Differences in the protein repertoires between two organisms should reflect differences in their anatomical and physiological complexities. On p. 6317, Vogel et al. analyse the immunoglobulin superfamily (IgSF) genes, which encode proteins involved in cell-cell recognition and communication, in Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster. They identify 142 IgSF proteins in the fly and 80 in the worm, and show that three-quarters of the fly's IgSF repertoire and one half of the worm's repertoire have emerged since their evolutionary divergence. The fly genome encodes fewer proteins in total than that of the worm, and the researchers suggest that the expansion of particular protein families, including the immunoglobulin superfamily, has contributed to the evolution of the more complex physiology of the fly.
Genes and the evolution of complexity
Genes and the evolution of complexity. Development 22 December 2003; 130 (25): e2502. doi:
Download citation file:
Sign in
Client Account
Sign in via your institution
Sign in via ShibbolethAdvertisement
Cited by
History of our journals

As our publisher, The Company of Biologists, turns 100 years old, read about Development’s journey and highlights from some its first issues, and explore the history of each of our sister journals: Journal of Cell Science, Journal of Experimental Biology, Disease Models & Mechanisms and Biology Open.
Call for papers – Lifelong Development: the Maintenance, Regeneration and Plasticity of Tissues

Development invites you to submit your latest research to our upcoming special issue – Lifelong Development: the Maintenance, Regeneration and Plasticity of Tissues. This issue will be coordinated by Guest Editors Meritxell Huch (Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Germany) and Mansi Srivastava (Harvard University and Museum of Comparative Zoology, USA), working alongside our team of academic Editors. Submit your articles by 15 May 2025.
A case for broadening our view of mechanism in developmental biology

In this Perspective, B. Duygu Özpolat and colleagues survey researchers on their views on what it takes to infer mechanism in developmental biology. They examine what factors shape our idea of what we mean by ‘mechanism’ and suggest a path forward that embraces a broad outlook on the diversity of studies that advance knowledge in our field.
In preprints
Did you know that Development publishes perspectives on recent preprints? These articles help our readers navigate the ever-growing preprint literature. We welcome proposals for ‘In preprints’ articles, so please do get in touch if you’d like to contribute.