We present a detailed analysis of the cell lineage of the tardigrade Thulinia stephaniae with a 4D-microscopy system (3D time-lapse recording). The recording, of the entire development from embryogenesis until hatching, allowed us to analyze the fate of single descendants from early blastomeres up to germ layer formation and tissue development. The embryo undergoes an irregular indeterminate cleavage pattern without early fate restriction. During gastrulation, mesodermal and endodermal precursors, and a pair of primordial germ cells migrate through a blastopore at the prospective position of the mouth. Our results are not consistent with earlier descriptions of mesoderm formation by enterocoely in tardigrades. The mesoderm in Thulinia stephaniae originates from a variable number of blastomeres, which form mesodermal bands that later produce the serial somites. The nervous system is formed by neural progenitor cells, which delaminate from the neurogenic ectoderm. Early embryogenesis of Thulinia stephaniae is highly regulative, even after laser ablations of blastomeres at the two- and four-cell stages `normal' juveniles are formed. This has never been observed before for a protostome. Germ cell specification occurs late during development between the sixth and seventh cell generation. Comparing the development of other protostomes with that of the Tardigrada,which occupy a basal position within the Arthropoda, suggests that an indeterminate cleavage and regulatory development is not only part of the ground pattern of the Arthropoda, but probably of the entire Ecdysozoa.
Most of what is known about tardigrade development and has been adopted by zoology textbooks originating from the early studies of von Erlanger(von Erlanger, 1895), von Wenck (von Wenck, 1914) and Marcus (Marcus, 1928; Marcus, 1929). However, a recent study by Eibye-Jacobsen(Eibye-Jacobsen, 1997) on tardigrade development was unable to confirm some of the conclusions of these authors. For example Marcus and von Erlanger reported that the mesoderm is formed by enterocoely from the gut, yet enterocoelic formation of mesoderm is usually found only in deuterostome animals. The interpretations of the early cleavage pattern of tardigrades are also controversial. All authors agree that tardigrades show total cleavage; however, Marcus(Marcus, 1929) interprets it as indeterminate, whereas Eibye-Jacobsen(Eibye-Jacobsen, 1997)suggests that the early cleavage pattern is consistent with a modified spiral pattern. Thus, the data matrix of the current zoology book by Brusca and Brusca (Brusca and Brusca,2003) notes tardigrade development as being `fundamentally spiral'. This scarcity of information, as well as new ideas about the metazoan phylogeny, have brought the tardigrade development back into focus. According to molecular, morphological and palaeontological data(Dewel and Dewel, 1997; Garey, 2001; Garey et al., 1996; Garey et al., 1999; Giribet et al., 1996; Giribet et al., 2000; Maas and Waloszek, 2001; Mallatt et al., 2004; Nielsen, 2001; Regier and Shultz, 2001; Schmidt-Rhaesa, 2001; Weygoldt, 1986), tardigrades are associated with the Euarthropoda, thus forming along with the onychophorans the taxon Arthropoda. But the sister group of the arthropod lineage is now questioned. The Ecdysozoa hypothesis, which is based mainly on molecular data (e.g. Aguinaldo et al.,1997; de Rosa et al.,1999; Garey, 2001; Giribet et al., 2000; Mallatt et al., 2004), favours now the Cycloneuralia or its members (Kinorhyncha, Loricifera, Priapulida,Nematomorpha and Nematoda) and not, according to the Articulata hypothesis,the Annelida as the sister group. However, the Ecdyosozoa hypothesis is still debated (Giribet, 2003; Nielsen, 2003; Schmidt-Rhaesa et al., 1998; Scholtz, 2002; Scholtz, 2003) and new data are needed to resolve the problem. A comparative approach is needed to determine the ancestral mode of development in the Arthropoda, thereby preferentially serving as evidence to support one of the two hypotheses. As basal members of the arthropods, tardigrades are one of the key groups to investigate when reconstructing the ancestral mode. Therefore, we examined the early cleavage pattern and cell lineage of the eutardigrade Thulinia stephaniae using a 3D time-lapse microscopy system (4D microscopy)(Schnabel et al., 1997), which allows us to follow cells in the living embryo. This new technology has been successfully used for studies of nematode embryos(Dolinski et al., 1998; Houthoofd et al., 2003; Schnabel et al., 1997), the analysis of brain development in Drosophila(Urbach et al., 2003), and description of segmentation in an isopod crustacean (A. Hejnol, PhD thesis,Humboldt University of Berlin, 2002)(Dohle et al., 2004). To further investigate the type of determination and the potential for regulation of the tardigrade embryo, we combined 4D-microscopy with laser cell ablations.
Materials and methods
Thulinia stephaniae is a freshwater tardigrade that can be maintained in cultures at 15°C to 25°C on an algae diet in the laboratory. Two to 12 fertilized eggs are laid into the exuvia during moulting. Cultures were obtained from Connecticut Valley Biological Supply(MA, USA). Thulinia stephaniae is present in the Gene Database, with partial sequences for 18S rRNA, RNA polymerase II subunit and elongation factor 1 α, and has been used for molecular phylogeny(Garey, 2001; Garey et al., 1999).
For the 4D recordings, the early eggs were removed from the exuvia with scissor needles and embryos were mounted on an agar pad under the microscope following a slightly modified protocol developed for C. elegans(Sulston and Horvitz, 1977). A 60×24 mm cover slip is used and the water is only around the agar pad to supply the embryo with sufficient oxygen. The fundamentals of 4D microscopy are described by Schnabel et al. (Schnabel et al., 1997). Commercial parts are now available for the microscope and high-resolution digital images can be stored. A Zeiss Axioplan Imaging 2 microscope with an internal focus drive was used to move the temperature-controlled stage to record the z-series (45 focal levels,increment 1 μm). Pictures are captured with a Hamamatsu Newvicon camera,digitized with an Inspecta 3 frame grabber (Mikroton, Germany) and finally compressed tenfold with a wavelet function (Lurawave, Germany). Digital cameras like the PCO sensicam can also be used. The microscope is controlled with a PC using software (AK Schulz and RS) programmed in C++. Embryos were recorded at 24°C until the body plan was established (∼48 hours of development). Embryos were then removed from the microscope slide and placed in culture to increase survival and hatching rates. Records were analyzed as described by Schnabel et al. (Schnabel et al., 1997), using SIMI°BioCell software (SIMI, Germany). This software manages the large quantity of digital image data generated and helps to document cell positions, migrations and mitoses during computational developmental analysis. The data are illustrated as a cell genealogy tree and the positions of the nuclei can be viewed as 3D-representations using coloured spheres (e.g. Fig. 2). Only embryos which developed normally and gave rise to hatched, normal instars were analyzed. Our analysis of normal development is based on four embryos,henceforth referred to as embryos 1-4.
Blastomeres were ablated as described by Hutter and Schnabel(Hutter and Schnabel, 1994). For cell ablations, eggs were mounted on an agar pad while still in the exuvia to allow the identification of manipulated eggs after culture. The intensity of the laser beam and the duration of treatment were optimized to ensure complete destruction of the ablated blastomere without causing lethal damage to the embryo. 4D recordings of embryos were stopped after degeneration of all descendants of the ablated cell to cytoplasts had occurred and the exuvia containing the embryos was incubated at 15°C until the embryos hatched.
Early development executes an indeterminate cleavage pattern
Thulinia stephaniae lays fertilized eggs into its empty exuvia during moulting. The oval shaped eggs, which are about 50 μm long and 43μm in diameter are completely filled by the embryo. After the eggs are deposited, the nucleus resides at the pole of the egg at which the polar body is extruded (Fig. 1A). The development is summarized in Fig. 1,(embryo 1). Blastomeres cleave totally and equally, and are indistinguishable from one another up to the onset of gastrulation. In the first cleavage the spindle is set up perpendicularly to the long axis of the egg. During the formation of the cleavage furrow, the embryo and polar body undergo a coordinated rotation of ∼90°(Fig. 1B, see Movie 1 in the supplementary material). In the subsequent division to the four-cell stage,both spindles are initially oriented perpendicularly to the long axis of the egg but later rotate by 45°, allowing the blastomeres to cleave parallel to each other (Fig. 1C). After the next cell division, the relative position of the eight blastomeres varied from embryo to embryo (Fig. 1D). During the formation of the 16-cell embryo, the spindle orientation again shows variation but all mitoses occur tangential to the surface of the embryo. This cleavage pattern results in an embryo in which all blastomeres have contact with the eggshell(Fig. 1E). In some 32-cell stage embryos, we observed cell divisions that were oriented perpendicular to the surface of the embryo, which positions cells into the interior of the embryo. This could be mistaken for gastrulation. However, in all cases this`mislocation' of the blastomere is eventually corrected through a repositioning of the cell to the surface of the embryo. In the 32-cell embryo,blastomeres polarise and the nuclei are positioned on the surface of the embryo (Fig. 1F). Blastomeres develop a pyramidal shape and the thin ends of the cells point to the inside of the embryo (Fig. 1G). After the 64-cell stage is reached, gastrulation starts with the immigration of single blastomeres. We did not observe alternating cleavage angles before the initiation of gastrulation, as is typical in spiralian cleavage(Fig. 2D-F). To determine whether specific early blastomeres have conserved positions (e.g. at the 32-cell stage and/or form conserved regions of the embryo), as it occurs in Caenorhabditis elegans (Schnabel et al., 1997) (see Movie 2 in the supplementary material), we differently coloured the descendants of the four-cell stage systematically with using SIMI°BioCell. In the three embryos shown in Fig. 2J-L, the distribution of cells varies from the eight-cell upwards until the 122- or 124-cell embryo and later. All attempts to match the cleavage patterns after the four-cell stage by rotating the embryos around their axes failed, thus no stereotyped pattern in the localization of the descendants of the early blastomeres was detectable. Additionally, cell migrations did not occur prior to the onset of gastrulation in the analyzed embryos. The early development of embryos 1 to 3 can be observed in Movies 3 to 5 (see supplementary material), showing 4D representations corresponding to Fig. 2J-L. The timing of the cell divisions is also variable(Fig. 2). Early embryos execute predominantly synchronous cell divisions. However, by the fifth generation,some cells show significant retardation, which can increase to 30% of the average cell cycle by the seventh generation. Generally, the time for each cell cycle and the variability between increases as development proceeds(Fig. 2A-C).
Gastrulation and germ layer formation in Thulinia stephaniae
During gastrulation the main embryonic axes become visible (embryo 2, Fig. 3A). The migration of the blastomeres starts at two spatially distinct regions on the ventral surface of the embryo (Fig. 3A,B). The germ cells invaginate first through an anterior pore, the blastopore(Fig. 3F), and are immediately followed by the invagination of mesodermal and entodermal precursor cells. Interestingly, the primordial germ cells (PGC) are first encircled by the other germ layer precursors as has been described for some other arthropods(Fuchs, 1914; Kühn, 1913). Cells that migrate through the second smaller posterior pore are ectodermal cells, which after immigration rise back to the surface and fill the pore(Fig. 3D). These areas are separated by a minimum of one cell row. The origin of the germ layer precursors is variable and follows no detectable pattern in the cell lineage(Fig. 3C), indicating a non-autonomous, regional specification of these cells. After gastrulation, the mesoderm and endoderm precursors proliferate. The ectoderm is formed by cells that surround the inner cells. The cell divisions are irregular and follow no detectable pattern. The ectodermal epithelium consists of one cell layer,which gives rise to the epidermis and the nervous system of the juvenile. After gastrulation is complete, new pores become visible at the same positions of the former pores (Fig. 3E). The anterior, larger pore forms the mouth opening (stomodaeum), and the posterior smaller pore forms the hindgut (proctodaeum) of the juvenile. Both structures are derived from ectodermal cells(Fig. 3E).
We also followed the formation of the left and right anterior mesodermal somites in two embryos using the 4D microscope system (embryo 1 and 3). After the mesodermal precursors enter the small blastocoel, they adhere to the inside of the outer ectodermal layer (Fig. 4A-C), on which they migrate to their final position. During this migration, the cells proliferate and form bands along the left and right side of the prospective pharynx and midgut (Fig. 4D). This proliferation does not follow a clear anteroposterior polarity and no growth zone is detectable(Fig. 4F). Later, the cells of the mesodermal bands split into groups of cells. These form segmental somites below the ectodermal prospective limb anlagen(Fig. 4E). In contrast to earlier reports (Eibye-Jacobsen,1997; Marcus,1928; Marcus,1929; von Erlanger,1895), no cavities were detectable inside these somites during our in vivo observations. We were able to follow the formation of muscle from somites inside the limb bud. The remaining cells differentiated into small cells and could not be traced further.
The nervous system is built by neuronal progenitor cells immigrating from the neurogenic ectoderm
The tardigrade central nervous system (CNS) is composed of the dorsal brain, the ventral sub-oesophageal ganglion, and the serial ventral ganglia,which are joined by connectives (Fig. 5A). In one recording (embryo 3), we could trace back founder cells of the ventral ganglia in Thulina stephaniae(Fig. 5). Before gangliogenesis is initiated (48 hours of development; Fig. 5B), the four neuronal progenitor cells (NPC), are located in the future position of the ganglia. Earlier, at 33 hours of development, the four NPCs are located in the ventral fold in an anteroposterior row ready to immigrate (Fig. 5C). The anteriormost NPC forms the first ganglion (I) the second the second ganglion(II) and so on. The four NPCs are produced between 25 and 33 hours of development, by two subsequent divisions of four precursor cells. The sisters of the NPCs founder cells in each of these two divisions differentiate into epidermis (Fig. 5D). At 25 hours, the four founders of these lineages are located in positions that are not obviously related to the final arrangement of the NPCs. For example, the founder of the most posterior NPC is in the most anterior position at this time (Fig. 5E). We could only follow the process from the left side of the embryo as embryos always rotate to the side after gastrulation. Thus, we cannot exclude the possibility that the ganglia are founded by bilaterally located NPCs, as in malacostracan crustaceans (Dohle et al.,2004). The brain of Thulinia stephaniae is also formed by NPCs. Although we could not determine the number of cells forming the brain,we could detect the neuroectodermal anterior region, from which the NPCs are derived (Fig. 5F). The immigration of the brain precursor occurs before the immigration of the NPCs that form the ganglia. Although the early origin of the suboesophageal ganglion remains unclear, it seems likely that it is formed by an outgrowth of the brain, as we could not detect an early anlage.
Specification of primordial germ cells
The germline in Thulinia stephaniae consists of two PGCs. In three(embryos 1, 3 and 4) out of four embryos, they could be recognized as non-dividing cells in the sixth generation before the onset of gastrulation(Fig. 6). In one embryo (embryo 2) one PGC differentiated in the sixth and the other at the seventh generation (Fig. 3C), which suggests an indeterminate specification. The PGCs are morphologically distinguishable from the somatic cells by their larger size. In all analyzed embryos, the sister cells of the PGC execute different fates(Fig. 3C, Fig. 6C). In the three embryos that form the PGCs in the sixth generation, both blastomeres of the two-cell stage form one germ cell each (Fig. 6C). In the remaining embryo, both PGCs were derived from one blastomere of the two-cell stage (Fig. 3C). These observations indicate that the PGCs are determined non-autonomously before gastrulation. During gastrulation, the germ cells migrate into the blastocoel and locate posterior to the developing pharynx,adjacent to the midgut cells (Fig. 6D). Later, during elongation of the embryo, the cells move by different paths to a posterior position, which is dorsal to the midgut, where the gonad will develop (Fig. 6E,F).
Laser ablation of one blastomere in the two-cell stage
To test the regulatory ability of early embryos, we laser ablated blastomeres (Table 1). After ablations of one of the two blastomeres in two-cell stage embryos, normal juveniles hatched (n=9). These juveniles, which developed from only one blastomere were smaller than the untreated control embryos (see Fig. 10C,D). In all recorded embryos the ablated cell divided twice before the damaged descendants degraded into many cytoplasts of different size(Fig. 7A). The development of the non-ablated blastomeres was not affected(Fig. 7C). The normal cells initially surround the ablated cytoplasts(Fig. 7B), but soon begin to`ignore' the debris and assume the typical pyramidal shape(Fig. 7A). After the blastomeres have rearranged, gastrulation is initiated(Fig. 7D). These embryos still form all tissues; the inner blastomeres form gut, mesodermal bands and the pharynx (Fig. 7E,F; Fig. 10). The ectodermal cells are much larger than in the control embryos, as it is expected for an embryo composed of only half the number of cells of a normal embryo. We did not find a compensatory cell generation in the ablated embryos during the 4D analyses. Interestingly, all ablated embryos display two germ cells. Thus, germline formation is regulative, which makes it unlikely that a pre-existing germ cytoplasm is shunted into specific blastomeres(Fig. 7E).
|.||Two-cell stage .||Four-cell stage (one cell) .||.||.||Four-cell stage (two cells) .||.|
|Ablation .||.||.||.||.||.||Control .|
|Total||14 (9)||11 (10)||2 (2)||12 (12)|
|.||Two-cell stage .||Four-cell stage (one cell) .||.||.||Four-cell stage (two cells) .||.|
|Ablation .||.||.||.||.||.||Control .|
|Total||14 (9)||11 (10)||2 (2)||12 (12)|
Numbers in brackets indicate the number of juveniles that hatched after the ablations. Exuvia in which the untreated control embryos did not hatch were discarded.
Ablations in the four-cell stage embryo
We ablated individual blastomeres located either laterally or at one pole of the egg in four-cell embryos. Development of these embryos proceeded as described for the ablations experiments in the two-cell embryos. Normal juveniles developed from the ablated four-cell embryos, also formed a pair of two germ cells and hatched (Fig. 8, see Fig. 10). Additionally, we ablated two blastomeres, which are non-sibling in the four-cell embryo (Table 1, Fig. 9). These two embryos developed similarly to the other ablated embryos, although the development of the embryos took longer. For example, the formation of the pyramidal cells,which are normally formed prior to gastrulation, was delayed. However, the early cell cycles proceeded normally in this developmental phase(Fig. 9A). Presumably, the delay is caused by the large aggregation of ablated cells, which occupies the centre of the embryo after ablation and which must be subsequently displaced by the untreated blastomeres in order to form the embryo(Fig. 9B,C). After the blastomeres have assembled, gastrulation starts immediately. These observations indicate an astonishing plasticity of early embryogenesis. Both embryos were recovered after the initial recording and developed into normal hatched juveniles despite the early ablations.
General course of embryogenesis
For a long time, the nature of tardigrade development has remained obscure. Early descriptions have not been reinvestigated, owing to a loss of interest in `minor phyla' and the experimental opportunities available in other, more tractable, systems. Therefore, the work of a sole investigator Marcus(Marcus, 1929) has appeared in nearly every invertebrate textbook for the past 70 years. We have now analyzed Thulinia stephaniae as a representative species for eutardigrade development using 4D microscopy. The early cleavages of the embryo are variable from the second cell division onwards. The position of the anterior posterior axis varies in relation to early cleavages. With the ability to trace the fate of single blastomeres, we could establish lineages of different embryos and show a variable origin of the PGCs and of the main germ layers. This is consistent with the impressive regulative potential of the embryo. The formation of the nervous system, especially the synchronous immigration of neural progenitor cells, resembles development patterns in some arthropods(Dove and Stollewerk, 2003; Stollewerk, 2002). Additionally, our reassessment of gastrulation and mesoderm formation displays striking similarities to these processes in some other arthropods(Anderson, 1973; Siewing, 1969). Gastrulation takes place at the ventral surface of the embryo and the blastopore corresponds to the future mouth opening. Concerning AP axis formation,gastrulation, endoderm formation and germline development, our findings are inconsistent with the descriptions of Marcus(Marcus, 1928; Marcus, 1929) and von Erlanger(von Erlanger, 1895). Eibye-Jacobsen (Eibye-Jacobsen,1997) was not able to confirm that the mesoderm is derived from outpocketings of the gut (enterocoely), as described by Marcus(Marcus, 1928; Marcus, 1929), but she was not able to determine the origin of the mesoderm. Our lineage analysis now shows that the mesodermal somites are derived from subdivisions of lateral mesodermal bands. As opposed to Marcus(Marcus, 1928; Marcus, 1929), we find that in Thulinia stephaniae, all germ layers precursors are present during gastrulation. Disparities between our findings and Marcus' results may be explained by his inability to analyze the cell borders in as great of detail as his drawings suggest. Marcus himself conceded that he could not detect cell borders in the stages that follow gastrulation, yet he included cell borders in his schematic drawings (Marcus,1928). The arrangement of the germ layer precursors that encircle the PGCs prior to immigration shows striking similarities to that of total cleaving crustacean embryos like that of the copepod Megacyclops viridis (Fuchs, 1914) and the water flea Polyphemus(Kühn, 1913). This may reflect a common fate determination mechanism in arthropods, although these crustaceans show a stereotyped cleavage program. Recent detailed cell lineage studies of amphipod embryos (Gerberding et al., 2002; Wolff and Scholtz,2002) show a similar pattern in the arrangement of the germ cell and mesoderm and endoderm precursors. However, the cleavage program of the amphipods is highly derived in the crustaceans and thus makes it difficult to compare. In many arthropods, lateral mesodermal bands are formed by a posterior growth zone, which proliferates towards the anterior pole(Anderson, 1973). Later coelomic cavities, also called somites, are built up by schizocoely(Anderson, 1973; Dohle, 1979). Thulinia stephaniae shows similarities to the pattern of mesoderm formation of the Euarthropoda and onychophorans (Manton,1949) and therefore may reflect the ancestral condition of this process in arthropods.
Cell ablation experiments show a high regulatory potential of the tardigrade embryo
Our cell ablation experiments indicate that early cell fate restrictions do not occur in tardigrade development. Our observations in Thulinia stephaniae are inconsistent with a spiral development. After our cell ablations in the two- and four-cell embryos, all embryonic axes were formed. Thus, the axes are not fixed at these stages. Despite the fact that up to one half of the embryo is missing after the ablations, germ layer formation and germ-line specification proceeded normally. No protostome embryo with a similar regulative ability to compensate for such invasive blastomere deletions has yet been reported. The highest capability for regulation in protostomes was described by Wiegner and Schierenberg(Wiegner and Schierenberg,1999) for the nematode Acrobeloides nanus. Here, the posterior but not the anterior blastomere of the two-cell stage will form a larvae when the other cell is ablated. Our results suggest that a non-autonomous mechanism specifies the main axes and tissues of the embryo sometime after the tardigrade embryo has reached the four-cell stage. It would be interesting to determine molecular mechanisms governing embryogenesis in tardigrades. However, owing to the specific biology of the system, it appears that it would be difficult to establish Thulinia stephaniae as a molecular genetic system allowing functional analysis.
The early development of arthropods is diverse, ranging from total cleavage to syncytial cleavage (Anderson,1973; Scholtz,1997; Siewing,1969) and it has remained unclear which type of development reflects the ancestral mode. We showed for Thulinia stephaniae, as a representative of the tardigrades, a variable cleavage pattern with a high regulatory potential of the early embryo. Tardigrades are a basal lineage in the arthropods (Dewel and Dewel,1997; Garey, 2001; Garey et al., 1996; Garey et al., 1999; Giribet et al., 1996; Maas and Waloszek, 2001; Mallatt et al., 2004; Nielsen, 2001; Regier and Shultz, 2001), but this does not necessarily mean that our descriptions reflect the ancestral condition in the Arthropoda. A comparison of the different types of development present in arthropods with that of the sister group of the Arthropoda (outgroup comparison), is needed to define the ground pattern(Ax, 1984; Scholtz, 2004). The classical Articulata hypothesis favours the Annelida, which display an exemplary spiral quartet cleavage, as the sister group of the Arthropoda. The cleavage program of the molluscs, the sister group of the Articulata, is also spiral. Thus, the common ancestor of the Articulata must have had a spiral cleavage, which was then modified in the stem species of the Arthropoda(Scholtz, 1997; Fig. 10A). Although several total cleaving arthropods, mainly crustaceans with a determinate cleavage and traceable cell lineage, have been investigated(Alwes and Scholtz, 2004; Anderson, 1969; Gerberding et al., 2002; Hertzler, 2002; Hertzler and Clark, 1992; Hertzler et al., 1994; Wolff and Scholtz, 2002; Zilch, 1978; Zilch, 1979), none of them shows clear traits of a spiral cleavage. The emerging Ecdysozoa hypothesis favours not the Annelida but the Cycloneuralia (Cycloneuralia consist of Nematoda, Nematomorpha, Priapulida, Kinorhyncha and Loricifera) as the sister group of the arthropods (Aguinaldo et al.,1997; de Rosa et al.,1999; Giribet et al.,2000; Schmidt-Rhaesa et al.,1998; Valentine,1997). This makes it unnecessary to assume that a modified spiral cleavage is part of the ground pattern of the arthropods, as no spiral cleaving cycloneuralian embryo is known. Priapulids show a `radial' cleavage type (Lang, 1953; Zhinkin, 1949; Zhinkin and Korsakova, 1953),and the cleavage of the Nematomorpha was reported to be indeterminate(Inoue, 1958; Malakhov and Spiridonov, 1984; Meyer, 1913; Mühldorf, 1914). The sister group of the Nematomorpha, the nematodes, show diverse cleavage types. The stereotypic cleavage pattern found in Caenorhabditis elegans(Sulston et al., 1983), is not typical for nematodes, as several indeterminately cleaving nematode embryos have also been reported (Voronov,1999; Voronov,2001; Voronov and Panchin,1998). Considering the Nematomorpha as the outgroup, a variable cleavage pattern appears to be the ancestral condition in the Nematoda, and the `typical' stereotyped cell lineage of the rhabdite nematodes is derived(Fig. 10B). Nothing is known about the cleavage of the remaining cycloneuralian clades, the kinorhynchs and loriciferans. If the Cycloneuralia are the sister group to the Arthropods, an indeterminate cleavage pattern, similar to that of Thulinia stephaniae, should be part of the ground pattern in the Ecdysozoa(Fig. 10B). This notion is also supported by the fact that arthropods with an irregular cleavage pattern have been described in both crustaceans(Benesch, 1969; Scheidegger, 1976; Weygoldt, 1960) and myriapods(Dohle, 1964; Tiegs, 1940; Tiegs, 1947). Of all investigated arthropods, these species show the greatest similarity to the early development of Thulinia stephaniae and are thus good candidates to represent the ancestral mode of early developmental patterns in the Euarthropoda.
We thank Reinhard Møbjerg Kristensen for species identification and his help in collecting Echiniscoides sigismundii, which unfortunately did not want to be recorded. A field-collecting trip for Echiniscoides sigismundii was supported by the COBICE program of the European Union. We thank Heather Marlow, Gemma Richards, Ryan Viveiros, Gerhard Scholtz and Wolfgang Dohle for improving the manuscript.