In the golden hamster the critical days of palatal development occur between days 12 and 14 of gestation. During this period the shelves undergo transposition from vertical positions alongside the tongue to horizontal positions above it, and undergo fusion with each other. Palatal transposition, per se, probably takes place on or about day 12. Present data are in-sufficientto indicate in which direction this occurs. Although epithelial remnants arestill present in the midline of the palate on day 13, they have completely disappeared by day 14, thus signaling the completion of the fusion process. Preosteoblast areas are clearly visible on day 12 but actual ossification is first seen on day 13.

Cadmium apparently has a marked deleterious affect on the head mesoderm of golden hamsters, causing the production of numerous malformations, including unilateral and bilateral cleft lips and palates. It is suggested that the clefts found in cadmium-treated hamsters are due to a mesodermal deficiency rather than to a delay in shelf transposition. Marked abnormalities in cartilage formation and delays in ossification are also described.

The mechanism of action of cadmium—whether directly on the differentiating embryonic tissue, or indirectly through action on the maternal tissues—remains to be elucidated.

Recent investigations have established the easily reproducible teratogenic effects of cadmium on the embryonic facial structures of the golden hamster (Ferm, 1967; Ferm & Carpenter, 1967, 1968; Ferm, 1969). Among the malformations produced were unilateral and bilateral cleft lips and palates and complex facial fissures.

In our attempts to understand the nature of the palatal clefts produced by cadmium, it became necessary to define clearly the normal events of palatal development in the golden hamster. Although detailed descriptions of palatal formation exist for the mouse (Walker & Fraser, 1956; Larsson, 1961) and the rat (Coleman, 1965), previous papers on the development of the golden hamster do not deal specifically enough with the events of palatal closure (Graves, 1945; Boyer, 1953).

In this study the events of palatal closure in golden hamster embryos are discussed as a basis of subsequent considerations of the interference by cadmium with the normal events of palatal development. The morphology of these cadmium-produced effects is also presented.

Ten pregnant golden hamsters (Cricetus auratus) were divided into control (5) and experimental (5) groups. The day following the evening of conception was designated day 1 of gestation. On the eighth day of gestation five experimental animals were injected intravenously with a solution of cadmium sulfate (3CdSO4.8H2O) in the amount of 2 mg per kg, made up in distilled water. The five control animals received no treatment. Animals from both groups were sacrificed on each of days 12, 13 and 14 of pregnancy. The numbers of control and experimental embryos obtained at each time interval were as follows: day 12, 3 controls and 3 experimentals; day 13, 2 controls and 7 experimentals; day 14, 1 control and 2 experimentals. The heads of the embryos from both normal and experimental groups were fixed in Bouin’s solution, processed according to standard histologic procedures, and embedded in paraffin wax. Serial sections of 7 p thickness were obtained in the frontal plane. Comparative sections were stained with either H. and E., Masson’s trichome, or M filler’s colloidal ferric oxide.

For clarity of presentation, the palate is divided into the following areas, proceeding antero-posteriorly : primary palate, anterior hard palate, mid-hard palate, posterior hard palate and soft palate. The following descriptive results were obtained.

12-day normal

In the region of the primary palate, the cartilaginous nasal septum and nasal capsule are well demarcated. The lateral palatine processes in this area are horizontal and have completely joined with the nasal septum (Fig. 1 A). In all other sections of the palate the palatine shelves are directed in a vertical direction alongside the tongue (Fig. 1C); the only exception to this being in the extreme posterior region where the tongue is actually part of the floor of the mouth and the palatal shelves are lying horizontally above it (Fig. 1 E). Although ‘preosteoblast’ (osteoid) areas (Larsson, 1961) can be seen throughout the palate, no sign of actual ossification is yet discernible.

FIGURE 1.

ABBREVIATIONS ON FIGURES

Ca cleft area

cp cleft palate

er epithelial remnants

Ipp lateral palatine processes

nc nasal cartilage

ns nasal septum

o ossification areas

po preosteoblast areas

tc thyroglossal cleft

Frontal sections through three different antero-posterior levels of the palates of normal (A, C, E) and cadmium-treated (B, D, F) 12-day-old hamster embryos. All stained with H. and E.×52 5.

(A) Primary palate region: the lateral palatine processes (lpp) have assumed a horizontal position and are completely united with the intervening nasal septum (ns). No ossification is evident in the preosteoblast areas (po).

(B) Primary palate region: the cartilaginous nasal septum (nc) is bifurcated and directed more in a horizontal than in a vertical direction, causing the nose to be extremely foreshortened. A bilateral cleft palate (cp) exists with the nose deviating to the side of the smaller cleft.

(C) Anterior hard palate region: the lateral palatine process is vertically directed alongside the tongue.

(D) Anterior hard palate: the cartilaginous nasal septum is bifurcated and horizontally directed. The lateral palatine processes are redundant in nature.

(E) Soft-palate region : extreme posterior portions of the lateral palatine processes lying horizontally above floor of mouth.

(F) Soft palate region : the palatal region appears normal but a thyroglossal cleft (tc) exists at base of tongue.

FIGURE 1.

ABBREVIATIONS ON FIGURES

Ca cleft area

cp cleft palate

er epithelial remnants

Ipp lateral palatine processes

nc nasal cartilage

ns nasal septum

o ossification areas

po preosteoblast areas

tc thyroglossal cleft

Frontal sections through three different antero-posterior levels of the palates of normal (A, C, E) and cadmium-treated (B, D, F) 12-day-old hamster embryos. All stained with H. and E.×52 5.

(A) Primary palate region: the lateral palatine processes (lpp) have assumed a horizontal position and are completely united with the intervening nasal septum (ns). No ossification is evident in the preosteoblast areas (po).

(B) Primary palate region: the cartilaginous nasal septum (nc) is bifurcated and directed more in a horizontal than in a vertical direction, causing the nose to be extremely foreshortened. A bilateral cleft palate (cp) exists with the nose deviating to the side of the smaller cleft.

(C) Anterior hard palate region: the lateral palatine process is vertically directed alongside the tongue.

(D) Anterior hard palate: the cartilaginous nasal septum is bifurcated and horizontally directed. The lateral palatine processes are redundant in nature.

(E) Soft-palate region : extreme posterior portions of the lateral palatine processes lying horizontally above floor of mouth.

(F) Soft palate region : the palatal region appears normal but a thyroglossal cleft (tc) exists at base of tongue.

12-day cadmium-treated

Areas of congenital malformations are most evident in the anterior portions of the palate. In the areas of the primary palate (Fig. 1B) and anterior hard palate (Fig. 1D), the nose is extremely foreshortened. The vertical portion of the cartilaginous nasal septum is completely absent. A bilateral cleft exists in the area of the primary median palatal triangle and the nasal septum deviates to the side of the narrower cleft (Fig. IB). In the anterior hard palate the lateral palatine processes are quite small, if not almost redundant (Fig. ID). In the posterior region an abnormality which was found in several cadmium-treated animals was a thyroglossal cleft (Fig. 1F). Except for a decreased amount of cartilaginous nasal capsule in the mid-hard palate, the palate itself appears normal from the mid-hard palate posteriorly (Fig. ID, F).

13-day normal

The lateral palatine processes have already undergone transposition and are united with each other in the midline (Fig. 2C). Epithelial remnants are seen in all areas of the secondary palate except in the most posterior aspects of the soft palate and in the region of the primary median palatal triangle (Fig. 2A). Fusion has not yet occurred between the nasal septum and the secondary palate (Fig. 2 C). Bone formation is present in all sections of the hard palate to about the same degree, except in the mid-hard palate where ossification is further advanced (Fig. 2 A, C).

FIGURE 2.

Frontal sections through three different antero-posterior levels of the palate of normal (A, C, E) and cadmium-treated (B, D, F) 13-day-old hamster embryos. All stained with H. and E.×52·5.

(A) Primary palate region: similar to day 12 except for increased size of structure. Ossification (o) has begun.

(B) Primary palate region : the nasal cartilage (nc) is bifurcated and the nasal septum (ns) is deviated away from the cleft areas (ca). Ossification appears to be delayed (po).

(C) Anterior hard palate region : the lateral palatine processes are undergoing fusion. Epithelial remnants (er) are evident in the midline. Areas of ossification are present.

(D) Anterior hard palate region: the nasal cartilage (nc) is bifurcated and the nasal septum (ns) is deviated away from the cleft area(ca). The palatine process (Ipp) on the side of the cleft is redundant in nature.

(E) Posterior hard palate region: fusion is taking place between the lateral palatine processes (Ipp). Areas of ossification (o) are present.

(F) Posterior hard palate region : the lateral palatine processes (Ipp) are still separated, a thyroglossal cleft exists and there are no evident areas of ossification.

FIGURE 2.

Frontal sections through three different antero-posterior levels of the palate of normal (A, C, E) and cadmium-treated (B, D, F) 13-day-old hamster embryos. All stained with H. and E.×52·5.

(A) Primary palate region: similar to day 12 except for increased size of structure. Ossification (o) has begun.

(B) Primary palate region : the nasal cartilage (nc) is bifurcated and the nasal septum (ns) is deviated away from the cleft areas (ca). Ossification appears to be delayed (po).

(C) Anterior hard palate region : the lateral palatine processes are undergoing fusion. Epithelial remnants (er) are evident in the midline. Areas of ossification are present.

(D) Anterior hard palate region: the nasal cartilage (nc) is bifurcated and the nasal septum (ns) is deviated away from the cleft area(ca). The palatine process (Ipp) on the side of the cleft is redundant in nature.

(E) Posterior hard palate region: fusion is taking place between the lateral palatine processes (Ipp). Areas of ossification (o) are present.

(F) Posterior hard palate region : the lateral palatine processes (Ipp) are still separated, a thyroglossal cleft exists and there are no evident areas of ossification.

13-day cadmium-treated

Unlike the previous day, malformations can be seen throughout the length of the palate. The nose is foreshortened and markedly deviates away from the cleft side (Fig. 2B, D). The cartilaginous nasal septum is bifurcated throughout its length (Fig. 2B, D). The lateral palatine process on the cleft side appears redundant throughout the length of the hard palate. The ability of the palatal shelves to undergo transposition is apparently not affected, as they are all horizontally located above the tongue (Fig. 2B, D, F). Bone formation is present but markedly retarded when compared to normal (Fig. 2B, D, F).

14-day normal

The secondary palate is now fully formed (Fig. 3 A, C, E). Epithelial remnants are no longer present in any areas of the palate indicating that fusion has been completed (Fig. 3C, E). The nasal septum has completely fused with the anterior portion of the hard palate and the vomerian bone beneath the cartilaginous nasal septum is well calcified (Fig. 3C). Bone formation, in general, has progressed much farther and has extended to the midline of the palate in the midhard palate (Fig. 3E) and posterior hard palate.

FIGURE 3.

Frontal sections through 3 different antero-posterior levels of the palates of normal (A, C, E) and cadmium-treated (B, D, F) 14-day-old hamster embryos. All stained with H. and E.×52-5.

(A) Primary palate region: similar to day 13 except for increased size of structure and for advanced level of ossification (o).

(B) Primary palate region : the nasal cartilage (zzc) is bifurcated and the nose is foreshortened. A bilateral cleft palate (cp) exists as the lateral palatine processes (Ipp) are joined neither to each other nor to the nasal septum (ns). Bone formation appears retarded.

(C) Anterior hard palate region: the palate has now become fused with the nasal septum. The level of ossification (o) has advanced from that of the previous day.

(D) Anterior hard palate region: there exists a bifurcated nasal cartilage (nc), a foreshortened nasal septum (ns) and a bilateral cleft palate (cp). The lateral palatine processes (Ipp) are approximating each other in the midline. Ossification (o) appears retarded.

(E) Mid-hard palate region : bone formation (o) has extended up to, but does not include, the median raphe of the palate.

(F) Mid-hard palate region: despite the abnormal character of the nose, the palate itself appears to be within normal limits. Ossification (o) somewhat retarded.

FIGURE 3.

Frontal sections through 3 different antero-posterior levels of the palates of normal (A, C, E) and cadmium-treated (B, D, F) 14-day-old hamster embryos. All stained with H. and E.×52-5.

(A) Primary palate region: similar to day 13 except for increased size of structure and for advanced level of ossification (o).

(B) Primary palate region : the nasal cartilage (zzc) is bifurcated and the nose is foreshortened. A bilateral cleft palate (cp) exists as the lateral palatine processes (Ipp) are joined neither to each other nor to the nasal septum (ns). Bone formation appears retarded.

(C) Anterior hard palate region: the palate has now become fused with the nasal septum. The level of ossification (o) has advanced from that of the previous day.

(D) Anterior hard palate region: there exists a bifurcated nasal cartilage (nc), a foreshortened nasal septum (ns) and a bilateral cleft palate (cp). The lateral palatine processes (Ipp) are approximating each other in the midline. Ossification (o) appears retarded.

(E) Mid-hard palate region : bone formation (o) has extended up to, but does not include, the median raphe of the palate.

(F) Mid-hard palate region: despite the abnormal character of the nose, the palate itself appears to be within normal limits. Ossification (o) somewhat retarded.

14-day cadmium-treated

The animal exhibits a bilateral cleft which continues as a midline cleft partway into the hard palate. The nose once more is extremely blunted and has a bifurcation of the cartilaginous nasal septum. In all areas where a cleft exists, bone formation appears retarded. From the region of the mid-hard palate posteriorly, however, where palatal formation appears normal, ossification also appears normal (Fig. 3F). Despite the bilateral nature of the cleft the nasal septum still appears to deviate to one side. In the region of the mid-hard palate, it is of interest that, while the lateral palatine processes have undergone fusion and appear quite normal, the nose itself exhibits a bifurcated septum (Fig. 3F).

In the golden hamster, formation of the secondary palate occurs between days 12 and 14 of development. By day 12 the most anterior portions of the lateral palatine processes have already united with the primary median palatal triangle which is between them. As one proceeds posteriorly, the palatal shelves slowly take on a more and more vertical inclination as they come to hang alongside the developing tongue, except in the most posterior areas where the tongue is actually part of the floor of the mouth and the palatine shelves are horizontally directed above it.

Palatal transposition takes place on or about day 12 of gestation. This is in disagreement with Boyer (1953), who reported that it occurred on day 11. Unfortunately, we have been unable to obtain sections from a palate undergoing transposition. Until we are able to do so, it is not possible to say whether transposition takes place anteriorly-posteriorly as in the rat (Coleman, 1965), or posteriorly-anteriorly as in the mouse (Walker & Fraser, 1956). By day 13 the shelves have already undergone transposition. Indeed, the fusion process between the shelves is almost complete. Although epithelial remnants are present in the midline throughout the hard palate, there are none seen in the soft palate. This is therefore consistent with Wood’s hypothesis that the shelves in this area unite with each other by mergence rather than by fusion (Wood & Draus, 1962).

By day 13 palatal bone formation in the normal hamster embryo appears to have progressed farthest in the regions of the primary median palatal triangle and the mid-posterior hard palate. These could be centers of ossification from which bone formation proceeds both anteriorly and posteriorly.

When cadmium is administered to pregnant hamsters, marked effects are noted in the facial development of the offspring. Among those noted in this paper and in previous reports are unilateral and bilateral clefts of the palate, midline clefts through the nose, thyroglossal clefts, and anophthalmia (Ferm, 1967; Ferm & Carpenter, 1967, 1968; Ferm, 1969).

Cadmium appears to have marked deleterious effects on cartilage and bone formation. In some animals the vertical cartilaginous nasal capsule was entirely missing. In others it was greatly foreshortened and bifurcated. Bone formation tended to be retarded in all areas where clefts were present. It is of interest that in those areas where clefts were not present, bone formation appeared quite normal. It is difficult to explain why a generalized bodily function, such as ossification, should be so closely related to a local happening such as shelf fusion; unless both processes represent two different expressions of derangement of embryonic mesenchymal cell activity.

Several present observations, as well as those by previous authors, support this view. The inability of the processes to join is most likely due to a mesodermal deficiency as suggested by Stark (Stark, 1961). The foreshortening of the nasal process has already been mentioned. The bifurcation of the nasal septum probably represents a lack of union between the medial nasal processes. These processes are thought to merge with one another rather than fuse with each other (Patten, 1961). Therefore, since these processes are always in contact with each other, a midline cleft is most probably due to a mesodermal deficiency.

Similar reductions in tissue mass were also seen in the lateral palatine processes. Furthermore, there was no evidence that the shelves were not able to undergo transposition at the proper time as has been reported following cortisone administration (Walker & Fraser, 1956). Therefore, the wide clefts were once again most probably due to a deficiency in mesodermal tissue, rather than delayed shelf transposition.

Marin-Padilla has demonstrated the effect of the teratogens vitamin A and dimethylsulfoxide on the hamster embryo (Marin-Padilla & Ferm, 1965; Marin-Padilla, 1966 a, b). Both of these agents have a marked effect on the embryonic mesenchyme. In a similar fashion, the administration of cadmium sulfate may affect a vulnerable cephalic mesoderm and interfere with the role this mesoderm plays during the morphogenetic mechanism of palatal closure. The facial malformations thus produced could be a direct consequence of a cadmium-induced mesodermal disturbance. The existence and nature of the direct action of the cadmium on the embryonic mesenchyme have yet to be determined.

The placental transfer of radioactive Cd109 has recently been demonstrated in this experimental system (Ferm, Hanlon & Urban, 1969). Further studies are needed to determine whether the mesodermal deficiency underlying the facial deformities resulting from this treatment might be due to causes other than direct embryonic damage. For example, these malformations may be due to interference with placental transfer of some essential metabolite (Walker & Fraser, 1956), or to the specific action of the teratogen on maternal enzymes and metabolism, with secondary effects on the differentiating embryonic tissue.

La formation de la face chez les Hamsters dorés normaux et traités au cadmium

Chez le Hamster doré, la période critique de la formation du palais se place entre les 12éme et 14ème jours de la gestation. Pendant cette période, les crêtes se déplacent de la position verticale sur les côtés de la langue à la position horizontale au dessus d’elle et se fusionnent. La transposition du palais per se se place probablement au 12ème jour, ou vers le 12ème jour. Les données actuelles sont insuffisantes pour indiquer dans quelle direction cela se passe. Alors que des restes épithéliaux se retrouvent sur la ligne médiane du palais au jour 13, ils ont complètement disparu au jour 14, ce qui montre ainsi la complétion du processus de fusion. Des aires de preostéoblastes sont clairement visibles au jour 12 mais l’ossification réelle n’est perceptible qu’au jour 13.

Le cadmium exerce apparemment un effet délétère marqué sur le mésoderme de la tête de hamsters dorés, provoquant la production de nombreuses malformations, y compris des fentes labiales unilatérales ou bilatérales et des fentes palatines. Il est suggéré que les fentes trouvés dans les hamsters traités au cadmium sont dues à une déficience du mésoderme plutôt qu’à un retard de la transposition des crêtes. Des anomalies sévères de la formation du cartilage et de retards de l’ossification ont également été décrites.

Le mécanisme de l’action du cadmium, qu’elle soit directe sur le tissu embryonnaire en différenciation, ou qu’elle agisse indirectement par l’intermédiaire des tissus maternels, reste à être élucidé.

We wish to acknowledge the technical assistance of Miss Lorraine Stevens and Miss Anna Morse.

This investigation was supported by USPHS grants DE 02849 (J. M.), HD 02616 (V. F.), and GM 10210 (V. F.).

Boyer
,
C. C.
(
1953
).
Chronology of development for the golden hamster
.
J. Morph.
92
, .
1
-
37
.
Coleman
,
R. D.
(
1965
).
Development of the rat palate
.
Anat. Rec.
151
,
107
—118.
Ferm
,
V. H
(
1967
).
The use of the golden hamster in experimental teratology
.
Lab. Animal Care
17
,
452
^
162
Ferm
,
V. H.
(
1969
).
The synteratogenic effect of lead and cadmium
.
Experienta
25
,
56
57
.
Ferm
,
V. H.
&
Carpenter
,
S. J.
(
1967
).
Teratogenic effect of cadmium and its inhibition by zinc
.
Nature, Lond.
216
,
1123
.
Ferm
,
V. H.
&
Carpenter
,
S. J.
(
1968
).
The relationship of cadmium and zinc in experimental mammalian teratogenesis
.
Lab. Invest.
18
,
429
432
.
Ferm
,
V. H.
,
Hanlon
,
O. W.
&
Urban
,
J.
(
1969
).
The permeability of the hamster placenta to radioactive cadmium
.
J. Embryol. exp. Morph.
22
,
107
113
.
Graves
,
A. P.
(
1945
).
Development of the golden hamster, Cricetus auratus (Waterhouse), during the first nine days
.
Am. J. Anat.
77
,
219
239
.
Larsson
,
K. S.
(
1961
).
Studies on the closure of the secondary palate: autoradiographic and histochemical studies in the normal mouse embryo
.
Acta morph, neerl.-scand.
4
,
349
367
.
Marin-Padilla
,
M.
(
1966a
).
Mesodermal alterations induced by hyper-vitaminosis A
.
J. Embryol. exp. Morph.
15
,
261
269
.
Marin-Padilla
,
M.
(
1966b
).
Mesodermal alterations induced by dimethyl sulfoxide
.
Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med.
122
,
717
720
.
Marin-Padilla
,
M.
&
Ferm
,
V. H.
(
1965
).
Somite necrosis and developmental malformations induced by vitamin A in the golden hamster
.
J. Embryol. exp. Morph.
13
,
1
8
.
Patten
,
B. M.
(
1961
).
The normal development of the facial region
. In
Congenital Anomalies of the Face and Associated Structures
(ed.
S.
Pruzansky
), pp.
11
—45.
Springfield, 111
.:
Charles C. Thomas
.
Stark
,
R. B.
(
1961
).
Embryology, pathogenesis and classification of cleft lip and cleft palate
. In
Congenital Anomalies of the Face and Associated Structures (ed. S. Pruzansky)
, pp.
66
-
84
. Springfield, 111. : Charles C. Thomas.
Walker
,
B. E.
&
Fraser
,
F. C.
(
1956
).
Closure of the secondary palate in three strains of mice
.
J. Embryol. exp. Morph.
4
,
176
189
.
Wood
,
P. J.
&
Draus
,
B. S.
(
1962
).
Prenatal development of the human palate
.
Archs oral Biol.
7
,
137
150
.