The phytohormone gibberellin (GA) regulates the development and fertility of Arabidopsis flowers. The mature flowers of GA-deficient mutant plants typically exhibit reduced elongation growth of petals and stamens. In addition, GA-deficiency blocks anther development, resulting in male sterility. Previous analyses have shown that GA promotes the elongation of plant organs by opposing the function of the DELLA proteins, a family of nuclear growth repressors. However, it was not clear that the DELLA proteins are involved in the GA-regulation of stamen and anther development. We show that GA regulates cell elongation rather than cell division during Arabidopsis stamen filament elongation. In addition, GA regulates the cellular developmental pathway of anthers leading from microspore to mature pollen grain. Genetic analysis shows that the Arabidopsis DELLA proteins RGA and RGL2 jointly repress petal, stamen and anther development in GA-deficient plants, and that this function is enhanced by RGL1 activity. GA thus promotes Arabidopsis petal, stamen and anther development by opposing the function of the DELLA proteins RGA, RGL1 and RGL2.
Gibberellin (GA) is an endogenous regulator of plant growth(Richards et al., 2001). Severely GA-deficient Arabidopsis mutants, such as ga1-3,exhibit retarded vegetative growth of shoots(Koornneef and van der Veen,1980; Peng and Harberd,1997; King et al.,2001) and roots (Fu and Harberd, 2003). In addition, the development of floral organs,especially petals and stamens, is impaired in GA-deficient mutants, while retarded anther development results in male-sterility owing to a lack of mature pollen (Wilson et al.,1992; Goto and Pharis,1999). All of the GA-deficient mutant floral phenotypes of ga1-3 can be restored to normal by application of exogenous GA(Koornneef and van der Veen,1980), demonstrating that GA regulates floral development(Pharis and King, 1985). Anther development is GA dependent in a range of plant species additional to Arabidopsis (Nester and Zeevaart,1988; Jacobsen and Olszewski,1991), suggesting that GA is a general regulator of floral development.
The histology of anther development (microsporogenesis) is well documented(Goldberg et al., 1993; McCormick, 1993; Sanders et al., 1999). In addition, the study of mutants exhibiting stage-specific defects in microsporogenesis and pollen release has further advanced our understanding of the process (Preuss et al.,1993; Sanders et al.,1999; Park and Twell,2001; Azumi et al.,2002; Steiner-Lange et al.,2003; Unte et al.,2003). Although little is known about how GA controls stamen filament elongation, anther development or microsporogenesis, there have been previous suggestions that GA-signalling components may modulate these processes. For example, overexpression of SPY (an ArabidopsisGA-signalling component) (Jacobsen et al.,1996) inhibits post-meiotic anther development in petunia(Izhaki et al., 2002). Furthermore, transgenic expression of wild-type or mutant forms of GAI(another Arabidopsis GA-signalling component, see below) can retard stamen elongation and induce male-sterility in tobacco and Arabidopsis (Huang et al.,2003; Hynes et al.,2003). By contrast, infertility caused by impaired floral development is also a characteristic of mutants lacking the rice or barley DELLA proteins SLR1 or SLN1 (Ikeda et al.,2001; Chandler et al.,2002). Despite these various reports, the mechanism via which GA regulates petal, stamen and anther development remained unclear.
Recent advances have enabled the identification of a family of proteins homologous to Arabidopsis GAI and RGA(Peng et al., 1997; Silverstone et al., 1998) that are crucial for the regulation of plant stem elongation growth in response to GA (Peng et al., 1999; Ikeda et al., 2001; Boss and Thomas, 2002; Chandler et al., 2002). These proteins belong to the DELLA family (Fleck et al., 2002), a subfamily of the GRAS family of putative transcriptional regulators(Pysh et al., 1999; Richards et al., 2000). The Arabidopsis genome encodes five distinct DELLA proteins(Lee et al., 2002). Genetic suppression studies have shown that GAI and RGA functions overlap in the repression of plant stem growth (Dill and Sun, 2001; King et al.,2001). Further studies showed that while RGL2 controls seed germination (Lee et al.,2002), RGL1 may control stem elongation as well as seed germination (Wen and Chang,2002). Although GAI, RGA, RGL1 and RGL2 are all expressed in developing inflorescences(Lee et al., 2002), no obvious suppression of ga1-3 floral phenotype was observed in ga1-3mutants lacking GAI, RGA, GAI and RGA, or RGL2(Dill and Sun, 2001; King et al., 2001; Lee et al., 2002). However, a transgenic RGL1 loss-of-function line was resistant to the arrest of floral organ development induced by paclobutrazol (PAC, an inhibitor of GA biosynthesis) (Wen and Chang,2002), suggesting that RGL1 might play a role in regulating floral development. These observations underscore the importance of determining systematically the respective roles of the various DELLA proteins in GA-mediated regulation of Arabidopsis petal and stamen development.
In this report, we describe experiments addressing two questions. First, we characterized ga1-3 floral development to determine at which stage of stamen/anther development GA-deficiency causes developmental arrest. Second,we used novel combinations of loss-of-function mutations to determine if DELLA proteins are repressors of stamen filament elongation and microsporogenesis. Our results show that GA is crucial both for cell elongation during stamen elongation and for the developmental progression from microspore to mature pollen grain during pollen development. We also show that the DELLA proteins RGA, RGL1 and RGL2 work together to repress stamen and anther development in GA-deficient plants.
Materials and methods
Plant growth conditions, genetic nomenclature, plant materials
Plants were grown as described previously(Lee at al., 2002), or in controlled long (LD)- and short (SD)-day growth conditions(Peng and Harberd, 1997). Genotypes are written in capital italics (e.g GAI), mutant genotypes in lowercase (e.g. gai-t6). Polypeptide gene products are written in nonitalic capitals (e.g. GAI). Mutant lines (Landsberg erectabackground) rgl1-1, rgl2-1, gai-t6, rga-t2 and ga1-3 were as described (Peng et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2002). The ga1-3 lines lacking various combinations of RGL1, RGL2, GAI or RGA were as described previously (King et al.,2001; Lee et al.,2002), or made via cross-pollination. Primer pairs used for genotype verification were as described previously(Lee et al., 2002). For anatomical analysis of ga1-3, seeds were chilled for 7 days,following which the seed coat was manually removed and the seed sown on soil.
Histology and in situ hybridization
For scanning electron microscopy, individual flower buds from fresh wild-type or mutant inflorescences were dissected; outer organs were removed using stainless steel needles. Buds were attached to a mounting plate, plunged into liquid nitrogen, quickly transferred to a specimen chamber and scanned at 10 KV (JSM-5310LV, JEOL, Japan). Pollen grains were mounted on scanning electron microscopy stubs and coated with gold using previously described techniques (Bozzola and Russell,1999). For anther sectioning, fresh inflorescences were fixed in formalin-acetic acid-alcohol (FAA) fixative buffer at 4°C overnight followed by dehydration steps and subsequent embedding in Jung Historesin(Leica). Sections (2.5 μm) were made using a Leica RM 2055 microtome and stained with 0.25% Toluidine Blue O (Sigma). DAPI staining of pollen grain nuclei was performed as described (Chen and McCormick, 1996) and pollen numbers were counted under a microscope (Leica DM RXA2) with 40× or 20× objectives. Color photos were taken using a Spot Insight QE digital camera (Diagnostic Instruments). The ATA7 and SDS antisense and sense probes were synthesized from the pMC1577 and pMC2317 plasmids, respectively(Zhao et al., 2002) and in situ hybridisation was performed as described previously(Luo et al., 1996). Callose staining and chromosome spread analysis of meiotic stages were as described(Regan and Moffatt, 1990; Ross et al., 1996).
GA regulates epidermal cell elongation during stamen elongation
To determine the developmental stage at which ga1-3 flower buds become arrested, the relative growth of stamens versus gynoecium in inflorescence flower buds [starting with the outmost (oldest) and ending with the innermost dissectable bud] was compared in ga1-3 and wild type via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). All floral organs were properly initiated in ga1-3, and appeared to develop normally, though only to around floral stage 10 (Fig. 1A) [floral stages as defined elsewhere(Smyth et al., 1990; Bowman, 1994)]. Subsequent petal and stamen development beyond stage 10 was arrested in ga1-3(compare wild type at floral stage 13 with ga1-3; Fig. 1A). The ultimate stamens and pistils of ga1-3 flower buds were much shorter than the mature stamens and pistils of the wild-type control(Fig. 1B). In addition, ga1-3 had a stronger effect on stamen filament length than on pistil length: the arrest of stamen development resulted in significantly shorter stamens versus pistils in ga1-3(Fig. 1B). SEM of stamen filament epidermal cells indicated that the arrest of stamen filament growth in ga1-3 was due to reduced cell length(Fig. 1C), rather than to a reduction in cell number (Fig. 1D).
ga1-3 plants fail to produce tricellular pollen grains
In Arabidopsis, the anther consists of four lobes, each of identical cell-type architecture, each derived from archesporial cells. Microsporogenesis initiates within the reproductive locule of each lobe. The sporogenous cells divide to generate microspore mother cells (MMC). Subsequently, the MMC undergo meiosis to generate tetrads of haploid microspores (MSp). The MSp are released from the tetrads and undergo two rounds of cell division to form mature tricellular pollen grains(Sanders et al., 1999).
The surface structure of the mature pollen grains released by wild-type plants was compared with that of immature pollen grains manually dissected from ga1-3 anther locules. All wild-type pollen grains were oval shaped with long indented lines. Very few oval shaped pollen grains were observed in ga1-3. Instead, in most cases, the immature pollen grains from ga1-3 plants were spherical in shape(Fig. 2A). Wild-type and ga1-3 anthers were dissected and stained with DAPI. As expected, the mature pollen grains from wild-type plants were tricellular, and contained three nuclei (Fig. 2B). However, in most cases (see Discussion), fewer than 10% of the developing grains examined in ga1-3 pollen sacs were found to be bicellular/tricellular (Fig. 2B,C). In fact, about 48% of ga1-3 pollen grains contained only a single nucleus and 46% had no nucleus. Clearly, ga1-3 fails to produce mature pollen, and this probably results from an arrest or impairment in pollen development prior to or during pollen mitosis in ga1-3 (Fig. 2C).
Microsporogenesis is arrested before pollen mitosis in ga1-3
As in other plant species, microsporogenesis in Arabidopsis is a highly programmed process, and can be divided into 14 stages at the cellular level (Sanders et al., 1999). In wild type, floral stage 10 corresponds to stage 7-8 of microsporogenesis(pre-mitosis) (Bowman, 1994). As shown above, petal and stamen growth arrests at around floral stage 10 in ga1-3, suggesting that microsporogenesis may arrest prior to pollen mitosis in this mutant. To define the specific stage of microsporogenesis arrested in the ga1-3 mutant, we compared transverse sections of anthers from ga1-3 and wild type. No obvious differences were observed between ga1-3 and wild type up to microsporogenesis stage 7,when tetrads are formed (Fig. 3). However, after stage 7, it appeared that the microspores in ga1-3 were not properly released and that the ga1-3 pollen sacs failed to expand. In addition, the ga1-3 tapetum remained at the vacuole stage and then subsequently degenerated together with the microspores and pollen sacs (Fig. 3). As a result, the later stages of microsporogenesis (stages 9-12) could not be convincingly distinguished in ga1-3, suggesting that microsporogenesis is arrested at stages 7-8 (prior to pollen mitosis), thus preventing the formation of mature pollen.
To confirm that microsporogenesis was arrested prior to pollen mitosis in ga1-3, we used the gene expression markers SDS and ATA7. SDS is a marker gene that is specifically expressed in microsporocytes(Azumi et al., 2002). In situ hybridization analysis revealed near-identical expression patterns for SDS in the anthers of ga1-3 mutants and wild type,suggesting that the early stages of microsporogenesis are not affected in ga1-3 (Fig. 4A). In fact, chromosome spread experiments confirmed that meiosis in ga1-3was successfully accomplished, resulting in the formation of tetrads(Fig. 4B). However, Aniline Blue staining showed that, although the callose wall was formed successfully,the tetrads in ga1-3 anthers were not properly separated from one another, as is seen in wild type (Fig. 4C). ATA7 is an early tapetum-specific molecular marker(Rubinelli, 1998). As expected, ATA7 was highly expressed in wild type between stages 7 and 9 (Fig. 4A). The ATA7 signal then gradually disappeared during the later stages of microsporogenesis, although pollen mitosis was occurring(data not shown). ATA7 was also strongly expressed in ga1-3anthers (Fig. 4A), implying that tapetum initiation is not detectably affected by GA deficiency. However,in most cases, the ga1-3 pollen sacs marked by ATA7 were irregular in shape and contained microspores that had become deformed and severely degenerate at a developmental stage prior to the disappearance of the ATA7 signal (Fig. 4A).
Absence of specific DELLA combinations suppresses ga1-3floral phenotype
To investigate if DELLA proteins are repressors of floral development, we studied floral development in ga1-3 plants lacking various combinations of GAI, RGA, RGL1 and RGL2.
First, we studied ga1-3 plants lacking single DELLA proteins. Absence of RGL1, RGL2 or GAI alone had little obvious effect on the phenotype of ga1-3, while absence of RGA alone partially suppressed the stem elongation phenotype of ga1-3(Silverstone et al., 1998)(Fig. 5A). However, absence of RGA alone did not restore normal floral development or fertility to ga1-3 (Fig. 5C).
Second, we studied ga1-3 plants lacking all possible pairwise combinations of RGL1, RGL2, GAI or RGA. Lack of GAI and RGA completely suppressed the dwarf phenotype conferred by ga1-3(Dill and Sun, 2001; King et al., 2001)(Fig. 5B). All other combinations caused a phenotype that was indistinguishable from that of ga1-3 (plants lacking RGL1 and RGL2, or lacking RGL1 and GAI, or lacking RGL2 and GAI) or from ga1-3 plants lacking RGA (plants lacking RGL1 and RGA, or lacking RGL2 and RGA). Thus, GAI and RGA in combination play the predominant role in controlling stem growth. Absence of RGL1 and RGL2 did not obviously enhance the suppression of ga1-3phenotype because of absence of RGA, suggesting that RGL1 and RGL2 have relatively minor roles in the regulation of stem elongation.
For the most part, the pair-wise DELLA absence combinations failed to confer normal flower development on ga1-3(Dill and Sun, 2001; King et al., 2001). All of these lines produced flower buds, but the buds failed to open and exhibited the arrested petal and stamen growth characteristic of ga1-3(Fig. 7A). However, some flower opening was observed in the late maturity of two of the pair-wise DELLA absence combination lines. Although flowers of 40-day old ga1-3plants lacking RGL2 and RGA were sterile, at ∼50 days and older these plants produced flowers that opened and were able to set seed(Fig. 5C). In addition, the flowers of late maturity ga1-3 plants lacking GAI and RGA (∼55 days old; data not shown) sometimes opened, but these flowers were almost always sterile.
RGL1, RGL2 and RGA act synergistically in the repression of Arabidopsis stamen and petal development
We next studied ga1-3 plants lacking all possible three-way combinations of RGL1, RGL2, GAI and RGA. Absence of RGL1, RGL2 and GAI failed to suppress any detectable aspect of ga1-3 phenotype(Fig. 6A,B and Fig. 7A). Absence of RGL1, RGL2 and RGA completely restored petal and stamen development to ga1-3(Fig. 1A, Fig. 7A), and permitted normal seed set (Fig. 6B, Fig. 7B), despite the fact that this line was semi-dwarf and exhibited a stem elongation phenotype only slightly taller than that of ga1-3 plants lacking RGA alone (compare Fig. 5A with Fig. 6B). Although ga1-3 plants lacking RGL2 and RGA produced fertile flowers only in late maturity, ga1-3 plants lacking RGL1, RGL2 and RGA produced fertile flowers at the onset of flowering. Thus RGL1, RGL2 and RGA act in combination to control petal and stamen development in response to GA.
ga1-3 plants lacking RGL1, GAI and RGA were taller than ga1-3 plants lacking GAI and RGA alone(Fig. 6A,B), suggesting that RGL1 has a significant role in the control of stem elongation when RGA and GAI are absent. However, lack of RGL1, GAI and RGA did not restore normal stamen and petal development to ga1-3(Fig. 1B, Fig. 7A), and this line was therefore sterile (Fig. 7B). In fact, the young flower buds of ga1-3 plants lacking RGL1, GAI and RGA were indistinguishable from those of ga1-3 plants lacking GAI and RGA only (Fig. 7A).
ga1-3 plants lacking RGL2, GAI and RGA were also taller at maturity than control lines lacking GAI and RGA alone(Fig. 6A,B,D). In contrast to what was seen with lack of RGL1, lack of RGL2 (in ga1-3 plants lacking RGL2, GAI and RGA) partially restored petal and stamen development to ga1-3 plants lacking GAI and RGA, making this line partially fertile(Fig. 1B and Fig. 7A,B).
In summary, the results described in this section indicate that GA-regulation of Arabidopsis petal and stamen elongation is mediated via RGL1, RGL2 and RGA, with RGL2 and RGA playing the predominant roles.
Absence of RGA, RGL2, RGL1 and GAI leads to GA-independent plant growth
Finally, we analysed ga1-3 plants lacking RGL1, RGL2, GAI and RGA. We found that this mutant line bolted and flowered earlier than wild type both in long (LD) (Fig. 6A,C) and short (SD) days (Fig. 6C). Furthermore, ga1-3 plants lacking RGL1, RGL2, GAI and RGA were taller than the wild-type control (Fig. 6B,D). In addition, combined absence of RGL1, RGL2, GAI and RGA suppressed the effects of ga1-3 on petal and stamen development. The flowers of ga1-3 plants lacking RGL1, RGL2, GAI and RGA exhibited fully extended stamens and petals (Fig. 7A). Anther development proceeded to completion, resulting in flowers that were fertile and set seeds in both LD(Fig. 7B) and SD (data not shown).
We next analyzed stamen filament growth in ga1-3 plants lacking RGL1, RGL2, GAI and RGA and found that these filaments were slightly longer than those of the wild-type control (Fig. 1A,B). In fact, removing only RGL1, RGL2 and RGA from ga1-3 also resulted in filament lengths longer than that of wild type(Fig. 1A,B). SEM of stamen filament epidermal cells indicated that restoration of stamen filament length in ga1-3 mutant plants lacking RGL1, RGL2, GAI and RGA was due to an increase in cell length (Fig. 1C) as opposed to an increase in cell number(Fig. 1D), a difference similar to what was previously observed between wild-type and ga1-3 stamen filaments. Thus, the elongation of stamen filaments becomes GA independent when all four DELLA proteins are removed.
SEM analysis of pollen grains from ga1-3 plants lacking RGA, RGL2 and RGL1 showed that their surface structure was indistinguishable from those of wild type (Fig. 2A), being oval-shaped with long indented lines. However, pollen grains from ga1-3 plants lacking RGL1, RGL2, GAI and RGA were substantially different from those of wild type, mostly having a wrinkled appearance, and sometimes being markedly deformed (Fig. 2A). Although ga1-3 plants lacking RGL1, RGL2 and GAI had hugely different stem elongation phenotypes to ga1-3 plants lacking RGL1, GAI and RGA (Fig. 6A,B),the floral phenotypes of these two lines are very similar and both lines had∼30% tricellular pollen (Fig. 2C). This suggests that microsporogenesis is partially restored in these two lines. Lack of both RGL2 and RGA had a greater effect on microsporogenesis, as ∼60% or ∼80% of pollen grains were found to be tricellular in ga1-3 plants lacking RGL2, GAI and RGA or RGL1, RGL2 and RGA respectively (Fig. 2B,C). These results indicate that RGA and RGL2 play important roles in the repression of microsporogenesis in Arabidopsis, and that GA regulates microsporogenesis by overcoming the repressing effects of RGA and RGL2.
Transverse sectioning showed that ga1-3 plants lacking RGL1, RGL2 and RGA or ga1-3 plants lacking RGL1, RGL2, GAI and RGA both achieved complete microsporogenesis (Fig. 3). However, although no obvious differences were observed between wild-type and ga1-3 plants lacking RGL1, RGL2 and RGA, we often observed that one or two of the four locules of the anthers of ga1-3plants lacking RGL1, RGL2, GAI and RGA were aborted (data not shown).
DELLA proteins act as repressors of growth whose function is opposed by GA(Richards et al., 2001). In several cases, GA opposes DELLA function by promoting DELLA disappearance,most likely via ubiquitin-ligase dependent targetting to the proteasome and subsequent protein degradation(Silverstone et al., 2001; Ito et al., 2002; Gubler et al.,2002; Fu et al.,2002). Recent studies have identified candidate F-box components of a SCF E3 ubiquitin ligase apparently responsible for targetting DELLA proteins to the proteasome (McGinnis et al., 2003; Sasaki et al.,2003). Thus, one emerging picture is that GA stimulates GA-responses by targetting DELLA protein growth repressors for destruction in the proteasome (Harberd,2003). In another case, that of RGL2, GA apparently opposes RGL2 function by causing downregulation of RGL2 transcript levels during seed germination (Lee et al., 2002).
Previous studies of Arabidopsis DELLA function have involved phenotypic comparisons of GA-deficient (ga1-3) plants with GA-deficient plants lacking GAI, RGA, RGL1, or RGL2 or a limited range of combinations of these factors (Dill and Sun, 2001; King et al.,2001; Lee et al.,2002). In this paper, we described the effects of a more comprehensive set of DELLA-lack combinations, focussing especially on floral development.
Flowering consists of three distinct phases: floral initiation (in which the vegetative meristem is transformed into an inflorescence meristem), floral organ initiation and floral organ growth. As shown previously, lack of GAI and RGA substantially suppresses the effect of the ga1-3 mutation on flowering time (a measure of time of floral initiation) in SD(Dill and Sun, 2001). We have shown that an additional lack of RGL2 or of both RGL1 and RGL2 further advances the flowering time (in both LD and SD) of ga1-3 plants lacking GAI and RGA. However, the magnitude of this further advance is relatively small compared with that initially caused by lack of both GAI and RGA. Thus, GAI and RGA play the predominant role in regulating flowering time in the GA-signalling floral promotive pathway(Simpson and Dean, 2002), with only small contributions from RGL1 and RGL2.
By contrast, RGL1, RGL2 and RGA play key roles in floral organ development. The temporal coordination of the development of individual floral organs is essential for floral function. For example, at around the time that the pollen matures and is dehisced from the anther, the stamen filaments of flowers of self-fertilizing species such as Arabidopsis elongate and bring the pollen into contact with the stigmatic papillae(Smyth et al., 1990; Bowman, 1994). We showed that the relatively short stamen filaments of ga1-3 flowers result from an arrest of cell elongation rather division and that combined lack of RGL1,RGL2, GAI and RGA restored stamen filament cell elongation in ga1-3plants. We also showed that, in general, microspores do not proceed to the formation of mature pollen in ga1-3 anthers, that microspore development is possibly arrested prior to pollen mitosis in ga1-3,and that tapetal development is perturbed in ga1-3. Whether the effect of ga1-3 on pollen mitosis is a secondary effect of arrested tapetal development, or is independent of the effect on tapetal development is at present unclear. In addition, we occasionally observed ga1-3flower buds containing a significant number of tricellular pollen grains. Further investigation is needed to find out if this is a true reflection of the ga1-3 developmental process or is caused by other unknown environmental cues. Lack of RGL1, RGL2, GAI and RGA proteins restored microsporogenesis in ga1-3 plants. Further genetic analysis enabled us to identify RGL2, RGA and RGL1 as the key GA-response regulators controlling stamen filament length and microsporogenesis. Interestingly,pollen grains from ga1-3 plants lacking GAI, RGL1, RGL2 and RGA,although tricellular and viable, are deformed when compared with the wild-type-appearing pollen grains from ga1-3 plants lacking RGL1,RGL2 and RGA. Perhaps absence of all four DELLA proteins activates the GA pathway to such high levels that pollen wall materials are overproduced,resulting in abnormal pollen morphology.
Previous developmental genetic analyses showed that the Arabidopsis DELLA proteins GAI and RGA act as repressors of stem elongation and that GA exerts its promotive effects on stem growth by overcoming the effects of GAI and RGA (Dill and Sun, 2001; King et al.,2001). These observations, and additional observations on the behaviour of DELLA proteins in other species, have been incorporated into a general `release of restraint' model, which envisages DELLA proteins as general agents of restraint of plant organ growth, and GA as a means of overcoming that restraint (Peng et al.,1997; King et al.,2001; Richards et al.,2001; Harberd,2003). However, the initial experiments (which examined the effect of lack of Arabidopsis GAI and RGA) showed that although stem elongation could be explained in terms of the `release of restraint' model,other aspects of growth and development which were known to be GA regulated(in particular seed germination and floral organ growth) could not(Dill and Sun, 2001; King et al., 2001). It therefore remained possible that some other, entirely different, mechanism was responsible for the GA-mediated regulation of seed germination and floral organ growth.
Recently, it has been reported that the GA-promotion of Arabidopsis seed germination can be explained in terms of a GA-mediated release of the restraint upon germination imposed by RGL2(Lee et al., 2002) or RGL1(Wen and Chang, 2002). The results in this present paper show for the first time that the GA-regulation of floral organ development is also DELLA-mediated. However, different combinations of DELLA proteins are key to floral organ development (RGA, RGL1,RGL2), seed germination (RGL2 and RGL1) and stem elongation (RGA, GAI). The three key aspects of the ga1-3 mutant phenotype (dwarfism, inhibition of seed germination, retarded floral organ development) can now be explained:the lack of GA in this mutant causes a failure to overcome the repressive effects of the DELLA protein combinations that are specific to each particular phenotypic aspect. As a consequence, the `release of DELLA restraint'hypothesis can now be considered to be a viable model with which to understand GA responses in general. One possible explanation for how different DELLA combinations control different developmental processes (e.g. seed germination versus stem elongation versus stamen development) is that individual DELLA proteins have different temporal and spatial expression patterns. For example, GAI and RGA are ubiquitously expressed in all plant tissues,whereas RGL1 and RGL2 transcripts are relatively enriched in the inflorescence (Silverstone et al.,1998; Lee et al.,2002; Wen and Chang,2002). In situ hybridisation showed that RGL1 is highly expressed in the stamen primordium (Wen and Chang, 2002); however examination of an RGL2promoter-GUS fusion line showed that RGL2 transcripts are also enriched in the stamen (Lee et al.,2002). The expression patterns of RGL1 and RGL2are therefore consistent with our current observation that RGL1 and RGL2 are both important for stamen development. It is possible that RGL3 also plays an important role in various aspects of GA-mediated developmental regulation. Determination of the relative role of RGL3 awaits characterization of Arabidopsis mutants lacking the functional RGL3 allele.
The nature of the arrest in flower development conferred by ga1-3(and restored by lack of RGL1, RGL2 and RGA) is particularly interesting. Our results identify a relatively distinct developmental stage at which arrest occurs. Before that stage, ga1-3 stamen and anther development proceeds in a way that is indistinguishable from that of wild type. After that stage, wild-type development continues, while ga1-3 development is blocked. It will be interesting to determine if other GA-deficiency phenotypes(e.g. the particular shape of leaves of ga1-3 mutant plants) are also due to premature arrest of an identifiable developmental sequence.
Plasmids pMC1577 (ATA7) and pMC2317 (SDS) were kindly provided by Dr Hong Ma. We are grateful for Yang Sun Chan and Qing Wen Lin for their help with SEM; and De Ye, Weicai Yang, Lin Guo and Chen Jun for advice on techniques and useful discussions. We thank Zoe Wilson for comments on the manuscript. This work is financially supported by the Agency for Science, Technology and Research in Singapore. The work of X.F., D.R. and N.P.H. was supported by the Core Strategic Grant from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council to the John Innes Centre and by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Grant 208/P15108. The work of L.Q. and D.L. was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30240018) and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KSCX2-SW-309).