Animals can be cloned by transferring a somatic cell nucleus into an enucleated oocyte, but the reprogramming of such nuclei to totipotency to create clones seems to depend on the cell-cycle and differentiation state of both the donor and recipient cell. Now, on p. 1953, Dieter Egli and Kevin Eggan reveal that somatic nuclear reprogramming is not cell cycle dependent but does require nuclear transcriptional factors from the recipient cell. The researchers investigated reprogramming efficiency by examining the development of embryos that were produced by combining donor nuclei and recipient cells at various cell cycle and developmental stages. Many stages of the cell cycle are compatible with nuclear reprogramming, they report, provided sufficient host nuclear factors (including the transcriptional regulator Brg1) are retained in the enucleated recipient cell. Furthermore, cell cycle synchrony between the donor and the recipient is not strictly required at the time of nuclear transfer for successful reprogramming. These results, which reveal that reprogramming is remarkably flexible, might help to improve the efficiency of somatic cell nuclear reprogramming.
Hosting factors for reprogramming
Hosting factors for reprogramming. Development 15 June 2010; 137 (12): e1205. doi:
Download citation file:
Advertisement
Cited by
History of our journals

As our publisher, The Company of Biologists, turns 100 years old, read about Development’s journey and highlights from some its first issues, and explore the history of each of our sister journals: Journal of Cell Science, Journal of Experimental Biology, Disease Models & Mechanisms and Biology Open.
Call for papers – Lifelong Development: the Maintenance, Regeneration and Plasticity of Tissues

Development invites you to submit your latest research to our upcoming special issue – Lifelong Development: the Maintenance, Regeneration and Plasticity of Tissues. This issue will be coordinated by Guest Editors Meritxell Huch (Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Germany) and Mansi Srivastava (Harvard University and Museum of Comparative Zoology, USA), working alongside our team of academic Editors. Submit your articles by 15 May 2025.
A case for broadening our view of mechanism in developmental biology

In this Perspective, B. Duygu Özpolat and colleagues survey researchers on their views on what it takes to infer mechanism in developmental biology. They examine what factors shape our idea of what we mean by ‘mechanism’ and suggest a path forward that embraces a broad outlook on the diversity of studies that advance knowledge in our field.
In preprints
Did you know that Development publishes perspectives on recent preprints? These articles help our readers navigate the ever-growing preprint literature. We welcome proposals for ‘In preprints’ articles, so please do get in touch if you’d like to contribute.