The Drosophila Extramacrochaetae protein antagonizes the proneural function of the Achaete and Scute proteins in the generation of the adult fly sensory organs. Extra-macrochaetae sequesters these basic-region-helix-loop-helix transcription factors as heterodimers inefficient for binding to DNA. We show that, during embryonic devel-opment, the extramacrochaetae gene is expressed in complex patterns that comprise derivatives of the three embryonic layers. Expression of extramacrochaetae often precedes and accompanies morphogenetic movements. It also occurs at regions of specialized cell-cell contact and/or cell recognition, like the epidermal part of the muscle attachment sites and the differentiating CNS. The insuffi-ciency of extramacrochaetae affects most tissues where it is expressed. The defects suggest faulty specification of different cell types and result in impairment of processes as diverse as cell proliferation and commitment, cell adhesion and cell recognition. If Extramacrochaetae par-ticipates in cell specification by dimerizing with basic-region-helix-loop-helix proteins, the variety of defects and tissues affected by the insufficiency of extramacrochaetae suggests that helix-loop-helix proteins are involved in many embryonic developmental processes.

The function of the Drosophila extramacrochaetae (emc) gene has been characterized almost exclusively in relation to the pat-terning of the fly’s sensory organs (chaetae and other types of sensilla). Thus, the first alleles of emc were isolated in a gene-dose titration analysis (Botas et al., 1982) to find regulatory genes of the achaete-scute complex (AS-C). The AS-C comprises four proneural genes that confer to cells the ability to become neuroblasts or sensory organ mother cells (Campuzano and Modolell, 1992, review). Viable combina-tions of emc alleles generated ectopic extramacrochaetae whose number was related to the number of AS-C copies present in the flies. Consequently, emc was proposed to be a negative regulator of the AS-C (Botas et al., 1982; Moscoso del Prado and García-Bellido, 1984).

The four AS-C proneural genes and emc encode proteins bearing the helix-loop-helix (HLH) dimerizing domain (Garrell and Campuzano, 1991; Murre and Baltimore, 1992, reviews) characteristic of a large family of transcriptional reg-ulators that function as homo-or hetero-dimers. Most proteins of this family, including the proneural ones, have, adjacent to the HLH domain, a basic region necessary for DNA binding (Murre and Baltimore, 1992). Emc lacks this region and, con-sequently, it has been proposed that Emc antagonizes proneural function, and thereby sensory organ generation, by sequestering the proneural bHLH proteins in complexes incapable of effective interaction with DNA (Ellis et al., 1990; Garrell and Modolell, 1990). Experiments in vitro support this view (Van Doren et al., 1991; Martínez et al., 1993). In addition, emc insufficiency increases the accumulation in imaginal wing discs of at least one of the AS-C proneural products (that of scute (sc), Cubas et al., 1991; Cubas and Modolell, 1992), and variations in Emc levels modulate the transcriptional activity of the achaete (ac) promoter (Martínez et al., 1993; Van Doren et al., 1992). This suggests that EMC also antagonizes proneural activity by downregulating ac/sc transcription. These interactions between proneural genes and emc help tune the levels of proneural function, sharpen the spatial distribution of proneural activity in the imaginal discs epithelia, and consequently refine the positions where sensory organs arise (Cubas and Modolell, 1992; Van Doren et al., 1992; Campuzano and Modolell, 1992, review). In the mouse, the family of Id proteins, which also lack this basic region and probably are the vertebrate homologs of Emc, negatively regulate myogenesis by a mechanism similar to that of Emc in neurogenesis (Benezra et al., 1990; Jen et al., 1992; Sun et al., 1991).

Some, albeit scarce, data suggest that during embryonic and imaginal development emc plays roles other than antagonizing the proneural function. For instance, embryos harbouring the strongest lack-of-function emc alleles die and display anomalies in the cuticle (García-Alonso and García-Bellido, 1988). In the wing, clones of cells bearing the most extreme alleles are cell lethal and clones carrying weaker but still embryonic-lethal alleles have abnormal sizes and shapes and differentiate extraveins (García-Alonso and García-Bellido, 1988). These analyses suggested that emc plays roles in cell proliferation, cellular recognition and vein patterning (García-Alonso and García-Bellido, 1988). Finally, maternal Emc is needed in sex determination for the proper communication of the X:A ratio, which results in inactivation of Sxl in males (Younger-Shepherd et al., 1992).

The aim of this work has been to study the role of emc during embryonic development. This might reveal aspects of emc function whose analysis cannot be easily approached either in emc viable mutant backgrounds or in cell clones. Moreover, it might disclose interactions of emc with other proteins which are not present or whose expressions do not occur together with that of emc during imaginal development. To this end, we have analyzed the embryonic expression of emc by hybridization in situ to wild-type and mutant embryos and the embryonic phenotype of emc strong, lack-of-function alleles. We find that emc is required for a variety of developmental processes occurring in derivatives of the three embryonic layers.

Drosophila stocks

emc1 is a point mutant (Garrell and Modolell, 1990), emcFX119 was induced by X-rays, and the deficiency emcE12 deletes approximately ten chromosomal bands, including the emc locus. These alleles are genetically described by (García-Alonso and García-Bellido, 1988; Moscoso del Prado, 1985). emcip15 and emciX10 were obtained by P. Heitzler in a P element-mediated and an X ray-induced mutagenesis, respectively. Mutant chromosomes were kept over a TM2-lacZ balancer to allow identification of homozygous mutant embryos by X-gal staining. To minimize the effect of maternal inheritance, whenever possible mutant embryos were obtained from TM2/emcE12 mothers.

Embryonic cuticle preparations

Embryos were dechorionated in bleach, devitellinized in a mixture of heptane/methanol, washed once in methanol, several times in PBS and mounted directly in a 1:1 mixture of lactic acid and Hoyers’ medium (Van der Meer, 1977).

Histochemistry

Hybridizations in situ to whole mounts of embryos (prestained with X-gal to reveal β-galactosidase-expressing balancers when required, Ashburner, 1989) was performed according to Tautz and Pfeifle (1989). Digoxigenin-labelled probes were prepared with an emc cDNA clone of nearly full length (Garrell and Modolell, 1990) or with a dpp cDNA clone (Padgett et al., 1987). Immunological staining of whole mounts of embryos, using the ABC system (Vector Labora-tory), were made as described in Ruiz-Gómez and Ghysen (1993).

emc expression during embryogenesis

During most of embryogenesis, emc is expressed in complex and rapidly evolving patterns. emc mRNA is already detectable in syncytial blastoderms, where it is homogeneously distributed. This mRNA is probably of maternal origin, since emc is expressed during oogenesis in the nurse and follicle cells (not shown). Fig. 1 describes the emc mRNA distribution in the subsequent developmental stages, from cellular blastoderm to the post dorsal-closure stage (stage 15, according to Campos-Ortega and Hartenstein, 1985). The mRNA conspicuously accumulates in or adjacent to regions that will undergo mor-phogenetic movements. Examples are the cephalic (Fig. 1C) and ventral furrows (Fig. 1D), the amnioproctodeal invagina-tion (Fig. 1C), the anterior midgut primordium (Fig. 1E), the dorsal folds (Fig. 1F, G), the invaginating stomodeum (Fig. 1G, I), the tracheal pits (Fig. 1J), and the intersegmental grooves (Fig. 1M). Remarkably, the mRNA is virtually absent from the ectodermal layer from which neuroblasts segregate (Fig. 1H). This suggests that, in contrast to the developing adult peripheral nervous system, emc is not paramount in controlling proneural function in the embryonic CNS. emc is nevertheless expressed at later stages in the developing ventral cord (Fig. 1N). Other regions of abundant emc expression are the meso-dermal layer (Fig. 1G,H), the visceral mesoderm (Fig. 1L,N), the rudiments of the Malpighian tubules (Fig. 1I), the tubules themselves (not shown), and the muscle attachment sites (apodemes, Fig. 1N).

Fig. 1.

emc mRNA distribution during embryogenesis. Embryos are staged according to Campos-Ortega and Hartenstein (1985). Anterior is to the left and, where appropriate, dorsal on top. (A,B) Medial and ventral horizontal views of a late stage 5 embryo. Expression occurs in nine transversal stripes (A, arrowheads) and one dorsal and one ventral anteroposterior wide band, the latter one is shown in B (arrowheads). Two of the transversal stripes are located at the prospective procephalon, six at the prospective germ band and the posteriormost stripe at the region that gives rise to the proctodeum and posterior midgut (Hartenstein, 1985). (C,D) Dorsal and ventral views of a late stage 6 embryo. Cephalic furrow (cf), amnioproctodeal invagination (api), and ventral furrow (vf) form at or adjacent to emc-expressing regions. (E,F) Anterior/lateral and posterior/dorsal partial views of a late stage 7 embryo. emc is expressed in the cells forming the anterior midgut invagination (am), the posterior transversal furrow (ptr) and the amnioproctodeal invagination, but not in the pole cells (pc). (G) Early stage 8 embryo. emc is also expressed in the anterior transversal furrow (atr), and in the mesodermal layer (ms), proctodeum (pr) and posterior midgut (pm) but not detectably in the ectodermal layer (ec). (H) Detail of the mesodermal and ectodermal layers (late stage 9) during neuroblast segregation. Neuroblasts (arrows) accumulate much less emc RNA (if any) than the mesodermal cells (ms). (I,J) Different focal planes of a late stage 10 embryo. Note the expression in the stomodeal invagination (st), the posterior midgut (pm), the hindgut (hg) and the Malpighian tubules rudiments (mt). Asterisks (J) mark patches of emc expression where tracheal pits will form. Amnioserosa (as) expresses emc (arrowheads). (K) Lateral view of the germ band (late stage 11); tracheal pits are visible (arrowheads). (L,M) Different focal planes of a stage 13 embryo; visceral mesoderm (vm), developing ventral cord (vc), procephalic lobe (pl), foregut (fg) and intersegmental grooves (is) express emc. (N) Medial horizontal view of stage 15 embryo. The epidermal part of the apodemes (ap) accumulates emc RNA (this expression is restricted from the intersegmental grooves to the apodemes during stage 14). Supraesophageal ganglion (spg), visceral mesoderm (vm) and neural ventral cord (out of focus) also express emc. Expression persists in the CNS longer than in other tissues, up to at least hatching time. In the head region, complex and dynamic emc expression takes place. Bar, in N, representing 50 μm applies to most panels. E and F are two and H three times further magnified.

Fig. 1.

emc mRNA distribution during embryogenesis. Embryos are staged according to Campos-Ortega and Hartenstein (1985). Anterior is to the left and, where appropriate, dorsal on top. (A,B) Medial and ventral horizontal views of a late stage 5 embryo. Expression occurs in nine transversal stripes (A, arrowheads) and one dorsal and one ventral anteroposterior wide band, the latter one is shown in B (arrowheads). Two of the transversal stripes are located at the prospective procephalon, six at the prospective germ band and the posteriormost stripe at the region that gives rise to the proctodeum and posterior midgut (Hartenstein, 1985). (C,D) Dorsal and ventral views of a late stage 6 embryo. Cephalic furrow (cf), amnioproctodeal invagination (api), and ventral furrow (vf) form at or adjacent to emc-expressing regions. (E,F) Anterior/lateral and posterior/dorsal partial views of a late stage 7 embryo. emc is expressed in the cells forming the anterior midgut invagination (am), the posterior transversal furrow (ptr) and the amnioproctodeal invagination, but not in the pole cells (pc). (G) Early stage 8 embryo. emc is also expressed in the anterior transversal furrow (atr), and in the mesodermal layer (ms), proctodeum (pr) and posterior midgut (pm) but not detectably in the ectodermal layer (ec). (H) Detail of the mesodermal and ectodermal layers (late stage 9) during neuroblast segregation. Neuroblasts (arrows) accumulate much less emc RNA (if any) than the mesodermal cells (ms). (I,J) Different focal planes of a late stage 10 embryo. Note the expression in the stomodeal invagination (st), the posterior midgut (pm), the hindgut (hg) and the Malpighian tubules rudiments (mt). Asterisks (J) mark patches of emc expression where tracheal pits will form. Amnioserosa (as) expresses emc (arrowheads). (K) Lateral view of the germ band (late stage 11); tracheal pits are visible (arrowheads). (L,M) Different focal planes of a stage 13 embryo; visceral mesoderm (vm), developing ventral cord (vc), procephalic lobe (pl), foregut (fg) and intersegmental grooves (is) express emc. (N) Medial horizontal view of stage 15 embryo. The epidermal part of the apodemes (ap) accumulates emc RNA (this expression is restricted from the intersegmental grooves to the apodemes during stage 14). Supraesophageal ganglion (spg), visceral mesoderm (vm) and neural ventral cord (out of focus) also express emc. Expression persists in the CNS longer than in other tissues, up to at least hatching time. In the head region, complex and dynamic emc expression takes place. Bar, in N, representing 50 μm applies to most panels. E and F are two and H three times further magnified.

Mutants analyzed

We have studied several of the strongest embryonic lethal emc alleles available (emc1, emcFX119 and emcip15), either singly or in combination with a deficiency for the emc chromosomal region (emcE12). The emc mRNA expression in emcFX119 and emcip15 homozygous embryos was extremely weak, although detectable (not shown). This is consistent with the strong phenotype of these mutants and it suggests that they still have residual emc function. The DNA lesions associated with these mutations are unknown but may affect important emc regula-tory regions.

emc mRNA distribution was unaffected in emc1 embryos but its abundance was several fold higher than in the wild type (not shown). emc1 is a point mutant in which a valine residue has been replaced by glutamic acid within the HLH domain (Garrell and Modolell, 1990), a modification that impairs the function of the Emc1 protein (Martínez et al., 1993). Assuming that no other lesions are present in the emc1 gene, the increased mRNA abundance suggests a negative regulation of emc tran-scription by the Emc protein.

Phenotypes were examined in derivatives of the three embryonic layers. As a rule, the strength of the defects, although variable, could be ordered from weakest to strongest as follows: emc1 < emc1/emcE12 < emcFX119 = emcip15 = emcFX119/emcip15 < emcFX119/emcE12 = emcip15/emcE12 < emcE12/emcE12. In all cases, the phenotype of emcE12 embryos was a strongest version of the alterations observed in the hypo-morphic combinations. This suggests that the phenotype of this deficiency may correspond to the emc null condition. Unless otherwise specified, the phenotypes described below corre-spond to the emcip15/emcE12 combination.

Cuticle alterations

emc mutant embryos did not hatch and their cuticle displayed multiple alterations. Thus, head involution and differentiation of the mandibular apparatus, spiracles and filzkörper could be incomplete or totally absent (Fig. 2). Denticle belts were also affected (Fig. 2B, see also below), but not so the derivatives of the maxillary and antennal segments. Other alterations are described in the legend to Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Larval cuticle of wild type and emc mutants. (A,B) Cuticles of a wild-type, recently hatched larva and of an emcip15/emcip15 embryo at the end of its development. The mutant shows incomplete head (h) involution and poorly differentiated denticle belts (db). Note the dorsal bend of the embryo. (C,D) Lateral views of wild-type and emcip15/emcE12 mutant heads. ci, cirri; mso, maxillary sensory organ; aso, antennal sensory organ. In D, most of the derivatives (see Jürgens et al., 1986) of the mandibular and clypeolabral segments (mandibular apparatus) are absent. (E,F) Horizontal views of wild-type and emcip15/emcE12 telsons. Note the absence of filzkörper (fk) and the poor differentiation of the spiracles (sp) in F. The epidermis in mutant embryos was thinner than in the wild type. Dorsal closure was often abnormal. Scale bar in F (20 μm) applies to C-F. A and B are at 3.5 times lower magnification.

Fig. 2.

Larval cuticle of wild type and emc mutants. (A,B) Cuticles of a wild-type, recently hatched larva and of an emcip15/emcip15 embryo at the end of its development. The mutant shows incomplete head (h) involution and poorly differentiated denticle belts (db). Note the dorsal bend of the embryo. (C,D) Lateral views of wild-type and emcip15/emcE12 mutant heads. ci, cirri; mso, maxillary sensory organ; aso, antennal sensory organ. In D, most of the derivatives (see Jürgens et al., 1986) of the mandibular and clypeolabral segments (mandibular apparatus) are absent. (E,F) Horizontal views of wild-type and emcip15/emcE12 telsons. Note the absence of filzkörper (fk) and the poor differentiation of the spiracles (sp) in F. The epidermis in mutant embryos was thinner than in the wild type. Dorsal closure was often abnormal. Scale bar in F (20 μm) applies to C-F. A and B are at 3.5 times lower magnification.

Intersegmental grooves

emc was required for the proper formation of the interseg-mental grooves. Thus, in emc mutants accumulation of Fasciclin III (Patel et al., 1987) was reduced and many grooves appeared shallower than their wild-type counterparts or were absent (Fig. 3A-C). Moreover, accumulation of Engrailed protein, which takes place at the anterior side of each groove, occurred in fewer cells than in the wild type and to lower an extent (Fig. 3D,E) or was undetectable. Furthermore, after secretion of the cuticle, most of the denticles in the first and second denticle rows, which in the abdominal segments abut the intersegmental boundaries (Campos-Ortega and Hartenstein, 1985), were missing (Fig. 3F,G). In contrast, many of the denticles of the remaining rows were present although in somewhat disorganized arrays. These findings suggest a faulty specification of the intersegmental border cells.

Fig. 3.

Requirement of emc in intersegmental borders. Lateral views of the epidermis of wild-type (A), emcip15/emcE12 (B) and emcE12/emcE12 (C) embryos at the dorsal closure stage stained with anti-fasciclin III antibody. Asterisks mark the third thoracic segment. In the mutants, many intersegmental grooves are abnormally shallow or absent (arrowheads) and epidermal cells are less tightly packed. (D,E) Lateral views of anti-Engrailed stainings of wild-type and emcip15/emcE12 embryos after dorsal closure. Arrows mark the first abdominal Engrailed stripes. In the mutant, all stripes contain abnormally few Engrailed-positive cells. In emcE12 homozygous embryos, these cells are absent at this stage (not shown). (F,G) Sixth abdominal denticle belt of wild-type and emcip15/emcE12 embryo. Anterior is to the top. Abdominal belts have six denticle rows. Denticles have characteristic polarity (indicated by arrowheads) in each row. This allows identification of the rows. The intersegmental boundary lies between the first and second rows. In emc mutants, the polarity of the denticles is maintained, although these are somewhat disorganized. With high frequency, the first and second rows are missing, have very few denticles or their elements are mixed together in a single row. Scale bar in A equals 25 μm. D and E are slightly more magnified.

Fig. 3.

Requirement of emc in intersegmental borders. Lateral views of the epidermis of wild-type (A), emcip15/emcE12 (B) and emcE12/emcE12 (C) embryos at the dorsal closure stage stained with anti-fasciclin III antibody. Asterisks mark the third thoracic segment. In the mutants, many intersegmental grooves are abnormally shallow or absent (arrowheads) and epidermal cells are less tightly packed. (D,E) Lateral views of anti-Engrailed stainings of wild-type and emcip15/emcE12 embryos after dorsal closure. Arrows mark the first abdominal Engrailed stripes. In the mutant, all stripes contain abnormally few Engrailed-positive cells. In emcE12 homozygous embryos, these cells are absent at this stage (not shown). (F,G) Sixth abdominal denticle belt of wild-type and emcip15/emcE12 embryo. Anterior is to the top. Abdominal belts have six denticle rows. Denticles have characteristic polarity (indicated by arrowheads) in each row. This allows identification of the rows. The intersegmental boundary lies between the first and second rows. In emc mutants, the polarity of the denticles is maintained, although these are somewhat disorganized. With high frequency, the first and second rows are missing, have very few denticles or their elements are mixed together in a single row. Scale bar in A equals 25 μm. D and E are slightly more magnified.

Nervous system

Consistently with the absence of emc expression in the neu-roectoderm (Fig. 1H), the early patterns of proneural clusters, neuroblasts and SMCs, as visualized by Achaete, Hunchback and Cut staining, respectively, seemed normal in emc mutants (not shown). However, just before the start of germ band retraction, the spatial distribution of neuroblasts and their descendants, the ganglion mother cells, was more disorganized than in the wild type (Fig. 4A,B). Later, when the first neural processes appeared and emc started to be strongly expressed in the ventral cord (Fig. 1L), Fasciclin II staining revealed anomalous axonal patterns in approximately 50% of emcip15/emcE12 embryos. Anomalies ranged from subtle devi-ations of axonal pathways (Fig. 4D) or localized defects in the longitudinal connectives of older embryos (Fig. 4F), to a general disorganization of the pattern (Fig. 4E). Anomalies were also found in the PNS and consisted in a few missing neurons, rare changes of neuronal identity and, in the most extreme cases, a general disorganization of the neuronal groups and axonal routing (Fig. 4I,J). Axonal misrouting could be so extreme that axons belonging to cells from different segments fasciculated together (Fig. 4G,H) In emcE12 homozygous embryos, all these anomalies were exaggerated and many segmental and intersegmental nerves were interrupted or missing (not shown). Taken together, these defects indicate that emc does not play a mayor role in the early patterning of the embryonic CNS and PNS, but is involved in neuronal differentiation.

Fig. 4.

emc phenotype in the CNS and PNS. Details of wild-type (A,C) and emcip15/emcE12 (B,D-F) developing CNS are shown in progressively older embryos. Anterior is up. (A,B) Late stage 11 embryos stained with anti-Hunchback antibody, which reveals neuroblasts and their progeny (Jiménez and Campos-Ortega, 1990). Notice the mutant loose pattern of Hunchback-positive cells. (C-F) Anti-Fasciclin II antibody staining, which reveals a subset of motoneuron axons (Grenningloh et al., 1990). Note in D (late stage 12 embryo) that the axon (arrowhead) emerging from a pCC cell is misrouting towards the midline. E shows a more abnormal mutant CNS (stage 13) with generalized disorganization (compare with wild type, C), missing axons (arrow), and tangled axons and cell bodies (arrowhead). (F) Stage 15 CNS with localized abnormal thinning of longitudinal connectives (arrowheads). (G,H) Stage 15 wild-type and emcip15/emcE12 dissected embryos stained with anti-Fasciclin II antibody and focussed at the PNS. The wild-type pattern of nerves is regular while that of the mutant is disarrayed. Notice the abnormal fasciculation of nerves that connect homologous neuronal bodies in adjacent segments (arrowheads) and the fasciculation of two non-neighbouring intersegmental nerves (arrows). (I,J) Lateral views of a wild-type and an emcip15/emcE12 late embryo stained with mAb22C10 showing the general pattern of the PNS. Arrowhead points to an external sensory organ which has been apparently replaced by a chordotonal-like organ. Brackets mark an out-of-focus ventral group of sensory organs with several missing neurons. Scale bar represents 30 μm. Magnification in C-F is approximately 1.5 times larger and in G-J 0.6 times smaller.

Fig. 4.

emc phenotype in the CNS and PNS. Details of wild-type (A,C) and emcip15/emcE12 (B,D-F) developing CNS are shown in progressively older embryos. Anterior is up. (A,B) Late stage 11 embryos stained with anti-Hunchback antibody, which reveals neuroblasts and their progeny (Jiménez and Campos-Ortega, 1990). Notice the mutant loose pattern of Hunchback-positive cells. (C-F) Anti-Fasciclin II antibody staining, which reveals a subset of motoneuron axons (Grenningloh et al., 1990). Note in D (late stage 12 embryo) that the axon (arrowhead) emerging from a pCC cell is misrouting towards the midline. E shows a more abnormal mutant CNS (stage 13) with generalized disorganization (compare with wild type, C), missing axons (arrow), and tangled axons and cell bodies (arrowhead). (F) Stage 15 CNS with localized abnormal thinning of longitudinal connectives (arrowheads). (G,H) Stage 15 wild-type and emcip15/emcE12 dissected embryos stained with anti-Fasciclin II antibody and focussed at the PNS. The wild-type pattern of nerves is regular while that of the mutant is disarrayed. Notice the abnormal fasciculation of nerves that connect homologous neuronal bodies in adjacent segments (arrowheads) and the fasciculation of two non-neighbouring intersegmental nerves (arrows). (I,J) Lateral views of a wild-type and an emcip15/emcE12 late embryo stained with mAb22C10 showing the general pattern of the PNS. Arrowhead points to an external sensory organ which has been apparently replaced by a chordotonal-like organ. Brackets mark an out-of-focus ventral group of sensory organs with several missing neurons. Scale bar represents 30 μm. Magnification in C-F is approximately 1.5 times larger and in G-J 0.6 times smaller.

Malpighian tubules

Malpighian tubules develop from four separate outpushings of the prospective hindgut (Campos-Ortega and Hartenstein, 1985) by, initially, cell proliferation and, later, polytenization and rearrangement of the cells to elongate the tubules (Janning et al., 1986; Skaer and Martínez-Arias, 1992). In the prolifer-ative stage, an enlarged cell, the tip cell, appears at the distal part of each tubule. The tip cell is required for proliferation of the cells near to it (Skaer, 1989).

emc expression preceded and accompanied formation of the Malpighian tubules. Thus, emc mRNA accumulated in the proctodeum, before and during emergence of the tubules rudiments (Fig. 1G,I). It was present in these rudiments during the proliferation and elongation period, but not in the tip cell and the fully differentiated tubules (not shown). emc mutations drastically affected the development of the tubules. Thus, in emcip15/emcE12 embryos, each tubule rudiment had from two to eight tip-like cells (Fig. 5A-C), as identified by the tip cell marker Achaete (M. Hock and H. Skaer, personal communi-cation; see also Romani et al., 1987). These extra tip cells did not enhance proliferation, since the tubules had at most a normal number of cells. Moreover, the tubules did not elongate (Fig. 5D,E). In emcE12 deficiency embryos, tubules remained as rudiments and contained only a fraction of the final number of cells of the mature wild-type tubules (not shown). Thus, cell allocation and/or proliferation were affected.

Fig. 5.

emc is required for Malpighian tubules development. (A) Wild-type developing Malpighian tubule stained with anti-Cut antibody (Blochlinger et al., 1990). Arrow points to the tip cell, which is larger than the other cells. (B,C) Anti-Achaete antibody staining of tip cells of stage 13 wild-type (arrow) and emcip15/emcE12 (arrowheads) embryos. Mutant tubules have multiple tip cells (up to eight in the marked tubule) of which three are in focus. Tip cells of another tubule are visible in the upper part. (D,E) Stage 14 wild-type and emcip15/emcE12 embryo stained with anti-Cut antibody. Wild-type tubules are partly elongated but mutant ones fail to do so (arrowheads). Scale bar (50 μm) applies to D,E. A-C are approximately 3.3 times further magnified.

Fig. 5.

emc is required for Malpighian tubules development. (A) Wild-type developing Malpighian tubule stained with anti-Cut antibody (Blochlinger et al., 1990). Arrow points to the tip cell, which is larger than the other cells. (B,C) Anti-Achaete antibody staining of tip cells of stage 13 wild-type (arrow) and emcip15/emcE12 (arrowheads) embryos. Mutant tubules have multiple tip cells (up to eight in the marked tubule) of which three are in focus. Tip cells of another tubule are visible in the upper part. (D,E) Stage 14 wild-type and emcip15/emcE12 embryo stained with anti-Cut antibody. Wild-type tubules are partly elongated but mutant ones fail to do so (arrowheads). Scale bar (50 μm) applies to D,E. A-C are approximately 3.3 times further magnified.

Mesodermal derivatives

emc mRNA accumulates in the mesoderm until the end of stage 10 (Fig. 1G,H), before the mesoderm splits into the somato-pleura and splanchnopleura, which will give rise, among other structures, to the somatic and visceral muscles, respectively (Campos-Ortega and Hartenstein, 1985). emc is no longer expressed in the somatic mesodermal cells, but it is again expressed in the visceral mesodermal cells from stage 13 to 16 (Fig. 1K,L).

Somatic muscles

emc mutations caused defects that ranged from absence of some muscles (Fig. 6A,B) to great disruptions when many muscles were missing (not shown). Muscles occasionally formed large masses spanning more that one segment and in many instances muscles detached from the epidermis (Fig. 6C) and yielded a l(1)myospheroid-like phenotype (Newman and Wright, 1981). Whereas muscle detachment is probably caused by wrong specification of the apodema (where emc mRNA accumulates, Fig. 1N), the disruption of the muscle pattern may be due to an early requirement of emc in the mesoderm. This is supported by our finding that the levels of Twist, a protein involved in mesodermal specification (Simpson, 1983; Thisse et al., 1988), were generally decreased in stage 11 emcip15/emcE12 embryos (not shown). Moreover, inaccurate specification of the cells at the segmental borders may also contribute to the extreme disorganization of the muscle patterns found in the strongest combinations (Fig. 6C) (Volk and VijayRaghavan, 1994).

Fig. 6.

Final pattern of body muscles (anti-Myosin Heavy Chain staining) of wild-type (A), emcip15/emcE12 (B) and emciX10 (C) embryos. B shows one of the mildest phenotypes found in this genetic combination; the pattern is not as regular as in the wild type and some muscles are missing. In C many muscles are missing, others have detached from the epidermis and remain as myospheres (arrows) and some unfused myoblasts express MHC (arrowheads). Both myospheres and unfused myoblasts, albeit less abundant, are also observed in weaker mutant combinations, like in B. Scale bar represents 50 μm.

Fig. 6.

Final pattern of body muscles (anti-Myosin Heavy Chain staining) of wild-type (A), emcip15/emcE12 (B) and emciX10 (C) embryos. B shows one of the mildest phenotypes found in this genetic combination; the pattern is not as regular as in the wild type and some muscles are missing. In C many muscles are missing, others have detached from the epidermis and remain as myospheres (arrows) and some unfused myoblasts express MHC (arrowheads). Both myospheres and unfused myoblasts, albeit less abundant, are also observed in weaker mutant combinations, like in B. Scale bar represents 50 μm.

Visceral muscles

During germ band shortening, the visceral mesoderm forms two lateral palisade-like bands of tightly packed cells (Campos-Ortega and Hartenstein, 1985), which accumulate Fasciclin III (Patel et al., 1987; Fig. 7A,C). These bands join the anterior and posterior midgut primordia before they fuse together (Reuter et al., 1993). emc insufficiency resulted in uneven and zigzagging mesodermal bands that contained cells that were less tightly packed, more irregularly shaped and had less Fasciclin III than the wild-type controls (Fig. 7B). These anomalies were exaggerated in embryos homozygous for the emc deficiency (Fig. 7D).

Fig. 7.

emc phenotype in visceral mesodermal and endodermal derivatives. (A-D) Anti-Fasciclin III stainings of wild-type (A,C), emcip15/emcE12 (B) and emcE12/emcE12 (D) stage 13 embryos. (A,B) General views of embryos showing one of the two visceral mesoderm bands (arrows). Mutant bands are more irregular and accumulate lower levels of Fasciclin III. The palisade-like structure of the visceral mesoderm is clearly visible at higher magnification (C), but is much disrupted in D, where the cells have failed to adopt the fusiform shape and remain roundish as at earlier stages. Often, the mesodermal bands are fragmented (not shown). (E,F) Digoxigenin-staining with a decapentaplegic probe that reveals visceral mesodermal cells of parasegment 7 (Immergluck et al., 1990) in emc/TM2-lacZ and emcip15/emcE12 embryos. In F (stage 15), the splitting of the mesodermal decapentaplegic band has not yet been accomplished, as it has occurred in the younger (stage 14) E embryo. (G,H) mAbBP102 staining of a wild-type and an emcip15/emcE12 embryo, which reveals the visceral mesoderm. The midgut constrictions in G (arrows) are absent in the mutant (H) and the mesodermal layer (arrowheads) is of uneven thickness. Sometimes the patches of dpp-expressing cells were fragmented (not shown). (I,J) Anti-Fasciclin II antibody staining of a wild-type and an emcip15/emcE12 embryo, which reveals the midgut epithelium irregularities in the mutant relative to the wild type (arrowheads). Scale bar represents 50 μm. Magnification in C-F is approximately 2.3 times larger.

Fig. 7.

emc phenotype in visceral mesodermal and endodermal derivatives. (A-D) Anti-Fasciclin III stainings of wild-type (A,C), emcip15/emcE12 (B) and emcE12/emcE12 (D) stage 13 embryos. (A,B) General views of embryos showing one of the two visceral mesoderm bands (arrows). Mutant bands are more irregular and accumulate lower levels of Fasciclin III. The palisade-like structure of the visceral mesoderm is clearly visible at higher magnification (C), but is much disrupted in D, where the cells have failed to adopt the fusiform shape and remain roundish as at earlier stages. Often, the mesodermal bands are fragmented (not shown). (E,F) Digoxigenin-staining with a decapentaplegic probe that reveals visceral mesodermal cells of parasegment 7 (Immergluck et al., 1990) in emc/TM2-lacZ and emcip15/emcE12 embryos. In F (stage 15), the splitting of the mesodermal decapentaplegic band has not yet been accomplished, as it has occurred in the younger (stage 14) E embryo. (G,H) mAbBP102 staining of a wild-type and an emcip15/emcE12 embryo, which reveals the visceral mesoderm. The midgut constrictions in G (arrows) are absent in the mutant (H) and the mesodermal layer (arrowheads) is of uneven thickness. Sometimes the patches of dpp-expressing cells were fragmented (not shown). (I,J) Anti-Fasciclin II antibody staining of a wild-type and an emcip15/emcE12 embryo, which reveals the midgut epithelium irregularities in the mutant relative to the wild type (arrowheads). Scale bar represents 50 μm. Magnification in C-F is approximately 2.3 times larger.

In the following stage, each visceral mesodermal band splits in the middle along its length and the two halves move apart (Fig. 7E). Then, cells from both parts spread dorsally and ventrally to cover the midgut completely (Campos-Ortega and Hartenstein, 1985; Hartenstein and Jan, 1992; Reuter and Scott, 1990). In emc embryos, these movements were abnormal. Splitting of the bands was delayed and was not neat since it occurred as an irregular formation of cells (Fig. 7F). The final distribution of the visceral mesoderm cells on the midgut was also irregular (not shown).

The visceral mesoderm seems mechanically to impose on the endoderm the three constrictions that divide the midgut (Fig. 7G) by acting as a drawstring closing a bag (Reuter and Scott, 1990). Accordingly, when visceral mesoderm is altered or missing, as in tinman and bagpipe mutants, these constric-tions do not form (Azpiazu and Frasch, 1993; Bodmer, 1993). In emc mutants they were also absent (Fig. 7H). Moreover, the midgut epithelium, of endodermal origin, was of irregular thickness in different regions (Fig. 7I,J). This anomaly may be due to emc insufficiency in the anterior and posterior midgut primordia and/or to the defective differentiation of the visceral mesoderm, which participates in the arrangement of the endo-dermal cells as an ordered epithelium (Reuter et al., 1993; Tepass and Hartenstein, 1994).

We have shown that emc is expressed from the preblastoderm up to the end of embryonic development in complex patterns that are tightly controlled in time and space and comprise derivatives of the three embryonic layers. In spite of its early expression, embryos carrying strong hypomorphic combina-tions of emc (i.e. emcip15/emcE12) or the deletion of the locus and adjacent chromosomal regions (emcE12/emcE12) do not show obvious morphological defects until shortly before germ band retraction. This may be due to the presence of emc products of maternal origin in the early embryo. Indeed, emc is expressed in ovaries (Ellis et al., 1990) and, more specifi-cally, in both the nurse and follicle cells (our observations). Moreover, a maternal contribution of emc in sex determination has been demonstrated (Younger-Shepherd et al., 1992) and at least some phenotypes of emc mutants are enhanced when the mothers are strong emc mutants (M. Ruiz-Gómez, unpublished data). Strong emc alleles including those used in this work are cell lethal in the adult epidermis, even in Minute+ clones (García-Alonso and García-Bellido, 1988; J. F. de Celis, personal communication). Consequently, we have not attempted to make germ-line clones of these alleles because lethal mutations in the epidermis are also lethal in germ-line clones (García-Bellido and Robbins, 1983). With the caveat that embryos maternally deprived of emc products might present even stronger phenotypes, the observed phenotypes in most or all of the embryonic regions where emc is expressed do define multiple and novel requirements for emc during embryonic development. They also suggests that no other gene has functions largely redundant with those of emc.

emc deficiency affects diverse morphogenetic processes

In many cases, strong emc expression precedes and accompa-nies formation of invaginations and grooves like the cephalic, ventral and transversal furrows, the stomodeal, amnioproc-todeal and anterior midgut invaginations, the Malpighian tubules primordia, the intersegmental grooves and the tracheal pits. emc expression also occurs at sites where migrations and rearrangements of cells are taking place, like the visceral mesoderm cells while these are spreading over the midgut and the cells of the Malpighian tubules while they rearrange their positions and elongate the tubules. Morphogenetic movements imply changes in proliferation, selective cell adhesion, and/or cytoskeleton-mediated changes of cell shape. The phenotypes of emc loss-of-function mutations indicate that emc is func-tionally significant for at least some of these processes, specially those occurring late, after the presumed maternal inheritance may no longer be relevant. Thus, the formation of intersegmental furrows is not properly accomplished in emc mutants. Moreover, the epidermal levels of Fasciclin III, a membrane protein probably involved in cell adhesion (Snow et al., 1989), are lower than in the wild type. Later, it becomes clear that the cells at the segmental border are defectively specified, as indicated by the reduced number of engrailed-expressing cells and the preferential absence of the ventral denticles that flank this border. Defective segmental borders are also suggested in emc embryos by the occasional failure of muscles and PNS axons to recognize them as barriers (Volk and VijayRaghavan, 1994), with the resulting crossing over of muscles (not shown) and nerves (Fig. 4H). At least some of the adult epidermal folds also require certain levels of emc function, as shown by the failure of viable hypomorphic emc clones to form the notopleural and scutelar sutures (J. F. de Celis, personal communication).

A most clear defect in cellular migration is observed in the visceral mesoderm of emc mutants. Initially, the cells in the mesodermal bands are not as tightly packed as in the wild type and have abnormal shapes, suggesting deficient cell adhesion. (Fasciclin III is expressed at reduced level in these mutants.) Later, the migration of the cells over the midgut is delayed and abnormal, and, at the end of development, they form an anomalous layer which seems incapable of driving the formation of the midgut constrictions. In the case of the Malpighian tubules, the insufficiency of emc strongly impairs cell rearrangements leading to the elongation of the tubules and, in the most extreme genetic combination, cell prolifera-tion and/or allocation is also affected. As a consequence, the tubules remain short and broad. Interestingly, the accumulation of Fasciclin II, another cell adhesion protein (Greningloh et al., 1990), decays prematurely in emcip15/emcE12 mutant tubules but not in other places like the developing central nervous system or the endodermal layer. In tracheal development, the cell divisions accompanying formation of the tracheal pits do not seem to be affected. However, the formation of the tracheal tree, which does not involve cell proliferation but cell migration and changes of cell shape (Campos-Ortega and Hartenstein, 1985), is often not fully accomplished (not shown). Similar tracheal phenotypes are found in mutants for Notch (Hartenstein et al., 1992) and for breathless (Glazer and Shilo, 1991; Klämbt et al., 1992), both genes coding for trans-membrane proteins presumably involved in cell communica-tion. Moreover, Breathless protein levels are reduced in emc mutants (our unpublished results).

emc is also expressed in regions of specialized cell-cell contact and/or cell recognition. Examples are the muscle attachment sites and the CNS during axonal pathfinding and fasciculation. At some of these sites, the lack of emc function causes alterations consistent with interference with adhesive-ness or cell recognition. An example of insufficient adhesive-ness is the l(1)myospheroid-like phenotype (Newman and Wright, 1981) found in the somatic muscles, which detach from the apodema. The defect probably resides in the epidermal part of the muscle attachment sites, since emc is expressed in them, but not in the muscles themselves. A striking example of inadequate cell recognition is the axonal misroutings observed in the PNS. Misrouting may be caused by abnormal specification of the sensory neurons or by alter-ations in the cues that the growth cones recognize during pathfinding such as the tracheae, (Giniger et al., 1993) or the myoblasts (Johansen et al., 1989). We would favor the second alternative, since emc is not obviously expressed in the devel-oping cells of the embryonic PNS. However, the occasional apparent change of neuronal fate found in emc mutants, i.e. the substitution of a chordotonal organ for an external sense organ (Fig. 4J), suggests that emc can also alter neuronal specifica-tion. The defects found in the developing axons of the CNS may also be due to abnormal axonal pathfinding. It should be stressed that, in imaginal development, emc has been shown to interact genetically with genes coding for membrane proteins like Notch, Delta and Fasciclin II (de Celis et al., 1991; L. García-Alonso, personal communication).

Mechanism

emc insufficiency causes a loss in the expression of most of the protein markers that we have examined. These markers are characteristic of differentiated cells and their loss probably reflects the faulty specification of the corresponding cells. This in turn would result in the observed alterations in processes as diverse as cellular adhesion and recognition, cell proliferation and cell commitment. How the Emc protein may act in the specification of the diverse cell types affected in emc mutants? In the commitment of sensory organ mother cells (Campuzano and Modolell, 1992) and possibly in sex determination (Younger-Shepherd et al., 1992), Emc antagonizes the function of a group of bHLH transcriptional regulators, the proneural proteins, most likely by sequestering them as heterodimers incapable of binding to DNA (Ellis et al., 1990; Garrell and Modolell, 1990; Martínez et al., 1993; Van Doren et al., 1991). Moreover, the Id group of mouse Emc homologs inhibits differentiation of fibroblasts by a similar mechanism (Benezra et al., 1990; Jen et al., 1992; Sun et al., 1991). Although, in addition to the HLH domain, the Emc protein bears other putative regulatory regions, such as a highly acidic domain and a glutamine-rich stretch (Garrell and Modolell, 1990), at least the second one is largely dispensable since individuals carrying only the mutant Emc Achaetous protein, which lacks this region, are viable. Consequently, Emc function may be exerted mainly through its HLH domain.

bHLH proteins control transcription of downstream genes by directly activating (or repressing) them (Jan and Jan, 1993; Olson and Klein, 1994) or, more indirectly, by stabilizing the binding to DNA of non-bHLH factors (rel-related proteins) which, in turn, directly control transcription (Jiang and Levine, 1993). In any case, Emc could act in developmental processes other than neurogenesis and sex determination by binding to bHLH proteins involved in those processes and decreasing their effective concentration, thus modulating the transcrip-tional activity of their target genes. The insufficiency of Emc would increase the effective concentration of these proteins and be equivalent to the simultaneous or sequential excess of function of the bHLH-coding genes. Thus, emc phenotypes would depend on the combinations of Emc-sensitive bHLH factors present in a given time and site. For instance, the presence of extra tip cells in the Malpighian tubules can be directly correlated with derepression of achaete function. Alternatively, the anomalies in the mesodermal derivatives may be difficult to interpret if they result from the unbalance of several bHLH factors like Twist, Nautilus, Lethal of scute and Hairy, all known to be present in the mesoderm (Hooper et al., 1989; Michelson et al., 1990; Thisse et al., 1988; F. Jiménez and A. Carmena, personal communication). The pos-tulated ability of Emc to interact with bHLH factors involved in a variety of regulatory pathways may account for the diversity of developmental processes and tissues affected by the emc insufficiency. Moreover, in mammalian cell cultures bHLH proteins can interact with b-leucine-zipper proteins (Bengal et al., 1992). This suggests that Emc may participate in networks of transcriptional regulators other than bHLH proteins and make its regulatory function even more complex.

We are most grateful to A. Martínez-Arias, M. Bate, H. Skaer, G. Morata, F. Jiménez, L. García-Alonso and M. D. Ferrés-Marcó for expert advice and comments on the manuscript; to L. García-Alonso, J. F. de Celis, F. Jiménez and H. Skaer for communicating unpub-lished results; to all the members of Juan Modolell’s laboratory and to M. Skalski for their help; to M. D. Ferrés-Marcó for the Fasciclin II stainings of the nervous system; and to C. Goodman, Y. N. Jan, A. Ferrús, S. Carroll, B.-Z. Shilo, P. Macdonald and D.P. Kiehart for antibodies, W. Gelbart for a dpp cDNA clone and P. Simpson for the emcip15 and emciX10 stocks. P. C. was a Rich Foundation postdoctoral fellow. M. R.-G. is a Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia postdoctoral fellow. This work was supported by grants from DGICYT (PB90-0085) and Comunidad Autónoma of Madrid to J. Modolell and an institutional grant from Fundación Ramón Areces.

Ashburner
,
M.
(
1989
).
Drosophila. A Laboratory Manual
.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
.
Azpiazu
,
N.
and
Frasch
,
M.
(
1993
).
tinman and bagpipe: two homeo box genes that determine cell fates in the dorsal mesoderm of Drosophila
.
Genes Dev
.
7
,
1325
1340
.
Benezra
,
R.
,
Davis
,
R. L.
,
Lockshon
,
D.
,
Turner
,
D. L.
and
Weintraub
,
H.
(
1990
).
The protein Id: a negative regulator of helix-loop-helix DNA binding proteins
.
Cell
61
,
49
59
.
Bengal
,
E.
,
Ransone
,
L.
,
Scharfmann
,
R.
,
Dwarki
,
V.
,
Tapscott
,
S.
,
Weintraub
,
H.
and
Verma
,
I.
(
1992
).
Functional antagonism between c-Jun and MyoD proteins: a direct physical association
.
Cell
68
,
507
519
.
Blochlinger
,
K.
,
Bodmer
,
R.
,
Jan
,
L. Y.
and
Jan
,
Y. N.
(
1990
).
Patterns of expression of Cut, a protein required for external sensory organ development in wild-Type and cut mutant Drosophila embryos
.
Genes Dev
.
4
,
1322
1331
.
Bodmer
,
R.
(
1993
).
The gene tinman is required for specification of the heart and visceral muscles in Drosophila
.
Development
118
,
719
729
.
Botas
,
J.
,
Moscoso del Prado
,
J.
and
García-Bellido
,
A.
(
1982
).
Gene-dose titration analysis in the search of trans-regulatory genes in Drosophila
.
EMBO J
.
1
,
307
310
.
Campos-Ortega
,
J. A.
and
Hartenstein
,
V.
(
1985
).
The Embryonic Development of Drosophila melanogaster
.
Berlin
:
Springer-Verlag
.
Campuzano
,
S.
and
Modolell
,
J.
(
1992
).
Patterning of the Drosophila nervous system: the achaete-scute gene complex
.
Trends Genet
.
8
,
202
207
.
Cubas
,
P.
,
de Celis
,
J.-F.
,
Campuzano
,
S.
and
Modolell
,
J.
(
1991
).
Proneural clusters of achaete-scute expression and the generation of sensory organs in the Drosophila imaginal wing disc
.
Genes Dev
.
5
,
996
1008
.
Cubas
,
P.
and
Modolell
,
J.
(
1992
).
The extramacrochaetae gene provides information for sensory organ patterning
.
EMBO J
.
11
,
3385
3393
.
de Celis
,
J. F.
,
Marí-Beffa
,
M.
and
García-Bellido
,
A.
(
1991
).
Function of trans-acting genes of the achaete-scute complex in sensory organ patterning in the mesonotum of Drosophila
.
Rouxs Arch. Dev. Biol
.
200
,
64
76
.
Ellis
,
H. M.
,
Spann
,
D. R.
and
Posakony
,
J. W.
(
1990
).
extramacrochaetae, a negative regulator of sensory organ development in Drosophila, defines a new class of helix-loop-helix proteins
.
Cell
61
,
27
38
.
García-Alonso
,
L.
and
García-Bellido
,
A.
(
1988
).
extramacrochaetae, a trans-acting gene of the achaete-scute complex of Drosophila involved in cell comunication
.
Roux’s Arch. Dev. Biol
.
197
,
328
338
.
García-Bellido
,
A.
and
Robbins
,
L. G.
(
1983
).
Viability of female germ-line cells homozygous for zygotic lethals in Drosophila melanogaster
.
Genetics
103
,
235
247
.
Garrell
,
J.
and
Campuzano
,
S.
(
1991
).
The helix-loop-helix domain: a common motif for bristles, muscles and sex
.
BioEssays
13
,
493
498
.
Garrell
,
J.
and
Modolell
,
J.
(
1990
).
The Drosophila extramacrochaetae locus, an antagonist of proneural genes that, like these genes, encodes a helix-loop- helix protein
.
Cell
.
61
,
39
48
.
Giniger
,
E.
,
Jan
,
L. Y.
and
Jan
,
Y. N.
(
1993
).
Specifying the path of the intersegmental nerve of the Drosophila embryo: a role for Delta and Notch
.
Development
117
,
431
440
.
Glazer
,
L.
and
Shilo
,
B.-Z.
(
1991
).
The Drosophila FGF-R homolog is expressed in the embryonic tracheal system and appears to be required for direct tracheal cell extension
.
Genes Dev
.
5
,
697
705
.
Greningloh
,
G.
,
Bieber
,
A. J.
,
Rehm
,
E. J.
,
Snow
,
P. E.
,
Traquina
,
Z. R.
,
Hortsch
,
M.
,
Patel
,
N. H.
and
Goodman
,
C. S.
(
1990
).
Molecular genetics of neuronal recognition in Drosophila: evolution and function of immunoglobulin superfamily cell adhesion molecules
.
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol
.
55
,
323
340
.
Hartenstein
,
A. Y.
,
Rugendorff
,
A.
,
Tepass
,
U.
and
Hartenstein
,
V.
(
1992
).
The function of the neurogenic genes during epithelial development in the Drosophila embryo
.
Development
116
,
1203
1220
.
Hartenstein
,
V.
,
Technau
,
G.M.
and
Campos-Ortega
,
J.A.
(
1985
).
Fate- mapping in wild-type Drosophila melanogaster. III. A fate map of the blastoderm
.
Roux’s Arch. Dev. Biol
.
194
,
213
216
.
Hartenstein
,
V.
and
Jan
,
Y. N.
(
1992
).
Studying Drosophila embryogenesis with P-lacZ enhancer trap lines
.
Roux Arch. Dev. Biol
.
201
,
194
220
.
Hooper
,
K. L.
,
Parkhurst
,
S. M.
and
Ish-Horowicz
,
D.
(
1989
).
Spatial control of hairy protein expression during embryogenesis
.
Development
107
,
489
504
.
Hursh
,
D. A.
,
Padgett
,
R. W.
and
Gelbart
,
W. M.
(
1993
).
Cross regulation of decapentaplegic and Ultrabithorax transcription in the embryonic visceral mesoderm of Drosophila
.
Development
117
,
1211
1222
.
Immergluck
,
K.
,
Lawrence
,
P. A.
and
Bienz
,
M.
(
1990
).
Induction across germ layers in Drosophila mediated by a genetic cascade
.
Cell
62
,
261
268
.
Jan
,
Y. N.
and
Jan
,
L. Y.
(
1993
).
HLH proteins, fly neurogenesis, and vertebrate myogenesis
.
Cell
75
,
827
830
.
Janning
,
W.
,
Lutz
,
A.
and
Wissen
,
D.
(
1986
).
Clonal analysis of the Malpighian tubules in Drosophila melanogaster
.
Roux Arch. Dev. Biol
.
195
,
22
32
.
Jen
,
Y.
,
Weintraub
,
H.
and
Benezra
,
R.
(
1992
).
Overexpression of Id protein inhibits the muscle differentiation program: in vivo association of Id with E2A proteins
.
Genes Dev
.
6
,
1466
1479
.
Jiang
,
J.
and
Levine
,
M.
(
1993
).
Binding affinities and cooperative interactions with bHLH activators delimit threshold responses to the Dorsal gradient morphogen
.
Cell
72
,
741
752
.
Jiménez
,
F.
and
Campos-Ortega
,
J. A.
(
1990
).
Defective neuroblast commitment in mutants of the achaete-scute complex and adjacent genes of, D
.
melanogaster. Neuron
5
,
81
89
.
Johansen
,
J.
,
Halpern
,
M. E.
and
Keshishian
,
H.
(
1989
).
Axonal guidance and the development of muscle fiber-specific innervation in Drosophila embryos
.
J. Neurosci
.
9
,
4318
4332
.
Jürgens
,
G.
,
Lehmann
,
R.
,
Shardin
,
M.
and
Nüslein-Volhard
,
C.
(
1986
).
Segmental organization of the head in the embryo of Drosophila melanogaster
.
Roux’s Arch. Dev. Biol
.
195
,
359
377
.
Klämbt
,
C.
,
Glazer
,
L.
and
Shilo
,
B.-Z.
(
1992
).
breathless, a Drosophila FGF receptor homolog, is essential for migration of tracheal and specific midline glial cells
.
Genes Dev
.
6
,
1668
1678
.
Martínez
,
C.
,
Modolell
,
J.
and
Garrell
,
J.
(
1993
).
Regulation of the proneural gene achaete by helix-loop-helix proteins
.
Mol Cell Biol
.
13
,
3514
3521
.
Michelson
,
A. M.
,
Abmayr
,
S. M.
,
Bate
,
M.
,
Martínez-Arias
,
A.
and
Maniatis
,
T.
(
1990
).
Expression of a MyoD family member prefigures muscle pattern in Drosophila embryos
.
Genes Dev
.
4
,
2086
2097
.
Moscoso del Prado
,
J.
(
1985
).
Regulación genética del complejo achaete- scute de Drosophila melanogaster
.
Ph.D. Thesis. Autonomous University of Madrid
.
Moscoso del Prado
,
J.
and
García-Bellido
,
A.
(
1984
).
Genetic regulation of the achaete-scute complex of Drosophila melanogaster
.
Roux’s Arch. Dev. Biol
.
193
,
242
245
.
Murre
,
C.
and
Baltimore
,
D.
(
1992
).
Transcriptional Regulation. Cold Spring Harbor
,
New York
:
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
.
Newman
,
S. M.
and
Wright
,
T. R. F.
(
1981
).
A histological and ultrastructural analysis of developmental defects produced by the mutation lethal(1)myospheroid in Drosophila melanogaster
.
Dev. Biol
.
86
,
393
402
.
Olson
,
E. N.
and
Klein
,
W. H.
(
1994
).
bHLH factors in muscle development: dead lines and commitments, what to leave in and what to leave out
.
Genes Dev
.
8
,
1
8
.
Padgett
,
R. W.
,
St. Johnston
,
R. D.
and
Gelbart
,
W. M.
(
1987
).
A transcript from a Drosophila pattern gene predicts a protein homologous to the transforming growth factor-β family
.
Nature
325
,
81
84
.
Patel
,
N. H.
,
Snow
,
P. M.
and
Goodman
,
C. S.
(
1987
).
Characterization and cloning of fasciclin III: a glycoprotein expressed on a subset of neurons and axon pathways in Drosophila
.
Cell
48
,
975
988
.
Reuter
,
R.
,
Grunewald
,
B.
and
Leptin
,
M.
(
1993
).
A role for the mesoderm in endodermal migration and morphogenesis in Drosophila
.
Development
119
,
1135
1145
.
Reuter
,
R.
and
Scott
,
M. P.
(
1990
).
Expression and function of the homoeotic genes Antennapedia and Sex combs reduced in the embryonic midgut of Drosophila
.
Development
109
,
289
303
.
Romani
,
S.
,
Campuzano
,
S.
and
Modolell
,
J.
(
1987
).
The achaete-scute complex is expressed in neurogenic regions of Drosophila embryos
.
EMBO J
.
6
,
2085
2092
.
Ruiz-Gómez
,
M.
and
Ghysen
,
A.
(
1993
).
The expression and role of a proneural gene, achaete, in the development of the larval nervous system of Drosophila
.
EMBO J
.
12
,
1121
1130
.
Simpson
,
P.
(
1983
).
Maternal-zygotic gene interactions during formation of the dorsoventral pattern in Drosophila embryos
.
Genetics
105
,
615
632
.
Skaer
,
H.
(
1989
).
Cell division in the Malpighian tubule development in D
.
melanogaster is regulated by a single tip cell. Nature
342
,
566
569
.
Skaer
,
H.
and
Martínez-Arias
,
A.
(
1992
).
The wingless product is required for cell proliferation in the Malpighian tubule anlage of Drosophila melanogaster
.
Development
116
,
745
754
.
Snow
,
P. M.
,
Bieber
,
A. J.
and
Goodman
,
C. S.
(
1989
).
Fasciclin III: a novel homophilic adhesion molecule in Drosophila
.
Cell
59
,
313
323
.
Sun
,
X. H.
,
Copeland
,
N. G.
,
Jenkins
,
N. A.
and
Baltimore
,
D.
(
1991
).
Id proteins Id1 and Id2 selectively inhibit DNA binding by one class of helix- loop-helix proteins
.
Mol. Cell. Biol
.
11
,
5603
5611
.
Tautz
,
D.
and
Pfeifle
,
C.
(
1989
).
A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback
.
Chromosoma
98
,
81
85
.
Tepass
,
U.
and
Hartenstein
,
V.
(
1994
).
Epithelium formation in the Drosophila midgut depends on the interaction of endoderm and mesoderm
.
Development
120
,
579
590
.
Thisse
,
B.
,
Stoetzel
,
C.
,
Gorostiza-Thise
,
C.
and
Perrin-Schmitt
,
F.
(
1988
).
Sequence of the twist gene and nuclear localization of its protein in endomesodermal cells of early Drosophila embryos
.
EMBO J
.
7
,
2175
2183
.
Van der Meer
,
J. M.
(
1977
).
Optical clean and permanent whole mount preparations for phase-contrast microscopy of cuticular structures of insect larvae
.
Drosoph. Inform. Serv
.
52
,
160
.
Van Doren
,
M.
,
Ellis
,
H. M.
and
Posakony
,
J. W.
(
1991
).
The Drosophila extramacrochaetae protein antagonizes sequence-specific DNA binding by daughterless/achaete-scute protein complexes
.
Development
113
,
245
255
.
Van Doren
,
M.
,
Powell
,
P. A.
,
Pasternak
,
D.
,
Singson
,
A.
and
Posakony
,
J. W.
(
1992
).
Spatial regulation of proneural gene activity: auto- and cross- activation of achaete is antagonized by extramacrochaetae
.
Genes Dev
.
6
,
2592
2605
.
Volk
,
T.
and
VijayRaghavan
,
K.
(
1994
).
A central role for epidermal segment border cells in the induction of muscle patterning in the Drosophila embryo
.
Development
120
,
59
70
.
Younger-Shepherd
,
S.
,
Vaessin
,
H.
,
Bier
,
E.
,
Jan
,
L. Y.
and
Jan
,
Y. N.
(
1992
).
dead-pan, an essential pan-neural gene encoding an HLH protein, acts as a denominator in Drosophila sex determination
.
Cell
70
,
911
922
.