Dynamic cell movements and rearrangements are essential for the generation of the mammalian body plan, although relatively little is known about the genes that coordinate cell movement and cell fate. WAVE complexes are regulators of the actin cytoskeleton that couple extracellular signals to polarized cell movement. Here, we show that mouse embryos that lack Nap1, a regulatory component of the WAVE complex, arrest at midgestation and have defects in morphogenesis of all three embryonic germ layers. WAVE protein is not detectable in Nap1 mutants, and other components of the WAVE complex fail to localize to the surface of Nap1 mutant cells; thus loss of Nap1 appears to inactivate the WAVE complex in vivo. Nap1 mutants show specific morphogenetic defects: they fail to close the neural tube, fail to form a single heart tube (cardia bifida), and show delayed migration of endoderm and mesoderm. Other morphogenetic processes appear to proceed normally in the absence of Nap1/WAVE activity: the notochord, the layers of the heart, and the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) at gastrulation appear normal. A striking phenotype seen in approximately one quarter of Nap1 mutants is the duplication of the anteroposterior body axis. The axis duplications arise because Nap1 is required for the normal polarization and migration of cells of the Anterior Visceral Endoderm (AVE), an early extraembryonic organizer tissue. Thus, the Nap1 mutant phenotypes define the crucial roles of Nap1/WAVE-mediated actin regulation in tissue organization and establishment of the body plan of the mammalian embryo.
Cell-type specification in the mammalian embryo depends on the interplay between intercellular signaling events that determine cell fate and morphogenetic movements that regulate the positions of the signal-producing cells and their target tissues. Despite the essential role of cell movements in the establishment of the body plan, the molecular genetic analysis of mouse development has focused on the signaling pathways and transcription factors that control cell fate, and we understand much less about the genetic control of embryonic cell migration and tissue morphogenesis.
Gastrulation in the mouse, which establishes the three definitive germ layers from the single-cell layer of the epiblast, consists of a sequence of interdependent morphogenetic movements. Gastrulation initiates at E6.5 with the formation the primitive streak at one position on the circumference of the proximal epiblast; the position of the primitive streak defines the future posterior of the embryo. At the primitive streak, cells of the epiblast undergo an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), exit the primitive streak, enter either the mesodermal or endodermal germ layers, and then migrate anteriorly to form the definitive endoderm and mesoderm germ layers(Tam and Behringer, 1997). The EMT depends on Fgf signaling, which leads to the transcriptional downregulation of E-cadherin as cells traverse the primitive streak, which allows them to migrate away from the primitive streak in the mesodermal and endodermal layers (Ciruna and Rossant,2001). The position and time that mesoderm cells move through the primitive streak is crucial for their fate: extraembryonic and cardiac mesoderm exit the primitive streak first, followed by paraxial mesoderm, which is generated by the middle primitive streak, and the node and notochord, which arise from the anterior primitive streak(Tam and Behringer, 1997).
It has been proposed that the position of the primitive streak in the posterior epiblast depends on the earlier movement of a group of extraembryonic cells, the anterior visceral endoderm (AVE). At the onset of gastrulation, the AVE overlies the anterior epiblast at the boundary between embryonic and extraembryonic regions. The AVE cells secrete Cerl, Lefty1 and Dkk1, which inhibit the Nodal and Wnt pathways that are required for primitive streak formation; this restricts the position of the primitive streak to a single site opposite the AVE (Lu et al.,2001). The cells that will become the AVE originate in the visceral endoderm at the distal tip of the egg cylinder at E5.0 when they begin to express characteristic molecular markers, including the transcription factors Hex and Hesx1. Between E5.5 and E6.0 the AVE cells migrate from their initial distal position to the proximal limit of the epiblast(Thomas et al., 1998).
Time-lapse imaging of Hex-GFP-expressing AVE cells has demonstrated that AVE cells migrate actively through the visceral endoderm: they become polarized and extend filopodia in the direction of migration and appear to move in response to a directional cue(Srinivas et al., 2004). Embryological ablation and transplantation experiments suggest that extraembryonic ectoderm may be the source of chemotactic signals that direct AVE migration (Rodriguez et al.,2005). In addition, inhibition of Nodal or Wnt signaling can reorient the direction of AVE migration(Kimura-Yoshida et al., 2005; Yamamoto et al., 2004), and the Nodal inhibitor Lefty1 and Wnt3 are asymmetrically expressed in the visceral endoderm at the time of AVE migration(Rivera-Pérez and Magnuson,2005; Takaoka et al.,2006). However, the molecular mechanisms and signals that provide the force and directionality of AVE migration in the normal embryo are not clear.
Cell migration depends on reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton that is mediated, in part, by proteins of the related WASP and WAVE families. WASP is auto-regulated by an inhibitory domain that prevents interaction with the ARP2/3 actin-nucleating complex. Binding of CDC42 to WASP relieves WASP autoinhibition, allowing WASP to bind and activate ARP2/3, and promote formation of filopodia at the leading edge of migrating cells. WAVE proteins lack an auto-inhibitory domain and purified WAVE activates ARP2/3 constitutively (Bompard and Caron,2004). WAVE is regulated by a complex of the Sra1, Nap1, Abi1 and HSPC300 proteins, which mediates responses to Rac (which binds Sra1), as well as to Nck (which binds Nap1) and Abl (which binds Abi1)(Echarri et al., 2004; Eden et al., 2002; Gautreau et al., 2004; Innocenti et al., 2004; Kobayashi et al., 1998; Steffen et al., 2004). Because the activities of Nck, Rac and Abl are regulated by intercellular signals, the components of the WAVE complex couple extracellular cues to the formation of lamellipodia at the leading edge of migrating cells.
The WAVE complex is crucial for diverse aspects of morphogenesis during development, including chemotactic movement of Dictyostelium amoebae(Blagg et al., 2003; Ibarra et al., 2006), axon pathfinding in Drosophila (Hummel et al., 2000) and spreading of the surface ectoderm in C. elegans (Soto et al.,2002). However, the roles of the WAVE complex in the morphogenetic events required for early vertebrate development have not been studied. Two murine WAVE genes, WAVE1 and WAVE2, are expressed in the early embryo and appear to have overlapping functions in early development, as both single mutants survive beyond midgestation without gross morphological defects (Soderling et al.,2003; Yamazaki et al.,2003; Yan et al.,2003). Abi2 mutants are viable and do not have morphological defects (Grove et al.,2004), whereas mutants in Abi1, either of the two Sra genes and Hspc300 have not been described.
Here, we demonstrate that Nap1, the only member of its gene family expressed in the early mouse embryo, is essential for specific aspects of early morphogenesis. We confirm that Nap1 is required for the stability of WAVE and the membrane localization of WAVE complex proteins in embryonic cells. Based on the phenotypes of mutant embryos, we find that Nap1 and WAVE play specific roles in the regulation of migration of the mesoderm and endoderm, and in neural tube closure. In addition, we find that Nap1 regulates anteroposterior axis formation because it is required for normal polarization and migration of cells in the AVE. Our findings demonstrate that proper AVE migration is required for localized expression of the signals that determine the position of the primitive streak.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mouse strains and genotyping
We identified Nap1khlo in a screen for recessive ethylnitrosourea-induced mutations(García-García et al.,2005). Nap1khlo mutant mice were genotyped based on linkage to flanking SSLP markers (D2MIT94 and D2SKI328; http://mouse.ski.mskcc.org/). Phenotypic analysis was carried out in congenic C3HeB/FeJ animals. Two ES cell lines (XE068 and XE133) carrying gene trap insertions in the Nap1gene were obtained from BayGenomics. Both lines contained identical insertions 504 base pairs downstream of exon 24 of Nap1. Mice derived from both ES cell clones produced identical phenotypes and are collectively referred to as Nap1GT. Nap1GT mice were genotyped by PCR using primers to detect the neo gene (Jackson Laboratories;IMR013, IMR014, IMR015 and IMR016) or using primers that specifically amplified the wild-type (P1, 5′-CCAGATGGCTGCACTCTTTA-3′; P2,5′-CGTTCCTGAGAGGACAGAGC-3′) or Nap1GT (P1, P3,5′-TCTAGGACAAGAGGGCGAGA-3′) allele. The Hex-GFP transgene was detected by PCR using primers specific to GFP (Jackson Laboratories; IMR872, IMR1416).
Genetic mapping of khlo
The khlo mutation was mapped between D2SKI308 and D2SKI324(http://mouse.ski.mskcc.org)in a backcross panel of 911 opportunities for recombination between C57BL/6J and C3HeB/FeJ or CAST/EiJ. Candidate genes in the critical interval were identified based on physical map information from Ensembl and the Celera Discovery System, and sequenced from RT-PCR products amplified from E8.5 Nap1khlo and wild-type C57BL/6J RNA samples. The Nap1 transcript amplified from four out of four Nap1khlo mutant embryos contained a T to C transition mutation at nucleotide 50 of the Nap1-coding region.
Analysis of khlo mutant embryos
In situ hybridization, immunofluorescence and X-gal staining were carried out as described (Eggenschwiler and Anderson, 2000). Embryos for histological analysis were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in the decidual tissue, embedded in paraffin and sections were taken every 8 μm. Sections were stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin according to standard protocols.
Embryos were lysed in RIPA buffer with a protease inhibitor cocktail(Roche). Total protein concentration was estimated by Bradford assay and approximately 20 μg of total embryo extract was subject to western blotting. Bands were detected with ECL Plus (Amersham), and band intensities were measured from digital scans of films using ImageJ software (NIH).
Primary explant cultures of nascent mesoderm, epiblast and primitive streak were generated as described (Burdsal et al., 1993; Ciruna and Rossant,2001). The explants were cultured for 24-48 hours on fibronectin(BD Biosciences). Mesoderm migration in primitive streak explants was measured on digital photomicrographs using ImageJ software (NIH).
Analysis of Hex-GFP expression
Embryos from Nap1khlo/+; Hex-GFP/+intercrosses were dissected at E6.0 and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for one hour on ice. GFP-positive embryos were counterstained with rhodamine-phalloidin (Molecular Probes) and scanned on an inverted Leica TCS SP2 confocal microscope. Image stacks were assembled and analyzed using Volocity software (Improvision).
Antibodies and reagents
Polyclonal anti-Nap1 antiserum was raised against a C-terminal peptide(CHAVYKQSVTSSA), as described (Eden et al., 2002; Kitamura et al.,1996; Steffen et al.,2004). Anti-Abi1 monoclonal antibody was a generous gift from G. Scita (Milan). Polyclonal antiserum against Sra1 was a generous gift from T. Stradal (Braunschweig). Commercial antibodies used were: anti-E-cadherin(Sigma), anti-cortactin (Upstate), anti-WAVE1 (BD Transduction Laboratories)and anti-γ-tubulin (Sigma). Fluorescent secondary antibodies were from Jackson Laboratories and Molecular Probes. HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies were from Zymed and Amersham. Filamentous actin was detected with rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin (Molecular Probes) and nuclei were visualized with DAPI (Sigma).
Loss of Nap1 causes morphogenetic defects and midgestation lethality
We identified two recessive mutations in the mouse Nap1 gene (also known as Nap125, Nckap1 or Hem2) that caused striking morphological defects and lethality at E9.0. The first allele, khlo,was identified in an ENU mutagenesis screen based on a set of prominent morphogenetic defects in the midgestation (E9.0) mouse embryo(García-García et al.,2005). Mutants arrested development prior to embryonic turning,with only 5-6 pairs of small somites when wild-type littermates had 8-12 pairs of somites (Fig. 1A,B). At E8.5, khlo embryos accumulated a mass of disorganized mesenchymal cells at the primitive streak, the source of new mesoderm and endoderm(Fig. 1D, Fig. 2B). This phenotype is seen in embryos with defects in migration of mesoderm away from the primitive streak (Bladt et al., 2003; Meyers et al., 1998; Xue et al., 2001), suggesting that the khlo mutation affected cell migration. The two khloheart primordia failed to fuse to form a single heart tube (cardia bifida; Fig. 1H, Fig. 2D), and the underlying endoderm failed to close to form the foregut pocket(Fig. 2D). Closure of neural ectoderm into a tube failed completely in khlo embryos(Fig. 1B; data not shown). Because most mesodermal and neural cell types were specified normally in khlo embryos (Fig. 1B,D,F,H; see also Fig. S1 in the supplementary material), it appeared that the mutant phenotypes were the result of defects in cell and tissue movements. In addition to these morphogenetic defects, a fraction of khlo embryos showed duplications of the anteroposterior body axis of varying severity (Fig. 3B,C,E;see below).
We mapped the khlo mutation to a 1.4 Mb region on chromosome 2 that contained nine transcription units including the Nap1 gene(Fig. 4A). The mutant allele was associated with a missense mutation in an evolutionarily conserved residue(L17P) near the N terminus of the Nap1 open reading frame(Fig. 4B). We generated a second allele of the gene from an ES cell line that carried a gene-trap insertion (Stryke et al.,2003) into Nap1 (Nap1GT) that should encode a truncated protein fused to β-geo(Fig. 4C,D). Embryos homozygous for the gene trap allele, as well as khlo/Nap1GTembryos, arrested at E9.0 with phenotypes similar to that of khlo(Fig. 4F; data not shown). The similar embryonic phenotypes caused by the two alleles and their failure to complement confirmed that the early lethality and morphological abnormalities of the mutants were the result of the loss of Nap1 activity. The phenotypes of Nap1GT homozygous and Nap1GT/Nap1khlo embryos were slightly weaker than that of Nap1khlo homozygotes (see below), which suggested that Nap1GT retained some wild-type activity. Consistent with this hypothesis, we detected a small amount of normally spliced Nap1 transcript in RNA samples from Nap1GT homozygous embryos by RT-PCR (data not shown).
The Nap1 protein was expressed in all three germ layers of the embryo as well as in the visceral endoderm during gastrulation(Fig. 5A,B). Nap1 was also expressed in all cell types at midgestation(Fig. 5C-E; data not shown). The protein was enriched in both apical and basal regions of epithelia(Fig. 5A-E).
Nap1 is essential for stability and membrane localization of the WAVE complex in embryonic cells
Previous RNA interference studies in cultured cells indicated that both Nap1 and its blood cell-specific homolog Hem1 are required for the stability of WAVE proteins (Steffen et al.,2004; Weiner et al.,2006). Although we did not detect WAVE2 protein in early wildtype embryos (data not shown), three isoforms of WAVE1 were observed in extracts from E8.5 wild-type embryos. WAVE1 levels were reduced more than 10-fold in Nap1khlo mutant embryo extracts (0.06±0.03, n=5), and by approximately twofold in Nap1khloheterozygous embryo extracts (0.44±0.09, n=5, Fig. 6A); thus, Nap1 is required for WAVE stability in the early embryo.
The WAVE complex localizes to lamellipodia, and this membrane localization is essential for its activity (Innocenti et al., 2004; Steffen et al.,2004). RNA interference experiments have indicated that Nap1 is required for membrane localization of the WAVE complex components Sra1 and Abi1 (Steffen et al., 2004). In primary cultures of wild-type E7.5 mesodermal cells, Sra1 and Abi1 localized to the leading edge of migrating cells(Fig. 6B,D). By contrast, Sra1 and Abi1 could not be detected on the surface of Nap1khlomutant mesodermal cells (Fig. 6C,E). We observed a low level of Sra1 and Abi1 surface localization in Nap1GT cells (data not shown), consistent with the slightly milder phenotype of Nap1GT embryos.
The destabilization of WAVE and the mislocalization of Abi and Sra1 in Nap1khlo cells confirm the conclusions from RNA interference experiments that Nap1 is required for WAVE stability and WAVE complex membrane localization in vivo. These phenotypes demonstrate that the Nap1khlo mutation is a strong loss-of-function or null allele, and that no other gene can compensate for loss of Nap1 in the embryo.
Nap1 mutant mesodermal cells lack normal lamellipodia and fail to polarize
Because WAVE proteins regulate the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton required for cell migration, we assessed the organization of the actin cytoskeleton in cells isolated from Nap1khlo embryonic tissue layers. The epiblast (the epithelial layer of the early embryo) and mesoderm layers were isolated from E7.5 embryos, cultured in conditions where they retain their epithelial and mesenchymal character(Burdsal et al., 1993), and stained with phalloidin to visualize the actin cytoskeleton. The actin cytoskeleton of Nap1khlo mutant epiblast cells was indistinguishable from that of wild-type cells(Fig. 6F,G). By contrast,phalloidin staining showed that mesoderm cells from Nap1khlo embryos were more compact than wild-type mesoderm cells, and had a collapsed network of stress fibers surrounding the nucleus(Fig. 6H,I). Wild-type mesodermal cells were polarized and had large lamellipodia, as visualized by staining for cortactin, an actin-binding protein that is enriched in lamellipodia (Weed et al.,2000) (Fig. 6J). By contrast, Nap1khlo mesodermal cells were surrounded by many short protrusions, had only small lamellipodia, and lacked clear polarity(Fig. 6K). Thus, mesodermal cells isolated from Nap1khlo mutants lacked the actin organization required for efficient polarized cell migration, similar to the cellular phenotypes seen in cultured WAVE2 mutant fibroblasts(Yan et al., 2003), or in cell lines depleted for Nap1, Hem1, Sra1 or Abi1 activity by small interfering RNAs(Innocenti et al., 2004; Steffen et al., 2004; Weiner et al., 2006).
Defects in mesoderm and endoderm migration in Nap1khlo embryos
In the gastrulating embryo, the mesoderm and endoderm migrate through the primitive streak and then spread away to create the definitive germ layers of the embryo. To assess the ability of the mutant mesoderm cells to migrate, we analyzed primitive streak explants from E7.5 embryos; these explants include both the epiblast and nascent mesoderm, and continue to generate migrating mesodermal cells in culture (Ciruna and Rossant, 2001). Wildtype primitive streak explants produced E-cadherin-negative mesenchymal cells that migrated away from the epiblast and traveled approximately 350 μm over 24 hours(Fig. 7A). By contrast,mesenchymal cells produced by Nap1khlo mutant primitive streaks downregulated E-cadherin, but failed to migrate and accumulated beneath the epiblast (Fig. 7B). Thus, Nap1 was absolutely required for mesoderm migration in culture.
In contrast to its complete failure in culture, mesoderm migration was only partially disrupted in the intact embryo. Nascent mesodermal cells of Nap1khlo embryos did not migrate as efficiently as wild-type cells: as early as E7.5, mesoderm accumulated adjacent to the Nap1khlo primitive streak, forming a layer that was three to four cells thick, whereas wild-type embryos had only a single layer of mesodermal cells between the primitive streak and the endoderm(Fig. 7C,D). Despite this defect, the majority of mesoderm cells spread around the circumference of E7.5 mutant embryos (Fig. 7D), and Cripto and Lim1, markers of the nascent mesoderm, were expressed in their normal domains around the embryonic circumference in the mutants (Fig. 8A-D). Furthermore, lateral plate, cardiac and axial mesoderm were properly specified and had moved to their normal positions at E8.0-E8.5(Fig. 1F,H; data not shown). Only migration of the paraxial mesoderm (the precursor of the somitic mesoderm), the last mesodermal cell type to transit the primitive streak, was clearly disrupted in Nap1khlo mutants. Only a few small somites formed, although Mox1 expression revealed that some paraxial mesoderm cells did successfully migrate away from the primitive streak(Fig. 1B). Thus, in contrast to the dramatic defect in primitive streak explants, mesoderm migration in the embryo was only modestly disrupted; this discrepancy suggests that mesoderm migration in vivo depends on both Nap1-dependent and Nap1-independent mechanisms that are not mimicked in culture.
Although cardiac mesoderm cells were present in the two lateral cardiac anlagen of Nap1khlo embryos, these primordia failed to move ventrally to fuse in a single heart tube, which resulted in cardia bifida(Fig. 1H). Despite the abnormal position of Nap1khlo hearts, the myocardial and endocardial tissue layers were organized normally(Fig. 2D) and the hearts could beat. Thus, the tissue reorganization required to generate the layered organization of the heart does not depend on Nap1, whereas the movement of the heart primordia to the midline does require Nap1.
The foregut endoderm underlying the heart failed to fuse to form the anterior gut tube in Nap1khlo mutants(Fig. 2D), which suggested defective migration of the endoderm. We found that definitive endoderm cells,marked by expression of Cerl, exited the primitive streak of Nap1khlo embryos, but they did not spread anteriorly. By E7.5, Cerl-expressing cells had arrived at the anterior of wild-type embryos, but accumulated adjacent to the primitive streak of mutant embryos(Fig. 8F,G). Similarly, FoxA2, a marker of the foregut, was expressed in fewer cells in mutants than in wild-type embryos and the mutant cells failed to reach the anterior (Fig. 8H,I). Delayed migration of the definitive endoderm is sufficient to account for failure of foregut closure (Constam and Robertson,2000), and closure of the foregut is required for fusion of the lateral heart primordia (Constam and Robertson, 2000; Roebroek et al., 1998). Thus, the cardia bifida seen in Nap1khlo mutant embryos may be secondary to delayed endoderm migration.
Axis duplications in Nap1 mutant embryos
Although most of the phenotypes of Nap1 mutant embryos could be attributed to defects in morphogenesis, approximately one quarter of Nap1 mutants had a striking defect in patterning of the body axis. Primitive streak-derived structures were duplicated in 16% of E8.5 embryos homozygous for Nap1khlo (13 out of 82) and 8% of Nap1GT homozygotes (7 out of 86). In half of these embryos(6 out of 13 for Nap1khlo and 4 out of 7 for Nap1GT), only the allantois, the most posterior embryonic structure, was duplicated (Fig. 3B). In the other half, all primitive streak-derived structures,including the node and the notochord, were duplicated(Fig. 3C). In addition to these embryos, some Nap1khlo homozygotes (3 out of 45) had a second allantois located anterior to the head(Fig. 3E).
Axis duplication can occur either because of duplication of the node(Merrill et al., 2004) or because of abnormal specification of the primitive streak(Pöpperl et al., 1997; Shawlot and Behringer, 1995). When assayed prior to formation of the node, approximately 20% (3 out of 16)of E7.5 Nap1khlo embryos expressed the primitive streak marker brachyury (T) ectopically in two stripes or in a ring at the proximal end of the epiblast (Fig. 9A-C). Formation of the primitive streak requires Wnt3, and Wnt3 expression in the posterior epiblast and adjacent visceral endoderm is the earliest known marker for the posterior pole of the embryonic axis (Rivera-Pérez and Magnuson,2005). At E6.5, Wnt3 expression was restricted to the posterior epiblast of wild-type embryos, but was expanded around the embryonic circumference in ∼40% (3 out of 7) Nap1khlo mutants(Fig. 9D,E). These results indicate that the axis duplications in Nap1khlo embryos were caused by the failure to restrict primitive streak formation to a single site.
Axis duplication in Nap1khlo mutants is caused by defective AVE migration
Specification of primitive streak position correlates with the migration of the AVE from its initial distal position to the future anterior side of the embryo before the onset of gastrulation(Beddington and Robertson,1999). Because Nap1 is required for cell migration and for the restriction of the primitive streak to the posterior, we tested whether Nap1 was required for migration of the AVE. Cerl and Hex are expressed in overlapping but distinct populations of AVE cells(Yamamoto et al., 2004). The AVE, marked by either Cerl or Hex, failed to reach its normal proximal position at the embryonic/extraembryonic boundary in ∼50%(6 out of 11) of the Nap1khlo embryos examined at E6.5 and E7.5 (Fig. 10A-D). Using a Hex-GFP transgene (Srinivas et al., 2004), we were able to follow the behavior of individual AVE cells. By E6.0, all of the GFP-expressing cells had left the distal tip of the wild-type embryos (Fig. 10E,G), but in half (4 out of 8) of the Nap1khlo embryos the majority of the Hex-GFP-expressing cells failed to migrate away from the distal pole(Fig. 10E,F), although some Hex-GFP-expressing cells reached the presumptive anterior(Fig. 10F). Additionally, in one embryo in which the majority of the GFP-expressing cells migrated to the presumptive anterior side of the embryo, a few GFP-positive cells were present on the posterior side of the embryo (Fig. 10H). We therefore conclude that Nap1 is required for efficient directional migration of the AVE and that inefficient migration of the AVE is the cause of the axis duplications seen in Nap1 mutant embryos.
Cells of the wild-type AVE extend polarized processes during migration(Srinivas et al., 2004), and we had seen that Nap1 was required for cellular polarity in explanted mesodermal cells. We therefore hypothesized that the defective AVE movement in Nap1khlo mutants could be due to a defect in polarization of the AVE cells. Using the Hex-GFP transgene(Srinivas et al., 2004) to mark the AVE, we confirmed that AVE cells in wild-type E6.0 embryos were elongated and polarized in the direction of migration(Fig. 10I). By contrast,Hex-GFP-expressing cells in all Nap1khlo mutant embryos examined (n=8), regardless of their position along the proximodistal axis, were more round and had no obvious leading-trailing polarity(Fig. 10J), a phenotype similar to that seen in explanted mesodermal cells(Fig. 6I,K). These data demonstrate that Nap1 is required for the polarization of AVE cells and that this polarity is required for efficient migration of the AVE.
Specific morphogenetic movements in the mouse embryo depend on Nap1 and the WAVE complex
Although it is clear that the WAVE complex is essential for the migration of cells in culture, its roles during development of the mouse embryo have not been defined. We find that Nap1, a component of the WAVE regulatory complex,is the only member of its gene family required in the early embryo and that Nap1khlo mutant embryos appear to lack all WAVE complex activity. Thus, the Nap1khlo phenotype defines the role of the WAVE complex in the morphogenetic events that shape the early mouse embryo.
Although Nap1 is essential for survival of the embryo, not all morphogenetic events are disrupted in Nap1khlo embryos. For example, Nap1, and therefore the regulated activity of WAVE, are absolutely required for the cell shape changes that allow neural tube closure. By contrast, the morphogenetic events that shape the notochord, the layers of the heart and the EMT during gastrulation appear to be normal in Nap1khlo embryos. Most cell migration events in Nap1khlo mutants are disrupted, although to varying degrees. Migration of AVE cells, which move as individuals, was consistently disrupted, although some AVE cells arrive at the correct final destination. Migration of the definitive endoderm, which migrates as an epithelial sheet,is severely retarded. Migration of the mesoderm, which migrates as loosely connected groups of cells, was moderately retarded in vivo. Among the mesodermal subtypes, only the paraxial mesoderm showed significant disruption:only a few, small somites were specified in mutant embryos. As the paraxial mesoderm is the last mesodermal type to move through the primitive streak(Tam et al., 2001), the defect in paraxial mesoderm may represent the cumulative effects of slightly delayed mesoderm migration throughout the course of gastrulation; alternatively,paraxial mesoderm may be uniquely dependent on Nap1-mediated signals for migration.
In none of these cases (migration of the AVE, endoderm and mesoderm) does loss of Nap1 completely block cell migration in vivo. This finding is similar to that seen with mutations in Dictyostelium NapA, PirA and Scar, which encode the homologs of Nap1, Sra1 and WAVE(Blagg et al., 2003; Ibarra et al., 2006). NapA, PirA and Scar mutant cells are motile and can move towards a chemoattractant, but they move more slowly and fail to orient efficiently towards the chemoattractant. Thus, as in Dictyostelium,embryonic cell migrations are regulated both by WAVE and by other components that collaborate with WAVE to promote directional migration.
Tissue-specific regulation of WAVE
The phenotypes of mouse mutants that lack Nck, Abl or Rac, the components that act upstream of the WAVE complex, suggest that different signals regulate the WAVE complex in the different cell types. Embryos that lack both Nck1 and Nck2 arrest at approximately E9.0 and have an external morphology similar to that of Nap1khlo mutants (Bladt et al., 2003). This phenotypic similarity suggests that receptor tyrosine kinase signaling, mediated by Nck, could be the central regulator of the WAVE complex during mesoderm and endoderm migration. The neural tube of Nck1; Nck2 double mutants closes in the trunk, in contrast to the completely open neural tube of Nap1khlo embryos, which suggests that Nck does not regulate neural tube closure. However, embryos that lack two Abl genes, Abl and Arg, completely fail to close the neural tube (Koleske et al.,1998). Thus, the Abl kinases are good candidates to act upstream of WAVE in neural tube closure. Rac1 is required for survival of the nascent mesoderm (Sugihara et al.,1998), precluding analysis of its role in germ layer migration or neural tube closure. Migration of the AVE has not been analyzed in Rac1 mutants or in Nck1; Nck2 or Abl; Arg double mutant embryos, so it is not clear which of these upstream regulators control the WAVE complex in the AVE.
Cell migration is required for specification of a single body axis and acts upstream of Wnt3
Because movement of the AVE correlates with primitive streak formation, it has been hypothesized that AVE movement determines primitive streak position and orientation of the anteroposterior axis. However, all the genes that have been previously shown to be required for AVE migration, such as Cripto,Otx2 and Lim1, regulate the expression and/or activity of the Wnt and Nodal signals that control the primitive streak fate(Ding et al., 1998; Kinder et al., 2001; Perea-Gomez et al., 2001). As a result, the phenotypes of these mutants do not formally distinguish between the possibility that AVE migration is required to specify the position of the primitive streak and the possibility that the same signaling molecules act twice to control AVE migration and primitive streak formation(Ding et al., 1998; Perea-Gomez et al., 2001; Shawlot et al., 1998). Because Nap1 is dedicated to the regulation of the cytoskeleton, the coupled Nap1khlo phenotypes of disrupted AVE migration and axis duplication demonstrate that movement of the AVE is required for normal positioning of the primitive streak.
The nature of the earliest events that define the position of the anteroposterior axis is still controversial. Recent data have suggested that Wnt3 expression in the posterior visceral endoderm may precede AVE migration (Rivera-Pérez and Magnuson, 2005) and that overexpression of Wnts can block AVE migration (Kimura-Yoshida et al.,2005). These observations suggested that the direction of AVE migration is a consequence of a pre-existing anteroposterior polarization of Wnt signaling. However, the AVE migrates normally in Wnt3 mutant embryos (Liu et al., 1999). In addition, our data demonstrate that AVE movement is crucial for the restriction of Wnt3 expression to the posterior of the embryo. We therefore argue that AVE migration begins before Wnt signaling is localized and that other, non-Wnt, signals initiate the polarized migration of the AVE cells. Our findings would, however, be consistent with the possibility that once AVE movement is initiated, localized Wnt signals reinforce the direction of AVE migration.
While AVE migration and the domain of Wnt3 expression appear to be directly coupled, additional events must regulate the formation of the primitive streak and the definitive anteroposterior axis. Although we find that the degree of migration of the AVE is correlated to the domain of Wnt3 expression, the frequency of axis duplication at E8.5 was significantly lower than the frequency of AVE migration defects (13 out of 82 versus 9 out of 18; χ2, P≤0.01). We infer that the expanded Wnt3 domain represents the region that is competent to form a primitive streak, but additional regulative events restrict primitive streak formation to a single site in all but the most severely affected mutants. Consistent with these observations, embryological experiments in the chick have demonstrated the existence of a streak-derived inhibitor that prevents ectopic streak formation (Bertocchini et al., 2004).
We propose that several mechanisms act in concert to insure formation of a single primitive streak and, therefore, a single anteroposterior body axis. The migration of AVE cells is regulated by Nap1 and also by Nap1-independent mechanisms. AVE migration controls the size of the domain competent to form a primitive streak, marked by Wnt3 expression. If the AVE migrates slowly or does not reach the correct final position, a feedback loop is initiated from the primitive streak that prevents the specification of an ectopic primitive streak. Only when more than one mechanism fails, is it possible for two stable primitive streaks to form and direct the specification of more than one body axis.
We thank M. Wyler for initial mapping of khlo; M. Zhao for the Nap1 antibody; T. Rodriguez and T. Magnuson for providing the Hex-GFPtransgenic mice; G. Scita and T. Stradal for providing antibodies; the Sloan Kettering Molecular Cytology Core Facility for assistance with confocal microscopy and image analysis; M. Baylies, T. Bestor, and members of the Anderson lab for comments on the manuscript; and L. M. Rakeman for naming khlo. Nap1GT ES cells were obtained from BayGenomics. Genome sequence analysis used Ensembl and the Celera Discovery System and associated databases. The work was supported by NIH grant HD35455 to K.V.A.