1% GlutaMAX (100×, Gibco), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (100×, Gibco), 1% non-essential amino acids (100%, Gibco), 100 µM β-mercaptoethanol (Gibco), Knockout DMEM (Gibco). Between days 3 and 10, KOSR medium was gradually changed to N2 medium [1% GlutaMAX (100×, Gibco), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (100×, Gibco), 1% N-2 supplement (100×, Gibco), 2% B-27 supplement (50×, Gibco), Neurobasal medium (Gibco)]. At the same time, the following small-molecule inhibitors were added: the glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) inhibitor CHIR99021 (3 µM, BioGems), the multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitor SU5402 (10 µM, Tocris Bioscience, Minneapolis, MN) and the γ-secretase inhibitor DAPT (10 µM, Sigma, St Louis, MO), which indirectly inhibit Notch. SMAD inhibitors were removed on day 6 (CHIR99021) or day 11 (SU5402 and DAPT). Cells were passaged on day 3 and replated onto 10 mm coverslips (1.5×104 cells/coverslip) coated with Matrigel by TrypLE (Gibco) on day 11 in N2 medium. On day 11, SU5402 and DAPT were depleted, and the following compounds were included in N2 medium up to day 14: CHIR99021 and human recombinant proteins: neurotrophin-3 (NT-3, 25 ng/ml, BioGems), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF, 25 ng/ml, BioGems), glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF, 25 ng/ml, BioGems), and nerve growth factor (NGF, 25 ng/ml, Sigma). Medium was replaced with fresh one on days 13 and 15. We followed the protocol by Chambers et al. to differentiate neurons within 15 days of differentiation (Chambers et al., 2012). Characterization of the mature sensory neurons expressing markers (NF, TUB and TRPV1) was examined by qPCR during the 15-day differentiation (Chambers et al., 2012). The qPCR results revealed that these molecules were highly expressed on day 15. Differentiation protocols with similar time course were established and the cells were defined as mature sensory neurons. Furthermore, the high-efficiency protocol was gradually developed to induce iPSCs into functional sensory neurons and contributed to in vitro modeling and regenerative therapy (Cai et al., 2017; Terheyden-Keighley et al., 2018). Gene expression levels of NANOG, OCT4, SOX2, PPRPH, TUJ1, TRPV1, TRKA, TRKB and TRKC in these three clones indicated that clonal and differentiation variations did not exist in the experimental set-up used here (Fig. S1).
Vincristine
Vincristine (1 mg, Sigma) was dissolved in 108.3377 ml DMSO as a stock solution (10 μM), and then further diluted in medium to 7.5 nM, 1.88 nM or 0.48 nM. Human iPSC-derived sensory neurons were incubated with vincristine of different concentrations with an approximately four-fold increase (0.48 nM, 1.88 nM and 7.5 nM) or solution DMSO as the control group in N2 medium on day 12.
Immunocytochemistry
Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma) in PBS for 30 min, followed by incubation with primary antibodies (Table S2) in 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS and 0.25% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma) for 16 h-18 h at 4°C. After rinsing with 1× PBS three times (each for 5 min), the cells were labeled with fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibodies diluted in 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS and 0.25% BSA for 1 h at room temperature. Once secondary antibodies had been added, reactions were protected from light. Cells were rinsed with 1× PBS three times (5 min each), incubated with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, 0.5 µg/ml) in double-distilled H2O for 3 min at room temperature and rinsed again three times with 1× PBS (5 min each). Coverslips were mounted on gelatine-coated glass slides with glycerol and stored at −20°C.
RNA extraction
Cells were lysed with 0.5 ml NucleoZOL (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany), followed by addition of 0.2 ml RNase-free H2O (Sigma). Cell lysates were vortexed for 15 s, incubated at room temperature for 15 min and centrifuged at 12,000 g for 15 min at 4°C. Fractions (0.5 ml) were transferred to new 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes, mixed gently with 0.5 ml 100% isopropanol and incubated at room temperature for 10 min to precipitate RNA. The solution was centrifuged at 12,000 g for 10 min at 4°C, supernatant removed and RNA pellets were washed with 0.5 ml 75% ethanol, followed by centrifugation at 8000 g for 3 min at 4°C. The supernatants were then discarded and the pellets dissolved with RNase-free H2O.
Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
The protocol of RT-PCR followed the manufacturer instructions and our published report (Chen et al., 2019). After RNA extraction, 1 µg RNA was mixed gently with a reaction solution of 20 µl containing RNase-free H2O and reverse transcriptase (5× PrimeScript RT Master Mix, Takara, Kyoto, Japan). The solution was incubated at 37°C for 15 min and 85°C for 5 s to synthesize cDNA. The cDNA was stored at −20°C.
Real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)
A reaction mixture of 20 µl containing 10 µl 2× SensiFast SYBR Lo-ROX Mix (Bioline, London, UK), 0.8 µl 10 µM primer mix of forward and reverse primers, 7.2 µl RNase-free H2O and 2 µl cDNA (10× diluted) was incubated once at 95°C for 2 min, at 95°C for 5 s, followed by incubation at specific temperature according to the different genes for 20 s. The last two steps were repeated for 40 cycles. Gene expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method described by Livak and Schmittgen (2001). The target gene expression (CT value) was normalized to GAPDH and relative expression was calculated as 2−ΔΔCt. TRKA/TRKB/TRKC and RUNX1/SHOX2/RUNX3 were compared using ΔCt values, i.e. the difference between the Ct value of the target gene and that of the housekeeping gene (GAPDH). Sequences of primers were listed in Table S3.
Western blotting
Cells were twice washed with 1× PBS and lysed in 1× RIPA lysis buffer [1× protease inhibitor, 1× phosphatase inhibitor (PhosSTOP, Sigma)]. Samples were centrifuged at 21,913 g for 20 mins at 4°C and supernatants extracted, followed by normalization for protein (10 μg per lane) using a BCA protein assay (Tprobio, New Taipei, Taiwan). Proteins were separated using SDS-PAGE on 10–15% Tris-glycine gels and transferred to PVDF membranes (Merck, Kenilworth, NJ). After blocking non-specific binding sites of the membranes with 5% non-fat milk for 40 min at room temperature, membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies (Table S2). Subsequently, membranes were washed and incubated with appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Signals were detected by using HRP-conjugated ECL (Tprobio). Quantification was performed using ImageJ.
LC3 and p62 turnover assay
iPSC-derived sensory neurons were cultured in N2 medium supplemented with 7.5 nM vincristine and 10 nM bafilomycin A1 (Baf A1, Cayman, Ann Arbor, MI) or 7.5 nM vincristine only on day 12 – after neuronal differentiation – for 12 h. Expression of LC3-II and p62 in the presence and absence of Baf A1 was analyzed by western blotting. The difference in LC3-II and p62 protein expression after treatment with or without bafilomycin A1 represents the amount of degraded protein delivered to lysosomes. Based on the above, the difference in protein levels between control and Baf A1 treatment groups was compared to measure the autophagic flux.
Cell sorting
On day 15 of the differentiation protocol, iPSCs were dissociated using 0.05% trypsin-EDTA (0.5%, Gibco), centrifuged at 200 g for 5 min and once resuspended in 1× PBS. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature, permeabilized with 0.5% TritonX-100 (Sigma) in PBS for 30 min and incubated with primary antibodies against Peri and NF in 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS and 0.25% BSA at 4°C overnight. After washing with 1× PBS, cells were labeled with fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibodies Cy3 and Alexa Fluor 488 diluted in 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS/0.25% BSA, and were then incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After labeling, cells were resuspended in 1× PBS and sorted according to expression of Peri and NF with 4-laser FACSAriaIII cell sorter (BD Biosciences).
Imaging, quantification and statistical analysis
Images were taken with a microscope (Zeiss AxioImager A1 and Carl Zeiss LSM880) at magnification 100× (10× eyepiece and object lens) and 630× (10× eyepiece and 63× object lens) to capture five fields (one at the center and four at each quadrant). Images were then processed to 8-bit grayscale pictures and neuron number and neurite length were quantified with ImageJ (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/index.html) or NeurphologyJ (https://hwangeric5.wixsite.com/erichwanglab/neurphologyj), a plugin to ImageJ. All statistical tests were performed using ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test or two-tailed paired t-test.
Axon degeneration index
Images were first processed to 8-bit; then axons were captured by using Otsu threshold algorithms. The total area of axons was measured by using ‘analyze particle’ algorithms: size was set as 0–∞, circularity was set as 0–1.0. Circularity of particles >0.2 was defined as the fragmented axon (circularity set as 0.2–1.0). The degeneration index was calculated as the ratio of fragmented axon area over the total axon area (Kneynsberg et al., 2016; Sasaki et al., 2009).
Acknowledgements
We thank the Human Disease iPSC Service Consortium, the imaging core at the First Core Labs of the National Taiwan University College of Medicine, and the staff of the Third Core Lab of the Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, for the generation of iPSCs and technical support. The Consortium is funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) (MOST 109-2740-B-001-002).
Footnotes
Author contributions
Conceptualization: T.-Y.Y., S.-T.H.; Formal analysis: N.-W.T., C.-C.L.; Investigation: N.-W.T., C.-C.L., Y.-A.C., H.-H.C.; Resources: H.-P.H.; Writing - original draft: N.-W.T., S.-T.H.; Writing - review & editing: T.-Y.Y., S.-T.H., H.-P.H.; Project administration: S.-T.H.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the National Taiwan University Hospital (UN109-013), the Ministry of Science and Technology (107-2320-B-002-043-MY3, 107-3017-F-002-002) and the Ministry of Education (107L9014-2). Open Access funding provided by National Taiwan University College of Medicine. Deposited in PMC for immediate release.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The protocol of this work was approved by the Ethics Committee of National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (NTUH 201504052RINC, [email protected]).
Cell line authentication
The human iPSC used in this work was derived from the subjects who concerned this study which was approved by National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH 201504052RINC).
References
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing or financial interests.