Tbx6 is a T-box transcription factor with multiple roles in embryonic development as evidenced by dramatic effects on mesoderm cell fate determination, left/right axis determination, and somite segmentation in mutant mice. The expression of Tbx6 is restricted to the primitive streak and presomitic mesoderm, but some of the phenotypic features of mutants are not easily explained by this expression pattern. We have used genetically-inducible fate mapping to trace the fate of Tbx6-expressing cells in wild-type and mutant embryos to explain some of the puzzling features of the mutant phenotype. We created an inducible Tbx6-creERT2 transgenic mouse in which cre expression closely recapitulates endogenous Tbx6 expression both temporally and spatially. Using a lacZ-based Cre reporter and timed tamoxifen injections, we followed temporally overlapping cohorts of cells that had expressed Tbx6 and found contributions to virtually all mesodermally-derived embryonic structures as well as the extraembryonic allantois. Contribution to the endothelium of major blood vessels may account for the embryonic death of homozygous mutant embryos. In mutant embryos, Tbx6-creERT2-traced cells contributed to the abnormally segmented anterior somites and formed the characteristic ectopic neural tubes. Retention of cells in the mutant tail bud indicates a deficiency in migratory behavior of the mutant cells and the presence of Tbx6-creERT2-traced cells in the notochord, a node derivative provides a possible explanation for the heterotaxia seen in mutant embryos.
The T-box transcription factor gene Tbx6 is a critical gene for the determination and differentiation of mesoderm during gastrulation. Embryos homozygous for a null mutation die at midgestation with multiple hematomas, abnormally segmented rostral somites, ectopic neural tubes in place of the more caudal somites, an enlarged tail bud, and heterotaxia (Chapman et al., 1996; Chapman and Papaioannou, 1998; Hadjantonakis et al., 2008). Embryos with reduced levels of Tbx6 are viable and lack ectopic neural tubes, but have severe defects in somite patterning and differentiation (Watabe-Rudolph et al., 2002; White et al., 2003). A TBX6 mutation in humans results in spondylocostal dysostosis (Sparrow et al., 2013). Although Tbx6 has a limited expression pattern in the primitive streak, presomitic mesoderm and tail bud of the mouse embryo during mesoderm ingression and somitogenesis, the effects of mutations are quite diverse due to the multiple cell fates of early mesoderm, which have been well established by classical fate-mapping studies (Beddington, 1994; Lawson et al., 1991; Smith et al., 1994; Sulik et al., 1994; Tam and Beddington, 1987; Wilson and Beddington, 1996). However, because the lines drawn in fate-mapping studies are imprecise, it is not known exactly where cells that express Tbx6 are bound in later development, how this affects the mutant phenotype, or how mutation of Tbx6 affects cell lineage.
To answer these questions, we traced the lineage of cells that have expressed Tbx6 using genetically-inducible fate mapping (GIFM). This method provides additional information to traditional fate mapping by tracing the fate of cells that express a particular gene of interest (Joyner and Zervas, 2006). GIFM is accomplished by crossing mice carrying a transgene with a specific promoter driving the expression of cre recombinase with mice carrying a loxP-flanked reporter transgene that allows the visualization of cells that express Cre. Because the Cre-induced recombination event in the reporter transgene is irreversible and heritable, the reporter tracks the fate of the cells whether or not they continue to express cre. By using a tamoxifen-inducible cre transgene, this technique can be used to mark cohorts of cells that express cre during different developmental intervals. In this study we have produced a transgenic mouse with cre expressed in the Tbx6 expression domain and have used this mouse to trace the lineage of cells that express Tbx6 at some point in their history in both wild-type and Tbx6 homozygous mutant embryos.
Tbx6 expression-reporter transgene
A multipurpose bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) targeting vector was used to create a lineage tracing allele of the Tbx6 gene by targeting a Tbx6-containing BAC (Fig. 1). This allele contained a selection cassette flanked by FRT sites and a tamoxifen-inducible creERT2 gene under the control of the endogenous Tbx6 promoter. The modified BAC was then used to produce random insertion transgenic mice by pronuclear microinjection. Four cre-positive transgenic founders were bred to mice carrying a ubiquitous flp transgene to remove the selection cassette, producing mice carrying the lineage tracer allele (Fig. 1). Males were crossed with Cre-reporter mT/mG female mice and embryos were recovered at embryonic day (E)10.5 and examined under fluorescence microscopy to detect GFP fluorescence indicative of Cre activity. Descendants of two of the founders had low Cre activity and were not pursued; descendants of the other two had high levels of fluorescense in the Tbx6 expression domain (not shown). The alleles in the latter two lines were named Tg(Tbx6-creERT2)1Pa and Tg(Tbx6-creERT2)2Pa and were tested further.
To determine whether the transgenes faithfully recapitulate Tbx6 promoter activity both spatially and temporally, cre expression was documented by in situ hybridization (ISH) at several time points: E6.5, prior to the onset of Tbx6 expression; E7.5, when Tbx6 is expressed in the primitive streak; E9.5, when it is expressed in the presomitic mesoderm and tail bud; and E12.5 and E13.5, when Tbx6 expression is extinguished (Chapman et al., 1996). For both transgenic lines, no expression was observed at E6.5 or in early stage E7.5 embryos, whereas some more advanced E7.5 embryos showed cre expression in the primitive streak and not in the node, as expected for endogenous Tbx6 expression, but with less expansion into the lateral mesoderm (Fig. 2A-C, Table 1). At E9.5 all of the embryos genotyped by PCR as cre-positive showed cre expression by ISH in the tail bud and presomitic mesoderm comparable to but somewhat less extensive than the domain of Tbx6 expression (Fig. 2D-H). For Tg(Tbx6-creERT2)1Pa, expression in the tail bud persisted at E12.5 and was gone in most embryos by E13.5 (Fig. 2I,J), whereas for Tg(Tbx6-creERT2)2Pa, cre was not expressed in the tail buds at E12.5. Thus, Tg(Tbx6-creERT2)1Pa was chosen for further study as the timing of cre expression from the transgenic allele more closely recapitulates endogenous Tbx6 expression, both temporally and spatially, with no evidence of ectopic expression (Fig. 2, Table 1).
Lineage tracing of cells that express Tbx6 during normal development
To trace the lineage of cells and all their progeny that have expressed Tbx6 at some point in development, hereafter referred to as Tbx6-creERT2-traced cells, males carrying the Tg(Tbx6-creERT2)1Pa transgene and either wild type or heterozygous for Tbx6tm2Pa were crossed with R26R reporter females. Pregnant females were injected with tamoxifen between E5.5 and E9.5 to induce recombination in the reporter allele and embryos were recovered 2-5 days later to obtain a dynamic picture of the cohorts of Tbx6-creERT2-traced cells labeled at progressively later developmental stages (see Table 2 for the number of embryos evaluated at each time point by whole mount and/or sectioning). Recombination starts within 6-12 h of tamoxifen injection and continues for 36-48 h (Hayashi and McMahon, 2002; Joyner and Zervas, 2006), providing an effective labeling window from a single dose of tamoxifen of approximately 24-30 h. Thus, injection of pregnant females at E5.5, a day before Tbx6 is expressed, is expected to capture a cohort of the earliest Tbx6-expressing cells with the labeling window extending to E7 (36 h post injection), and injection at E6.5 should label cells expressing Tbx6 from approximately E6.75 to E8. Tamoxifen injections at 24 h intervals will therefore capture overlapping cohorts of Tbx6-creERT2-traced cells.
A few scattered blue cells representing the progeny of the earliest Tbx6-expressing cells were seen as far anteriorly as the headfolds in a headfold-stage embryo at E8.5, laterally along the axis of the embryo and posteriorly in the primitive streak and the base of the allantois (Fig. 3A, arrowheads). In embryos recovered a day later at 15-30 somites (Fig. 3B-H), labeled cells were concentrated in somites, with fewer labeled cells in the most rostral and most caudal somites. Labeled cells are located in the limb buds, when these are present, and in the lateral mesoderm extending posteriorly, but were not seen in the tail bud or presomitic mesoderm. Most embryos had some labeled cells in the head mesenchyme as far anteriorly as the level of the diencephalon, arranged in dorsal-ventral tracks (Fig. 3B, arrow), and about half of the embryos had a few labeled cells in the heart. Four of these embryos were sectioned and labeled cells were located in the head mesenchyme (Fig. 3C), heart (Fig. 3D), somites (Fig. 3E,F), intermediate mesoderm, somatopleure and splanchnopleure mesoderm derivatives of the lateral plate (Fig. 3E-H), and in the endothelium of blood vessels including the dorsal aorta and the umbilical vessels (Fig. 3E,H).
The next cohort of Tbx6-creERT2-traced cells labeled by tamoxifen injection at E6.5 with a labeling window between E6.75 and E8 was sampled 2-5 days after injection. After 2 days, in unturned E8.5 embryos of 3-11 somites, labeled cells were seen in the head mesenchyme, cardiac crescent/heart, somites, along the lateral flanks of embryos extending posteriorly to the presomitic mesoderm and in the allantois (Fig. 4A,C,D). No label was seen in the node. Three days after injection, at E9.5 (12-30 somite stages), whole mounts revealed a scattering of labeled cells in the branchial arches and head (Fig. 4B, arrow), a few cells in the heart, and in the base of the allantois, while the main concentration of labeled cells was in the somites and lateral body wall, including the limb buds, and in the mesonephric ducts. Similar to the earlier labeled cell cohort, the most heavily labeled somites were in the caudal cervical and the thoracic region with fewer labeled cells in the rostral- and caudal-most somites and the presomitic mesoderm (Fig. 4B). Sections (Fig. 4E-H) revealed labeled cells in head mesenchyme and in all parts of the heart, a large contribution to somites, mesonephros, lateral body wall and coelomic epithelium (Fig. 4E-H), particularly around the pericardio-peritoneal canal. Notably, one of six embryos had extensive labeling of the notochord from the cervical region (Fig. 4G, arrow) and a second had several labeled cells in the posterior notochord, whereas the other four embryos showed no notochord labeling (Fig. 4H, arrow). 4-5 days after injection, labeled cells in the head were concentrated around the otic vesicle; they were also located in the branchial arches, heart, differentiating somites (Fig. 4I), limb buds and lateral body wall (Fig. 4K,L), endothelium of the aorta, coelomic epithelium, mesenchyme surrounding the gut and bronchi (Fig. 4J,L) and in the genital ridge and mesonephric tubules (Fig. 4K,L). In five of the seven embryos sectioned, a few labeled cells were seen within the hindbrains or cervical neural tube (Fig. 4I, arrowheads), but none were seen in the notochords.
The cohort of cells labeled at E7.5 with a labeling window between E7.75 and E9 was sampled 2 or 4 days later at 20-35 somite stages and showed a similar distribution to the previous cohort but with a posterior shift in the concentration of labeled cells such that there were fewer in the head, heart and rostral somites (compare Figs 4B and 5A). Labeled cells were seen in head mesenchyme, differentiating somites and their derivatives, mesenchyme of the body wall, mesenchyme surrounding the viscera (Fig. 5F,G), limb buds, heart (Fig. 5E), aorta (Fig. 5F), mesonephric ducts (Fig. 5I), tail bud mesenchyme (Fig. 5H) and in a few cells of the posterior notochord in one of the nine embryos sectioned. As observed for the earlier cohort of labeled cells, there were a few scattered labeled cells in the hindbrain or cervical neural tube in three embryos and, in addition, one embryo had a few labeled cells in the floorplate of the neural tube in the tail region just caudal to the hind limb (Fig. 5H, arrow).
Tbx6-expressing cells labeled at E8.5 (labeling window between E8.75 and E10) and recovered 3 days later at 30-40 somite stages showed a pronounced posterior shift compared with earlier cohorts (Fig. 5B) with labeled cells only as far rostral as the mid-thoracic region. Labeled cells were seen in the tail mesenchyme and somites (Fig. 5K), hind limbs, mesonephric tubules and metanephric primordia (Fig. 5J), the genital papilla, and in the neural tube in the tail of two of the eight embryos analyzed (Fig. 5K, arrow). Progeny of Tbx6-expressing cells labeled at E9.5 and recovered three days later were further restricted to mesenchyme of the tail only (not shown).
Lineage tracing in Tbx6 homozygous mutant embryos
It was of interest to determine whether the lack of Tbx6 alters the distribution of presomitic mesoderm cells and also to determine the origin of the tissue that makes up the ectopic neural tubes in homozygous mutant embryos. Because mutant embryos die shortly after E9.5, lineage tracing was limited to a single cohort of cells labeled by tamoxifen injections at E6.5 with recovery at E9.5. Homozygous mutants, recognized by their expanded tail bud and the lack of posterior somites (Chapman and Papaioannou, 1998), showed patterns of LacZ expression in whole mounts that resembled wild-type embryos (compare Fig. 6A-C with 4B) with the exception that there was a greater concentration of labeled cells in the expanded mutant tail buds (Fig. 6A-C,H). Sections of seven mutant embryos revealed labeled cells in the head mesenchyme (Fig. 6D,E), the heart (Fig. 6E) and endothelial lining of blood vessels, in the limb buds, lateral body wall, intermediate mesoderm, and splanchnopleure surrounding the gut (Fig. 6F,G), the coelomic epithelium, mesonephros and notably, the ectopic neural tubes (Fig. 6F,G). One embryo also had a few labeled cells in the notochord (Fig. 6F). Gut endoderm and axial neural tube had no labeled cells.
Normal lineage of cells that have expressed Tbx6
Temporal and spatial regulation of Tbx6 expression is complex and is controlled by multiple enhancers and repressors (White et al., 2005, 2003). Lopez and Fan (2012) made use of a genomic region containing an enhancer to produce several random-insertion, inducible Tbx6-cre transgenes, one of which was expressed robustly in the presomitic mesoderm and in newly formed somites, in addition to several areas of ectopic expression. The regulatory region used in this transgene is missing a somite silencer element required to restrict expression to the presomitic mesoderm, resulting in somite expression, and also drives expression with a lag of one day compared to endogenous Tbx6 expression (White et al., 2005). Thus, while useful for conditional manipulation of gene function in the PSM and somites, it is not suitable for expression-lineage tracing.
Based on our experience with a ‘knock-in’ reporter that similarly did not fully recapitulate normal Tbx6 expression (Hadjantonakis et al., 2008 and personal observations), we chose to make a Tbx6-cre reporter using BAC transgenesis in order to preserve all regulatory elements controlling Tbx6 expression. By documenting cre expression and also using reporter mice to assay Cre activity in the progeny of two transgenic founders with the BAC transgene, we showed that Tg(Tbx6-creERT2)1Pa provides an accurate reporter of Tbx6 promoter activity as judged by the close temporal and spatial correlation between cre and endogenous Tbx6 expression with several caveats that may limit expression of cre to a subset of Tbx6 expresssing cells: first, the timing of Tg(Tbx6-creERT2)1Pa expression may be slightly delayed compared with Tbx6, as expression was not seen until the late bud stage at E7.5, whereas Tbx6 can be detected at the early bud stage (Nowotschin et al., 2012); secondly, as seen from ISH, cre expression appears less extensive than Tbx6 expression in the presomitic and lateral mesoderm. A further limitation of this reporter is that following administration of the maximum dose of tamoxifen compatible with embryo survival, it appears that only a subset of the Tbx6-expressing cells undergoes Cre-dependent excision as all areas of lacZ expression subsequently appear mosaic. Thus, we can use the lineage tracer to determine what tissues Tbx6-creERT2-traced cells contribute to, but cannot say whether a tissue is composed entirely of cells that have expressed Tbx6.
Endogenous Tbx6 expression is first detected by ISH in the early primitive streak and in the paraxial mesoderm surrounding the streak between E7 and E7.5, extending from just caudal to the node to the base of the allantois. Between E8.5 and E9.5, Tbx6 is expressed in the unsegmented, presomitic mesoderm of the posterior region surrounding the caudal end of the neural plate and in mesoderm surrounding the posterior end of the hindgut. Expression is extinguished as somites form but persists in the unsegmented presomitic mesoderm and tail bud for as long as new somites are being formed (Chapman et al., 1996; Nowotschin et al., 2012). As expected from this expression pattern, the lineage of the earliest Tbx6-creERT2-traced cells closely matches the cell fate of the primitive streak and paraxial mesoderm as determined by classical fate mapping studies (Smith et al., 1994; Wilson and Beddington, 1996). Following tamoxifen injection at E5.5 and E6.5, which should capture the earliest Tbx6-expressing cells, labeled cells are detected rostrally in the head mesenchyme and caudally in the extraembryonic allantoic mesoderm, presumably deriving from the rostral and caudal regions of the primitive streak, respectively. Cells were also located throughout the paraxial mesoderm, in cardiac mesoderm, somites, intermediate mesoderm and in the mesoderm layers of the lateral plate somatopleure and splanchnopleure, all areas known to be derived from different regions of the early primitive streak (Smith et al., 1994; Wilson and Beddington, 1996). Relatively few labeled cells were present in the presomitic mesoderm and tail bud, in line with the expectation that following a limited labeling period, most labeled cells move out of the presomitic mesoderm as they differentiate. When chased to later time points, these early cohorts of cells made contributions to derivatives of virtually all mesoderm tissues, contributing to the limb buds, somites, including the most rostral somites, and mesonephric ducts, metanephros, blood vessels, and, notably, the notochord. Descendants of cohorts of cells labeled at later developmental stages showed very similar patterns of deployment with the exception that the bulk of labeled cells was located progressively more caudally.
In addition to the mesoderm derivatives, Tbx6-creERT2-traced cells were detected in sections of the hindbrain or rostral neural tube of 8/38 embryos injected with tamoxifen at E6.5 or later and recovered at E10.5 or later. Several observations point to these cells being invading vascular cells. First, no Tbx6-creERT2-traced cells are present in the neural tube of any embryos recovered prior to E10.5, indicating that these cells have migrated into the neural tube, and secondly, their morphology is generally not typical of neural cells but closely resembles that of invading vascular cells, as described by Nakao et al. (1988) a process that begins at E9.5. Three additional embryos injected with tamoxifen at E7.5 or E8.5 and recovered at E11.5 had labeled cells in the neural tube or floorplate of the neural tube in the tail region, but these cells were less typical of vascular cells and may represent a late contribution of Tbx6-creERT2-traced cells to the posterior neural tube.
Tbx6-creERT2-traced cells in Tbx6 homozygous mutants
Our results help resolve several outstanding questions regarding the phenotype of homozygous Tbx6 mutants. Vascular abnormalities were assumed to be the cause of death of Tbx6 mutants due to the presence of multiple hematomas (Chapman and Papaioannou, 1998). Our results showing contributions of Tbx6-creERT2-traced cells to the endothelium of major vessels and to the heart support this hypothesis. Similarly, the expansion of the tail bud in mutants and in chimeras (Chapman et al., 2003) has been attributed to a failure of ingressing cells to migrate away from the primitive streak. Comparison between the cohorts of cells labeled at E6.5 and followed 3 days later in wild-type and mutant embryos supports the notion that the wild-type cohort has moved out of the tail bud, but that a large proportion of the mutant cohort has remained in the tail buds of the mutants. Finally, our results show that the ectopic neural tubes of Tbx6 mutant embryos are derived from the Tbx6-creERT2-traced cells that have ingressed through the streak, and not from ectoderm or the axial neural tube.
Another feature of the Tbx6 mutant phenotype is the formation of 8-12 abnormally segmented rostral somites that are progressively more abnormal caudally to the level of the forelimb bud, where the ectopic neural tubes begin (Chapman et al., 2003; Chapman and Papaioannou, 1998). The lineage results indicate that Tbx6-creERT2-traced cells do contribute to all of the rostral somites, however, even in the cohort of cells labeled at the earliest stages of Tbx6 expression, there is a rostral-to-caudal gradient of low-to-high contribution of cells to these somites. This supports the idea that only some of the cells of the most rostral somites have expressed Tbx6, perhaps protecting them from the mesoderm to neural transdifferentiation that occurs more caudally (Takemoto et al., 2011). This interpretation is in accordance with the results of chimera experiments in which Tbx6 mutant embryonic stem (ES) cells can contribute to rostral but not caudal somites in mutant/wild-type chimeras (Chapman et al., 2003). In these same chimera experiments, mutant ES cells were largely excluded from the gut, leading to the hypothesis that Tbx6 may be involved in gut formation. However, there is no evidence from this lineage study that Tbx6-creERT2-traced cells contribute to the gut.
The presence of labeled cells in the notochord of three wild-type embryos and one mutant embryo was unexpected on the basis of fate maps that indicate that the notochord derives from the node (Beddington, 1994; Sulik et al., 1994; Wilson and Beddington, 1996), and the fact that Tbx6 expression has never been documented in the node (Chapman et al., 1996; Hadjantonakis et al., 2008). However, Tbx6 mutant embryos have abnormalities in the node, particularly in the nodal cilia, resulting in randomized left/right axis determination (Hadjantonakis et al., 2008). The lineage analysis indicated here would imply that at least some cells of the node expressed Tbx6 at some point in their development. Cell lineage studies of early stage embryos, prior to node formation, indicate that some precursors of the node/notochord reside in the rostral portion of the E6.7 prestreak region or E7.5 rostral early streak (Lawson et al., 1991; Tam and Beddington, 1987). As cilia are assembled on node precursor cells prior to their emergence on the embryo's surface and the formation of the node (Lee and Anderson, 2008), this could explain the abnormalities in Tbx6 mutants. It should be noted however, that the notochord was labeled in only 4/48 embryos in the entire study. Thus, if this explanation is correct, the Tbx6-creERT2-traced cells may contribute only a small proportion of cells to the node even though cilia of all the node cells are affected in mutants.
These results provide novel information through GIFM on the fate of cells that express the T-box transcription factor, Tbx6, and on how the multiple abnormalities caused by mutations in Tbx6 are mediated. They also point to many areas colonized by Tbx6-creERT2-traced cells where no mutant phenotypes have yet been reported, but that may provide areas for future study of Tbx6 function.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Generation of Tbx6-creERT2 transgenic mice
Using the Sv129 BAC bmq-279H8 (The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK) as a template, two regions of homology, upstream and downstream of the Tbx6 translational start site were cloned into a multipurpose BAC targeting vector along with an optimized, inducible cre-ERT2 with a poly-adenylation site (gift from T. Ludwig, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA) and a kanamycin/neomycin selection cassette cloned using pL451 as a template. The final construct contained the homologous arms flanking the translational start site of Tbx6, cre-ERT2 with its own translational start site and poly-adenylation signal, and a kanamycin/neomycin selection cassette driven by a dual bacterial/mammalian promoter flanked by FRT sites in between these two arms (Fig. 1; see Table S1 for primers used).
Established protocols (Washkowitz and Shaywitz, 2007) were used to target this construct to the Tbx6-containing BAC, bmq-279H8. Briefly, we transformed an erythromycin-resistant plasmid containing an arabinose-inducible version of the recombinase system from bacteriophage lambda into the BAC-containing bacteria. This bacterial strain was grown overnight at 37°C, subcultured into 50 ml of LB medium at a concentration of 1:100 and grown to an OD600=0.2. At this point, 20% L(+) Arabinose (Sigma #10839) 1:200 was added to the culture and it was incubated at 37°C to a final OD600 of 0.6-0.8. The bacteria were then collected in sterile water and electroporated at 2.3 kV, 200Ω, 25 μF with the linear fragment of the targeting construct generated by digestion with Sac2. The bacteria were allowed to recover for 75 min at 37°C and then plated on LB+Cm (20 μg/ml)+Kan (12.5 μg/ml). Colonies were picked and tested for the BAC insertion using PCR with primers that encompassed a region outside of the homolgous arms of the targeting vector as well as a region inside. Positive colonies were phenol-chloroform extracted, transformed into fresh bacteria and tested for kanamycin and chloramphenicol resistance and erythromycin sensitivity. These bacteria were grown and the BAC was isolated and injected into the pronucleus of C57BL/6 embryos by the Columbia University Medical Center Transgenic Facility.
Animals and genotyping
All animal experiments were carried out according to protocols approved by the Columbia University Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. C57BL/6 potential transgenic founder animals were genotyped by PCR for the presence of cre. For removal of the kanamycin/neomycin cassette, founders were mated with ROSA26::FLPe transgenic mice (Farley et al., 2000) to obtain cre-positive, neo-negative, flpE-positive animals. These were mated with ICR random bred mice (Taconic, Germantown, NY, USA) for maintenance of the transgenes and in subsequent generations, mice without the flpE transgene were selected for breeding. PCR was done according to standard conditions using the primers indicated in Table S1.
Cre expression in the founder transgenic lines was tested by mating cre-positive animals with random bred ICR females and recovering embryos for in situ hybridization with a 1000 bp cre probe. More advanced embryos were genotyped for cre by PCR of the yolk sac. Cre enzymatic activity was also tested by mating cre-positive animals with the Cre reporter strains Gt(ROSA)26Sortm4(ACTB-tdTomato,-EGFP)Luo/J (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA; called mT/mG) or B6.129S4-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1Sor/J (The Jackson Laboratory; called R26R). Pregnant females were injected intraperitoneally with tamoxifen (20 mg/ml; 5-7 mg/mouse) in sunflower seed oil (Sigma, 8001-21-6), which has the effect of translocating Cre-ERT2 to the nucleus where it excises the reporter gene, and embryos were examined under fluorescence microscopy or were subjected to X-Gal staining for LacZ.
In situ hybridization (ISH)
Embryos were fixed overnight at 4°C in fresh 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) (Sigma, 30525-89-4), then dehydrated and stored at −20°C in 100% methanol. Embryos were rehydrated for whole-mount ISH performed as described by Wilkinson (1992). ISH was performed for cre-ERT2 mRNA using a DIG-labeled single stranded RNA probe, developed using a standard labeling assay kit (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Cat. No. 11-277-073-910).
Lineage tracing using lacZ
For lineage tracing, mice carrying a cre transgene and wild type or heterozygous for a null allele Tbx6tm2Pa (Hadjantonakis et al., 2008) were mated with R26R reporter females, some of which were also heterozygous for Tbx6tm2Pa for the collection of homozygous mutants that were recognized morphologically. The day of the copulation plug was considered E0.5. Pregnant females were injected at different stages of gestation with tamoxifen (most received 5 mg/mouse with a few in early experiments receiving 6 or 7 mg/mouse), and in later experiments in combination with progesterone (2 mg/mouse), which greatly reduced the rate of embryo resorption caused by tamoxifen alone (Joyner and Zervas, 2006). Embryos were collected 2-5 days later, genotyped for cre by PCR, fixed in 4% PFA at 4°C for 1 h, and cre-positive embryos were either stained as whole mounts with X-Gal prior to cryosectioning or paraffin embedding and sectioning, or were cryosectioned and then stained for X-Gal (Lobe et al., 1999). Nuclear fast red counterstain was used for all sections. For cryosectioning, embryos were placed in 30% sucrose (Sigma, 57-50-1) at 4°C, overnight or longer and then washed in optimum cutting temperature medium (OCT) for 1 h at 4°C followed by rapid freezing in fresh OCT. Blocks were stored in 2-methylbutane (Sigma, 78-78-4) at −80°C until sectioning at 4-10 µM. Embryos for paraffin embedding were dehydrated, embedded and sectioned at 8-10 µM. The numbers of Tbx6 wild-type and mutant embryos examined at each time point by whole mount and/or sections is shown in Table 2.
We thank Thomas Ludwig for providing the optimized, inducible cre-ERT2 plasmid, Qingxue Liu for technical assistance, and Kat Hadjantonakis and Vasso Episkopou for helpful discussions.
Conceptualization: N.C.D., V.E.P.; Methodology: D.C., A.J.W., A.D., V.E.P.; Validation: V.E.P.; Formal analysis: D.C., A.J.W., V.E.P.; Investigation: D.C., A.J.W., A.D., P.O., J.I.Y., V.E.P.; Writing - original draft: V.E.P.; Writing - review & editing: D.C., A.J.W., A.D., P.O., J.I.Y., N.C.D., V.E.P.; Visualization: D.C., A.J.W., A.D., P.O., J.I.Y., V.E.P.; Supervision: N.C.D., V.E.P.; Project administration: V.E.P.; Funding acquisition: V.E.P.
Funding was provided by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant R37 HD033082 (to V.E.P.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
The authors declare no competing or financial interests.